Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Eye irritation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
migrated information: read-across based on grouping of substances (category approach)
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Study period:
11 Mar - 31 Mar 1988
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Guideline study with acceptable restrictions (lack of individual tabulated data on cornea and iris; reading at 72 h in only 1 animal)

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1988
Report date:
1988

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.5 (Acute Toxicity: Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
lack of details on test substance; lack of individual tabulated data on cornea and iris; reading at 72 h in only 1 animal
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
lack of details on test substance; lack of individual tabulated data on cornea and iris; reading at 72 h in only 1 animal
GLP compliance:
yes

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
Fatty acids, C6-10, Me esters
EC Number:
273-094-6
EC Name:
Fatty acids, C6-10, Me esters
Cas Number:
68937-83-7
IUPAC Name:
68937-83-7
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): Only trade name given
- Substance type: Fatty acid methyl ester, C6-10
- Physical state: clear yellowish liquid
- Analytical purity: no data

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
other: Kleinrusse, Chbb:HM
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Thomae GmbH, Biberach, Germany
- Weight at study initiation: mean 2467.5 g
- Housing: individually
- Diet: Altromin Haltungsdiät 2023, ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 1 week

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20 - 21
- Humidity (%): 45 - 55
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 / 12

Test system

Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
other: the untreated eye served as control
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.1 mL

Duration of treatment / exposure:
single application without washing
Observation period (in vivo):
72 h
Reading time points: 1, 6, 24, 48 and for 1 animal at 72 hours
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
4
Details on study design:
SCORING SYSTEM: according to 79/831/EWG, Annex, Part B (Draize scoring system)

TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: fluorescein

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
mean out of all 4 animals
Time point:
other: mean over 24, 48 and 72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: Reversibility: not applicable
Remarks on result:
other: no 72 h data are available for 3 animals; for calculation of mean scores, the 72 h values were assumed to be the same as those at 48 h (worst case assumption: persistence of effects seen at 48 h over 72 h)
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
mean out of all 4 animals
Time point:
other: mean over 24, 48 and 72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
other: Reversibility: not applicable
Remarks on result:
other: no 72 h data are available for 3 animals; for calculation of mean scores, the 72 h values were assumed to be the same as those at 48 h (worst case assumption: persistence of effects seen at 48 h over 72 h)
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
mean out of all 4 animals
Time point:
other: mean over 24, 48 and 72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
other: Reversibility: not applicable
Remarks on result:
other: no 72 h data are available for 3 animals; for calculation of mean scores, the 72 h values were assumed to be the same as those at 48 h (worst case assumption: persistence of effects seen at 48 h over 72 h)
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
mean out of all 4 animals
Time point:
other: mean over 24, 48 and 72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: Reversibility: not applicable
Remarks on result:
other: no 72 h data are available for 3 animals; for calculation of mean scores, the 72 h values were assumed to be the same as those at 48 h (worst case assumption: persistence of effects seen at 48 h over 72 h)
Irritant / corrosive response data:
No reactions were observed on the cornea and the iris.
The conjunctival reactions were slight to moderate in 2 of 4 animals at reading time point 1 and 6 hour and disappeared totally within 24 hours after application.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 1: Evaluation of the eye lesions

Rabbit No.

Scoring [h]

Cornea

Iris

Conjunctiva

Redness

Chemosis

1

1

0

0

0

0

 

6

0

0

0

0

 

24

0

0

0

0

 

48

0

0

0

0

 

72

0

0

0

0

Mean (24, 48, 72 h)

0

0

0

0

2

1

0

0

1

0

 

6

0

0

1

0

 

24

0

0

0

0

 

48

0

0

0

0

 

72

No experimental data available; for calculation of mean scores, the 72 h values were assumed to be the same as those at 48 h (worst case assumption)

Mean (24, 48, 72 h)

0

0

0

0

3

1

0

0

1

0

 

6

0

0

1

0

 

24

0

0

0

0

 

48

0

0

0

0

 

72

No experimental data available; for calculation of mean scores, the 72 h values were assumed to be the same as those at 48 h (worst case assumption)

Mean (24, 48, 72 h)

0

0

0

0

4

1

0

0

0

0

 

6

0

0

0

0

 

24

0

0

0

0

 

48

0

0

0

0

 

72

No experimental data available; for calculation of mean scores, the 72 h values were assumed to be the same as those at 48 h (worst case assumption)

Mean (24, 48, 72 h)

0

0

0

0

Group mean

0

0

0

0

- = Not evaluated

 

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not irritating
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
CLP: not classified
DSD: not classified