Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
developmental toxicity
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Study period:
2012 to 2013
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Guideline study (OECD 422), performed under GLP
Cross-reference
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to same study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2012

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: OECD 422
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Limit test:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Butyl 2-[[3-[[(2,3-dihydro-2-oxo-1H-benzimidazol-5-yl)amino]carbonyl]-2-hydroxy-1-naphthyl]azo]benzoate
EC Number:
250-800-0
EC Name:
Butyl 2-[[3-[[(2,3-dihydro-2-oxo-1H-benzimidazol-5-yl)amino]carbonyl]-2-hydroxy-1-naphthyl]azo]benzoate
Cas Number:
31778-10-6
Molecular formula:
C29H25N5O5
IUPAC Name:
butyl 2-({2-hydroxy-3-[(2-oxo-2,3-dihydro-1H-benzimidazol-5-yl)carbamoyl]-1-naphthyl}diazenyl)benzoate
Test material form:
solid: nanoform, no surface treatment

Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
Wistar
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Species/strain: healthy Wistar rats, Crl: WI(Han) (Full Barrier)
- Source: Charles River, 97633 Sulzfeld, Germany (The animals were derived from a controlled full-barrier maintained breeding system (SPF). According to Art. 9.2, No. 7 of the German Act on Animal Welfare [7] the animals were bred for experimental purposes.)
- Sex: male and female; the female animals were non-pregnant and nulliparous
- Age at study initiation: males: 10-11 weeks old, females: 10-11 weeks old.
- Weight at study initiation (allocation of the animals to the experimental groups): males: 272 - 306 g (mean: 290.65 g, +/-20% = 232.52 – 348.78 g)
females: 177 - 208 g (mean: 190.68 g, +/- 20% = 152.54 – 228.81 g)
- Housing: Full barrier in an air-conditioned room. The animals were kept individually in IVC cages (except during the mating period when one female will be paired with one male), type III H, polysulphone cages on Altromin saw fibre bedding (lot no. 261111)
- Diet: Altromin 1324 maintenance diet for rats and mice (lot no. 2355), ad libitum
- Water: tap water, sulphur acidified to a pH of approximately 2.8 (drinking water, municipal residuecontrol, microbiological controls at regular intervals), ad libitum
- Certificates of food, water and bedding are filed at BSL BIOSERVICE
- Acclimation period: at least 5 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22+/-3
- Humidity (%): 55+/-10
- Air changes (per hr): 10
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
corn oil
Details on exposure:
VEHICLE
- Justification for use and choice of vehicle (if other than water): The vehicle was selected based on the test item’s characteristics (stability and homogeneity) of the test item in the vehicle.
- Concentration in vehicle: 25 mg/ml, 75 mg/ml, 250 mg/ml
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage): 4 ml/kg body weight
- Lot/batch no. (if required): Batch No.: MKBF8603V; Manufacturer: Sigma
Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
yes
Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
Each dosing concentration was analysed for nominal concentration. Stability and homogeneity of the test item in the vehicle were analysed for the for the LD, MD, and HD dosing formulation. Samples for the nominal concentration verification were taken in study week 1 (first week of pre mating period), 3 (first week of mating), 5 (gestation) and 7 (gestation/lactation) of control and all treatment groups (16 samples in total). Samples for homogeneity were taken from the top, middle and bottom of HD, MD, and LD preparation in study week 1 and 5 (18 samples in total).
All formulation samples were analyzed on the day of sample collection at BSL BIOSERVICE Scientific.
Laboratories GmbH according to a phase plan which was amended to the study plan.
Details on mating procedure:
- M/F ratio per cage: 1:1
- Length of cohabitation: maximum 14 days
- Proof of pregnancy:sperm in vaginal smear referred to as day 0 of pregnancy
- Further matings after two unsuccessful attempts: no
- After successful mating each pregnant female was caged (how):individually
Duration of treatment / exposure:
Females:
Maximum exposure of 54 days in total (at least 14 days of pre-mating, up to 14 days of mating, 22 days of gestation and 4 days of post-partum).
Males:
28 days
Frequency of treatment:
The test item is orally administered daily, i.e. 7 days per week in graduated doses
Duration of test:
The test item is orally administered daily, i.e. 7 days per week in graduated doses to several groups of test animals (male and female), one dose level per group with a maximum exposure of 54 days in total (at least 14 days of pre-mating, up to 14 days of mating, 22 days of gestation and 4 days of post-partum).
No. of animals per sex per dose:
10
Control animals:
yes, concurrent vehicle
Details on study design:
- Dose selection rationale: The highest dose level was chosen with the aim of inducing toxic effects, but no death or severe suffering. Thereafter, a descending sequence of dose levels was selected with a view to demonstrate any dosage related response and NOAEL. The doses were selected on the basis of data from a Dose Range Finding Study.
- Rationale for animal assignment (if not random): random

Examinations

Maternal examinations:
CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: once a day
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: Once a week
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: The body weight was recorded once before the assignment to the experimental groups, on the first day of administration and weekly during the treatment period as well as at the end of the study. During pregnancy, females were weighed on gestation days (GD) 0, 7, 14 and 20 and within 24 hours of parturition (day 0 post-partum) as well as day 4 post-partum along with pups. Any animals prematurely sacrificed were
weighed prior to the sacrifice.
FOOD CONSUMPTION
- Food consumption for each animal determined and mean daily diet consumption calculated as g food/kg body weight/day: No
Food consumption was measured weekly on the corresponding days of the body weight measurements after the beginning of the dose administration. Food consumption was not measured during the mating period in males and females and the post-mating period in males.

OTHER: Functional Observations
Multiple detailed behavioural observations were made in the week before the first treatment and during the last week of the treatment in 5 randomly selected males /group and in the week before the first treatment as well as on day 3 of the lactation period in 5 randomly selected females / group outside the home cage using a functional observational battery of tests

SACRIFICE
- Male animals: All surviving male animals were sacrificed after the completion of the mating period (total dosing period: 28 days) on study day 29 or 30
- Maternal animals: All surviving female animals were sacrificed on post-natal day 4 along with pups
GROSS NECROPSY
- Gross necropsy consisted of external and internal examinations including the cervical, thoracic, and abdominal viscera.
HISTOPATHOLOGY / ORGAN WEIGHTS
The wet weight of the organs of 5 sacrificed males and 5 females randomly selected from each group was recorded as soon as possible: iver uterus with cervix, kidneys thymus, adrenals, thyroid/parathyroid glands, testes, spleen, epididymides, brain, prostate, seminal vesicles and coagulating glands, pituitary gland,
ovaries, heart
Paired organs were weighed separately. Organ weights of animals found dead or euthanised for animal welfare reasons were not recorded. In addition reproductive organs of all animals were weighed.
A full histopathology was carried out on the preserved organs and tissues of 5 randomly selected male and female animals of the control and high dose groups which were sacrificed at the end of the treatment period. These examinations were extended to animals of all other dosage groups for treatmentrelated changes that were observed in the high dose group. Only organs and tissues of the other dosage groups showing changes in the high dose group were examined. Testes, epididymides, ovaries, uterus with cervix, vagina, accessory sex organs (prostate, seminal vesicle with coagulating gland) and all organs showing gross lesions were examined in all animals. For the testes, a detailed qualitative examination was made; taking into account the tubular stages of the spermatogenic cycle for the evaluation of additional hematoxylin- PAS (Periodic Acid Schiff) stained slides.
Haematology
Haematological parameters from five randomly selected males and females of each group were examined at the end of the treatment prior to or as part of the sacrifice of the animals. Blood from the abdominal aorta of the animals was collected in EDTA-coated tubes. The following haematological parameters were examined: haemoglobin content (Hb), red blood cell count (RBC), reticulocytes (Re), platelet count (PLT), white blood cells (WBC), neutrophils (Neu), lymphocytes (Lym), monocytes (Mono), eosinophils (Eos), basophils (Baso).
Blood Coagulation
Coagulation parameters from five randomly selected males and females of each group were examined at the end of the treatment prior to or as part of the sacrifice of the animals. Blood from the abdominal aorta of the animals was collected in citrate tubes. The following coagulation parameters were examined: prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT)
Clinical Biochemistry
Parameters of clinical biochemistry from five randomly selected males and females of each group were examined at the end of the treatment prior to or as part of the sacrifice of the animals. Blood from the abdominal aorta of the animals was collected in serum separator tubes. The following parameters of clinical biochemistry were examined: alnine aminotransferase (ALAT), aspartate-aminotransferase (ASAT), alkaline phosphatase (AP), creatinine (Crea), total protein (TP), albumin (Alb), urea, total cholesterol (Chol), glucose (Gluc), sodium (Na), potassium (K), total bile acids (TBA)
Ovaries and uterine content:
The ovaries and uterine content was examined after termination: Yes
Examinations included:
- Gravid uterus weight: No
- Number of corpora lutea: Yes
- Number of implantations: Yes
- Number of early resorptions: Yes
- Number of late resorptions: Yes
Fetal examinations:
- External examinations: Yes: all per litter
- Soft tissue examinations: No
- Skeletal examinations: No
- Head examinations: No
Statistics:
A statistical assessment of the results of the body weight, food consumption, parameters of haematology, blood coagulation and clinical biochemistry and absolute and relative organ weights were performed for each gender by comparing values of dosed with control animals of the main groups using a one-way ANOVA and a post-hoc Dunnett Test. These statistics were performed with GraphPad Prism 5.01 software.
Indices:
Viability index, copulation index, fertility index, and delivery index were calculated.

Results and discussion

Results: maternal animals

Maternal developmental toxicity

Details on maternal toxic effects:
Maternal toxic effects:no effects

Details on maternal toxic effects:
Some parameters were changed like parameters of clinical biochemistry. However, none of them can be clearly attributed to the test item and they are consnsidered to be without toxicological relevance. For details see respective study records in section 7.5.1 and/or 7.8.1.

Effect levels (maternal animals)

open allclose all
Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
Effect level:
>= 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
Based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect level:
other: developmental toxicity
Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
Effect level:
>= 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
Based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect level:
other: maternal toxicity

Results (fetuses)

Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
Embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:no effects

Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
External examination of the pups revealed no teratogenic effects.

Effect levels (fetuses)

Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
Effect level:
>= 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
Based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect level:
other: teratogenicity

Fetal abnormalities

Abnormalities:
not specified

Overall developmental toxicity

Key result
Developmental effects observed:
no

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
This study is a valid investigation of the toxicological effects resulting from repeated oral-gavage administration of the test item to rats (according to OECD 422, GLP compliant). The test item was administered in vehicle (corn oil) at dosages of 100, 300, and 1000 mg/kg body weight/day, animals in control groups received the vehicle only. Test item was administered to male rats for 28 days and to female rats for 14 days prior to pairing, through the pairing and gestation periods until the F1 generation reached day 4 post partum (i.e. 54 days).
No test item related effects of toxicological relevance were found at any dose level tested. Thus, the NOAEL for general toxicity in males and females and for reproduction/developmental toxicity is considered to be >= 1000 mg/kg body weight.
Executive summary:

The aim of this study was to provide information on the possible health hazards after repeated dose administration in male and female Wistar rats. It further provides information on possible effects on male and female reproductive performance, development of the conceptus and parturition.

The test item was administered daily in graduated doses to 3 groups of test animals. Animals of an additional control group were handled identically as the dose groups but received corn oil, the vehicle used in this study. The 4 groups comprised 10 male and 10 femaleWistarrats.

During the period of administration, the animals were observed each day for signs of toxicity. Animals that died were examined macroscopically and at the conclusion of the test, surviving animals were sacrificed and observed macroscopically.

Body weight and food consumption were measured weekly, except for food consumption measurements which were not taken during the mating period in female animals and the mating and post-mating period in male animals.

Haematological and clinical biochemistry evaluations were performedon blood samples collected at terminal sacrifice from five males and five randomly selected females from each group. Urinalysis wasperformedon samples collected at terminal sacrifice from five randomly selected males from each group.

Epididymal sperm motility was evaluated in all male animals.

Functional observations including sensory reactivity to different stimuli, grip strength, motor activity assessments and other behaviour observations were performed in the week before the treatment and at the end of the study.

After 14 days of treatment to both male and female, animals were mated (1:1) for a maximum of 14 days. The subsequent morning onwards the vaginal smears of females were checked to confirm the evidence of mating. After the confirmation of the mating, females were separated and housed individually. Each litter was examined as soon as possible after delivery of the dam to establish the number and sex of pups, stillbirths, live births, runts and the presence of gross abnormalities. Live pups were counted, sexed and litters weighed within 24 hours of parturition and on day 4 post-partum.

The males were sacrificed after completion of the mating period on treatment days 29 and 30 and the females along with their pups were sacrificed on post natal day 4. Non-pregnant females were sacrificed on day 26.

Pups sacrificed on postnatalday 4 and those found dead, were carefully examined for gross external abnormalities.

A full histopathological evaluation of the tissues was performed on high dose and control animals. Organs showing gross alterations were also examined histopathologically. The examinations of these organs were extended to animals of the medium and low dose groups if treatment-related changes were observed in high dose groups.

  The following doses were evaluated:

Control:                       0        mg/kg body weight

Low Dose:                   100     mg/kg body weight

Medium Dose:             300     mg/kg body weight

High Dose:                  1000   mg/kg body weight

The test item formulation was prepared freshly on each day of administration. The test item was suspended in corn oil and administered daily during 14 days of pre-mating and 14 days of mating in both male and female animals, during the gestation period and up to post-natal day 3 in females. Males were dosed for 28-30 days. Dose volumes were adjusted individually based on weekly body weight measurements. Theadministration volume was 4 mL/kg body weight.

Summary Results

No mortalities were recorded at any dose levels.

No clinical symptoms which were related to the test item could be recognized.

No relevant effects were observed in any of the parameters of the functional observation battery before and at the end of the treatment period. There were no biologically relevant differences in body temperature between the groups.

No test item related change in body weight could be found for male and female animals during the treatment period.

No considerable effect of the test item on food consumption was found in any of the groups of male animals and in female animals.

Litter data was not affected due to treatment with the test item.

Litter weight data was not affected due to treatment with the test item.

No treatment-related effect was observed during the precoital interval or during the duration of gestation when compared with the control group.

No test item related change could be found for pre- and post-natal data.

No test item related influence could be found for viability index, copulation index, fertility index, and delivery index.

No significant effect on survival of the pups from PND 0 to PND 4 was observed in any treatment group when compared with controls.

No treatment-related gross external findings were observed in any of the treated groups.

At the end of the treatment period PLT values were slightly increased in treatment groups of male animals when compared to C group. A test item relation is unlikely.

In male animals, percentage of neutrophils were statistically significant increased in LD group and percentage of lymphocytes was significantly decreased (p<0.01) in LD group. However, this is assumed to be occurred incidentally since this pattern was not found in MD or HD group.

Besides, all haematological parameters of male and female animals were within the normal range of variation.

Blood coagulation was not affected by the test item. The increase in HD group of female animals is not considered to be biologically relevant since it is not statistically significant and a high standard deviation could be found.

At the end of the treatment period values of SGOT (ASAT) were slightly but dose-dependently decreased in treatment groups of female animals. Since a slight decrease is commonly not indicative for adverse effects and since all values are within historical C data findings were considered not to be of toxicological relevance.

Values of cholesterol were slightly but dose-dependently increased in treatment groups of female animals when compared to C group. However, since the C value was relatively low when compared with our historical control data, this is not assumed to be of toxicological relevance.

Besides, all parameters of clinical chemistry of male and female animals were within the normal range of variation for this strain and no relevant difference could be mentioned between treatment groups and C group.

The urinalysis performed in male and female animals revealed no test- item related effect in any of the treatment groups compared to the control group.

The sperm motility analysis, performed at the end of the treatment period, revealed no test- item related effect in any of the treatment groups compared to the control group.

Discoloured red mesenteric lymph (4/10 LD; 2/10 MD; 4/10 HD) nodes as well as Ileum (1/10 C; 2/10 LD; 4/10 HD) could be found in treatment groups of male animals. A toxicological relevance seems unlikely.

Based on the histopathological evaluation of a representative subset, these changes were considered to be most probably unrelated to the treatment. No test item-related histopathological findings were noted in the reproductive organs and inthe other organs evaluated in this study.

In male animals, mean weight of hearts of LD group was significantly increased (p<0.05) when compared to C group (C: 0.984 g; LD: 1.082 g). This is considered to be not test item related.

The mean recoveries observed in LD, MD and HD groups were 105.0%, 98.3%, and 88.8% of the nominal concentration, respectively. Homogeneity of formulation samples was determined in study week 1 and 5 for all dose groups. The mean recoveries observed for LD group were 103.9% and 97.1%, for MD group 101.6% and 95.6%, and for HD group 99.5% and 85.3% of the nominal value. The coefficients of variation of the different sampling locations (top, middle, bottom) were in LD group 7.3% and 4.9%, in MD group 1.7% and 2.3%, and in HD group 1.0% and 0.5%.

Under the conditions of this study, no adverse effects were found in males or females up to the highest dose level of 1000 mg/kg bw/day (i.e. NOAEL >= 1000 mg/kg bw/day).