Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
11.06.1987 - 24.06.1987
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Similar to OECD guideline 406 but GLP standards were not applied. However, study was well conducted and documented. However, observation time did not go beyond 48 hours for reversibility.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1987
Report date:
1987

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
not specified
Remarks:
A GLP statement is not included. However, it is stated in the report that raw data, study plan, report, and samples are stored in the archive of the Hüls AG (now Evonik).
Type of study:
guinea pig maximisation test
Justification for non-LLNA method:
The in vivo skin sensitisation study was carried out before the entry into force of the amendments to Annex VII

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Dibutyl maleate
EC Number:
203-328-4
EC Name:
Dibutyl maleate
Cas Number:
105-76-0
Molecular formula:
C12H20O4
IUPAC Name:
dibutyl but-2-enedioate
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): Dibutylmaleinat, Maleinsäure-di-n-butylester
- Substance type: active substance
- Physical state: clear liquid
- Analytical purity: 96.5%
- Day of production: 18 March 1987
- Lot/batch No.: 930
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: not reported

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
other: Albino, Bor:DHPW
Sex:
female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Commercial supplier
- Weight at study initiation: 340.4-346.3 g
- Housing: 1 - 5 animals in Makrolon type IV cages
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): G4 diet for guinea pigs ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): tap water ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 4 - 8 days


ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20°C +/- 1°C
- Humidity (%): 60% +/- 5 %
- Air changes (per hr): 15 fold per hour
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hours dark/12 hours light

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Inductionopen allclose all
Route:
intradermal
Vehicle:
corn oil
Concentration / amount:
2 x 0.1 ml Freund's complete adjuvant, 2 x 0.1 ml of a 10% solution of DBM in corn oil, and 2 x 0.1 ml 10% solution of 10% of DBM in corn oil with Freund's complete adjuvant.
Challengeopen allclose all
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
corn oil
Concentration / amount:
2 x 0.1 ml Freund's complete adjuvant, 2 x 0.1 ml of a 10% solution of DBM in corn oil, and 2 x 0.1 ml 10% solution of 10% of DBM in corn oil with Freund's complete adjuvant.
No. of animals per dose:
Ten control and 20 experimental animals
Details on study design:
The method followed was the Maximization Test" of Maganusson-Kligman. All animals received 6 intracutaneous injections into a 4 x 6 hair clipped skin area. Control only received corn oil.

MAIN STUDY
A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 3 x 2 injections intracutaneously
- Exposure period: one week
- Test groups: 1
- Control group: 1
- Site: left and right shoulder
- Frequency of applications: 2
- Concentrations: 2 x 0.1 ml Freund's complete adjuvant, 2 x 0.1 ml of a 10% solution of DBM in corn oil, and 2 x 0.1 ml 10% solution of 10% of DBM in corn oil with Freund's complete adjuvant.

B. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 1
- Day(s) of challenge: 7
- Exposure period: 48 hours
- Test groups: 1
- Control group: 1
- Site: shoulder
- Concentrations: undiluted
Challenge controls:
One week later the treated area was hair-clipped again and covered by a 2 x 4 cm filter paper containing 0.3 ml of pure DBM. Control only received a patch with corn oil. Two weeks later a filter paper patch (2 x 2 cm) containing corn oil or 0.2 ml pure DBM was placed on the hair-clipped left flank of both treated and control animals for 24 hours. The patch was removed 24 hours later.
Positive control substance(s):
no
Remarks:
Corn oil

Study design: in vivo (LLNA)

Statistics:
No specified.

Results and discussion

Positive control results:
A positive control was not tested. No effects were observed in the contro lgruop receiving corn oil only.

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
pure corn oil
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Clinical observations:
none
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: pure corn oil. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0. Clinical observations: none.
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
0.3 ml of DBM
No. with + reactions:
80
Total no. in group:
20
Clinical observations:
erythema (grade 1 to 2)
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 0.3 ml of DBM . No with. + reactions: 80.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0. Clinical observations: erythema (grade 1 to 2).
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
0.3 ml of DBM
No. with + reactions:
70
Total no. in group:
20
Clinical observations:
erythema
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 0.3 ml of DBM. No with. + reactions: 70.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0. Clinical observations: erythema .

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
sensitising
Remarks:
Migrated information
Conclusions:
Based on the results, dibutyl maleate is a strong skin sensitizer in guinea pig.
Executive summary:

The potential effect of skin sinsitization of dibutyl maleate was evaluated on female Albino Guinea pigs. Animals were exposed to 0.1 ml of 10% solution of the test substance in corn oil. A week later, a filter paper containing 0.2 ml of DBM was placed on the treated area. Two weeks later, the treated area was challenged with a filter paper containing 0.2 ml of pure DBM placed on the hair-clipped left flank of both treated and control animals for 24 hours. Observations showed that 80% of the animals developed erythema (grade 1 to 2) after 24 hours and 70% after 48 hours. Based on the results, it was concluded that dibutyl maleate is a skin sensitizer in Guinea pig.