Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Acute toxicity: via oral route

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
acute toxicity: oral
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
other information
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Comparable to guideline with restrictions (method shortly described; LD50 expressed in mL/kg instead of mg/kg; animals not fasted before exposure).
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to same study
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 401 (Acute Oral Toxicity)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
method shortly described; LD50 expressed in mL/kg instead of mg/kg; animals not fasted before exposure.
GLP compliance:
no
Remarks:
GLP was not mandatory at the time of the study
Test type:
standard acute method
Limit test:
no
Species:
rat
Strain:
Wistar
Sex:
male
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Winkelmann, Germany.
- Weight at study initiation: 160-180 g.
- Housing: animal were housed in groups of 5 animals per cage.
Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Details on oral exposure:
Observation period: 14 days.
Doses:
Doses: 1.0, 1.5, 1.8, 2.0, and 3.1 mL/kg (1150, 1750, 2070, 2300, 3565 mg/kg bw).

No. of animals per sex per dose:
10
Control animals:
other: not necessary
Statistics:
The calculation of the LD50 was performed according to Fink and Hund, Arzneim.-Forsh 15, 1965, 624.
Sex:
male
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
1 909 mg/kg bw
95% CL:
1 644 - 2 116
Remarks on result:
other: rat
Mortality:
Mortality occurred at doses of 1750 mg/kg bw and higher concentrations.
Clinical signs:
other: Toxic symptoms: reduction of general conditions.

LD 50= 1.66 mL/kg. The density of dimethyl maleate is 1.15 g/cm³ at 20 °C. Therefore LD50 expressed in mg/kg is calculated to be 1909 mg/kg.

Table 1. Acute oral toxicity results

Dosis mg/kg b.w

 Time of death

 Toxicological Results

Dead animals/ Aanimals with symptoms/Animals used

 1150

 -

 0/0/10

 1750

 2 -5d

 3/10/10

 2070

 2 -7d

 7/10/10

 2300

 2 -4d

 8/10/10

 3565

 4h -2d

 10/10/10

Interpretation of results:
Category 4 based on GHS criteria
Conclusions:
Based on the study results and according to EU classification criteria, the test substance is classified as Acute Tox. 4, according to the CLP regulation.
Executive summary:

Bayer (1977)


 


In an acute oral toxicity 10 non-fasted male rats were administered with 1150, 1750, 2070, 2300, 3565 mg/kg bw dimethyl maleate with a method similar to OECD guideline 401 with acceptable deviations (method shortly described; LD50 expressed in mL/kg instead of mg/kg; animals not fasted before exposure).


The animals were observed for 14 days after administration.


Mortality occurred at doses of 1750 mg/kg bw and higher concentrations. Reduction of general conditions was observed. The acute oral LD50 was calculated to be 1909 mg/kg bw.


Based on the study results and according to EU classification criteria, the test substance is classified as Acute Tox. 4, according to the EU-CLP regulation.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
adverse effect observed
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Value:
1 909 mg/kg bw

Acute toxicity: via dermal route

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
acute toxicity: dermal
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP-Guideline study with restrictions (analytical purity not reported; occlusive dressing instead of porous dressing).
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to same study
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 402 (Acute Dermal Toxicity)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
analytical purity not reported, occlusive dressing instead of porous dressing.
Principles of method if other than guideline:
This study was conducted using the method of Noaks and Sanderson (1969). British Journal of Industrial Medicine 26:59-64.
GLP compliance:
yes
Test type:
standard acute method
Limit test:
no
Species:
rat
Strain:
Wistar
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- Age at study initiation: 9-12 weeks old.
- Weight at study initiation: 235-288 g (males); 179-230 g (female).
Type of coverage:
occlusive
Vehicle:
not specified
Details on dermal exposure:
5/rats/sex/group received a single application of 500 or 2000 mg MAD/kg body weight on their shaved backs (area approx. 20 cm²), and this was covered with an occlusive dressing for 24 hours. The rats were observed for 14 days after application, and systemic and local effects were recorded.
Duration of exposure:
24 hours
Doses:
500 or 2000 mg of dimethyl maleate/kg body weight.
No. of animals per sex per dose:
5/sex/ group
Control animals:
no
Details on study design:
Details on study design
- Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days.
- Examinations performed: systemic and local effects were recorded.
Statistics:
no data
Sex:
male/female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
> 2 000 mg/kg bw
Remarks on result:
other: rat
Mortality:
No deaths occurred after application of 500 or 2000 mg dimethyl maleate/kg body weight.
Clinical signs:
other: No systemic effects occurred after application of 500 or 2000 mg dimethyl maleate/kg body weight. Local erythema followed by necrosis could be observed in the treated skin in both groups.
Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Executive summary:

Heimann (1991)

Acute dermal toxicity study was conducted according to OECD guideline 402 with acceptable restrictions (analytical purity not reported, occlusive dressing instead of porous dressing).

5 rats/sex/group received a single application of 500 or 2000 mg dimethyl maleate/kg body weight on their shaved backs (area approx. 20 cm²), and this was covered with an occlusive dressing for 24 hours. The rats were observed for 14 days after application, and systemic and local effects were recorded.

No deaths and no systemic effects occurred after application of 500 or 2000 mg dimethyl maleate/kg body weight. Therefore, the LD50 was concluded to be greater than 2000 mg/dimethyl maleate body weight. Local erythema and followed by necrosis could be observed on the treated skin in both groups.

Based on the study results and according to EU and EU-CLP classification criteria, the test substance is not to be classified.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Value:
> 2 000 mg/kg bw

Additional information

Justification for classification or non-classification

Acute oral toxicity:


The acute oral LD50 was calculated to be 1909 mg/kg bw. Based on the study results,  the test substance is classified as Acute Tox. 4, according to the EU-CLP regulation.


 


Acute dermal toxicity: 


The LD50 was concluded to be greater than 2000 mg/kg bw. Based on the study results and according to  EU-CLP classification criteria, the test substance is not to be classified.