Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 265-228-7 | CAS number: 64755-01-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
It is considered from the results that all the substances in the category of calcium salts of C14-C22 monocarboxylic acids exhibit a similar lack of acute oral and dermal toxicity potential across the entire category. There is no evidence of a relevant intrinsic acute oral or dermal toxicity requiring classification or substance specific RMMs.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Acute toxicity: via oral route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: oral
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- The study was performed between 21 April 2010 and 01 June 2010.
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- Study conducted in compliance with agreed protocols, with no or minor deviations from standard test guidelines and/or minor methodological deficiencies, which do not affect the quality of the relevant results. The study report was conclusive, done to a valid guideline and the study was conducted under GLP conditions.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 420 (Acute Oral Toxicity - Fixed Dose Method)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.1 bis (Acute Oral Toxicity - Fixed Dose Procedure)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Test type:
- fixed dose procedure
- Limit test:
- yes
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Sex:
- female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source:
Harlan UK Limited, Oxon, UK.
- Age at study initiation:
At the start of the study the animals were eight to twelve weeks of age.
- Weight at study initiation:
The bodyweight variation did not exceed ± 20% of the initial/mean bodyweight of any previously dosed animal(s).
- Fasting period before study:
overnight fast immediately before dosing
- Housing:
The animals were housed in groups of up to four in suspended solid floor polypropylene cages furnished with woodflakes.
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum):
(2014 Teklad Global Rodent diet supplied by Harlan UK Limited, Oxon, UK.) was allowed ad libitum throughout the study.
- Water (e.g. ad libitum):free access to mains drinking water
- Acclimation period:acclimatisation period of at least five days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C):
19 to 25°C
- Humidity (%):
30 to 70%
- Air changes (per hr):
The rate of air exchange was at least fifteen changes per hour.
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light):
lighting was controlled by a time switch to give twelve hours continuous light (06:00 to 18:00) and twelve hours darkness.
IN-LIFE DATES: From: Day 1 To: Day 14 - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- water
- Details on oral exposure:
- VEHICLE
- Concentration in vehicle:
For the purpose of the study the test material was freshly prepared, as required, as a suspension in distilled water to give a dose level of 300 or 2000mg/kg bodyweight.
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage):
Not stated
- Justification for choice of vehicle:
Distilled water was the preferred vehicle of the test method.
- Lot/batch no. (if required):
Not stated
- Purity:
Not stated
MAXIMUM DOSE VOLUME APPLIED:
10ml/kg
DOSAGE PREPARATION (if unusual):
Not applicable
CLASS METHOD (if applicable)
- Rationale for the selection of the starting dose:
In the absence of data regarding the toxicity of the test material, 300 mg/kg was chosen as the starting dose. - Doses:
- Following a sighting test at a dose levels of 300 and 2000 mg/kg, an additional four fasted female animals were given a single oral dose of test
material, as a suspension in distilled water, at a dose level of 2000 mg/kg bodyweight. Clinical signs and bodyweight development were monitored
during the study. All animals were subjected to gross necropsy. - No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 1 female at 300 mg/kg
1 female at 2000 mg/kg
4 females at 2000 mg/kg - Control animals:
- no
- Details on study design:
- - Duration of observation period following administration:
14 days
- Frequency of observations and weighing:
Clinical observations were made ½, 1, 2, and 4 hours after dosing and then daily for fourteen days. Morbidity and mortality checks were made twice daily. Individual bodyweights were recorded on Day 0 (the day of dosing) and on Days 7 and 14.
- Necropsy of survivors performed:
Yes
- Other examinations performed:
Clinical signs, body weight. - Preliminary study:
- A sighting test at a dose levels of 300 and 2000 mg/kg was performed.
- Sex:
- female
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Effect level:
- > 2 000 mg/kg bw
- Mortality:
- There were no deaths.
- Clinical signs:
- other: Signs of systemic toxicity noted were hunched posture, pilo-erection, ataxia, noisy respiration, sneezing and increased salivation. Animals appeared normal 2, 5 or 10 days after dosing.
- Gross pathology:
- No abnormalities were noted at necropsy.
Individual necropsy findings are given in Table 6 (in any other information section) - Interpretation of results:
- Category 5 based on GHS criteria
- Remarks:
- Migrated information: The acute oral median lethal dose (LD50) of the test material in the female Wistar strain rat was estimated to be greater than 2000 mg/kg bodyweight (Globally Harmonised Classification System - Category 5).
- Conclusions:
- The acute oral median lethal dose (LD50) of the test material in the female Wistar strain rat was estimated to be greater than 2000 mg/kg bodyweight (Globally Harmonised Classification System - Category 5).
- Executive summary:
Introduction.
The study was performed to assess the acute oral toxicity of the test material in the Wistar strain rat. The method was designed to meet the requirements of the following:
OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals No 420 “Acute Oral Toxicity - Fixed Dose Method” (adopted 17 December 2001)
Method B1 bis Acute Toxicity (Oral) of Commission Regulation (EC) No. 440/2008
Method.
Following a sighting test at dose levels of 300 mg/kg and 2000 mg/kg, a further group of four fasted females was given a single oral dose of test material, as a suspension in distilled water, at a dose level of 2000 mg/kg bodyweight. Clinical signs and bodyweight development were monitored during the study. All animals were subjected to gross necropsy.
Mortality.
There were no deaths.
Clinical Observations.
Signs of systemic toxicity noted in animals treated at a dose level of 2000 mg/kg were hunched posture, pilo-erection, ataxia, noisy respiration, sneezing and increased salivation. There were no signs of systemic toxicity noted in the animal treated at a dose level of 300 mg/kg.
Bodyweight.
All animals showed expected gains in bodyweight.
Necropsy.
No abnormalities were noted at necropsy.
Conclusion.
The acute oral median lethal dose (LD50) of the test material in the female Wistar strain rat was estimated to be greater than 2000mg/kg bodyweight (Globally Harmonised Classification System-Category 5).
Reference
Table1 Individual Clinical Observations and Mortality Data -300mg/kg
Dose Level mg/kg |
Animal Number and Sex |
Effects Noted After Dosing |
Effects Noted During Period After Dosing |
||||||||||||||||
½ |
1 |
2 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
||
300 |
1-0 Female |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0= No signs of systemic toxicity
Table 2 Individual Bodyweights and Bodyweight Changes -300mg/kg
Dose Level mg/kg |
Animal Number |
Bodyweight (g) at Day |
Bodyweight Gain (g) |
|||
0 |
7 |
14 |
1 |
2 |
||
300 |
1-0 Female |
180 |
202 |
212 |
22 |
10 |
Table 3 Necropsy Findings -300 mg/kg
Dose Level |
Animal Number |
Time of Death |
Macroscopic Observations |
300 |
1-0 Female |
Killed Day 14 |
No abnormalities detected |
Dose Level mg/kg |
Animal Number and Sex |
Effects Noted After Dosing |
Effects Noted During Period After Dosing |
||||||||||||||||
½ |
1 |
2 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
||
2000 |
2-0 Female |
H |
H |
HPA |
HPA |
HPA |
HA |
HA |
H |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3-0 Female |
HRnS |
HRnS |
HPRn |
HPRn |
HARn |
Rn |
Rn |
RnRs |
RnRs |
RnRs |
RnRs |
RnRs |
RnRs |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
3-1 Female |
H |
HPA |
HPA |
HP |
H |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
3-2 Female |
H |
HPA |
HPA |
HA |
H |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
3-3 Female |
H |
HA |
HA |
HA |
H |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0= No signs of systemic toxicity
H = Hunched posture
P = Pilo-erection
A = Ataxia
Rn = Noisy respiration
Rs = Sneezing
S = Increased salivation
Table 5 Individual Bodyweights and Bodyweight Changes -2000mg/kg
Dose Level mg/kg |
Animal Number |
Bodyweight (g) at Day |
Bodyweight Gain (g) During Week |
|||
0 |
7 |
14 |
1 |
2 |
||
2000 |
2-0 Female |
176 |
180 |
193 |
4 |
13 |
3-0 Female |
176 |
178 |
189 |
2 |
11 |
|
3-1 Female |
165 |
184 |
190 |
19 |
6 |
|
3-2 Female |
186 |
198 |
213 |
12 |
15 |
|
3-3 Female |
172 |
182 |
202 |
10 |
20 |
Table 6 Individual Necropsy Findings-2000mg/kg
Dose Level |
Animal Number |
Time of Death |
Macroscopic Observations |
2000 |
2-0 Female |
Killed Day 14 |
No abnormalities detected |
3-0 Female |
Killed Day 14 |
No abnormalities detected |
|
3-1 Female |
Killed Day 14 |
No abnormalities detected |
|
3-2 Female |
Killed Day 14 |
No abnormalities detected |
|
3-3 Female |
Killed Day 14 |
No abnormalities detected |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- discriminating dose
- Value:
- 2 000 mg/kg bw
- Quality of whole database:
- High
Acute toxicity: via inhalation route
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Acute toxicity: via dermal route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: dermal
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- The study was performed between 12 May 2010 and 26 May 2010
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- Study conducted in compliance with agreed protocols, with no or minor deviations from standard test guidelines and/or minor methodological deficiencies, which do not affect the quality of the relevant results. The study report was conclusive, done to a valid guideline and the study was conducted under GLP conditions.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 402 (Acute Dermal Toxicity)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.3 (Acute Toxicity (Dermal))
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Test type:
- standard acute method
- Limit test:
- yes
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- Five male and five female Wistar (HsdRccHan:WIST) strain rats were supplied by Harlan Laboratories U.K. Ltd., Oxon, UK. On receipt the animals were randomly allocated to cages. The females were nulliparous and non pregnant. After an acclimatisation period of at least five days the animals were selected at random and given a number unique within the study by indelible ink-marking on the tail and a number written on a cage card. At the start of the study the animals weighed at least 200g, and were eight to twelve weeks of age. The weight variation did not exceed ± 20% of the mean weight for each sex.
The animals were housed in suspended solid floor polypropylene cages furnished with woodflakes. The animals were housed individually during the 24-hour exposure period and in groups of five, by sex, for the remainder of the study. Free access to mains drinking water and food (2014 Teklad Global Rodent diet supplied by Harlan Laboratories U.K. Ltd., Oxon, UK) was allowed throughout the study. The diet, drinking water and bedding were routinely analysed and were considered not to contain any contaminants that could reasonably be expected to affect the purpose or integrity of the study.
The temperature and relative humidity were set to achieve limits of 19 to 25°C and 30 to 70% respectively. Any occasional deviations from these targets were considered not to have affected the purpose or integrity of the study. The rate of air exchange was at least fifteen changes per hour and the lighting was controlled by a time switch to give twelve hours continuous light (06:00 to 18:00) and twelve hours darkness.
The animals were provided with environmental enrichment items which were considered not to contain any contaminant of a level that might have affected the purpose or integrity of the study. - Type of coverage:
- semiocclusive
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Details on dermal exposure:
- On the day before treatment the back and flanks of each animal were clipped free of hair.
Using available information on the toxicity of the test material, a group of five male and five female rats was treated with the test material at a dose level of 2000 mg/kg.
The appropriate amount of test material, moistened with distilled water, was applied as evenly as possible to an area of shorn skin (approximately 10% of the total body surface area). A piece of surgical gauze was placed over the treatment area and semi-occluded with a piece of self adhesive bandage. The animals were caged individually for the 24 hour exposure period. Shortly after dosing the dressings were examined to ensure that they
were securely in place. - Duration of exposure:
- 24 hours
- Doses:
- 2000 mg /kg body weight
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 5
- Control animals:
- not required
- Details on study design:
- After the 24-hour contact period the bandage was carefully removed and the treated skin and surrounding hair wiped with cotton wool moistened with distilled water to remove any residual test material. The animals were returned to group housing for the remainder of the study period.
The animals were observed for deaths or overt signs of toxicity ½, 1, 2 and 4 hours after dosing and subsequently once daily for fourteen days.
After removal of the dressings and subsequently once daily for fourteen days, the test sites were examined for evidence of primary irritation and scored according to the following scale from Draize J H (1977) "Dermal and Eye Toxicity Tests" In: Principles and Procedures for Evaluating the Toxicity of Household Substances, National Academy of Sciences, Washington DC p.31:
EVALUATION OF SKIN REACTIONS
Erythema and Eschar Formation Value
No erythema 0
Very slight erythema (barely perceptible) 1
Well-defined erythema 2
Moderate to severe erythema 3
Severe erythema (beef redness) to slight eschar formation (injuries in depth) 4
Oedema Formation
No oedema 0
Very slight oedema (barely perceptible) 1
Slight oedema (edges of area well-defined by definite raising) 2
Moderate oedema (raised approximately 1 millimetre) 3
Severe oedema (raised more than 1 millimetre and extending beyond the area of exposure) 4
Any other skin reactions, if present were also recorded.
Individual bodyweights were recorded prior to application of the test material on Day 0 and on Days 7 and 14.
At the end of the study the animals were killed by cervical dislocation. All animals were subjected to gross necropsy. This consisted of an external examination and opening of the abdominal and thoracic cavities. The appearance of any macroscopic abnormalities was recorded. No tissues were retained. - Statistics:
- No statistical analysis was performed.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Effect level:
- > 2 000 mg/kg bw
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Remarks on result:
- other: 95% confidence limits not reported
- Mortality:
- No deaths occurred during the study.
- Clinical signs:
- other: No clinical signs were observed during the course of the study.
- Gross pathology:
- No macroscopic findings were recorded at necropsy.
- Other findings:
- Individual dermal reactions are given in Table 2 and Table 3 in overall remarks section.
Well-defined erythema and very slight oedema were noted at the test site of one animal one day after dosing with very slight erythema noted two days after dosing. There were no signs of dermal irritation noted in the remaining animals. - Interpretation of results:
- practically nontoxic
- Remarks:
- Migrated information
- Conclusions:
- The acute dermal median lethal dose (LD50) of the test material in the Wistar strain rat was found to be greater than 2000 mg/kg bodyweight.
s - Executive summary:
- Introduction. The
study was performed to assess the acute dermal toxicity of the test
material in the Wistar strain rat. The method was designed to meet the
requirements of the following:
OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals No. 402 “Acute Dermal Toxicity” (adopted 24 February 1987)
Method B3 Acute Toxicity (Dermal) of Commission Regulation (EC) No. 440/2008
Method. A group of ten animals (five males and five females) was given a single, 24 hour, semi occluded dermal application of the test material to intact skin at a dose level of 2000 mg/kg bodyweight. Clinical signs and bodyweight development were monitored during the study. All animals were subjected to gross necropsy.
Mortality. There were no deaths.
Clinical Observations. There were no signs of systemic toxicity.
Dermal Irritation. Well-defined erythema and very slight oedema were noted at the test site of one animal. There were no signs of dermal irritation noted in the remaining animals.
Bodyweight. All animals showed expected gains in bodyweight over the study period.
Necropsy. No abnormalities were noted at necropsy.
Conclusion. The acute dermal median lethal dose (LD50) of the test material in the Wistar strain rat was found to be greater than 2000 mg/kg bodyweight.
Reference
Table 1 Individual Clinical Observations and Mortality Data
Dose Level mg/kg |
Animal Number and Sex |
Effects Noted After Initiation of Exposure (Hours) |
Effects Noted After Initiation of Exposure (Days) |
||||||||||||||||
½ |
1 |
2 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
||
2000 |
1-0 Male |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1-1 Male |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
1-2 Male |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
1-3 Male |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
1-4 Male |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
2-0 Female |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
2-1 Female |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
2-2 Female |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
2-3 Female |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
2-4 Female |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 = No signs of systemic toxicity
See Overall remarks for Dermal Reactions Tables 2 and 3.
Table 4 Individual Bodyweights and Weekly Bodyweight Changes
Dose Level mg/kg |
Animal Number and Sex |
Bodyweight (g) at Day |
Bodyweight Change (g) During Week |
|||
0 |
7 |
14 |
1 |
2 |
||
2000 |
1-0 Male |
229 |
247 |
278 |
18 |
31 |
1-1 Male |
241 |
262 |
293 |
21 |
31 |
|
1-2 Male |
244 |
271 |
291 |
27 |
20 |
|
1-3 Male |
236 |
259 |
293 |
23 |
34 |
|
1-4 Male |
231 |
255 |
294 |
24 |
39 |
|
2-0 Female |
208 |
212 |
223 |
4 |
11 |
|
2-1 Female |
210 |
219 |
228 |
9 |
9 |
|
2-2 Female |
200 |
201 |
219 |
1 |
1 8 |
|
2-3 Female |
202 |
206 |
209 |
4 |
3 |
|
2-4 Female |
201 |
209 |
218 |
8 |
9 |
Table 5 Individual Necropsy Findings
Dose Level mg/kg |
Animal Number |
Time of Death |
Macroscopic Observations |
2000 |
1-0 Male |
Killed Day 14 |
No abnormalities detected |
1-1 Male |
Killed Day 14 |
No abnormalities detected |
|
1-2 Male |
Killed Day 14 |
No abnormalities detected |
|
1-3 Male |
Killed Day 14 |
No abnormalities detected |
|
1-4 Male |
Killed Day 14 |
No abnormalities detected |
|
2-0 Female |
Killed Day 14 |
No abnormalities detected |
|
2-1 Female |
Killed Day 14 |
No abnormalities detected |
|
2-2 Female |
Killed Day 14 |
No abnormalities detected |
|
2-3 Female |
Killed Day 14 |
No abnormalities detected |
|
2-4 Female |
Killed Day 14 |
No abnormalities detected |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- discriminating dose
- Value:
- 2 000 mg/kg bw
- Quality of whole database:
- High
Additional information
The substances in the category are considered to be similar on the basis that they have common structures of a calcium ion varying only by the length of the fatty acid chain and the presence of unsaturated and/or hydroxyl functional groups. As a result it is expected that the substances will have similar, predictable properties. REACH Annex V, Entry 9, groups fatty acids and their potassium, sodium, calcium and magnesium salts, including C6 to C24, predominantly even-numbered, unbranched, saturated or unsaturated aliphatic monocarboxylic acids. Provided that they are obtained from natural sources and are not chemically modified, the substances included in REACH Annex V, Entry 9 are exempt from registration, unless they are classified as dangerous (except for flammability, skin irritation or eye irritation) or they meet the criteria for PBT/vPvB substances. The metal fatty acid substances in the category are therefore not expected to be hazardous. Due to the close structural similarity and the narrow range of carbon chain numbers covered in this category, the acute toxicity properties are expected to be predictable across the category.
Since REACH Annex V groups together calcium, potassium, sodium and magnesium salts of C6 to C24 fatty acids as being potentially exempt from registration, these metal cations are therefore not considered to contribute to any health hazard. On this basis, relevant published or proprietary data on any potassium, sodium or magnesium salt within the fatty acid category range of C14 to C22 can be used to read across to the calcium salts of C14-C22 fatty acid category.
Lithium salts of fatty acids are not included in REACH Annex V as being potentially exempt from registration. For these salts it is expected that the lithium cation would be the species with the potentially higher toxicity profile when compared to calcium, potassium, sodium, and magnesium cations. However, the substance fatty acids C18 (unsaturated) lithium salts contains a fatty acid anion that falls within the C14-C22 range. Experimental data for all the mammalian toxicity Annex VIII endpoints have been generated on this substance and the results obtained are relevant to read across to the calcium salts of C14-C22 fatty acids either in a weight of evidence approach or as key studies due to the structural similarity and its position within the category fatty acid range. This is clearly relevant when the results from the lithium fatty acid salts are negative.
HERA (2002) reviews published data on fatty acid and fatty acid salt acute toxicity. The HERA review also considers data presented in CIR (1982) and IUCLID (2000). All the data on simple metal salts of fatty acids show evidence of low acute oral and dermal toxicity, e.g. >5000 mg/kg bw for sodium stearate and >2000 mg/kg bw for fatty acids, C16-18 and C18-unsaturated, sodium salts. Since the salts of fatty acids will exhibit a similar toxicity profile as the comparable free acids, the available data for relevant fatty acids within the C14-C22 range provide a clear picture of low acute toxicity for this class of substance, with all oral LD50values >2000 mg/kg bw for palmitic, stearic, oleic, fatty acids C18-22, etc.
The category substances are exclusivelymanufactured in situ in base oil and not in isolated form. They have vapour pressures of less than 10 E-10 Pa and melting points of greater than 120°C, so the potential for the generation of inhalable forms is low, also the use of the grease forms will not result in aerosols, particles or droplets of an inhalable size, so exposure to humans via the inhalatory route will be unlikely to occur.In accordance with REACH Regulation, Annex VIII, 8.6.1, column 2 as well as Annex XI, 1, the performance of acute inhalation toxicity studies is not justified due to exposure as well as toxicological considerations.
In order to provide an additional weight of evidence conclusion concerning acute toxicity, a number of key acute oral and dermal toxicity studies in rats have been conducted on lithium salts of C14, C18 (hydroxylated), C18, and C22 monocarboxylic acids. The results from these studies showed no evidence of acute toxicity up to the highest doses tested (2000 mg/kg bw or greater).
While this information was obtained from an assessment of lithium fatty acid salts within the carbon range C14-C22, it is considered relevant to read the results across to the calcium fatty salts in this category since lithium is a simple metal in group one of the periodic table, along with sodium and potassium (see also the introduction to this section). Additionally, whereas the lithium cation might be expected to demonstrate higher acute hazard potential than the calcium, magnesium, potassium and sodium cations, the lack of acute toxicity from the studies on lithium fatty acid salts up to the maximum concentrations tested is directly applicable to the C14-C22 calcium (or magnesium, potassium, sodium) fatty acid salts.
Therefore, it is considered that the substances in the category of calcium fatty acid salts exhibit a lack of acute oral and dermal toxicity potential across the entire category.
Reference
HERA (Human Health and Environmental Risk Assessment on ingredients of European household cleaning products) (2002) Fatty Acid Salts (Soap) Environmental and Human Health Risk Assessment
IUCLID (2000) IUCLID Datasets for fatty acids. Created February 2000. European Chemical Bureau, Ispra, Italy.
Justification for selection of acute toxicity – oral endpoint
This substance is a representative fatty acid salt that can be read across to the calcium salts of C14-C22 fatty acids category
Justification for selection of acute toxicity – dermal endpoint
This substance is a representative fatty acid salt that can be read across to the calcium salts of C14-C22 fatty acids category
Justification for classification or non-classification
The oral and dermal LD50 values are greater than 2000 mg/kg bw.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.