Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 200-654-9 | CAS number: 67-47-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 11 June 2019 - 24 June 2019
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 019
- Report date:
- 2019
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 201 (Freshwater Alga and Cyanobacteria, Growth Inhibition Test)
- Version / remarks:
- 23 March 2006, Annex 5 corrected 28 July 2011
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method C.3 (Algal Inhibition test)
- Version / remarks:
- 20 May 2008, amended 7 December 2015, for the purpose of its adaptation to technical progress, by Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/266
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Reference substance 001
- Cas Number:
- 67-47-0
- Molecular formula:
- C6H6O3
- Reference substance name:
- Fructose
- EC Number:
- 200-333-3
- EC Name:
- Fructose
- Cas Number:
- 57-48-7
- Molecular formula:
- C6H12O6
- IUPAC Name:
- D-fructose
- Reference substance name:
- 1-(furan-2-yl)-2-hydroxyethanone
- Cas Number:
- 17678-19-2
- Molecular formula:
- C6H6O3
- IUPAC Name:
- 1-(furan-2-yl)-2-hydroxyethanone
- Reference substance name:
- Water
- EC Number:
- 231-791-2
- EC Name:
- Water
- Cas Number:
- 7732-18-5
- Molecular formula:
- H2O
- IUPAC Name:
- water
- Reference substance name:
- Sodium formate
- EC Number:
- 205-488-0
- EC Name:
- Sodium formate
- Cas Number:
- 141-53-7
- Molecular formula:
- CH2O2.Na
- IUPAC Name:
- sodium formate
- Reference substance name:
- Sodium nitrate
- EC Number:
- 231-554-3
- EC Name:
- Sodium nitrate
- Cas Number:
- 7631-99-4
- Molecular formula:
- HNO3.Na
- IUPAC Name:
- sodium nitrate
- Reference substance name:
- Glucose
- EC Number:
- 200-075-1
- EC Name:
- Glucose
- Cas Number:
- 50-99-7
- Molecular formula:
- C6H12O6
- IUPAC Name:
- D-glucose
- Reference substance name:
- Sodium acetate
- EC Number:
- 204-823-8
- EC Name:
- Sodium acetate
- Cas Number:
- 127-09-3
- Molecular formula:
- C2H4O2.Na
- IUPAC Name:
- sodium acetate
- Reference substance name:
- 2-furaldehyde
- EC Number:
- 202-627-7
- EC Name:
- 2-furaldehyde
- Cas Number:
- 98-01-1
- Molecular formula:
- C5H4O2
- IUPAC Name:
- 2-furaldehyde
- Reference substance name:
- Sodium 4-oxovalerate
- EC Number:
- 243-378-4
- EC Name:
- Sodium 4-oxovalerate
- Cas Number:
- 19856-23-6
- Molecular formula:
- C5H8O3.Na
- IUPAC Name:
- sodium 4-oxopentanoate
- Reference substance name:
- Formaldehyde
- EC Number:
- 200-001-8
- EC Name:
- Formaldehyde
- Cas Number:
- 50-00-0
- Molecular formula:
- CH2O
- IUPAC Name:
- formaldehyde
- Test material form:
- solid: crystalline
- Details on test material:
- freeze-dried material
Batch: 1808A-RO-C-I1-FD-Chg#3
Appearance Crystal / brown
Storage: Refrigerator (2 - 8 °C)
Expiring date: 31 December 2019
Constituent 1
impurity 1
impurity 2
impurity 3
impurity 4
impurity 5
impurity 6
impurity 7
impurity 8
impurity 9
impurity 10
Sampling and analysis
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
Test solutions
- Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION
The following test flasks were set up:
- Test solution (Tn); containing test water, test item and algae (three replicates per test concentration)
- Blank control (Bn); containing test water and algae (six replicates)
- Since the test item is soluble, the test solution was prepared by respective dilutions of a stock solution. A stock solution of 117 mg/l test item was prepared by adding the test item to test water in sterile glassware and stirred until dissolution. The respective dilutions of this stock solution were then prepared with test water and sterile glassware. 100 ml of each test media were added to the sterile test flasks and inoculated with an exponentially growing preculture of algae.
Pure test water, handled as the test item solutions inoculated with the exponentially growing preculture of algae mentioned above, served as blank controls. For the incubation, the test flasks were then placed on an orbital shaker at a nominal shaking speed of about 130 revolutions per min.
- Evidence of undissolved material: Not relevant. Since the test item is soluble, the test solution was prepared by directly dissolving the test item in sterile-filtered Algal medium (pH adjusted at 8.0 ± 0.2)
Test organisms
- Test organisms (species):
- Raphidocelis subcapitata (previous names: Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata, Selenastrum capricornutum)
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Test organism: Axenic slope culture of Raphidocelis subcapitata 61.81SAG (Collection of Algal Cultures, Institute of Freshwater Ecology, University of Göttingen, D-37073 Göttingen, Germany
- Culture: 250 ml flask containing 100 ml of sterile OECD medium inoculated with cell material from an axenic slope culture
- Illumination: Continuous (4440–8880 lux) from Osram Fluora L18W77 and Osram Daywhite L18W840 (Osram AG, Winterthur, Switzerland)
- Temperature: 21 to 24°C, maintained at ± 2°C in a thermo-controlled room
- Control of sensitivity: twice per year, with potassium dichromate
Study design
- Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 72 h
Test conditions
- Hardness:
- not reported
- Test temperature:
- Min: 22.0; Max: 23.0; Mean: 22.5
- pH:
- 7.8 - 9.0
- Dissolved oxygen:
- not reported
- Salinity:
- not reported
- Conductivity:
- not reported
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- The concentrations of 5-(Hydroxymethyl)furfural in the test media were measured by HPLC analysis with UV detection at the beginning and after 24, 48 h and 72 h of exposure. These analyses showed that the test concentrations were correctly dosed. However, the test concentrations decreased over the 72 hours test period and did not remain within 80–120% of the nominal value but ranged from 10% to 73% in the three lowest concentrations and within 80–120%
of the nominal value in the two highest concentrations.
Therefore, the effective concentrations ECx were assessed based on the geometric mean of the measured concentrations of the test item over the entire 72 hours test period, which were 122, 59.7, 27.1, 10.6 and 3.76 mg/l. - Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: 250 ml flasks, all-glass, with 100 ml of test medium, shaken (130 rpm), capped with air permeable stoppers
- Test medium: Recommended OECD medium
- Preculture: Exponentially growing liquid culture of Raphidocelis subcapitata kept under the same environmental conditions as in the test
- Illumination: Source: continuous from Osram Fluora L 18W77 and Osram Daywhite L 18W840 (Osram AG, Winterthur, Switzerland)
- Light intensity: the light intensity amounts to about 5000 lux which corresponds to about 40 µE•m-2•s-2
- Homogeneity: the light intensity is maintained within ±15% from the average light intensity over the incubation area. The test vessels are repositioned every day within the incubation area to minimize variation.
- Temperature: 21 to 24°C, maintained at ± 2°C in a thermo-controlled room
- pH: Initially adjusted to 8 ± 0.2; the pH of the control medium should not increase by more than 1.5 units during the test
- Test type: Static exposure conditions over a period of 72 h
- Starting cell density: 0.5–0.85 µg/ml with respect to dry weight corresponding to about 2–5•103 cells/ml (i.e. OD680 of about 0.005 units)
RANGE FINDING STUDY
Prior to the definitive test a non-GLP range finding test with nominal concentrations of 1, 10 and 100 mg/l of 5-(Hydroxymethyl)furfural was performed. The results indicated that the test item is well soluble and that the test solutions can be prepared by respective dilutions of a stock solution. The HPLC determinations indicate that the test item was correctly dosed, but the concentrations decreased over the duration of the test. Based on the results of this non-GLP range finding test the following concentrations were selected for the definitive test: 117, 58.5, 29.3, 14.6 and 7.32 mg/l of test item (which correspond to 100, 50.0,
25.0, 12.5 and 6.25 mg/l of the main component 5-(Hydroxymethyl)furfural).
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED
- Cell density: Cell concentrations were determined every 24 h using a spectrophotometer at 680nm wavelength (Shimadzu UV 1800, Shimadzu Schweiz GmbH, Römerstr. 3, CH-4153 Reinach). Aliquots of 5 ml were removed from each test flask under sterile conditions. Cell concentrations at time 0 h were only determined in the blank controls. - Reference substance (positive control):
- not required
- Remarks:
- Control of sensitivity: None – the culture is re-purchased annually
Results and discussion
Effect concentrationsopen allclose all
- Key result
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 132 mg/L
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Remarks on result:
- other: calculated using a linear regression
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC10
- Effect conc.:
- 39.2 mg/L
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Remarks on result:
- other: calculated using a linear regression
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 59.7 mg/L
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Remarks on result:
- other: calculated using a linear regression
- Key result
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 27.1 mg/L
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Remarks on result:
- other: calculated using a linear regression
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 45.5 mg/L
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- biomass
- Remarks on result:
- other: calculated using a linear regression
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC10
- Effect conc.:
- 16.2 mg/L
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- biomass
- Remarks on result:
- other: calculated using a linear regression
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 27.1 mg/L
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- biomass
- Remarks on result:
- other: calculated using a linear regression
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 10.6 mg/L
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- biomass
- Remarks on result:
- other: calculated using a linear regression
- Details on results:
- - Exponential growth in the control (for algal test): yes
- Any stimulation of growth found in any treatment: yes (growth rate and yield)
- Any observations (e.g. precipitation) that might cause a difference between measured and nominal values: no
With respect to the endpoint average specific growth rate, the following effects were observed compared to the control: 47% at 122 mg/l, 19% at 59.7 mg/l, 5% 27.1 mg/l, 1% at 10.6 mg/l and 2% at 3.76 mg/l.
The 72-hour EC50 based on average specific growth rate of 5-(Hydroxymethyl)furfural to Raphidocelis subcapitata was calculated to be 132 mg/l (95% confidence interval: 128–136 mg/l).
The EC10 was calculated to be 39.2 mg/l (95% confidence interval: 37.0–41.3 mg/l). These ECx were computed using a linear regression with a logit link function and a maximum likelihood algorithm (slope = 4.18, Intercept = –8.85, degrees of freedom = 13, p(Chi²) = 1.00, r2 =0.991, p(F) <0.001).
Even though 5-(Hydroxymethyl)furfural induced statistically significant inhibitions of 5%, 1% and 2% at the concentrations of 27.1, 10.6 and 3.76 mg/l, respectively (based on a Williams’ multiple sequential t-test procedure, one-sided smaller, ¿ = 0.05), these effects were not considered as biologically relevant toxic effects, since they are below the allowed coefficient of variation of the average specific growth rates of the controls (7%) as described in the validity criteria.
Therefore, the LOEC with respect to average specific growth rate is 59.7 mg/l and the NOEC is 27.1 mg/l.
With respect to the endpoint yield, the following effects were observed compared to the control: 92% at 122 mg/l, 63% at 59.7 mg/l, 24% at 27.1 mg/l, 7% at 10.6 mg/l and 8% at 3.76 mg/l.
The 72-hour EC50 based on yield of 5-(Hydroxymethyl)furfural to Raphidocelis subcapitata was calculated to be 45.5 mg/l (95% confidence interval: 41.6–49.6 mg/l). The EC10 was calculated to be 16.2 mg/l (95% confidence interval: 12.8–19.3 mg/l). These ECx were computed using a linear regression with a logit link function and a maximum likelihood algorithm (slope = 4.91, Intercept = – 8.15, degrees of freedom = 13, p(Chi²) = 1.00, r2 = 0.926, p(F) <0.001). Even though 5-(Hydroxymethyl)furfural induced statistically significant inhibitions of 7% and 8% at the concentrations of 10.6 and 3.76 mg/l, respectively (based on a Williams’ multiple sequential test procedure, one-sided smaller, ¿ = 0.05), these effects were not considered as biologically relevant toxic effects based on the threshold (20%) defined by the DIN 38412-L33 norm1.
Therefore, the LOEC with respect to yield is 27.1 mg/l and the NOEC is 10.6 mg/l. - Reported statistics and error estimates:
- Statistical analysis was performed with respect to the no observed effect concentrations. The statistical analysis was conducted with the software ToxRat® Standard Version 3.2.1.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Remarks:
- In the control cultures: average specific growth rate of 1.72 (>0.92)/coefficient of variation of average specific growth rates: 0.6% (<=7%)/ mean coefficient of variation for section-by-section specific growth rates 14.7% (<=35%).
- Conclusions:
- The acute toxicity of 5-(Hydroxymethyl)furfural (CAS no. 67-47-0) to to the green alga Raphidocelis subcapitata was determined in a 72 hour static test according to OECD guideline 201. The median effect concentration with respect to growth rate (ErC50/0–3 days) of 5-(Hydroxymethyl)furfural to Raphidocelis subcapitata was 132 mg/l based on the measured concentration of the test item. The no observed effect concentration (NOErC) with respect to growth rate was 27.1 mg/l based on the measured concentration of the test item. The results of the test can be considered reliable without restriction.
- Executive summary:
The growth inhibitory effects of 5-(Hydroxymethyl)furfural (CAS no. 67-47-0) to the green alga Raphidocelis subcapitata were investigated according to OECD guideline 201 over a period of 72 hours.
The test item 5-(Hydroxymethyl)furfural is solid, 85.4% pure and soluble in test water. The test solutions were prepared by appropriate dilutions of a stock solution in test water.
The nominal test item concentrations were 117, 58.5, 29.3, 14.6 and 7.32 mg/l (which correspond to 100, 50.0, 25.0, 12.5 and 6.25 mg/l of the main component). Three parallel test vessels were used
for each concentration of the test item and six vessels for the controls.
The concentrations of 5-(Hydroxymethyl)furfural in the test media were analyzed by HPLC with UV detection at the beginning and after 24, 48 and 72 hours of exposure. These analyses showed that the test concentrations were correctly dosed but decreased below 80% of the nominal value in the three lower concentrations over the 72 hours test period. Therefore, the effective concentrations ECx
were assessed based on the geometric mean of the measured concentrations of the test item over the entire 72 hours test period, which were 122, 59.7, 27.1, 10.6 and 3.76 mg/l.
With respect to the endpoint average specific growth rate, the following effects were observed compared to the control: 47% at 122 mg/l and 19% at 59.7 mg/l. No biologically relevant effects were observed at the three lower test concentrations.
With respect to the endpoint yield, the following effects were observed compared to the control: 92% at 122 mg/l, 63% at 59.7 mg/l, 24% at 27.1 mg/l. No biologically relevant effects were observed at the two lower test concentrations The results of the average specific growth rate and yield inhibition of 5-(Hydroxymethyl)furfural to the green alga Raphidocelis subcapitata are summarized in the following table based on the geometric mean of the measured concentrations (GMMC) of the test item:
Parameter (0-72 h)
Growth rate [mg/l]
Yield [mg/l]
EC50
132
45.5
EC10
39.2
16.2
LOEC
59.7
27.1
NOEC
27.1
10.6
The 72 h EC50 value based on average specific growth rate of 5-(Hydroxymethyl)furfural (CAS no. 67-47-0) on the green alga Raphidocelis subcapitata was 132 mg/l and the EC10 was 39.2 mg/l based on the measured concentration of the test item.
All validity criteria were fulfilled.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.