Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2 - 30 October 2006
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2006
Report date:
2006

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
Version / remarks:
April 2002
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.42 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
Version / remarks:
April 2004
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of study:
mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
-
EC Number:
472-690-5
EC Name:
-
Cas Number:
136040-19-2
Molecular formula:
C24BF20.C19H15
IUPAC Name:
Methylium, triphenyl-, tetrakis(pentafluorophenyl)borate(1-).
Test material form:
solid: particulate/powder

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
mouse
Strain:
CBA
Sex:
female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River France, L'Arbresle Cedex, France
- Females (if applicable) nulliparous and non-pregnant: yes
- Age at study initiation: approx. 11 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 20-26 g
- Housing: individual housing in labeled Macrolon cages containing sterilized sawdust as bedding material
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least 5 days before the start of treatment under lab conditions

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20.1-23.3 C
- Humidity (%): 42-89%
- Air changes (per hr): 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

Study design: in vivo (LLNA)

Vehicle:
methyl ethyl ketone
Concentration:
0%, 0.05%, 0.1%, 0.25%
No. of animals per dose:
5
Details on study design:
PRE-SCREEN TESTS:
- Doses: 0.25-0.5-1-2.5-5-10-25-50% test substance in methyl ethyl keton
- Systemic toxicity: noted at dose levels 25% (hunched posture) and 50% (sacrificed)
- Erythema scores: ranging between 2 and 3 on day 3 of all doses tested, oedema score was 0.

Positive control substance(s):
hexyl cinnamic aldehyde (CAS No 101-86-0)

Results and discussion

Positive control results:
Six monthly reliability check at 5%, 10% and 25%: EC3 value of 13.1%.

In vivo (LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Key result
Parameter:
SI
Value:
3.5
Test group / Remarks:
0.05%
Key result
Parameter:
SI
Value:
9.8
Test group / Remarks:
0.1%
Key result
Parameter:
SI
Value:
6.7
Test group / Remarks:
0.25%
Cellular proliferation data / Observations:
Erythema was observed in all animals while no oedema was noted. The irritation of the ears was considered not to have a toxicologically significant effect on the activity of the nodes. All nodes of the control and 0.05% treated groups were normal in size and the majority of the nodes of animals treated at 0.1% and 0.25% were increased in size. No macroscopic abnormalities of the surrounding area were noted. No adverse effects on body weight were noted.
No mortality occurred and no symptoms of systemic toxicity were observed in the animals of the main study.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
Category 1 (skin sensitising) based on GHS criteria
Conclusions:
The results indicate that the test substance could elicit a SI >= 3. No reliable EC3 value could be calculated as the response of the 0.25% group did not follow the expected dose-response relationship. Since systemic toxicity was evident at higher dose levels, the response of the 0.25% concentration might be less due to underlying systemic toxicity. Based on these results, the substance would be regarded as a skin sensitiser.