Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 484-490-5 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Skin sensitisation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 03 December 2007 - 07 January 2008
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 008
- Report date:
- 2008
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.42 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.2600 (Skin Sensitisation)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of study:
- mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- -
- EC Number:
- 484-490-5
- EC Name:
- -
- Molecular formula:
- Hill formula:C21 H12 N2 O6 S Sr 5/2(H2O) CAS formula: C21 H14 N2 O6 S . Sr
- IUPAC Name:
- strontium(2+) 3-hydroxy-4-[(1E)-2-(1-sulfonatonaphthalen-2-yl)diazen-1-yl]naphthalene-2-carboxylate
- Test material form:
- solid: granular
- Details on test material:
- Red Powder.
Batch-070711
Purity>=96.4 %
Storage-Room temperature in the dark.
Stable under storage conditions.
Epiry date-11 July 2011
Constituent 1
In vivo test system
Test animals
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- other: CSA strain
- Sex:
- female
- Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source:Charles River France, L'Arbresle Cedex, France
- Females (if applicable) nulliparous and non-pregnant: yes
- Age at study initiation:Young adult animals (approx. 12 weeks old)
- Weight at study initiation:Body weight variation was within +/- 20 % of the sex mean.
- Housing:Individual housing in labelled Macrolon cages (Ml type; height 12.5 cm) containing sterilized sawdust as bedding material (Litalabo, S.P.P.S., Argenteuil, France). Paper (Enviro-dri, Wm. Lillico & Son (Wonham Mill Ltd), Surrey, United Kingdom) was supplied as cage-enrichment. The paper was removed on Day 1 prior to dosing and was supplied again after scoring of the ears on Day 3.
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum):Free access to pelleted rodent diet (SM R/M-Z from SSNIFF® Spezialdiaten GmbH, Soest, Germany).
- Water (e.g. ad libitum):Free access to tap water.
- Acclimation period:The acclimatization period was at least 5 days before the start of treatment under laboratory conditions.
- Indication of any skin lesions:A health inspection was performed prior to treatment, to ensure that the animals are in a good state of health. Special attention was paid to the ears, which were intact and free from any abnormality.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
Animals were housed in a controlled environment, in which optimal conditions were considered to be approximately 15 air changes per hour, a temperature of 21.0 ± 3.0 °C (actual range: 19.0-23.1 °C), a relative humidity of 30-70 % (actual range: 43 - 71 %) and 12 hours artificial fluorescent light and 12 hours darkness per day.
Cleaning procedures in the room might have caused the temporary fluctuations above the optimal maximum level of 70 % for relative humidity. Based on laboratory historical data, these fluctuations were considered not to have affected the study integrity.
- IN-LIFE DATES: From: 03 December 2007 To: 07 January 2008
Study design: in vivo (LLNA)
- Vehicle:
- dimethylformamide
- Concentration:
- 0 %, 5 %, 10 %, 25 %
- No. of animals per dose:
- 5 animals per dose
- Details on study design:
- PRE-SCREEN TESTS:
A preliminary irritation study was conducted in order to select the highest test substance concentration to be used in the main study. In principle, this concentration should be well tolerated systemically by the animals and may give moderate irritation (grade 2) at the highest.
A series of two test substance concentrations was tested, selected from the series: 100 % (undiluted), 50 %, 25 %, 10 %, 5 %, 2.5 %, 1 % and if needed further lower concentrations using the same steps. The highest concentration, selected from this series, was the maximum concentration that could technically be applied.
The test system, procedures and techniques were identical to those used during Days 1 to 3 of the main study unless otherwise specified. Two young adult animals were selected (8-14 weeks old). Each animal was treated with one concentration on three consecutive days. Approximately 3-4 hours after the last exposure, the ear was cleaned of residual test substance with tap water and the irritation was assessed. Bodyweights were determined on Day 3. The animals were sacrificed after the final observation and no necropsy was performed.
MAIN STUDY:
Three groups of five animals were treated with one test substance concentration per group. The highest test substance concentration was selected from the preliminary irritation study.
One group of five animals was treated with vehicle.
Red staining by the test substance prevented scoring for erythema. As no signs of necrosis or oedema were present, a 25 % concentration was selected as the highest concentration that could be used in the main study.
ANIMAL ASSIGNMENT AND TREATMENT
- Name of test method:Assessment for Contact Hypersensitivity to R507-2 in the Mouse (Local Lymph Node Assay)
- Criteria used to consider a positive response:If the results indicate a SI >=3, the test substance may be regarded as a skin sensitizer, based on the test guideline and recommendations done by ICCVAM.
TREATMENT PREPARATION AND ADMINISTRATION: The dorsal surface of both ears was epidermally treated (25 µL/ear) with the test substance concentration, at approximately the same time per day. The concentrations were mixed thoroughly using a vortex mixer immediately prior to dosing.
The control animals were treated the same as the experimental animals, except that, instead of the test substance, the vehicle alone was administered. - Positive control substance(s):
- hexyl cinnamic aldehyde (CAS No 101-86-0)
Results and discussion
In vivo (LLNA)
Resultsopen allclose all
- Key result
- Parameter:
- SI
- Value:
- 1.5
- Test group / Remarks:
- 5% test substance
- Key result
- Parameter:
- SI
- Value:
- 1.1
- Test group / Remarks:
- 10% test substance
- Key result
- Parameter:
- SI
- Value:
- 1.5
- Test group / Remarks:
- 25 % test substance
- Cellular proliferation data / Observations:
CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Red staining by the test substance prevented scoring for erythema. No oedema was observed in any of the animals examined. One or both nodes of two animals at 5%, four animals at 10% and four animals at 25% were considered enlarged. The other nodes of the experimental and control groups were considered normal in size.
No macroscopic abnormalities of the surrounding area were noted.
No mortality occurred and no symptoms of systemic toxicity were observed in the animals of the main study.
BODY WEIGHTS: Body weights and body weight gain of experimental animals remained in the same range as controls over the study period.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- The SI values calculated for the substance concentrations 5, 10 and 25 % were 1.5, 1.1 and 1.5 respectively.
Since there was no indication that the test substance could elicit an SI >= 3 when tested up to 25 %, it was established that the EC3 value (if any) exceeds 25 %.
The six monthly reliability check with Hexylcinnamaldehyde, indicates that the Local Lymph Node Assay as performed at NOTOX is an appropriate model for testing for contact hypersensitivity.
Based on these results:
- according to the recommendations made in the test guidelines, R507-2 would not be regarded as skin sensitizer.
- according to the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals (GHS) of the United Nations (2004), R507-2 does not have to be classified for sensitization by skin contact
- according to the EC criteria for classification and labeling requirements for dangerous substances and preparations (Council Directive 67/548/EEC), R507-2 does not have to be classified and has no obligatory labeling requirement for sensitization by skin contact. - Executive summary:
Test substance concentrations selected for the main study were based on the results of a preliminary study.
In the main study, three groups of five experimental animals were treated with test substance concentrations of 5 %, 10 % or 25 % on three consecutive days, by open application on the ears.
Five vehicle control animals were similarly treated, but with vehicle alone (Dimethyl formamide). Three days after the last exposure, all animals were injected with3H-methyl thymidine and after
five hours the draining (auricular) lymph nodes were excised.
After precipitating the DNA of the lymph node cells, radioactivity measurements were performed. The activity was expressed as the number of Disintegrations Per Minute (DPM) and a stimulation index (SI) was subsequently calculated for each group.
Red staining by the test substance prevented scoring for erythema. No oedema was observed in any of the animals examined.
One or both nodes of two animals at 5 %, four animals at 10 % and four animals at 25 % were considered enlarged. The other nodes of the experimental and control groups were considered normal in size.
No macroscopic abnormalities of the surrounding area were noted.
Mean DPM/animal values for the experimental groups treated with test substance concentrations 5 %, 10 % and 25 % were 609, 433 and 630 respectively.
The mean DPM/animal value for the vehicle control group was 410.
The SI values calculated for the substance concentrations 5 %, 10 % and 25 % were 1.5, 1.1 and 1.5 respectively.
Since there was no indication that the test substance could elicit an SI ≥ 3 when tested up to 25 %, it was established that the EC3 value (if any) exceeds 25 %.
Based on these results:
- according to the recommendations made in the test guidelines, R507-2 would not be regarded as skin sensitizer.
- according to the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals (GHS) of the United Nations (2004), R507-2 does not have to be classified for sensitization by skin contact.
- according to the EC criteria for classification and labeling requirements for dangerous substances and preparations (Council Directive 67/548/EEC), R507-2 does not have to be classified and has no obligatory labeling requirement for sensitization by skin contact.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.