Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
short-term repeated dose toxicity: dermal
Data waiving:
study scientifically not necessary / other information available
Justification for data waiving:
other:
Justification for type of information:
There is no repeat dose dermal study on Sodium cocoamphopolycarboxyglycinate (Amines, N-(3-aminopropyl)-N’-C12-18-alkyltrimethylenedi-, N-(carboxymethyl)derivs., sodium salts with CAS no 2060541-51-5), but two valid read across studies from two 28 day oral toxicity studies according to OECD 422 are available. Based on the physicochemical properties of the substance, it is considered very unlikely that dermal absorption would exceed oral absorption, so it would be expected that the oral NOAEL would be lower than a corresponding value from a dermal study. Data from the repeat dose oral study can be used in the setting of DNELs in accordance with the REACH guidelines. As appropriate DNEL values can be calculated using the oral dosing study data, it is not justified on animal welfare grounds to perform a repeat dose dermal toxicity study.

Data source

Materials and methods

Results and discussion

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
As appropriate DNEL values can be calculated using the oral dosing study data, it is not justified on animal welfare grounds to perform a repeat dose dermal toxicity study.
Executive summary:

There is no repeat dose dermal study on Sodium cocoamphopolycarboxyglycinate (Amines, N-(3-aminopropyl)-N’-C12-18-alkyltrimethylenedi-, N-(carboxymethyl)derivs., sodium salts with CAS no 2060541-51-5), but two valid read across studies from two 28 day oral toxicity studies according to OECD 422 are available. Based on the physicochemical properties of the substance, it is considered very unlikely that dermal absorption would exceed oral absorption, so it would be expected that the oral NOAEL would be lower than a corresponding value from a dermal study. Data from the repeat dose oral study can be used in the setting of DNELs in accordance with the REACH guidelines. As appropriate DNEL values can be calculated using the oral dosing study data, it is not justified on animal welfare grounds to perform a repeat dose dermal toxicity study.