Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Physical & Chemical properties

Particle size distribution (Granulometry)

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Reference
Endpoint:
particle size distribution (granulometry)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
24 April 2008 and 19 September 2008
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Study conducted in compliance with GLP and agreed protocols, with no or minor deviations from standard test guidelines and/or minor methodological deficiencies, which do not affect the quality of relevant results.
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 110 (Particle Size Distribution / Fibre Length and Diameter Distributions)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: EC JRC Guidance Document on the Determination of Particle Size Distribution, Fibre Length and Diameter Distribution of Chemical Substance
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
Date of Signature: 15/10/2007; Date of Inspection: 21/08/2007
Type of method:
cascade impaction
Remarks:
with a sieve method screening test
Type of distribution:
volumetric distribution
Remarks on result:
not determinable
Remarks:
Too few particles were of a size < 10.0 µm to allow accurate assessment of mass median aerodynamic diameter
No.:
#1
Size:
< 100 µm
Distribution:
77.1 %
No.:
#2
Size:
< 10 µm
Distribution:
1.81 %
No.:
#3
Size:
< 5.5 µm
Distribution:
0.463 %

Screening test (sieve method)

The results of the sieving procedure are shown in the following table:

Sieve aperture size (µm)

100

Mass of test material transferred to sieve (g)

10.94

Mass of test material passed through sieve (g)

8.44

Test material less than sieve aperture size (%)

77.1

 

Definitive test (cascade impactor method)

Determination 1

The results of the cascade impactor method are shown in the following table:

Determination 1

Cup Number

ParticleCollected (µm)

Cup Masses (g)

Pre-sampling

Post-sampling

Difference

1

>10.0

86.1395

88.8327

2.6932

2

5.5 - 10.0

85.4426

85.4860

0.0434

3

2.4 - 5.5

85.8855

85.8948

0.0093

4

1.61 - 2.4

85.5868

85.5908

0.0040

5

0.307 - 1.61

85.7493

85.7519

0.0026

Filter

<0.307

75.1227

75.1245

0.0018

Amount of test material found in artificial throat: 0.11 g.
Total amount of test material recovered from impactor cups, filter and artificial throat: 2.8643 g.

The cumulative amounts found for the individual particle size cut-points (µm) are shown in the following table:

Determination 1

Cup Number

Particle Size Cut-points (µm)

Cumulative Mass of Test Material (g)

Cumulative Amount of Test Material (%)

2

10.0

0.0611

2.13

3

5.5

0.0177

0.618

4

2.4

0.0084

0.293

5

1.61

0.0044

0.154

Filter

0.307

0.0018

6.28 x 10-2

 


Determination 2

The results of the cascade impactor method are shown in the following table:

Determination 2

Cup Number

ParticleCollected (µm)

Cup Masses (g)

Pre-sampling

Post-sampling

Difference

1

>10.0

86.1113

88.9036

2.7923

2

5.5 - 10.0

85.4474

85.4906

0.0432

3

2.4 - 5.5

85.8807

85.8893

0.0086

4

1.61 - 2.4

85.6019

85.6047

0.0028

5

0.307 - 1.61

85.7342

85.7358

0.0016

Filter

<0.307

75.1130

75.1154

0.0024

Amount of test material found in artificial throat: 0.14 g.
Total amount of test material recovered from impactor cups, filter and artificial throat: 2.9909 g.

The cumulative amounts found for the individual particle size cut-points (µm) are shown in the following table:

Determination 2

Cup Number

Particle Size Cut-points (µm)

Cumulative Mass of Test Material (g)

Cumulative Amount of Test Material (%)

2

10.0

0.0586

1.96

3

5.5

0.0154

0.515

4

2.4

0.0068

0.227

5

1.61

0.0040

0.134

Filter

0.307

0.0024

8.02 x 10-2

 


Determination 3

The results of the cascade impactor method are shown in the following table:

Determination 3

Cup Number

Particle Collected (µm)

Cup Masses (g)

Pre-sampling

Post-sampling

Difference

1

>10.0

86.1210

88.9876

2.8666

2

5.5 - 10.0

85.4231

85.4549

0.0318

3

2.4 - 5.5

85.8856

85.8910

0.0054

4

1.61 - 2.4

85.5985

85.5991

0.0006

5

0.307 - 1.61

85.7456

85.7456

0

Filter

<0.307

75.1085

75.1100

0.0015

Amount of test material found in artificial throat: 0.04 g.
Total amount of test material recovered from impactor cups, filter and artificial throat: 2.9459 g.

The cumulative amounts found for the individual particle size cut-points (µm) are shown in the following table:

Determination 3

Cup Number

Particle Size Cut-points (µm)

Cumulative Mass of Test Material (g)

Cumulative Amount of Test Material (%)

2

10.0

0.0393

1.33

3

5.5

0.0075

0.255

4

2.4

0.0021

7.13 x 10-2

5

1.61

0.0015

5.09 x 10-2

Filter

0.307

0.0015

5.09 x 10-2

The overall cumulative amounts of test material with a particle size less than 10.0 µm (%) from Determinations 1 to 3 are shown in the following table:

Determination

Cumulative Amount of Test Material

Less Than 10.0 µm (%)

Mean Cumulative Amount of Test Material Less Than 10.0 µm (%)

1

2.13

1.81

2

1.96

3

1.33

The overall cumulative amounts of test material with a particle size less than 5.5 µm (%) from Determinations 1 to 3 are shown in the following table:

Determination

Cumulative Amount of Test Material

Less Than 5.5 µm (%)

Mean Cumulative Amount of Test Material Less Than 5.5 µm (%)

1

0.618

0.463

2

0.515

3

0.255

Discussion

Too few particles were of a size less than 10.0 µm to allow accurate assessment of mass median aerodynamic diameter.

Representative sampling was ensured by rolling the sample container for approximately 10 minutes and sampling from the top, middle and bottom prior to definitive testing.

The inhalable fraction is defined as the mass fraction of particles which can be inhaled by nose or mouth, the thoracic fraction is defined as the mass fraction of particles that passes the larynx and the respirable fraction is defined as the mass fraction of particles that reaches the alveoli.

Conclusions:
Particle size data acquired for the test material are shown below:

Proportion of test material having an inhalable particle size less than 100 µm: 77.1 % (Sieve method)
Proportion of test material having a thoracic particle size less than 10.0 µm: 1.81 % (Cascade Impactor method)
Proportion of test material having a respirable particle size less than 5.5 µm: 0.463 % (Cascade Impactor method)
Executive summary:

The volumetric particle size distribution of the test material was determined using a method designed to comply with that given in ‘Particle Size Distribution, Fibre Length and Diameter Distribution’, June 1996 European Commission technical guidance document, which satisfies the requirements of OECD Guideline 110.

Particle size data acquired for the test material are shown in the following table:

Measurement

Method

Result

Proportion of test material having an inhalable particle size less than 100 µm

Sieve

77.1%

Proportion of test material having a thoracic particle size less than 10.0 µm

Cascade Impactor

1.81%

Proportion of test material having a respirable particle size less than 5.5 µm

Cascade Impactor

0.463%


Description of key information

Proportion of test material having an inhalable particle size less than 100 µm: 77.1 %, Proportion of test material having a thoracic particle size less than 10.0 µm: 1.81 %, Proportion of test material having a respirable particle size less than 5.5 µm: 0.463 %, equivalent to OECD 110, Butler & White (2008)

Additional information

In the key study (Butler and White, 2008) the volumetric particle size distribution of the test material was determined in a method in line with the technical guidance EC JRC Guidance Document on the Determination of Particle Size Distribution, Fibre Length and Diameter Distribution of Chemical Substance which satisfies the data requirements for the method OECD 110. The study was performed using sieving and a cascade impactor. The study was performed under GLP conditions. The study was assigned a reliability score of 1 in accordance with the principles for assessing data quality outlined in Klimisch et al. (1997).

Under the conditions of the test, the particle size data acquired for the test material are:

Proportion of test material having an inhalable particle size less than 100 µm: 77.1 % (Sieve method)

Proportion of test material having a thoracic particle size less than 10.0 µm: 1.81 % (Cascade Impactor method)

Proportion of test material having a respirable particle size less than 5.5 µm: 0.463 % (Cascade Impactor method).