Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Eye irritation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
23 April - 21 May 2012
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: The study has been performed according to OECD and/or EC guidelines and according to GLP principles.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2012
Report date:
2012

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.5 (Acute Toxicity: Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EPA OPPTS 870.2400 (Acute Eye Irritation)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: Japanese Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (JMAFF), 12 Nousan, Notification No 8147, November 2000, including the most recent partial revisions.
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
Magnesium bis (2-ethylbutanoate)
IUPAC Name:
Magnesium bis (2-ethylbutanoate)
Test material form:
solid: particulate/powder
Remarks:
migrated information: powder
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): Magnesium bis (2-ethylbutanoate)
- Substance type: White powder with crystals
- Physical state: Powder
- Purity: 94.0%
- Lot/batch No.: CTO-268
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 31 January 2013
- Storage condition of test material: In refrigerator (2-8°C) in the dark
- General information: Incompatible materials: oxidizing agents
- Hygroscopic: Yes
- Volatile: No (Less than 8.0 x 10-4 Pa at 25°C)
- Test substance handling: Reactive to oxygen; store in well-sealed container
- pH: (1% in water, indicative range) 7.4-7.4

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- Source: Charles River Deutschland, Kisslegg, Germany
- Age at study initiation: Animals used withihn the study were at least 6 weeks old (one animal 7-8 weeks, and two animals8-9 weeks).
- Weight at study initiation: Body weights were at least 1.0 kg (1700, 1755 and 1833 grams, respectively).
- Housing: Individually housed in cages with perforated floors.
- Diet: Free access to pelleted diet for rabbits (Global Diet 2030 Harlan Teklad, Italy). Hay and wooden sticks were available during the study period.
- Water: Free access to tap water.
- Acclimation period: At least 5 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
Environmental controls for the animal room were set to maintain 18 to 24°C, a relative humidity of 40 to 70%, approximately 15 room air changes/hour, and a 12-hour light/12-hour dark cycle.

IN-LIFE DATES: From: 23 April - 21 May 2012

Test system

Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
other: One eye of each animal remained untreated and served as the reference control.
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL- Amount(s) applied:
53.8 mg (range 53.4 – 54.0 mg)
Duration of treatment / exposure:
Single instillation on Day 1.
Observation period (in vivo):
The eyes of each animal were examined approximately 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours and 7 and/or 14 days after instillation of the test substance
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
3 males
Details on study design:
STUDY DESIGN
The study was performed in a stepwise manner and was started by treatment of a single rabbit (sentinel). The two other animals were treated in a similar manner 3 weeks later, after considering the degree of eye irritation observed in the first animal.

TREATMENT
Animals were treated by instillation of, on average, 53.8 mg (range 53.4 – 54.0 mg) of the test substance (a volume of approximately 0.1 mL), in the conjunctival sac of one of the eyes after gently pulling the lower lid away from the eyeball. The lids were then gently held together for about one second to prevent loss of the test substance. The other eye remained untreated and served as the reference control.
Immediately after the 24-hour observation, a solution of 2% fluorescein (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) in water (adjusted to pH 7.0) was instilled into both eyes of each animal to quantitatively determine corneal epithelial damage. Any bright green stained area, indicating epithelial damage, was estimated as a percentage of the total corneal area. After the final observation, the animals were sacrificed by intra-venous injection of Euthasol® 20% (AST Farma BV, Oudewater, The Netherlands).

REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
-Washing: No

OBSERVATIONS
- Mortality/Viability: Twice daily.
- Toxicity: At least once daily.
- Body Weight: Day of treatment (prior to instillation) and after the final observation. For one animal also on Day 8 next to measurement after the final observation on Day 15. Evaluation: Provides additional information..
- Necropsy: No necropsy was performed according to protocol.
- Irritation:
The eyes of each animal were examined approximately 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours and 7 and/or 14 days after instillation of the test substance. The irritation scores and a description of all other (local) effects were recorded.
The irritation scores and a description of all other (local) effects were recorded.The irritation was assessed according to OECD 405.

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Remarks:
(opacity)
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 24, 48 and 72 hrs.
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 24, 48 and 72 hrs.
Score:
0.6
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 7 days
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Remarks:
(redness)
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 24, 48 and 72 hrs.
Score:
1.7
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 7 days
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 24, 48 and 72 hrs.
Score:
0.8
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 7 days
Irritant / corrosive response data:
Instillation of approximately 54 mg of Magnesium bis (2-ethylbutanoate) (a volume of approximately 0.1 mL) into one eye of each of three rabbits resulted in effects on the cornea, iris and conjunctivae.
The corneal injury consisted of slight dulling of the normal luster on Day 1 for all animals. No corneal opacity was observed, and treatment of the eyes with 2% fluorescein 24 hours after test substance instillation revealed no corneal epithelial damage. Iridial irritation (grade 1 or 2) was observed for two animals on Day 1 and for one animal at 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours after instillation. One of the animals showed absence of reactivity to light and reduced size of the pupil at 24, 48 and 72 hours after instillation. The irritation of the conjunctivae consisted of redness, chemosis and discharge and had completely resolved within 7 days. Bald skin around the eye was noted for one animal between 24 hours and 7 days after instillation.
Other effects:
Colouration/Remnants:
No staining of (peri) ocular tissues by the test substance was observed and no test substance remnants were seen.

Toxicity/Mortality:
No symptoms of systemic toxicity were observed in the animals during the test period and no mortality occurred.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
other: Irritating to eyes, but insufficient for classification.
Remarks:
Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
Based on these results, Magnesium bis (2-ethylbutanoate) does not have to be classified and has no obligatory labelling requirement for eye irritation according to the:
- Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) of the United Nations (2011)
- Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures