Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 203-868-0 | CAS number: 111-42-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
Description of key information
Acutely toxic for aquatic algae
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- EC50 for freshwater algae:
- 9.5 mg/L
- EC50 for marine water algae:
- 86.96 mg/L
- EC10 or NOEC for freshwater algae:
- 1.1 mg/L
Additional information
Regarding the toxicity of diethanolamine to algae, data of different studies and screening tests are available covering the freshwater species Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata, Desmodesmus subspicatus, Ankistrodesmus bibraianus as well as the marine species Phaeodactylum tricornutum. The respective results are summarized in the table below and subsequently discussed in detail:
Table: Effect concentrations of diethanolamine, determined for aquatic algae:
| Guideline | Species | Results [mg/L] |
Key Study | US EPA algal assay bottle test 600/9-78-0718 | P. subcapitata | Recalculation with ToxRat v2.10: |
Screening Tests (supporting study) BASF AG (1992) | DIN 38412-9; Re-evaluated with ToxRat v2.10 | D. subspicatus | Not neutralised: 72-h ErC10: 85.7 72-h ErC50: 107.3 Neutralised: 72-h ErC10: 2.4 72-h ErC50: 14.9 |
Screening Tests (supporting study) BASF AG (1992) | DIN 38412-9; Re-evaluated with ToxRat v2.10 | A. bibraianus | Not neutralised: 72-h ErC10: 30.1 72- ErC50: 57.5 Neutralised: 72-h ErC10: 123.9 72-h ErC50: > 100** |
Marine test (supporting study) Libralato et al. (2010) | ISO 10253; Marine algal growth inhibition test | P. tricornutum (marine) | 72-h NOErC: < 16 72-h ErC50: 86.96 |
* Not determined (n.d.), due to a multiple sequentially-rejective U-test after Bonferroni-Holm.
** The ErC50 could not be calculated due to the limited number of replicates. However, as the highest concentration tested was 100 mg/L and the ErC10 is already calculated to be > 100 mg/L, the ErC50 is concluded to be clearly > 100 mg/L.
Key study:
The most sensitive result was obtained in a GLP study following the US EPA algal assay bottle test 600/9-78-018 (1978) and using the green algae Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata (formerly Selenastrum capricornutum) (DOW Chemical, 1982). The applied calculation method for the specific growth rates by using cell count values is comparable to current guidelines, e.g. OECD 201. Therefore, the reported EC50 for cell count can be regarded as related to the internationally preferred endpoint growth rate (ErC50).
Test 1 and test 2 were re-evaluated by using ToxRat Professional v2.10.
Test 1: The 72-h ErC10 was recalculated to be 1.4 mg/L (72-h EyC10: 0.7 mg/L); the 72-h ErC50 was determined to be 9.5 mg/L (96-h EyC50: 2.7 mg/L).
Test 2: The 72-h ErC10 was recalculated to be 1.1 mg/L (72-h EyC10: n.d.); the 72-h ErC50 was determined to be 19 mg/L (96-h EyC50: 3.3 mg/L).
Supporting freshwater screening tests:
The effect of neutralised and non-neutralised test solutions with diethanolamine was examined in screening studies with Ankistrodesmus bibraianus and Desmodesmus subspicatus in 72-hour static tests following the German Industrial Standard DIN 38412, part 9 (BASF AG, 1992/1444/60, Rep. no 92/1444/60). These screening tests were selected as supporting studies. With neutralised samples, the pH values ranged from 7.7 - 8.1 at test start to 8.0 - 8.5 (without algae), respective 8.3 - 9.0 (with algae) after 72 h. In the non-neutralised samples, the pH values ranged from 7.4 - 8.8 at test start to 7.9 - 8.5 (without algae), respective 8.3 - 9.0 (with algae) after 72 h.
The measured data of the screening tests were re-evaluated with ToxRat v2.10 (BASF SE, 2015). For Ankistrodesmus bibraianus the 72-h ErC50 under non-neutralised conditions was determined to be 57.5 mg/L (ErC10, non-neutralised: 30.1 mg/L). The ErC50 for neutralised test solutions could not be calculated due to the limited number of replicates. However, as the highest concentration tested was 100 mg/L and the chronic value for neutralised test solutions is already calculated to be > 100 mg/L (ErC10, neutralised: 123.9), the ErC50 under neutralised conditions is concluded to be clearly >100 mg/L. The respective 72-h ErC50 values for Desmodesmus subspicatus were 14.9 mg/l (neutralised) and 107.3 mg/l in non-neutralised test solutions (ErC10, neutralised: 2.4 mg/L; ErC10, non-neutralised: 85.7 mg/L).
With respect to potential pH effects, these results seem to be contradictory since in one case higher sensitivity was observed under non-neutralized compared to neutralized conditions, and in the other case this was just the opposite. However, pH neutralisation was carried out in these studies to correct the pH variation associated with test substance, whereas the pH increases observed in all these tests were due to reduction in dissolved carbon dioxide in the media as the tests progressed (algal photosynthesis). It is likely that this continuing reduction in dissolved CO2 had a far greater effect on pH than preceding neutralisation for test substance. Hence, these differences in test results might also be due to intra-laboratory and/or biological variation (SIDS Initial Report for SIAM 24; Paris, France 17. - 20. April 2007).
Marine studies:
In a supporting study by Libralato et al. (2010) marine algae were tested according to ISO 10253. The test species was Phaeodactylum tricornutum. The concentration of the test item was analytically verified in the stock solution. After 72 h of exposure an EC50 of 86.96 mg/L and a NOEC of < 16 mg/L were determined.
In conclusion, diethanolamine is supposed to be acutely toxic for aquatic algae.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.