Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin irritation / corrosion

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin corrosion: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
27 - 28 Nov 2008
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2009
Report date:
2009

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 431 (In Vitro Skin Corrosion: Human Skin Model Test)
Version / remarks:
adopted 2004
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
interference with MTT not determined
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 431 (In Vitro Skin Corrosion: Reconstructed Human Epidermis (RHE) Test Method)
Version / remarks:
adopted 2016
Deviations:
not specified
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: EU Method B.40 (In Vitro Skin Corrosion: Human Skin Model Test)
Version / remarks:
adopted May 2008
Deviations:
not specified
GLP compliance:
yes

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
2-phenoxyethyl octanoate
EC Number:
607-240-0
Cas Number:
23511-73-1
Molecular formula:
C16H24O3
IUPAC Name:
2-phenoxyethyl octanoate

In vitro test system

Test system:
human skin model
Source species:
human
Cell type:
non-transformed keratinocytes
Source strain:
other: EpiDerm™; reconstructed three-dimensional human epidermis (EPI-200)
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Details on test system:
HUMAN SKIN MODEL TEST
- Model used: EpiDerm™ (Epi-200)
- Tissue batch number(s): 11208 kit H

TEMPERATURE USED FOR TEST SYSTEM
- Temperature used during treatment / exposure: 37.0 ± 1.0 °C (actual range 35.9 - 37.2 °C)

REMOVAL OF TEST MATERIAL AND CONTROLS
-Number of washing steps: 1

MTT DYE USED TO MEASURE TISSUE VIABILITY AFTER TREATMENT / EXPOSURE
- MTT concentration: 1 mg/mL
- Incubation time: 1 h
- Spectrophotometer: Multiskan Spectrum (Thermo Labsystems)
- Wavelength: 540 nm

REDUCTION OF MTT BY THE TEST SUBSTANCE
To assess the ability of the test substance to reduce MTT, approximately 100 µL of the test substance was added to a 24-well plate filled with 1 mL MTT medium. The mixture was incubated for approximately 1 h at room temperature in the dark. A negative control (sterile Milli-Q water) was tested concurrently.

FUNCTIONAL MODEL CONDITIONS WITH REFERENCE TO HISTORICAL DATA
- Viability:
Negative control: 3 min treatment (range: 1.153 - 2.003; mean: 1.61; SD: 0.22; n = 36); 1 h treatment (range: 1.298 - 2.007; mean: 1.60; SD: 0.19; n = 36)
Positive control: 3 min treatment (range: 0.075 - 0.156; mean: 0.11; SD: 0.02; n = 36); 1 h treatment (range: 0.059 - 0.178; mean: 0.09; SD: 0.02; n = 36)

NUMBER OF REPLICATE TISSUES: duplicates per incubation time and for controls

PREDICTION MODEL / DECISION CRITERIA (choose relevant statement)
- The test substance is considered to be corrosive to skin if the viability after 3 min exposure is less than 50%, or if the viability after 3 min exposure is greater than or equal to 50% and the viability after 1 h exposure is less than 15%.
- The test substance is considered to be non-corrosive to skin if the viability after 3 min exposure is greater than or equal to 50% and the viability after 1 h exposure is greater than or equal to 15%.
Control samples:
yes, concurrent negative control
yes, concurrent positive control
Amount/concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied: 50 µL

NEGATIVE CONTROL
- Amount(s) applied: 50 µL

POSITIVE CONTROL
- Amount(s) applied: 50 µL
- Concentration: 8N
Duration of treatment / exposure:
3 min and 1 h
Number of replicates:
2

Results and discussion

In vitro

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation / corrosion parameter:
% tissue viability
Run / experiment:
3 min application with the test substance
Value:
93
Vehicle controls validity:
not examined
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Irritation / corrosion parameter:
% tissue viability
Run / experiment:
1 h application with the test substance
Value:
113
Vehicle controls validity:
not examined
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Other effects / acceptance of results:
The relative mean tissue viability obtained after the 3-min and 1-h treatments with the test substance was 93% and 113%, respectively, compared with the negative control tissues.

Any other information on results incl. tables

In Table 1 the raw data are presented. Table 2 shows the mean tissue viability obtained after 3-min and 1-h treatments compared to the negative control tissues. Skin corrosion is expressed as the remaining cell viability after exposure to the test substance.

Table 1: Mean absorption at 540 nm

 

A

B

Mean

±SD

A

B

Mean

± SD

Negative control (water)

1.613

1.815

1.714

0.143

1.558

1.443

1.501

0.082

Positive control (8 N KOH)

0.082

0.091

0.086

0.007

0.064

0.075

0.070

0.008

Test substance

1.619

1.556

1.587

0.045

1.758

1.697

1.697

0.087

Values are corrected for background absorption.

SD: standard deviation

A and B: duplicate cultures

Table 2: Mean tissue viability

 

Viability [% of control]

 

3 min

1 h

Negative control (water)

100

100

Positive control (8 N KOH)

5

5

Test substance

93

113

The absolute mean OD540 (optical density at 540 nm) of the negative control tissues was within the laboratory historical control data range. The mean relative tissue viability following 3-min exposure to the positive control was 5%. The maximum inter-tissue variability in viability between two tissues treated identically was less than 15% and the maximum difference in percentage between the mean viability of two tissues and one of the two tissues was less than 8%. It was therefore concluded that the test system functioned properly.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
other: CLP/EU GHS criteria not met, no classification required according to Regulation(EC) No. 1272/2008
Conclusions:
Under the conditions of the RHE test method the test substance did not show corrosive properties.