Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
Reaction mass of N,N-ethanediylbis- Hexadecanamide, N-[2-[(1-oxohexadecyl)amino]ethyl]-Octadecanamide, Hexadecanoic acid, 12-hydroxystearic acid, reaction products with ethylenediamine, N,N-ethanediylbis-Octadecanamide and Octadecanoic acid, 12-hydroxystearic acid, reaction products with ethylenediamine
EC number: 906-763-4 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Skin irritation was tested in a study according to OECD guideline 404 in rabbits. No effects on the skin (erythema and edema) were observed in all animals at any observation time after application.
Licolub FA 6 was tested for its eye irritant properties in 3 New Zealand White rabbits.The study was performed according to OECD Guideline 405. No effects were observed in all animals 24, 48 and 72 hours after application. The only effect report was redness of the conjunctivae (mean score 1) which was fully reversible.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2006
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- With the exception that the test item was put on a surgical gauze patch of approximately 4 cm x 4 cm (instead of 6 cm²) to guarantee a good contact and uniform distribution of the test item on the skin, the study procedures described in this report meet or exceed the requirements of the following guidelines:
OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals, Section 4, number 404 "Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion", adopted April 24, 2002.
Commission Directive 2004/73/EC, B.4. "Acute Toxicity: Dermal Irritation/Corrosion", April 29, 2004. - GLP compliance:
- yes
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Harlan Netherlands BV
- Age at study initiation: 14 - 15 weeks (male); 13 - 15 weeks (females)
- Housing: Individually in stainless steel cages equipped with feed hoppers and drinking water bowls. Wood blocks (RCC Ltd, Füllinsdorf) and haysticks 4642 (batch no. 77/05, Provimi Kliba AG) were provided for gnawing.
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Pelleted standard Provimi Kliba 3418 rabbit maintenance diet ad libitum (batch no. 85/05) provided by Provimi Kliba AG, CH-4303 Kaiseraugst.
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Community tap water from Füllinsdorf, ad libitum.
- Acclimation period: 24-MAY-2006 to 28-MAY-2006
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 17-23 °C
- Humidity (%): 30-70 %
- Air changes (per hr): 10-15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
IN-LIFE DATES:
From: 24.05. To: 01.06.2006 - Type of coverage:
- semiocclusive
- Preparation of test site:
- clipped
- Vehicle:
- water
- Amount / concentration applied:
- 0.5 g (per animal) of the test item was weighed as delivered by the Sponsor and then moistened with approximately 0.5 mL of purified water before application. The pH of the test item was measured before the study initiation date. A formulation of a 1 % (w/w) solution was prepared. The pH was found to be 5 - 6. According to Commission Directive 2004/73/EC, B.4. and OECD Guidelines 404, a test item needs not to be tested if the pH-value is less than 2 or greater than 11.5, owing to its predictable corrosive properties.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Four days before treatment, the left flank was clipped with an electric clipeer, exposing an area of approximately 100 cm² (10 cm x 10 cm). The skin of the animals was examined one day before treatment, and regrown fur of all animals was clipped again. Animals with overt signs of skin injury or marked irritation which may have interfered with the interpretation of the results were not used in the test. On the day of treatment, 0.5 g of the test item was placed on a surgical gauze patch (ca. 4 cm x 4 cm). This gauze patch was applied to the intact skin of the clipped area. The patch was covered with a semi-occlusive dressing. The dressing was wrapped around the abdomen and anchored with tape. The duration of treatment was 4 hours. Then the dressing was removed and the skin was flushed with lukewarm tap water to clean the application site so that any reactions (erythema) were clearly visible at that time.
- Observation period:
- The skin reaction was assessed at approximately 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours after exposure (removal of the dressing, gauze patch and test item).
- Number of animals:
- Number of animals per test: 3 (Animals of both sexes were used)
Age of treatment: 14-15 weeks (male); Male No. 58
13-15 weeks (females); Female Nos. 59 and 60 - Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- IRRITATION:
The test item did not elicit any skin reactions at the application site of any animal at any of the observation times (all scores 0). The individual mean score for erythema/eschar and oedema for each of the three animals was therefore 0.
COLORATION:
No staining produced by the test item of the treated skin was observed.
CORROSION:
Neither alterations of the treated skin were observed nor were corrosive effects evident on the skin. - Other effects:
- VIABILITY/MORTALITY/CLINICAL SIGNS:
No clinical signs of systemic toxicity were observed in the animals during the study and no mortality occurred.
BODY WEIGHTS:
The body weights of all rabbits were considered to be within the normal range of variability. - Interpretation of results:
- other: not irritating to rabbit skin
- Conclusions:
- Based upon the referred classification criteria (Commission Directive 2001/59/EC of August 2001), the test item is considered to be "not irritating" to rabbit skin.
- Executive summary:
The primary skin irritation potential of the substance was investigated according to OECD test guideline no. 404. The test item was applied by topical semi-occlusive application of 0.5 g to the intact left flank of each of three young adult New Zealand White rabbits. The duration of treatment was four hours. The scoring of skin reactions was performed 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours after removal of the dressing.
The test item did not elicit any skin reactions at the application site of any animal at any of the observation times (all scores 0). The individual mean score for erythema/eschar and oedema for each of the three animals was therefore 0.
The application of the substance to the skin resulted in no signs of irritation. The test item caused no staining of the treated skin. No corrosive effects were noted on the treated skin of any animal at any of the measuring intervals and no clinical signs were observed.
Based upon the referred classification criteria (Commission Directive 2001/59/EC of August 2001), the test substance is considered to be "not irritating" to rabbit skin.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2006
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Harlan Netherlands BV
- Age at study initiation: 14-15 weeks (male), 14-15 weeks (females)
- Housing: Individually in stainless steel cages equipped with feed hoppers and drinking water bowls. Wood blocks (RCC Ltd, Füllinsdorf) and haysticks 4642 (batch no. 77/05, Provimi Kliba AG) were provided for gnawing
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Pelleted standard Provimi Kliba 3418 rabbit maintenance diet ad libitum (batch no. 8/06) provided by Provimi Kliba AG, CH-4303 Kaiseraugst
- Water (e.g. ad libitum):Community tap water from Füllinsdorf, ad libitum.
- Acclimation period: 01-JUN-2006 to 06-JUN-2006
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 17-23 °C
- Humidity (%): 30-70 %
- Air changes (per hr): 10-15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
IN-LIFE DATES:
From: 01.06. To: 19.06.2006 - Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Amount / concentration applied:
- 0.1 g (per animal) of the test item reduced into a fine powder was weighed and applied undiluted as delivered by the Sponsor.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- TREATMENT:
The eyes of the animals were examined one day prior to test item administration. Animals with overt signs of ocular injury or irritation which may have interfered with the interpretation of the results were not used in the test.
On the day of treatment, 0.1 g of the test item was placed in the conjunctival sac of the left eye of each animal after gently pulling the lower lid away from the eyeball. The lids were then gently held together for about one second to prevent loss of test item. The right eye remained untreated and served as the reference control. The treated eyes were not rinsed after instillation. - Observation period (in vivo):
- The eyes of each animal were examined approximately after 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours as well as 7 and 10 days after administration. Eye examinations were made with a Varta Cliptrix diagnostic-lamp (Roth AG, CH-4153 Reinach/Switzerland).
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- Number of animals per test: 3 (Animals of both sexes were used)
Age at treatment: 14-15 weeks (male); Male No. 58;
14-15 weeks (females); Females No. 59 and 60 - Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.67
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 10 days
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- IRRITATION:
The mean score was calculated across 3 scoring times (24, 48 and 72 hours after instillation) for each animal for corneal opacity, iris, redness and chemosis of the conjunctivae, separately. The individual mean scores for corneal opacity and iris were 0.00 for all three animals. The individual mean scores for the conjunctivae were 0.00, 1.00 and 1.00 for reddening and 0.00 for chemosis for all three animals, respectively.
No abnormal findings were observed in the cornea of iris of any animal at any of the measurement intervals.
Slight to moderate reddening of the conjunctivae was noted in all animals at the 1-hour reading and persisted in two animals until the 48-hour reading. Slight to moderate reddening of the sclerae was present in all animals at the 1-hour reading and persisted in two animals until the 48-hour reading. No abnormal findings were observed in the treated eye of any animal 10 days after treatment.
COLORATION:
White remnants of the test item were observed in the eye or conjunctival sac of two animals one hour after treatment.
CORROSION:
No corrosion of the cornea was observed at any of the reading times.
BODY WEIGHTS:
The body weights of all rabbits were considered to be within the normal range of variability. - Other effects:
- VIABILITY/MORTALITY AND CLINICAL SIGNS:
No clinical signs of systemic toxicity were observed in the animals during the study and no mortality occurred. - Interpretation of results:
- other: not irritating to the eye
- Conclusions:
- Based upon the referred classification (Commission Directive 2001/59/EC of August 06, 2001), the substance is considered to be "not irritating" to the rabbit eye.
- Executive summary:
The primary eye irritation potential of the substance was investigated according to OECD test guideline no. 405. The test item was applied by instillation of 0.1 g into the left eye of each of three young adult New Zealand White rabbits. Scoring of irritation effects was performed 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours, as well as 7 and 10 days after test item instillation.
The mean score was calculated across 3 scoring times (24, 48 and 72 hours after instillation) for each animal for corneal opacity, iris, redness and chemosis of the conjunctivae, separately. The individual mean scores for the conjunctivae were 0.00, 1.00 and 1.00 for reddening and 0.00 for chemosis for all three animals, respectively.
The instillation of the test item into the eye resulted in mild, early-onset and transient ocular changes, such as reddening of the conjunctivae and sclerae, chemosis and discharge. These effects were reversible and were no longer evident 10 days after treatment. No abnormal findings were observed in the cornea or iris of any animal at any of the examinations. No corrosion was observed at any of the measuring intervals. White remnants of the test item and a slight ocular discharge were observed in the eye or conjunctival sac of two animals one hour after treatment. No clinical signs were observed.
Thus, the test item did not induce significant or irreversible damage to the rabbit eye. Based upon the referred classification criteria (Commission Directive 2001/59/EC of August 06, 2001), the substance is considered to be "not irritating" to the rabbit eye.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Endpoint summary “irritation/corrosion”
Skin irritation: 1 key study available: not irritating
Eye irritation: 1 key study available: not irritating
There is one reliable study on the skin irritancy potential. Skin irritation was tested in a guideline study according to OECD guideline 404 in 6 New Zealand White rabbits. The animals were exposed to the test substance for 4 hours. No effects on the skin (erythema and edema) were observed in all animals at any observation time after application.
There is one reliable study available on the eye irritancy potential. Licolub FA 6 was tested for its eye irritant properties in 3 New Zealand White. This study was performed according to OECD Guideline 405. No effects were observed in all animals 24, 48 and 72 hours after application with exception of slight reversible reddening of the eyes.
Justification for selection of skin irritation / corrosion
endpoint:
Well performed and reported study equivalent to OECD guideline 404.
Justification for selection of eye irritation endpoint:
Well performed and reported study equivalent to OECD guideline 405.
Justification for classification or non-classification
With reference the reported scores Licolub FA 6 has not to be classified as irritant to the skin according to the criteria laid down in the EU Classification Labelling and Packaging Regulation (1272/2008/EC).
With reference the absence of severe effects Licolub FA 6 does not have to be classified as irritant to the eyes according to the criteria laid down in the EU Classification Labelling and Packaging Regulation (1272/2008/EC).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.