Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Remarks:
Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
May 11 - August 8, 2006
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: The study has been performed according to OECD guidelines and according to GLP principles.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2006
Report date:
2006

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
Deviations:
yes
Principles of method if other than guideline:
In the modified repeat experiment according to Prival and Mitchell, only 3 tester strains were used instead of the 5 strains required in the OECD Guidance document.
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay

Test material

Reference
Name:
Unnamed
Type:
Constituent
Details on test material:
Color: Yellow
Physical state: solid
Odour: odourless
Chemical family: azo pigment
Storage conditions: room temperature (15-30°C)

Method

Target gene:
Histidine gene in S. typhimurium
Tryptophan gene in E. coli
Species / strainopen allclose all
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
Species / strain / cell type:
E. coli WP2 uvr A
Species / strain / cell type:
other: S. typhimurium TA 98, TA 100 and TA 1538
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
Standard Aroclor 1254-induced rat liver S9 mix, 10%
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
Experiment 1 - 5: 0, 21, 62, 190, 560, 1670, 5000 µg/plate
Experiment 6: 0, 21, 41, 62, 130, 190 µg/plate
Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMF
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: it was the only solvent completely dissolving the test substance.
Controlsopen allclose all
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Remarks:
DMF
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
sodium azide
Remarks:
without S9; TA100 and TA1535 (5 µg/plate)

Migrated to IUCLID6: in water
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
methylmethanesulfonate
Remarks:
without S9; E-coli (1 µg/plate)

Migrated to IUCLID6: in water
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
2-nitrofluorene
Remarks:
without S9; TA98 (5 µg/plate)

Migrated to IUCLID6: in DMSO
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
9-aminoacridine
Remarks:
without S9; TA1537 (100 µg/plate)

Migrated to IUCLID6: HCl form in DMSO
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
benzo(a)pyrene
Remarks:
with S9; TA98, TA100 and TA1537 (5 µg/plate)

Migrated to IUCLID6: in DMSO
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
other: 2-aminoanthracene in DMSO
Remarks:
with S9; E-coli (100 µg/plate)
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
cyclophosphamide
Remarks:
with S9; TA1535 (100 µg/plate)

Migrated to IUCLID6: monohydrate form in water
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation) for experiment 1 and preincubation for experiments 2-6

DURATION
- Preincubation period: 30 minutes
- Exposure duration: 48-72 hours

NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: triplicate testing

DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: bacterial background lawn evaluation
Evaluation criteria:
Positive result:
a) a concentration-related increase over the range tested
b) a reproducible increase in at least one or more concentrations in the number of revertant colonies per plate in at least one strain with or without S9.
Negative result: if a result does not meet the above criteria, it is concluded as negative.
Equivocal result: if no definite judgement can be made to fit the above criteria, even after repeated experiments.
Statistics:
Statistical analysis may be applied to numbers suspected to be abnormally high or to have a dose-related increase in revertant counts (Mahon et al, 1989).

Results and discussion

Test resultsopen allclose all
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1538
Metabolic activation:
with
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Species / strain:
E. coli WP2 uvr A
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Precipitation: observed at 560, 1670 and 5000 mg/plate. At the highest dose the precipitate may have interfered with revertant colony counting.

The number of revertants per plate of TA100 in Experiment 5 was slightly out of the range of the solvent control at one concentration, 0.062 mg/plate. Although it showed statistical significance when compared with its solvent control by Dunnett's analysis, this data series did not show any trend of dose-response relationship, indicating that it was unlikely due to treatment with the substance. Secondly, the result was not reproduced in experiment 6. In this confirmatory experiment, the exposure concentrations covered nearly one order of magnitude, centering around 0.062 mg per plate. The interval between doses was smaller than what was used in the previous experiments in order to demonstrate a possible dose-response relationship. The number of revertants from plates treated with the substance were all within range of the solvent control. This result supports the assumption that the observation of TA100 in Experiment 5 at 0.062 mg/plate was probably not a manifestation of mutagenicity of the test substance.

COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA:
The negative and strain-specific positive control values were within the laboratory historical control data
ranges indicating that the test conditions were adequate and that the metabolic activation system functioned
properly.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative

The bacterial reverse mutation assay as presented includes the metabolic activation experiment as recommended by Pival and Mitchell - for addressing the potential mutagenic effects of azo compounds such as the test substance. The three tester strains used, instead of the recommended five, in the modified activation experiment cover both the frame shift and the base-pair substitution reverse mutations.
It was concluded that the test substance was not mutagenic to S. typhimurium strains, TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537 and TA1538 and E. coli WP2 uvrA in the absence and presence of standard and modified S9 mixtures.