Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
genetic toxicity in vitro
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
other information

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
other: EPAR Scientific discussion
Title:
Viread - EPAR Scientific discussion
Year:
2006
Bibliographic source:
European Medicines Agency

Materials and methods

GLP compliance:
yes

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
202138-50-9
Cas Number:
202138-50-9
IUPAC Name:
202138-50-9

Method

Target gene:
In vitro mouse lymphoma assay and an in vitro UDS test on rats hepatic cells.
Species / strainopen allclose all
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 1535
Species / strain / cell type:
other: rats hepatic cells
Metabolic activation:
with and without

Results and discussion

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative

Mutagenicity: Ames test negative, mutagenic in the “in vitro” mouse lymphoma assay. Negative in “in vivo”
mouse micronucleus assay.
The mutagenic potential of tenofovir DF was evaluated in a standard battery of in vitro and in vivo
tests. Tenofovir DF was positive in the in vitro mouse lymphoma assay, equivocal in the Ames tests
(positive in one assay using the strain of Salmonella typhimurium TA 1535 with or without
activation). Tenofovir DF was negative in the in vivo micronucleus assay in mouse (doses up to 2000
mg/kg orally). To clarify these findings and complete the information on the genotoxicity of tenofovir
DF, additional in vitro and in vivo UDS test on rats hepatic cells have been performed in order to
assess the ability of tenofovir DF (or metabolites) to cause DNA damage by measuring UDS induced
in vivo in primary hepatocytes cultured in vitro. The tenofovir DF was considered as weakly positive
in this assay, showing that tenofovir can induce DNA damage and supporting the previous mutagenic
potential results. These results will have to be considered in the light of the final assessment of the
rodent carcinogenicity studies.