Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Skin, rabbit (OECD 404): not irritating

Eye, rabbit (OECD 405): not irritating

The hazard assessment is based on the data currently available. New studies with the registered substance and/or other member substances of the glycol esters category will be conducted in the future. The finalised studies will be included in the technical dossier as soon as they become available and the hazard assessment will be re-evaluated accordingly.

For further details, please refer to the category concept document attached to the category object (linked under IUCLID section 0.2) showing an overview of the strategy for all substances within the glycol esters category.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin irritation / corrosion

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
27 Jun to 08 Aug 1989
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study with acceptable restrictions
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
Version / remarks:
adopted in 1981
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
purity not reported; assessed 24, 48 and 72h after application, not after patch removal
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
Version / remarks:
adopted in 2015
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
Limited documentation details, no rationale for in vivo testing
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: 67/548/CEE
GLP compliance:
yes
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Elevage des Feuilletas
- Age at study initiation: not given
- Weight at study initiation: 2 +/- 0.2 kg
- Housing: individual in stainless steel cages (61 x 46 x 34 cm), grid floor
- Diet: rabbit feed, ad libitum
- Water: tap water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 4 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 +/- 5
- Humidity (%): 55 +/- 25
- Air changes (per hr): 14
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light):12/12

IN-LIFE DATES: From: 27 Jun to 03 Jul 1989
Type of coverage:
semiocclusive
Preparation of test site:
clipped
Remarks:
with a fine comb electric clipper to obtain a skin area of approx. 14 x 14 cm
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
other: contralateral side was applied with distilled water as control
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.5 mL
- Concentration (if solution): unchanged
Duration of treatment / exposure:
4h
Observation period:
7 days
Readings at 24h, 48h, 72h, 6d, and 7d after application and at 1h after removal of dressing
Number of animals:
3
Details on study design:
TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: 2.5 cm² square
- Type of wrap if used: Test substance (or water on contralateral body side) was applied on a Codex hydrophilic eight layer gauze, about 2.5 cm², which was laid down on the skin. The gauze was kept in contact with skin using a hypoallergenic microporous adhesive strip. The whole was then covered with a stretchable band (fixed with adhesive tape) wrapped round the animal.

REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): none

OBSERVATION TIME POINTS
1 hour after removal of dressing; 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours, 6 days, and 7 days after application

SCORING SYSTEM:
- Method of calculation: erythema and edema scores from 0-4.
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #1
Remarks:
mean over
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.66
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 72 hours
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #2
Remarks:
mean over
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.66
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 72 hours
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #3
Remarks:
mean over
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
1
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 6 days
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal: #1 and #2
Remarks:
mean over
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: reversibility not applicable
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #3
Remarks:
mean over
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.33
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 48 hours
Irritant / corrosive response data:
Three animals were tested.
The individual mean erythema scores over 24/48/72 hours were 0.66, 0.66, and 1.0.
The individual mean oedema scores over 24/48/72 hours were 0.33, 0.0, and 0.0.

Erythema Draize scores, 4h semi-occlusive, 0.5 mL unchanged test substance, NZW rabbits

Animal #

24 h

48 h

72 h

Day 6

Day 7

1

1

1

0

0

0

2

1

1

0

0

0

3

1

1

1

0

0

Oedema Draize scores, 4h semi-occlusive, 0.5 mL unchanged test substance, NZW rabbits

Animal #

24 h

48 h

72 h

Day 6

Day 7

1

0

0

0

0

0

2

1

0

0

0

0

3

0

0

0

0

0

Erythema Draize scores, 4h semi-occlusive, 0.5 mL aqua dest., NZW rabbits

Animal #

24 h

48 h

72 h

Day 6

Day 7

1

0

0

0

0

0

2

0

0

0

0

0

3

0

0

0

0

0

Oedema Draize scores, 4h semi-occlusive, 0.5 mL aqua dest., NZW rabbits

Animal #

24 h

48 h

72 h

Day 6

Day 7

1

0

0

0

0

0

2

0

0

0

0

0

3

0

0

0

0

0

 

Interpretation of results:
other: CLP/EU GHS criteria not met, no classification required according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Eye irritation

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
26 Jun to 08 Aug 1989
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study with acceptable restrictions
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Version / remarks:
adopted in 1987
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
no purity reported
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Version / remarks:
adopted in 2017
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
Limited documentation, no in vivo testing rationale
GLP compliance:
yes
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Elevage des Feuilletas
- Age at study initiation: not given
- Weight at study initiation: 2 +/- 0.2 kg
- Housing: individual in stainless steel cages (61 x 46 x 34 cm), grid floor
- Diet: rabbit feed, ad libitum
- Water: tap water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 4 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 +/- 5
- Humidity (%): 55 +/- 25
- Air changes (per hr): 14
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light):12/12

IN-LIFE DATES: From: 26 Jun to 03 Jul 1989
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
not required
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.1 mL
- Concentration (if solution): unchanged product as provided by sponsor
Duration of treatment / exposure:
single instillation
Observation period (in vivo):
72 hours
Readings at 1h, 24h, 48h, and 72h after instillation
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
3
Details on study design:
SCORING SYSTEM: Chemosis (0-4), Conjunctiva redness (0-3), Iris (0-2), Cornea opacity (0-4)
Eyes were assessed 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours after instillation
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
animal: #1 and #3
Remarks:
mean over
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
other: reversibility not applicable
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
animal #2
Remarks:
mean over
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.33
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 48 hours
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
animal: #1, #2, #3
Remarks:
mean over
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
other: reversibility not applicable
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
animal: #1, #2, #3
Remarks:
mean over
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: reversibility not applicable
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
animal: #1, #2, #3
Remarks:
mean over
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: reversibility not applicable

Single instillation, 0.1 mL unchanged test substance, NZW rabbits

Conjunctivae Draize score

Animal #

24h

48h

72h

1

0

0

0

2

1

0

0

3

0

0

0

Iris Draize score

Animal #

24h

48h

72h

1

0

0

0

2

0

0

0

3

0

0

0

Chemosis Draize score

Animal #

24h

48h

72h

1

0

0

0

2

0

0

0

3

0

0

0

Corneal opacity Draize score

Animal #

24h

48h

72h

1

0

0

0

2

0

0

0

3

0

0

0

Interpretation of results:
other: CLP/EU GHS criteria not met, no classification required according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Respiratory irritation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Additional information

The hazard assessment is based on the data currently available. New studies with the registered substance and/or other member substances of the glycol esters category will be conducted in the future. The finalised studies will be included in the technical dossier as soon as they become available and the hazard assessment will be re-evaluated accordingly.

For further details, please refer to the category concept document attached to the category object (linked under IUCLID section 0.2) showing an overview of the strategy for all substances within the glycol esters category.

Skin irritation

A skin irritation study was conducted with Isooctadecanoic acid, monoester with propane-1,2-diol (CAS 68171-38-0) according to OECD guideline 404 under GLP conditions (key, 1989). 0.5 mL of the liquid test substance was applied to the clipped skin of 3 New Zealand White rabbits for 4 hours of exposure under semi-occlusive conditions. The skin irritation effects were scored 1, 20, 44 and 68 hours after patch removal. Slight erythema (score 1) was found in 3/3 at 24 and 48 hours after application and in 1/3 animal at 72 hours after application. No erythema was found 6 and 7 days after application. The individual mean erythema scores over 24/48/72 hours were 0.66, 0.66, and 1.0. Slight oedema was found in 1/3 animals at 24 hours after application. The individual mean oedema scores over 24/48/72 hours were 0.33, 0.0, and 0.0. The results of the study did not meet CLP/EU GHS criteria for a skin irritating potential.

 

Eye irritation

Isooctadecanoic acid, monoester with propane-1,2-diol (CAS 68171-38-0) was examined for its eye irritation potential in a study performed according to OECD guideline 405 under GLP conditions (key, 1989). 0.1 mL of undiluted test substance was instilled into one eye of each of 3 New Zealand White rabbits. The animals were observed for 72 hours and scoring according to Draize was performed 1, 24, 48, and 72 hours after instillation. Slight conjunctival redness (score 1) was seen in 1/3 rabbits at 24 hours. The effect had cleared completely within 48 hours. The individual mean conjunctivae scores over 24/48/72 hours were 0.33, 0.0, and 0.0. No other eye irritation effects were observed in any rabbit at any time point. The individual mean iris, chemosis, and cornea opacity scores over 24/48/72 hours were 0.0 in all three animals. Under the conditions of the study, the test substance showed no eye irritating potential.

 

Overall conclusion for skin and eye irritation

No skin or eye irritation potential was shown for Isooctadecanoic acid, monoester with propane-1,2-diol (CAS 68171-38-0).

Justification for classification or non-classification

The available data on skin and eye irritation do not meet the classification criteria according to Regulation (EC) 1272/2008, and are therefore conclusive but not sufficient for classification.