Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vitro
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2018
Report date:
2018

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 442D (In Vitro Skin Sensitisation: ARE-Nrf2 Luciferase Test Method)
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of study:
direct peptide reactivity assay (DPRA)

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Disodium piperazine-1,4-diethanesulphonate
EC Number:
278-562-3
EC Name:
Disodium piperazine-1,4-diethanesulphonate
Cas Number:
76836-02-7
Molecular formula:
C8H18N2O6S2.2Na
IUPAC Name:
disodium 2-[4-(2-sulfonatoethyl)piperazin-1-yl]ethane-1-sulfonate
Test material form:
solid: particulate/powder
Specific details on test material used for the study:
Chemical name 1,4 piperazinediethanesulfonic acid disodium salt
CAS number 76836-02-7
Purity/Composition ≥ 98%
UVCB: No

In vitro test system

Details on the study design:
For the DPRA assay, 1,4 piperazinediethanesulfonic acid disodium salt dissolved completely in milli-Q, no precipitate was observed in any of the samples. Furthermore, no co-elution of the test item and the peptides occurred.

Results and discussion

In vitro / in chemico

Resultsopen allclose all
Parameter:
other: Cystine Reactivity Assay
Value:
0.1
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation
Parameter:
other: lysine reactivity assay
Value:
0.8
Parameter:
other: mean of the synthetic peptides containing either cysteine (SPCC) or lysine (SPCL) depletion
Value:
0.5

Any other information on results incl. tables

In the cysteine reactivity assay the test item showed 0.1 ± 0.2% SPCC depletion while in the lysine reactivity assay the test item showed 0.8 ± 1.2% SPCL depletion. The mean of the synthetic peptides containing either cysteine(SPCC) or lysine (SPCL) depletion was 0.5% and as a result the test item was considered to be negative in the DPRA and classified in the “no or minimal reactivity class”when using the Cysteine 1:10 / Lysine 1:50 prediction model.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Executive summary:

The objective of this study was to reach an overall conclusion on the endpoint skin sensitization based on all available relevant information, including in silico/in chemico/in vitro data. A DPRA assay assay were performed in accordance with Section 8.3 of Annex VII of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 as amended in Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/1688 of 20 September 2016 and the strategy presented in ECHA Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment Chapter R.7a. The test item 1,4 piperazinediethanesulfonic acid disodium salt was negative in the DPRA, therefore it can be concluded that the substance will not interfere with protein moieties. Based on the current data-set it is concluded that there are no indications that 1,4 piperazinediethanesulfonic acid disodium salt has skin sensitizing properties. The data are considered sufficient to conclude that the substance does not have to be classified for skin sensitizing properties