Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin irritation / corrosion

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
17 January 2012 - 23 January 2012
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Justification for type of information:
The information is used for read across to Ethylphenylglycidate

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2012
Report date:
2012

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 439 (In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Test Method)
Version / remarks:
22 July 2010
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
Ethyl 2,3-epoxy-3-phenylbutyrate
EC Number:
201-061-8
EC Name:
Ethyl 2,3-epoxy-3-phenylbutyrate
Cas Number:
77-83-8
Molecular formula:
C12H14O3

In vitro test system

Test system:
human skin model
Source species:
human
Cell type:
other: epidermal keratinocytes
Cell source:
other: SkinEthic Laboratories, Lyon, France.
Source strain:
other: Not applicable
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Details on test system:
RECONSTRUCTED HUMAN EPIDERMIS (RHE) TISSUE
- Model used: EPISKIN Small ModelTM, 0.38 cm^2
- Ten μL of the undiluted test substance was added into 12-well plates on top of the skin tissues.
- The test item was applied topically to the corresponding tissues ensuring uniform covering.

TEMPERATURE USED FOR TEST SYSTEM
- Temperature used during treatment / exposure: approximately 37.0°C

PRE-TEST PROCEDURE:
Assessment of Direct Test Item Reduction of MTT
MTT Salt Metabolism, Cell Viability Assay
The MTT assay, a colourimetric method of determining cell viability, is based on reduction of the yellow tetrazolium salt (3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyl-tetrazolium bromide) to a blue formazan dye by mitochondrial succinate dehydrogenase in viable cells.
One limitation of the assay is possible interference of the test item with MTT. A test item may directly reduce MTT, thus mimicking dehydrogenase activity of the cellular mitochondria. This property of the test item is only a problem, if at the time of the MTT test (after rinsing) there are still sufficient amounts of the test item present on or in the tissues. In this case, the true metabolic MTT reduction and the false direct MTT reduction can be differentiated and quantified.
Test for Direct MTT Reduction + colour interference:
10 μL of the test item was added to 2 mL of a 0.3 mg/ml MTT solution freshly prepared in assay medium. The solution was incubated in the dark at 37ºC, 5% CO2 in air for 3 hours. Untreated MTT solution was used as a control.
If the MTT solution containing the test item turns blue, the test item is presumed to have reduced the MTT.

PRE-INCUBATION:
2 mL of maintenance medium, warmed to approximately 37°C, was pipetted into the first column of 3 wells of a pre-labelled 12-well plate. Each epidermis unit was transferred into the maintenance medium filled wells (3 units per plate). A different 12-well plate was used for the test item and each control item. The tissues were incubated at 37°C, 5% CO2 in air overnight.

APPLICATION/TREATMENT OF TEST SUBSTANCE:
2 mL of maintenance medium, warmed to approximately 37°C, was pipetted into the second column of 3 wells of the 12-well plate.
Triplicate tissues were treated with the test item for an exposure period of 15 minutes. The test item was applied topically to the corresponding tissues ensuring uniform covering. 10 μL of the test item was applied to the epidermis surface. Triplicate tissues treated with 10 μL of DPBS served as the negative controls and triplicate tissues treated with 10 μL of SDS 5% w/v served as the positive controls. To ensure satisfactory contact with the positive control item the SDS solution was spread over the entire surface of the epidermis using a pipette tip (taking particular care to cover the centre). After 7 minutes contact time the SDS solution was re-spread with a pipette tip to maintain the distribution of the SDS for the remainder of the contact period. The plate(s) were kept in the biological safety cabinet at room temperature for 15 minutes.
At the end of the exposure period, each tissue was removed from the well using forceps and rinsed using a wash bottle containing DPBS with Ca++ and Mg++. Rinsing was achieved by filling and emptying each tissue insert for approximately 40 seconds using a constant soft stream of DPBS to gently remove any residual test item. The rinsed tissues were transferred to the second column of 3 wells containing 2 ml of maintenance medium in each well. The rinsed tissues were incubated at 37ºC, 5% CO2 in air for 42 hours.

MTT LOADING/FORMAZAN EXTRACTION:
Following the 42-Hour post-exposure incubation period each 12-well plate was placed onto a plate shaker for 15 minutes to homogenise the released mediators in the maintenance medium. 1.6 mL of the maintenance medium from beneath each tissue was transferred to pre-labelled micro tubes and stored in a freezer at -14 to -30ºC for possible inflammatory mediator determination.
2 mL of a 0.3 mg/mL MTT solution, freshly prepared in assay medium, was pipetted into the third column of 3 wells of the 12 well plate(s). The tissues were transferred to the MTT filled wells, being careful to remove any excess maintenance medium from the bottom of the tissue insert by blotting on absorbent paper. The tissues were incubated for 3 hours at 37°C, 5% CO2 in air. At the end of the 3-Hour incubation period each tissue was placed onto absorbent paper to dry. A total biopsy of the epidermis was made using the EPISKINTM biopsy punch. The epidermis was carefully separated from the collagen matrix using forceps and both parts (epidermis and collagen matrix) placed into labelled 1.5 mL micro tubes containing 500 μL of acidified isopropanol, ensuring that both the epidermis and collagen matrix were fully immersed. Each tube was plugged to prevent evaporation and mixed thoroughly on a vortex mixer. The tubes were refrigerated at 1 to 10°C until Day 6 of the experiment, allowing the extraction of formazan crystals out of the MTT-loaded tissues.

CELL VIABILITY MEASUREMENT:
At the end of the formazan extraction period each tube was mixed thoroughly on a vortex mixer to produce a homogenous coloured solution.
For each tissue, duplicate 200 μL samples were transferred to the appropriate wells of a pre-labelled 96-well plate. 200 μL of acidified isopropanol alone was added to the two wells designated as ‘blanks’. The optical density was measured (quantitative viability analysis) at 540 nm (without a reference filter) using the Anthos 2001 microplate reader.

DECISION CRITERIA:
- A test substance is considered irritant in the skin irritation test if: The relative mean tissue viability of three individual tissues after 15 minutes of exposure to the test substance and 42 hours of post incubation is ≤ 50% of the mean viability of the negative controls.
- A test substance is considered non-irritant in the in vitro skin irritation test if: The relative mean tissue viability of three individual tissues after 15 minutes of exposure to the test substance and 42 hours of post incubation is > 50% of the mean viability of the negative controls.
Control samples:
yes, concurrent negative control
yes, concurrent positive control
Amount/concentration applied:
Test material
- Amount applied: 10 μL
Duration of treatment / exposure:
15-Minute exposure period and 42 hours post-exposure incubation period.
Number of replicates:
A total of 9 tissues were used: Triplicate tissues were treated with: test substance, positive control or negative control.

Test system

Amount / concentration applied:

- Concentration (if solution): undiluted

Positive control and details on concentration and application

Results and discussion

In vitro

Results
Irritation / corrosion parameter:
% tissue viability
Value:
115.8
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
other: The relative mean tissue viability compared to the negative control tissues (100%).
Other effects / acceptance of results:
Direct MTT Reduction:
The MTT solution containing the test item did not turn blue which indicated that the test item did not directly reduce MTT.

Quality Criteria:
The relative mean tissue viability for the positive control treated tissues was 7.7% relative to the negative control treated tissues and the standard deviation value of the percentage viability was 0.7%. The positive control acceptance criterion was therefore satisfied.
The mean OD540 for the negative control treated tissues was 0.834 and the standard deviation value of the percentage viability was 4.4%. The negative control acceptance criterion was therefore satisfied.
The standard deviation calculated from individual percentage tissue viabilities of the three identically treated tissues was 4.5%. The test item acceptance criterion was therefore satisfied.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Mean OD540 Values and Percentage Viabilities for the Negative Control Item, Positive Control Item and Test Item

Item

OD540 of

tissues

Mean OD540

of triplicate

tissues

± SD of

OD540

Relative

individual

tissue

viability (%)

Relative

mean

viability (%)

± SD of

Relative

mean

viability (%)

Negative

Control Item

0.860

0.834

0.037

103.1

100

4.4

0.792

95.0

0.851

102.0

Positive Control Item

0.063

0.064

0.006

7.6

7.7

0.7

0.059

7.1

0.070

8.4

Test Item

0.929

0.965

0.037

111.4

115.8

4.5

0.964

115.6

1.003

120.3

SD = Standard deviation

*The mean viability of the negative control tissues is set at 100 %

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
other: Not a skin irritant.
Remarks:
According to EU CLP Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008 and its amendments
Conclusions:
The relative mean tissue viability obtained after 15 ± 0.5 minutes treatment with the substance compared to the negative control tissues was 115.8%. Since the mean relative tissue viability for the substance was above 50% the substance is considered to be non-irritant.
Executive summary:

The possible skin irritation potential of the substance was tested in vitro using a human skin model through topical application for 15 minutes. The study procedures described in this report were according to OECD TG 439 guideline and GLP principles. Skin tissue was treated by topical application of 10 μL test substance. After 42 hours post incubation period, determination of the cytotoxic (irritancy) effect was performed. Cytotoxicity is expressed as the reduction of mitochondrial dehydrogenase activity measured by formazan production from (3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) MTT at the end of treatment. Skin irritation is expressed as the remaining cell viability after exposure to the test substance. Reliable negative and positive controls were included.

The relative mean tissue viability for the positive control treated tissues was 7.7% relative to the negative control treated tissues and the standard deviation value of the percentage viability was 0.7%. The positive control acceptance criterion was therefore satisfied. The mean OD540 for the negative control treated tissues was 0.834 and the standard deviation value of the percentage viability was 4.4%. The negative control acceptance criterion was therefore satisfied. The standard deviation calculated from individual percentage tissue viabilities of the three identically treated tissues was 4.5%. The test item acceptance criterion was therefore satisfied. The relative mean tissue viability obtained after 15 ± 0.5 minutes treatment with the substance compared to the negative control tissues was 115.8%. Since the mean relative tissue viability for the substance was above 50% the substance is considered to be non-irritant.