Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

LD50 (oral, rat): > 2000 mg/kg bw (BASF SE, 2015)

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Acute toxicity: via oral route

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
acute toxicity: oral
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 423 (Acute Oral toxicity - Acute Toxic Class Method)
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Test type:
acute toxic class method
Limit test:
yes
Species:
rat
Strain:
Wistar
Sex:
female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Wiga GmbH, Germany
- Age at study initiation: young adult animals (approx. 10 weeks)
- Weight at study initiation: animals of comparable weight (+/- 20% of the mean weight)
- Housing: single housing, Makrolon cage, type III
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): VRF1(P); SDS Special Diets Services, 67122 Altrip, Germany)
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): tap water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least 5 days before the beginning of the experimental phase

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22°C +/- 3°C
- Humidity (%): 30 – 70%
- Air changes (per hr): fully air-conditioned
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Doses:
2000 mg/kg
No. of animals per sex per dose:
3
Control animals:
no
Details on study design:
- Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days
- Other examinations performed: clinical signs, body weight,pathology
Sex:
female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
> 2 000 mg/kg bw
Based on:
test mat.
Mortality:
No mortality occurred in the first and second test group.
Clinical signs:
In only one animal of the first test group impaired general state and piloerection were observed from hour 2 until hour 5 after administration.
Body weight:
The mean body weight increased within the normal range throughout the study period.
Gross pathology:
There were no macroscopic pathological findings in all animals sacrificed at the end of the observation period.

Mortality

Dose (mg/kg bw):

2000

2000

Sex:

Female

Female

Administration:

1

2

No. of animals

3

3

Mortality (animals):

No mortality

No mortality

Under the conditions of this study the median lethal dose of 5-methyl oxazolidin-2-one after oral administration was found to be greater than 2000 mg/kg bw in rats.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed
Dose descriptor:
discriminating dose
Value:
2 000 mg/kg bw
Quality of whole database:
GLP guideline study

Additional information

In an acute oral toxicity study performed according to the Acute Toxic Class method (OECD 423), 2000 mg/kg bw of the undiluted test item 5-methyl oxazolidin-2-one were administered by gavage to two test groups of three fasted Wistar rats each. Clinical signs occurred within the first 5 hours after administration: 2000 mg/kg (first and second test group): impaired general state in one animal and piloerection in one animal. No mortality occurred in the first and second test group.

The mean body weight increased within the normal range throughout the study period. There were no macroscopic pathological findings at the end of the observation period. The acute oral LD50 was calculated to be > 2000 mg/kg bw (BASF SE, 2015).

Justification for selection of acute toxicity – oral endpoint
only available study

Justification for classification or non-classification

Based on the results, the test item was not classified and labelled according to Directive 67/548/EEC (DSD) and Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 (CLP).