Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Workers - Hazard via inhalation route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
1.8 mg/m³
Most sensitive endpoint:
repeated dose toxicity
DNEL related information
Overall assessment factor (AF):
10
Modified dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEC
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
exposure based waiving
DNEL related information

Local effects

Acute/short term exposure
DNEL related information

Workers - Hazard via dermal route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
0.25 mg/kg bw/day
Most sensitive endpoint:
repeated dose toxicity
DNEL related information
Overall assessment factor (AF):
40
Modified dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEL
Acute/short term exposure
DNEL related information

Workers - Hazard for the eyes

Additional information - workers

Industrial exposure to 4,6-bis(dodecylthiomethyl)-o-cresol is considered to be low in general, as the substance is a low melting point solid with a low vapour pressure.

Since the substance did not show adverse effects in limit tests for acute systemic and local toxicity, no DNELs were derived for these endpoints.

The most sensitive endpoint for long-term exposure is repeated dose toxicity. For the substance, no adverse effects were observed at the limit dose upon subacute oral exposure. A 90-day study is available for the analogue substance in rats and dogs. Both species showed responses of the liver. The DNEL is therefore derived from the NOEL of 10 mg/kg bw . The NOAEL may be 100 mg/kg bw, but effects are borderline, so 10 mg/kg bw is used for calculation. A quality factor of 1 is assigned because all studies are GLP and OECD testing guideline compliant studies. The remaining differences factor for intraspecies is not applied because two species were tested and the NOEL is used as a starting point. In addtion, the target substance was less hazardous upon subacute exposure. The NOEL is lower than tested doses in the studies for reproductive toxicity and therefore adequate for these endpoints as well.

DNEL Calculation - Workers

The derivation of DNEL is based on the above described NOAEC as described in R8 (ECHA, May 2008).

 

- Inhalative route – Long-term exposure.

For derivation of the worker inhalative DNEL, a route to route extrapolation of the above NOAEL was performed, and different assessment factors were applied as described below:

 

Long term systemic DNEL derivation (inhalation route)

Description

Values

Remark

Relevant dose descriptor

NOEL: 10 mg/kg bw/day

OECD Guideline 408; rat, 90 days

Modification of the starting point

0.38 m3/kg bw

Conversion into NOAEC

6.7 m3/10 m3

Light activity

Assessment factors

Exposure duration

2

Subchronic to chronic

Interspecies

1

Included in route-to-route extrapolation

No remaining factor for interspecies taken, because two species tested and most sensitive species chosen.

Intraspecies

5

worker

DNEL

Derivation equation and value

For workers

 10 mg/kg bw/day / 0.38m³/kg bw/day * 6.7m³/10m³ / (2 x 1 x 5 *1)

= 1.8 mg/m³

  

- Dermal route

The DNELs for dermal long term exposure of workers are also derived from the NOELs obtained in a subchronic oral study mentioned above. Extrapolation from oral to the dermal route has been performed assuming that 100 % of the amount applied is systemically available.

 

Long term systemic DNEL derivation (dermal route)

Description

Values

Remark

Relevant dose descriptor

NOEL: 10 mg/kg bw/day

OECD Guideline 409; dogs, 90 days

Modification of the starting point

Not applicable

Assessment factors

Exposure duration

2

Subchronic to chronic

Interspecies

4

 

No remaining factor for interspecies taken, because two species tested and most sensitive species chosen

Intraspecies

5

workers

Route to route

1

Assuming equal absorption

DNEL

Derivation equation and value

For workers

 10 mg/kg bw/day / (2 x 4 x 5 x 1) = 0.25 mg/kg bw/day

 

General Population - Hazard via inhalation route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
exposure based waiving
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
exposure based waiving
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
exposure based waiving
Acute/short term exposure
DNEL related information

General Population - Hazard via dermal route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
0.13 mg/kg bw/day
Most sensitive endpoint:
repeated dose toxicity
DNEL related information
Overall assessment factor (AF):
80
Modified dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEL
Acute/short term exposure
DNEL related information

General Population - Hazard via oral route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
0.13 mg/kg bw/day
Most sensitive endpoint:
repeated dose toxicity
DNEL related information
Overall assessment factor (AF):
80
Modified dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEL
Acute/short term exposure
DNEL related information

General Population - Hazard for the eyes

Additional information - General Population

Exposure to 4,6-bis(dedecylthiomethyl)-o-cresol is considered to be low in general, as it is embeddded at a low percentage in articles and is non volatile. Since it is did not show adverse effects in limit tests for acute systemic and local toxicity, no DNELs were derived for these endpoints. The most sensitive endpoint for long-term exposure is repeated dose toxicity. A 90-day study is available for rats and dogs with an analogue substance. The DNEL is therefore derived from the NOEL of 10 mg/kg bw. This is conservative because the target substance caused no adverse effects upon subacute oral exposure at 1000 mg/kg bw. A quality factor of 1 is assigned because all studies are GLP and OECD testing guideline compliant studies. The remaining differences factor for intraspecies is not applied because two species were tested and the NOEL is used as a starting point.

Long term systemic DNEL derivation (oral/dermal route)

Description

Values

Remark

Relevant dose descriptor

NOEL: 10 mg/kg bw/day

OECD Guideline 408; rat, 90 days

Modification of the starting point

Not applicable

Assessment factors

Exposure duration

2

Subchronic to chronic

Interspecies

4

-

Intraspecies

10

Route to route

1

Assuming equal uptake

DNEL

Derivation equation and value

For general population

 10 mg/kg bw/day / (2 x 4 x 10x 1)= 0.13 mg/kg bw/day