Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Guideline study.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1988

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of study:
guinea pig maximisation test

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
1,3-dichloro-4-nitrobenzene
EC Number:
210-248-3
EC Name:
1,3-dichloro-4-nitrobenzene
Cas Number:
611-06-3
Molecular formula:
C6H3Cl2NO2
IUPAC Name:
1,3-dichloro-4-nitrobenzene
Details on test material:
IUCLID4 Test substance: as prescribed by 1.1 - 1.4; purity: 98%.

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
other: Pirbright-White
Sex:
female

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Inductionopen allclose all
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
other: Freud´s Adjuvant, sterile saline, vaseline, paraffin
Concentration / amount:

see: Any other Information on materials and methods
Challengeopen allclose all
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
other: Freud´s Adjuvant, sterile saline, vaseline, paraffin
Concentration / amount:

see: Any other Information on materials and methods
No. of animals per dose:
5

Results and discussion

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
control
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
5
Clinical observations:
no
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: control. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 5.0. Clinical observations: no.
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
25%
No. with + reactions:
20
Total no. in group:
20
Clinical observations:
erythema scores 1-3; edema scores 1-2
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 25%. No with. + reactions: 20.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0. Clinical observations: erythema scores 1-3; edema scores 1-2.
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
72
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
control
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
0
Clinical observations:
no
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 72.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: control. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 0.0. Clinical observations: no.
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
72
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
25%
No. with + reactions:
20
Total no. in group:
20
Clinical observations:
erythema scores: 1-3; edema scores: 0-2;
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 72.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 25%. No with. + reactions: 20.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0. Clinical observations: erythema scores: 1-3; edema scores: 0-2; .

Any other information on results incl. tables

SO-Freetext: Hoechst AG  Frankfurt 80
Hoechst AG  Frankfurt/Main

RM-Freetext:
24 bis 48 h nach der Ausloesebehandlung konnten bei allen
Tieren kaum wahrnehmbare bis mittelschwere Erytheme und
sehr leichte Oedeme beobachtet werden, die Haut war
teilweise trocken und sproede.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Executive summary:

In a sensitisation test (Maximization test) in female Pirbright-White-guinea pigs the treatment was executed as follows:

The intradermal induction treatment took place with 5 % test substance in Paraffin viscous DAB; the dermal induction treatment and the dermal challenge treatment with 25 % test substance in Vaseline white DAB.

Slight to medium-severe erythema and very slight to slight edema could be observed after 24 to 48 hours after bandage removal.

Additionally the skin was dry and rough. The animals of the control group showed no signs of irritation.

The test substance was found to be sensitizing according to EG-directive 83/467/EWG.

Therefore the substance was classified as R 43.