Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Environmental fate & pathways

Biodegradation in water and sediment: simulation tests

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
biodegradation in water and sediment: simulation tests
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Reliability:
3 (not reliable)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Non-standard, non-guideline method, limited experimental data reported.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Degradation of organophosphoric esters in leachate from a sea-based solid waste disposal site
Author:
Kawagoshi Y, Nakamura S, Fukunaga I
Year:
2002
Bibliographic source:
Chemosphere, 2002, 48, 219-225

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
no guideline followed
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Degradation of organophosphate esters in leachate obtained from a waste-disposal site. Water and sediment were collected from "oxidation" and aeration treatment ponds. Each substance was tested in 7.5 L of water or water/sediment (600 g wwt). Control-series: autoclave-sterilised purified water (Run1), oxidation pond water (Run2), and oxidation pond water & sediment (Run3). Test bottles: oxidation pond water (Run4), and oxidation pond water & sediment (Run5), aeration pond water (Run6), aeration pond water and sediment (Run7). Degradation was followed for 80 days by GC.
GLP compliance:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Tris(2-ethylhexyl) phosphate
EC Number:
201-116-6
EC Name:
Tris(2-ethylhexyl) phosphate
Cas Number:
78-42-2
Molecular formula:
C24H51O4P
IUPAC Name:
tris(2-ethylhexyl) phosphate
Test material form:
not specified
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): tris-2-ethylhexyl phosphate (TEHP)
- 0.75 mg dissolved in acetone and added to each test bottle (target nominal concentration 0.1 mg/L)
Radiolabelling:
no

Study design

Oxygen conditions:
aerobic
Inoculum or test system:
other: presumably adapted pond water or water-sediment from waste-disposal site
Details on source and properties of surface water:
- Details on collection (e.g. location, sampling depth, contamination history, procedure): Water and sediment from an oxidation pond and aeration pond at a waste disposal. The aeration pond had 6 mechanical aerators. The site was a sea-based landfill operation. The report refers to the collected water as leachate.
- Temperature (°C) at time of collection: Oxidation: 20 °C, Aeration: 20 °C
- pH at time of collection: Oxidation: 8.1, Aeration: 7.6
- Oxygen concentration (mg/L) initial/final: Oxidation: 3.2, Aeration: 5.5
- Dissolved organic carbon (mg/L): Oxidation: 36, Aeration: 37
- Colour: yellow-green
Details on source and properties of sediment:
- Details on collection (e.g. location, sampling depth, contamination history, procedure): Collected with water samples from oxidation and aeration ponds.
Duration of test (contact time):
80 d
Initial test substance concentration
Initial conc.:
0.1 mg/L
Based on:
test mat.
Parameter followed for biodegradation estimation:
test mat. analysis
Details on study design:
TEST CONDITIONS
- Volume of test solution/treatment: 7.5 L
- Solubilising agent (type and concentration if used): acetone
- Test temperature: 23-26 °C
- pH: 7.4 - 8.5
- Aeration of dilution water: Run 6&7
- Suspended solids concentration: <10 mg/L
- Continuous darkness: no

TEST SYSTEM
- Number of cultures/concentration: 1
- Method used to create aerobic conditions: Run 6&7 mechanically aerated at 5 L/min
- Method used to create anaerobic conditions:

SAMPLING
- Sampling frequency: variable

CONTROL AND BLANK SYSTEM
- Inoculum blank: purified water (Run 1)
- Abiotic sterile control: oxidation pond water (Run 2) and water/sediment (Run 3)
Reference substance
Reference substance:
other: None

Results and discussion

% Degradationopen allclose all
% Degr.:
30
Parameter:
test mat. analysis
Sampling time:
80 d
Remarks on result:
other: Control Run 1, sterilised purified water
% Degr.:
60
Parameter:
test mat. analysis
Sampling time:
80 d
Remarks on result:
other: Control Run 2, sterilised oxidation pond water
% Degr.:
100
Parameter:
test mat. analysis
Sampling time:
80 d
Remarks on result:
other: Control Run 3, sterilised oxidation pond water/sediment
% Degr.:
100
Parameter:
test mat. analysis
Sampling time:
40 d
Remarks on result:
other: Run 4; detection limit reached
% Degr.:
100
Parameter:
test mat. analysis
Sampling time:
40 d
Remarks on result:
other: Run 5; detection limit reached
% Degr.:
100
Parameter:
test mat. analysis
Sampling time:
40 d
Remarks on result:
other: Run 6; detection limit reached
% Degr.:
100
Parameter:
test mat. analysis
Sampling time:
40 d
Remarks on result:
other: Run 7; detection limit reached
Transformation products:
not measured

Any other information on results incl. tables

Approximately 80% loss reached between 10-15 days for runs 4 -7, and 0-40% for controls over the same period. [Figure 4 of report]

The decrease in the control Runs 2&3 could have been caused by chemical reaction with compounds present in the leachate. The cause of the slow decrease in Run 1 is not known. The rate of decrease in TEHP concentration for Runs 4 -7 was higher, suggesting an additional contribution from biodegradation, but this cannot be confirmed from this experiment.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Validity criteria
Validity criteria fulfilled:
no
Remarks:
Not conducted to a guideline method
Conclusions:
Primary biodegradation is possible, but cannot be confirmed by this experiment.