Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 430-550-0 | CAS number: 1671-49-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- from 2012-01-16 to 2012-02-02 (experimental phase)
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Guideline-conform study under GLP without deviations
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 012
- Report date:
- 2012
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5100 - Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test (August 1998)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- -
- EC Number:
- 430-550-0
- EC Name:
- -
- Cas Number:
- 1671-49-4
- Molecular formula:
- C8H9NO4S
- IUPAC Name:
- 4-methanesulfonyl-1-methyl-2-nitrobenzene
- Test material form:
- solid: particulate/powder
- Remarks:
- migrated information: powder
- Details on test material:
- - Physical state: White powder
- Stability under test conditions: not reported
- Storage condition of test material: Room temperature in the dark
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- Histidine for Salmonella
Tryptophan for E. Coli
Species / strainopen allclose all
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Species / strain / cell type:
- E. coli, other: WP2 uvrA pKM101, WP2 pKM101
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 Microsomal fraction
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Experiment I, without S9: 50, 150, 500, 1500, 5000 µg/plate
Experiment I, with S9: 50, 150, 500, 1500, 5000 µg/plate, 5 and 15 µg/plate in addition for strain TA1537 and WP2uvrA pKM101
Experiment II, without S9: 5, 15, 50, 150, 500, 1500, 5000 µg/plate, 1.5 µg/plate in addition for strain WP2uvrA pKM101 and WP2pKM1001
Experiment II, with S9: 5, 15, 50, 150, 500, 1500, 5000 µg/plate, 1.5 µg/plate in addition for strain WP2uvrA pKM101 and WP2pKM100 - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: dimethyl sulphoxide
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: The test item was fully soluble in dimethyl sulphoxide at 50 mg/mL . The choice of solvent vehicle was based on its ability to solubilise the test item and lack of toxicity to the bacterial systems.
Controls
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
- 9-aminoacridine
- N-ethyl-N-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine
- other: 2-aminoanthracene
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION:
Experiment I with and without S9, Experiment II without S9: in agar (plate incorporation)
Experiment II with S9: preincubation
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 60 min (Experiment II with S9)
- Exposure duration: 48 h
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 3
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: Toxic effects were evident as a reduction in the growth of the bacterial background lawns and/or number of revertants. - Evaluation criteria:
- The test item will generally be considered mutagenic to bacteria if the following criteria are achieved. If the following criteria are not achieved then the test item will be considered non-mutagenic to bacteria.
i) In all strains a two-fold increase in the mean number of revertants per plate compared to the mean value of the concurrent vehicle control.
ii) Increases in revertant numbers for all strains must be related to increases in test item concentration.
iii) A positive response in one tester strain either with or without exogenous metabolic activation is sufficient to designate the test item as a bacterial mutagen.
Although most experiments will give clear positive or negative results, in some instances the data generated will prohibit a definitive judgement about the test item activity. Results of this type will be reported as equivocal. - Statistics:
- not performed
Results and discussion
Test resultsopen allclose all
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- Lowered revertant counts (less than 0.5 fold compared to the concurrent vehicle controls) were noted at 5000 µg/plate to Salmonella strain TA1537 in the presence of S9-mix (plate incorporation methodology).
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- E. coli, other: WP2 uvrA pKM101, WP2 pKM101
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- Lowered revertant counts (less than 0.5 fold compared to the concurrent vehicle controls) were noted at 5000 µg/plate to Escherichia coli strains WP2uvrApKM101 and WP2pKM101 in both the presence and absence of S9-mix.
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Precipitation: No test item precipitate was observed on the plates at any of the doses tested in either the presence or absence of S9-mix.
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: Not performed
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA: THe number of revertants of the solvent control and the positive control lie within the hitsorical control range.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY: The test item caused no visible reduction in the growth of the bacterial background lawns of any of the tester strains in either the absence or presence of S9-mix. However, lowered revertant counts (less than 0.5 fold compared to the concurrent vehicle controls) were noted at 5000 µg/plate to Escherichia coli strains WP2uvrApKM101 and WP2pKM101 in both the presence and absence of S9-mix (plate incorporation and pre-incubation methodology) and to Salmonella strain TA1537 in the presence of S9-mix ( plate incorporation methodology). The test item was tested up to the maximum recommended dose level. - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
The test item was considered to be non-mutagenic under the conditions of this test. - Executive summary:
This GLP-study was performed to investigate the potential of the test item to induce gene mutation..The method followed was that outlined in OECD TG 471.
Salmonella typhimurium strains TA1535, TA1537, TA98, TA100 and Escherichia coli strains WP2uvrApKM101 and WP2pKM101 were treated with the test item using both the Ames plate incorporation and pre-incubation methods at seven dose levels, in triplicate, both with and without the addition of a rat liver homogenate metabolising system (10% liver S9 in standard co-factors). The dose range for the first experiment (performed using the plate incorporation method) ranged between 5 and 5000 µg/plate, depending on bacterial strain type and presence or absence of S9-mix. A second experiment (utilising the pre-incubation method dosed in the presence of S9 and plate incorporation dosed in the absence of S9) was performed at later dates using doses ranging from 1.5 to 5000 µg/plate, fresh cultures of the bacterial strains and fresh test item formulations. Additional dose levels and an expanded dose range were selected (where applicable) in order to achieve both four non-toxic dose levels and the toxic limit of the test item.
The vehicle (dimethyl sulphoxide) control plates gave counts of revertant colonies within the normal range. The positive control chemicals used in the test induced marked increases in the frequency of revertant colonies, both with or without metabolic activation. Thus, the sensitivity of the assay and the efficacy of the S9-mix were validated.
The test item caused no visible reduction in the growth of the bacterial background lawns of any of the tester strains in either the absence or presence of S9-mix. However, lowered revertant counts (less than 0.5 fold compared to the concurrent vehicle controls) were noted at 5000 µg/plate to Escherichia coli strains WP2uvrApKM101 and WP2pKM101 in both the presence and absence of S9-mix (plate incorporation and pre-incubation methodology) and to Salmonella strain TA1537 in the presence of S9-mix ( plate incorporation methodology). The test item was tested up to the maximum recommended dose level. No test item precipitate was observed on the plates at any of the dose levels tested in either the presence or absence of S9-mix.
No significant increases in the frequency of revertant colonies, in excess of twofold greater than the concurrent solvent controls, were recorded for any of the bacterial strains, for any dose level of the test item, either with or without metabolic activation.
The test item was considered to be non-mutagenic under the conditions of this test.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.