Registration Dossier

Administrative data

Endpoint:
flash point
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Secondary citation, but by peer-reviewed and recognized source. Several sources lead to similar values.

Data source

Referenceopen allclose all

Reference Type:
review article or handbook
Title:
none
Year:
2010
Bibliographic source:
GESTIS-Stoffdatenbank: Gefahrstoffinformationssystem der Deutschen Gesetzlichen Unfallversicherung. IFA.
Reference Type:
publication
Title:
none
Author:
Lewis RJ Jr
Year:
1993
Bibliographic source:
Hawley’s Condensed Chemical Dictionary, 12th Ed., New York, Van Nostrand Reinhold, p. 417
Reference Type:
publication
Title:
none
Year:
2002
Bibliographic source:
Fire Protection Guide to Hazardous Materials. 13 ed. Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association, p. 325-51

Materials and methods

Principles of method if other than guideline:
closed cup; method not further detailed
Type of method:
other: Secondary citation, but by peer-reviewed and recognized source. Several sources lead to similar values. Method not specified.

Test material

Reference
Name:
Unnamed
Type:
Constituent

Results and discussion

Flash pointopen allclose all
Flash point:
-18 °C
Remarks on result:
other: closed cup, from GESTIS, pressure not indicated.
Flash point:
-15 °C
Remarks on result:
other: closed cup, from Fire Protection Guide quoted by HSDB and Hawley’s Condensed Chemical Dictionary quoted by IARC (pressure not indicated)

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
FP = -15 to -18°C
Executive summary:

Flash point by closed cup is similar from three sources:

- -18°C according to GESTIS

- -15°C according to Hawley’s Condensed Chemical Dictionary quoted by IARC, and Fire Protection Guide quoted by HSDB.