Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 604-195-9 | CAS number: 1406-66-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicological Summary
- Administrative data
- Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
- Workers - Hazard via dermal route
- Workers - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - workers
- General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
- General Population - Hazard via dermal route
- General Population - Hazard via oral route
- General Population - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - General Population
Administrative data
Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 43.8 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 10
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 438 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- As no inhalation study is available an reliable subchronic oral study is considered appropriate for the estimation of an inhalative DNEL.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- true NOAEC applied
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- correction for duration from sub-chronic to chronic
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- already considered in route correction
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- ECHA default assessment factor
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- good quality for database
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown (no further information necessary)
DNEL related information
Local effects
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown (no further information necessary)
DNEL related information
Workers - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 125 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 40
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 5 000 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- The dermal route is typically covered by oral route information in the absence of data for this administration route.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- true NOAEL used
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- correction for duration from sub-chronic to chronic
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- allometric scaling rat to human
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- default factor
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- good quality database
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Workers - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Additional information - workers
DNEL acute
A DNELacuteshould be established for substances if an acute hazard toxicity (leading to C&L) has been identified and a potential for high peak exposures exists.
RRR-(alpha-, beta-, gamma-, delta)-tocopherol does not have to be labelled for acute toxicity and therefore, a derivation of a DNELacuteis not necessary.
DNEL long-term systemic
RRR-(alpha-, beta-, gamma-, delta)-tocopherol isnot classified for any endpoint related to systemic toxicity.
For the DNEL-derivation a NOAEL of 500 mg/kg bw was used derived from the 90-day repeated dose oral, basedon hemorrhagic diathesis in males and females (an increase in APTT, PT and fibrinogen at 2000 mg/kg).
The dermal DNELfor long-term exposure - systemic effects for workers is derived as follows:
Description |
Value |
Remark |
Step 1) Relevant dose-descriptor |
NOAEL: 500 mg/kg bw/day |
Based on hemorrhagic diathesis in males and females |
Step 2) Modification of starting point |
x 50/5
|
50% for oral absorption, and 5% absorption is assumed for dermal absorption |
Modified dose-descriptor |
500 mg/kg bw/d x 50/5 = 5000 mg/kg bw/day |
|
Step 3) Assessment factors |
|
|
Interspecies |
4
|
Allometric scaling for the rat, the additional factor of 2.5 is omitted. |
Intraspecies |
5 |
Default assessment factor |
Exposure duration |
2 |
A correction for duration from sub-chronic to chronic is required |
Dose response |
1 |
NOAEL used |
Quality of database |
1 |
good quality database |
DNEL |
Value |
|
5000 mg/kg bw/d/ (4 x 5 x 2 x 1 x 1)=125 mg/kg bw/d |
The inhalative DNELfor long-term exposure - systemic effects for workers is derived as follows:
Description |
Value |
Remark |
Step 1) Relevant dose-descriptor |
NOAEL: 500 mg/kg bw/d |
Based on hemorrhagic diathesis in males and females |
Step 2) Modification of starting point |
/0.38 m3/kg bw
x 6.7 m3/10 m3
x50/100
|
8 h respiratory volume for rat.
Correction for activity driven differences of respiratory volumes in workers compared to workers in rest.
Default 50% for oral absorption, and 100% absorption is assumed for inhalation. |
Modified dose-descriptor |
500 x 0.67 x 0.5 / 0.38 = 440 mg/m3 |
|
Step 3) Assessment factors |
|
|
Interspecies |
1.0
|
The allometric scaling is already considered in the starting point correction. The additional factor of 2.5 is omitted. |
Intraspecies |
5 |
Default assessment factor |
Exposure duration |
2 |
A correction for duration from sub-chronic to chronic is required |
Dose response |
1 |
NOAEL used |
Quality of database |
1 |
good quality database |
DNEL |
Value |
|
|
440 mg/m3/ (1.0 x 5 x 2 x 1 x 1)=44 mg/m3 |
The dermal DNELfor long term exposure - local effects for workers should be established for substances if a local toxicity (leading to C&L) has been identified and a potential for long term risks exists. RRR-(alpha-, beta-, gamma-, delta)-tocopherol does not have to be labelled for local toxicity, including irritation and skin sensitisation and therefore, a derivation of a DNELacute is not necessary.
General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 10.8 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 20
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 217 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- As no inhalation study is available an reliable subchronic oral study is considered appropriate for the estimation of a inhalative DNEL.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- true NOAEL used
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- correction fro duration from subchronic to chronic
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- already considered in rout correction
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- default value
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- good quality databse
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown (no further information necessary)
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown (no further information necessary)
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown (no further information necessary)
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 62.5 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 40
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- LOAEL
- Value:
- 5 000 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- The dermal route is typically covered by oral route information in the absence of data for this administration route.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- true NOAEL used
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- correction factor for duration from sub-chronic to chronic
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- allometric scaling for the rat
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- default value
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- good quality database
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- low hazard (no threshold derived)
- Route of original study:
- Dermal
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown (no further information necessary)
General Population - Hazard via oral route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 6.25 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 80
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 500 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- not necessary as key study uses oral administration
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- true NOAEL used
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- correction factor for duration from sub-chronic to chronic is required
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- allometric scaling for rat
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- default value
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- good quality database
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Additional information - General Population
DNEL acute
ADNELacuteshould be established for substances if an acute hazard toxicity (leading to C&L) has been identifiedanda potential for high peak exposures exists. RRR-(alpha-, beta-, gamma-, delta)-tocopherol does not have to be labelled for acute toxicity and therefore, a derivation of a DNELacuteis not necessary.
DNEL long-term systemic
RRR-(alpha-, beta-, gamma-, delta)-tocopherol is not classified for systemic target organ toxicitity
For the DNEL-derivation a NOAEL of 500 mg/kg bw/d was used derived from the 90 -day repeated dose oral, based on hemorrhagic diathesis in males and females (an increase in APTT, PT and fibrinogen at 2000 mg/kg).
The dermal DNEL for long-term exposure - systemic effects for general population is derived as follows:
Description |
Value |
Remark |
Step 1) Relevant dose-descriptor |
NOAEL: 500 mg/kg bw/d |
Based on hemorrhagic diathesis |
Step 2) Modification of starting point |
x 50/5
|
50% for oral absorption and 5% absorption is assumed for dermal absorption. |
Modified dose-descriptor |
500 mg/kg bw/d x 50/5 = 5000 mg/kg bw/day |
|
Step 3) Assessment factors |
|
|
Interspecies |
4
|
Allometric scaling for the rat |
Intraspecies |
10 |
Default assessment factor |
Exposure duration |
2 |
A correction for duration from sub-chronic to chronic is required |
Dose response |
1 |
|
Quality of database |
1 |
good quality database |
DNEL |
Value |
|
5000 mg/kg bw/d/ (4 x 10 x 2 x 1 x 1)=62.5 mg/kg bw/d |
The inhalation DNEL for long-term exposure - systemic effects for general population is derived as follows:
Description |
Value |
Remark |
Step 1) Relevant dose-descriptor |
NOAEL: 500 mg/kg bw/d |
Based on hemorrhagic diathesis |
Step 2) Modification of starting point |
/ 1.15 m3/kg bw
x 50/100
|
24 h respiratory volume for rats.
50% for oral absorption and 100% absorption is assumed for inhalation. |
Modified dose-descriptor |
500 / 1.15 x 0.5 = 217 mg/m3 |
|
Step 3) Assessment factors |
|
|
Interspecies |
1.0
|
Allometric scaling already considered in starting point correction. |
Intraspecies |
10 |
Default assessment factor |
Exposure duration |
2 |
A correction for duration from sub-chronic to chronic is required. |
Dose response |
1 |
|
Quality of database |
1 |
|
DNEL |
Value |
|
*DNEL using ECETOC AF |
217 mg/m3/ (1.0 x 10 x 2 x 1 x 1)=10.8 mg/m3 |
The oral DNEL for long-term exposure - systemic effects for general public is derived as follows:
Description |
Value |
Remark |
Step 1) Relevant dose-descriptor |
NOAEL: 500 mg/kg bw/d |
Based on hemorrhagic diathesis |
Step 2) Modification of starting point |
Not required
|
|
|
|
|
Step 3) Assessment factors |
|
|
Interspecies |
4
|
Allometric scaling for the rat. |
Intraspecies |
10 |
Default assessment factor |
Exposure duration |
2 |
A correction for duration from sub-chronic to chronic is required |
Dose response |
1 |
|
Quality of database |
1 |
|
DNEL |
Value |
|
500 mg/kg bw/d/ (4 x 10 x 2 x 1 x 1)=6.25 mg/kg bw/d |
The dermal DNEL for long-term local effects should be established for substances if a local toxicity (leading to C&L) has been identified and a potential for long term risks exists. RRR-(alpha-, beta-, gamma-, delta)-tocopherol does not have to be labelled for local toxicity, including irritation and skin sensitisation and therefore, a derivation of a DNELacute is not necessary.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.