Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin sensitisation

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Before BPL and guidelines
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.6 (Skin Sensitisation)
Principles of method if other than guideline:
ASA: in an isotonic phosphate buffer at pH7. The volume injected in each case was 0.1 ml. The 5 injections were administered on Days 0, 2, 5, 8 and 12.On Day 16, the contact solution was applied. Each time, we used a mixture of acetone-almond oil in a 1:1 ratio (V:V).
GLP compliance:
no
Type of study:
guinea pig maximisation test
Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
not specified
Sex:
not specified
Route:
intradermal
Concentration / amount:
200 and 100 mg/ml
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Concentration / amount:
200 and 100 mg/ml
No. of animals per dose:
10
Positive control substance(s):
yes
Remarks:
acetylsalicylic acid anhydride (ASAN)
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
200 mg/mL
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
0
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 200 mg/mL. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 0.0.
Interpretation of results:
not sensitising
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
ASA is not sensitizing in a guinea pig test comparable to maximisation.
Executive summary:

ASA tested at high doses ( induction at 200 and 100 mg/ml intracutaneous) in guinea pigs, with a normal amount ( 0.01%) od the sensitising impurity ASAN, was totally negative in ths assay.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not sensitising)
Additional information:

ASA being not a skin sensitiser is also considered as a non respiratory sensitiser.


Migrated from Short description of key information:
ASA was not sensitising in the guinea pig and compared to an impurity (ASAN: acetyl salicylic anhydride) which is sensitising

Respiratory sensitisation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available
Additional information:
Migrated from Short description of key information:
ASA being not a skin sensitiser is also considered as a non respiratory sensitiser.

Justification for classification or non-classification

Not a sensitizer