Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vitro

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro cytogenicity / micronucleus study
Remarks:
Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
Type of information:
migrated information: read-across based on grouping of substances (category approach)
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
15 Feb 2013 - 11 Apr 2013
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: see 'Remark'
Remarks:
GLP - guideline study. In accordance to the ECHA guidance document “Practical guide 6: How to report read-across and categories (March 2010)”, the reliability was changed from RL1 to RL2 to reflect the fact that this study was conducted on a read-across substance.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2013
Report date:
2013

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: OECD Guideline 487 (In vitro Mammalian Cell Micronucleus Test), adopted July 22, 2010
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: EU Method B.49 (In vitro Mammalian Cell Micronucleus Test), adopted July 6, 2012
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
Hess. Ministerium fuer Umwelt, Energie, Landwirtschaft und Verbraucherschutz, Wiesbaden, Germany
Type of assay:
in vitro mammalian cell micronucleus test

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Didodecyl fumarate
EC Number:
219-280-2
EC Name:
Didodecyl fumarate
Cas Number:
2402-58-6
Molecular formula:
C28H52O4
IUPAC Name:
didodecyl but-2-enedioate
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): Didodecyl fumarate; fumaric acid, di-dodecyl ester
- Molecular weight: 452.72 g/mol
- Physical state: solid
- Analytical purity: 93.8 area-% (GC-FID)
- Lot/batch No.: 0008043725
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: Dec 2013
- Stability under test conditions: not indicated by the sponsor
- Storage condition of test material: atroom temperature

Method

Target gene:
not applicable
Species / strain
Species / strain / cell type:
Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- Type and identity of media: MEM (minimal essential medium) containing Hank's salts, glutamine and Hepes (25 mM). Additionally, the medium was supplemented with penicillin/streptomycin (100 U/mL/100 µg/mL) and 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum.
- Properly maintained: yes
- Periodically checked for Mycoplasma contamination: yes
- Periodically checked for karyotype stability: yes
- Periodically "cleansed" against high spontaneous background: yes
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
co-factor supplemented post-mitochondrial fraction (S9 mix), prepared from the livers of rats treated phenobarbital/beta-naphtoflavone
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Experiment I - 4 h exposure (-S9): 0.6, 1.4, 3.6, 9.0, 22.5, 56.3, 140.8, 352.0, 880.0, and 2200.0 µg/mL (evaluated: 1.4, 9.0, 22.5, and 56.3 µg/mL)
- Experiment II - 24 h exposure (-S9): 0.6, 1.4, 3.6, 9.0, 22.5, 56.3, 140.8, 352.0, 880.0, and 2200.0 µg/mL (evaluated: 1.4, 9.0, 22.5, and 56.3 µg/mL)
- Experiment I - 4 h exposure (+S9): 0.6, 1.4, 3.6, 9.0, 22.5, 56.3, 140.8, 352.0, 880.0, and 2200.0 µg/mL (evaluated: 3.6, 9.0, 22.5, and 56.3 µg/mL)
- Experiment II - 4 h exposure (+S9): 0.6, 1.4, 3.6, 9.0, 22.5, 56.3, 140.8, 352.0, 880.0, and 2200.0 µg/mL (evaluated: 3.6, 9.0, and 22.5 µg/mL)
Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: THF
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: solubility of the test item
Controls
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
cyclophosphamide
mitomycin C
other: griseofulvin (24 h exposure)
Remarks:
-S9: mitomycin C 0.3 µg/mL (in deionised water), griseofulvin 0.8 µg/mL (in DMSO); +S9: cyclophosphamide 15.0 µg/mL (in saline)
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium

DURATION
- Exposure duration: Experiment I: 4 hours; Experiment II: 24 hours (-S9 mix) or Experiment I and II: 4 h (+S9 mix)
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 24 h
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): 24 h

STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): Giemsa

NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: duplicate cultures in 2 independent experiments

NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 1000 cells/culture

DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: proliferation index
Evaluation criteria:
A test item can be classified as non-mutagenic if:
- the number of micronucleated cells in all evaluated dose groups is in the range of the historical laboratory control data and
- no statistically significant or concentration-related increase of the number of micronucleated cells is observed in comparison to the respective solvent control.
A test item can be classified as mutagenic if:
- the number of micronucleated cells is not in the range of the historical laboratory control data and
- either a concentration-related increase in three test groups or a statistically significant increase in the number of micronucleated cells is observed.
If the above mentioned criteria for the test item are not clearly met, the test item will be classified as equivocal or a confirmatory experiment may be performed. However, results may remain questionable regardless of the number of times the experiment is repeated.
Statistics:
Statistical significance at the five per cent level (p < 0.05) was evaluated by means of the Chi square test. Evaluation was performed only for test groups showing a higher number of micronucleated cells than the respective solvent control group.

Results and discussion

Test results
Species / strain:
Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Effects of pH: No
- Effects of osmolality: No
- Water solubility: Yes (phase at ≥3.6 µg/mL (-S9) and at ≥9.0 µg/mL (+S9))
- Precipitation: Yes (at the end of treatment at ≥56.3 µg/mL in Experiment I (+/-S9) and in Experiment II (-S9) and at the end of treatment at ≥22.5 µg/mL in Experiment II (+S9)
- Phase separation: Yes (at 9.0 µg/mL and above in all experiments)

HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA (SOLVENT CONTROL):
- 4 h treatment (-S9): 0.15–1.50% micronucleated cells
- 24 h treatment (-S9): 0.05–1.50% micronucleated cells
- 4 h treatment (+S9): 0.05 – 1.70% micronucleated cells
Remarks on result:
other: all strains/cell types tested
Remarks:
Migrated from field 'Test system'.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 1: Number of micronucleated cells; Experiment I - exposure period 4 h - without S9 mix

Treatment group

Concentration per mL

Σ of micronucleated cells/2000 cells

% of micronucleated cells

Mean Proliferation index

Solvent control

(THF)

0.5%

15

0.75

2.94

Positive control

(Mitomycin C)

0.3 µg

162

8.10

2.18

Test item

1.4 µg

16

0.80

2.85

9.0 µg

18

0.90

2.84

22.5 µg

19

0.95

2.92

56.3 µg

10

0.50

2.85

 

Table 2: Number of micronucleated cells; Experiment I - exposure period 4 h - with S9 mix

Treatment group

Concentration per mL

Σ of micronucleated cells/2000 cells

% of micronucleated cells

Mean Proliferation index

Solvent control

(THF)

0.5%

24

1.20

1.98

Positive control

(Cyclophosphamide)

15.0 µg

236

11.80

1.60

Test item

3.6 µg

25

1.25

1.96

9.0 µg

38

1.90

1.96

22.5 µg

21

1.05

1.94

56.3 µg

24

1.20

2.00

 

Table 3: Number of micronucleated cells; Experiment II - exposure period 24 h - without S9 mix

Treatment group

Concentration per mL

Σ of micronucleated cells/2000 cells

% of micronucleated cells

Mean Proliferation index

Solvent control

(THF)

0.5%

10

0.50

2.75

Positive control

(Griseofulvin)

8.0 µg

153

7.65

2.63

Test item

1.4 µg

9

0.45

2.76

9.0 µg

7

0.35

2.78

22.5 µg

11

0.55

2.81

56.3 µg

7

0.35

2.72

 

Table 4: Number of micronucleated cells; Experiment II - exposure period 4 h - with S9 mix

Treatment group

Concentration per mL

Σ of micronucleated cells/2000 cells

% of micronucleated cells

Mean Proliferation index

Solvent control

(THF)

0.5%

15

0.75

2.01

Positive control

(Cyclophosphamide)

15.0 µg

49

2.45

1.42

Test item

3.6 µg

15

0.75

1.94

9.0 µg

23

1.15

2.06

56.3 µg

14

0.70

2.27

 

 

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative