Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Reference
Endpoint:
dermal absorption in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
12 Feb 2020 to 13 May 2020
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 428 (Skin Absorption: In Vitro Method)
Version / remarks:
adopted in April 2004
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Radiolabelling:
yes
Species:
other: Human Skin Donors
Sex:
female
Type of coverage:
open
Vehicle:
other: neat compound and PE polymer powder
Duration of exposure:
The exposure period was terminated at 8 h after dosing. At 24 hours post dose, i.e. after 16 hours monitoring period, each diffusion cell was dismantled and the skin removed.
Doses:
- Nominal doses: 100% and 1% (mixture with PE)
- Actual doses: 96.8% and 0.97%
- Actual doses calculated as follows: Individual doses were accurately determined by collecting (weighed) mock doses at the time of dosing.
- Dose volume: 5 mg/cm²
- Rationale for dose selection: Exposure to the test item can occur during handling of the pure compound and during processing, e.g. the incorporation into a polymer matrix. Concentrations of bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)carbodiimide to be tested within the scope of this study represent the neat product and a relevant in-use concentration. Due to the use pattern of the test item, a PE polymer matrix was selected to generate a relevant and technically feasible test mixture representing a worst-case sample of the test item. The dose volume was selected based on the maximum recommended application dose for solids (5 mg/cm², OECD Guideline 428, Section 16). Moistening the test preparations with water is a realistic exposure, as this will allow better contact between the skin surface and the solid, and is intended to mimic the operator sweating during exposure to the test item. This is recommended for solids in the OECD Guidance Document No. 28 (Section 52).
No. of animals per group:
8 samples of skin obtained from at least 4 different donors per dose
Details on study design:
DOSE PREPARATION
- Method for preparation of dose suspensions:
Test Preparation 1:
First, a mixture of non-radiolabelled bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)carbodiimide and [14C]bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)carbodiimide was prepared. An amount of 1.00039 g of nonradiolabelled bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)carbodiimide was weighed into a pre-weighed glass vial. Approximately 5 MBq of radiolabelled test item was added by adding 0.0956 g (approximately 122 μL) from the stock solution Acetone was added until all test item was dissolved. The solvent was then evaporated overnight under a gentle nitrogen gas stream until a near dry powder remained. From the final weight of the vial, a concentration of 96.7% bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)carbodiimide was calculated. The remaining powder was grinded and mixed using a spatula. By radioactivity, a concentration of 316097 ± 3751 DPM/mg was determined. The test item was homogeneously distributed within the test preparation with a CV of 1.2%.
Test Preparation 2: First, 9.03 mg bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)carbodiimide and 1.00030 g PE powder was weighed into a pre-weighed glass vail. Approximately 5.62 MBq of radiolabelled test item was added by adding 0.1089 g (approximately 139 μL) from the stock solution. Acetone was added for mixing and the solvent then evaporated overnight under a gentle nitrogen gas stream until a near dry powder remained. From the final weight of the vial, a concentration of 0.87% (non-radiolabelled) bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)carbodiimide was calculated. The remaining powder was mixed using a spatula and stored at ambient conditions, shielded from direct light until use on the following day. By radioactivity, on the day of application, a radioactive concentration of 302421 ± 111501 DPM/mg was determined. The test item was homogeneously distributed within the test preparation with a CV of 3.7%.

APPLICATION OF DOSE:
A single approximate 5 mg dose of the test preparations (5 mg/cm²) was applied to a minimum of 8 samples of skin obtained from at least 4 different donors. Prior to dose application, the skin surface was dried. The dose formulation was applied to the stratum corneum surface of the skin by weighing the target amount on a small piece of weighing paper, which was then gently ‘poured’ onto the skin surface. Distribution over the skin surface was done by gently tapping against the diffusion cell. Following application, the powder was wetted using water (approximately 1 μL/mg formulation applied, i.e., a 1:1 mixing with water) to mimic sweat on the skin surface or occlusive conditions under clothing. The ‘paste’ was distributed evenly over the skin surface using a glass rod. The donor chamber of the cells was left open to the atmosphere.
Individual doses were accurately determined by collecting (weighed) mock doses at the time of dosing. The dosing procedure was repeated for all other test preparations.

VEHICLE
- Justification for use and choice of vehicle: Due to the use pattern of the test item (exposure to the test item can occur during handling of the pure compound and during processing, e.g. the incorporation into a polymer matrix), a PE polymer matrix was selected to generate a relevant and technically feasible test mixture representing a worst-case sample of the test item.
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): please refer to details on test preparation 2
- Lot/batch no.: P28D047
- Purity: 100%

TEST SITE
- Preparation of test site: Prior to dose application, the skin surface was dried.
- Area of exposure: 1 cm²

REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing procedures and type of cleansing agent: The exposure period was terminated at 8 h after dosing. Commercial hand wash soap (50 μL) was applied to the skin and the soap gently rubbed onto the skin with a cotton swab. The skin was then rinsed with approximately 5 mL of a 2% (v/v) commercial soap solution. The soap solution was applied in aliquots (1 mL) and each aliquot was aspirated with a pipette. The skin was dried with a cotton swab. This process was repeated once.
- Time after start of exposure: The exposure period was terminated at 8 h after dosing.

SAMPLE COLLECTION
Collecting fractions of the receptor fluid at the following time intervals: 0-1, 1-2, followed by 2 h intervals until 24 h after dosing. At 24 h post dose, i.e. after 16 h monitoring period, each diffusion cell was dismantled and the skin removed.

ANALYSIS
- Method type(s) for identification: HPLC-UV-RAD for Determination of the Radiochemical Purity, all radioactivity measurements will be performed by LSC (Liquid scintillation counting)

Details on in vitro test system (if applicable):
SKIN PREPARATION
- Source of skin: obtained from elective plastic surgery was purchased from Alphenyx
- Donor information:
Batch number: 19-06-80029, 19-10-80057, 19-03-80016, 19-09-21018
Sex: all Female
Age (yrs): 44, 29, 18, 63
Race: all Caucasian
Site: Breast, Abdominal, Breast, Breast
- Type of skin: Full-thickness skin
- Preparative technique: The skin was removed from the freezer and allowed to thaw to room temperature. The skin was cut to a thickness of ca. 200-400 μm using an electric dermatome. The thickness of the skin was confirmed using a micrometer. The split-thickness membranes was wrapped in aluminium foil and stored in a freezer (≤ -15 °C) for a maximum period of 1 year.
- Thickness of skin (in mm): ca. 200-400 μm
- Membrane integrity check: A tritiated water barrier integrity test was performed. The integrity of all human skin samples was within the acceptability criteria (absorption <1.6% of applied dose of tritiated water).
- Storage conditions: The skin was shipped on dry ice and stored in the freezer (≤ -15 °C) for a maximum period of 1 year
- Justification of species, anatomical site and preparative technique: Human skin has been chosen for the safety evaluation as this is the species that will be exposed to the test item during handling and use. Split-thickness skin membranes are an acceptable test system for predicting absorption of a test item.

PRINCIPLES OF ASSAY
- Receptor fluid: The receptor fluid chosen for use in this study was phosphate buffered saline (PBS) containing polyoxyethylene 20 oleyl ether (6%, w/v), sodium azide (0.01%, w/v), streptomycin (0.1 mg/mL) and penicillin G (100 units/mL). The pH was checked and adjusted to pH 7.4.
- Solubility of test substance in receptor fluid: The solubility of bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)carbodiimide in the receptor fluid was 18.2 ± 9.3 μg/mL.
- Flow-through system: The flow-through diffusion cells were positioned in a manifold heated via a circulating water bath to maintain a skin surface temperature of 32 ± 1 °C. The cells were connected to a multichannel peristaltic pump from their afferent ports. Effluent from the cells dropped into vials on a fraction collector via tubing. The surface area of exposed skin within the cells was 1 cm², with a receptor chamber of 0.25 mL. The peristaltic pump speed was adjusted to obtain a standard flow rate of 1.5 mL/h.



Signs and symptoms of toxicity:
no effects
Dermal irritation:
no effects
Absorption in different matrices:
- Skin wash: 100%: 0.11 ± 0.23 % applied dose, 1%: 0.13 ± 0.05 % applied dose
- Skin test site: 100%: 99.0 ± 9.5 % applied dose, 1%: 96.4 ± 9.3 % applied dose
- Skin, untreated site: 100%: 0.006 ± 0.008 % applied dose, 1%: 0.009 ± 0.014 % applied dose
- Receptor fluid, receptor chamber, donor chamber (in vitro test system):
Receptor fluid: 100%: <0.013 ± 0.004 % applied dose, 1%: 0.02± 0.01% applied dose
Receptor chamber: 100%: 0.004± 0.005 % applied dose, 1%: 0.002± 0.001% applied dose
- Stratum corneum (in vitro test system):
Stratum Corneum 1-2: 100%: 2.26 ± 5.89 % applied dose, 1% 0.48 ± 0.22 % applied dose
Stratum Corneum 1-20: 100%: 2.33 ± 5.90 % applied dose, 1%: 1.95 ± 0.76% applied dose
Total recovery:
- Total recovery: 100%: 101.5± 5.7 % applied dose, 1%: 98.6± 9.8 % applied dose
- Recovery of applied dose acceptable:
100%: Overall recovery slightly outside the OECD criterion of 100 ± 10%. However, the absorption data for this replicate were highly comparable to the other replicates. The higher recovery value is very likely caused by technical difficulties involved with accurately weighing low amounts of solid formulation.
1%: The absorption data obtained for those replicates showing a lower overall recovery were highly comparable to the replicates showing an adequate recovery (>95%). Thus, it can be concluded that any missing recovery is not associated with the absorbed fractions. Variation in the individual recovery values were the result of technical issues during application (i.e., some electrostatic interaction of the PE material) and difficulties involved with accurately weighing low amounts of solid formulation.
- Limit of detection (LOD): LoD rec fluid, receptor fluid wash and skin: 0.001% of the mean applied dose per sample. LoD ts: 0.0003% of mean applied dose per sample (100% dose); LoD ts: 0.0002% of mean applied dose per sample (1% dose)
- Quantification of values below LOD or LOQ: Values below LoD were considered as equal to LoD in the calculations and presented as ‘
Time point:
24 h
Dose:
100 %
Parameter:
percentage
Absorption:
0.19 %
Time point:
24 h
Dose:
1 %
Parameter:
percentage
Absorption:
2.2 %
Conclusions:
In conclusion, following topical application of [14C]bis(2,6-diisopropyl-phenyl)carbodiimide in test preparation 1 (actual concentration 96.8%) and test preparation 2 (actual concentration 0.97%) to human skin in vitro, the absorbed dose was 0.017% (0.76 μg equiv./cm²) and 0.021% (0.009 μg equiv./cm²) of the applied dose, respectively. The 8 h dislodgeable dose was 99.0% and 96.4% of the applied dose for test preparations 1 and 2, respectively, demonstrating consistently high decontamination of the skin. The total dislodgeable dose was 99.1% and 96.5% of the applied dose for test preparations 1 and 2, respectively.
The dermal delivery of [14C]bis(2,6-diisopropyl-phenyl)carbodiimide was 0.07% (2.87 μg equiv./cm²) of the applied dose for test preparation 1 and 0.16% (0.07 μg equiv./cm²) of the applied dose for test preparation 2.
Finally, the mass balance was 101.5% (4551 μg equiv./cm²) of the applied dose for test preparation 1 and 98.6% (44.9 μg equiv./cm²) of the applied dose for test preparation 2.
Based on the same EFSA Guidance, the absorption values should be corrected to account for variability. Based on the number of replicates, a multiple of the standard deviation is added to the mean value (e.g. 0.92 for 7 replicates and 0.84 for 8 replicates). The calculated dermal absorption value for bis(2,6- diisopropylphenyl)carbodiimide from test preparation 1 would then be 0.14 + (0.92×0.05) = 0.19% (rounded to two significant numbers as per EFSA Guidance). After correction to account for variability, the calculated dermal absorption value for bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)carbodiimide from test preparation 2 would then be 1.63 + (0.84×0.63) = 2.2%.
Executive summary:

The objective of this study was to determine the dermal absorption of the test Item bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)carbodiimide, following OECD Guideline 428 in compliance with GLP. Exposure to the test item can occur during handling of the pure compound and during processing, e.g., the incorporation into a polymer matrix. Concentrations of bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)carbodiimide tested within the scope of this study represented the neat product and a relevant in-use concentration. Due to the use pattern of the test item, a PE polymer matrix was selected to generate a relevant and technically feasible test mixture representing a worst-case sample of the test item.

Split-thickness human skin samples were mounted into flow-through diffusion cells (1 cm2). Phosphate buffered saline (PBS) containing polyoxyethylene 20 oleyl ether (PEG; 6%, w/v), sodium azide (0.01%, w/v), streptomycin (0.1 mg/mL) and penicillin G (100 units/mL) with the pH adjusted to 7.4 was used as receptor fluid. The skin surface temperature was maintained at 32 ± 1°C throughout the experiment.

A tritiated water barrier integrity test was performed. The integrity of all human skin samples was within the acceptability criteria (absorption <1.6% of applied dose of tritiated water). The test preparations were applied to human split-thickness skin membranes from four different donors and the cells were left open to the atmosphere. Test item stability during dosing was confirmed by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).

Absorption was assessed by collecting receptor fluid in hourly fractions from 0 to 2 h after dosing, then in 2 hourly fractions until 24 h after dosing. At 8 h after dosing, the exposure period was terminated by washing the skin surface with a concentrated commercial hand wash soap followed by rinsing with a dilute soap solution (2%, v/v) and drying the surface with a cotton swab. At 24 h after dosing, the diffusion cell was dismantled. The skin was then removed from the flow-through diffusion cells, the stratum corneum tape stripped and the skin divided into exposed and unexposed skin. All samples were analyzed by liquid scintillation counting.

For test preparation 1 (neat compound), the absorption of [14C]bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)carbodiimide into the receptor fluid within the first half of the study was 66 ± 9% of the total absorption into the receptor fluid at 24 h. As this is below 75% as defined in the EFSA Guidance on Dermal Absorption 2017, 15(6): 4873, the potentially absorbed dose is calculated as the sum of the radioactivity recovered in the receptor fluid, the receptor wash (sum of rinse and chamber wash), the exposed skin and the stratum corneum excluding tape strips 1 and 2, i.e., 0.14 ± 0.05%. Based on the same EFSA Guidance, the absorption values should be corrected to account for variability. Based on the number of replicates, a multiple of the standard deviation is added to the mean value (e.g. 0.92 for 7 replicates and 0.84 for 8 replicates). The calculated dermal absorption value for bis(2,6 -diisopropylphenyl)carbodiimide from test preparation 1 would then be 0.14 + (0.92×0.05) = 0.19% (rounded to two significant numbers as per EFSA Guidance).

For test preparation 2 (1% mixture with PE) the absorption of [14C]bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)carbodiimide into the receptor fluid within the first half of the study was 55 ± 13% of the total absorption into the receptor fluid at 24 h. As this is below 75%, the potentially absorbed dose is calculated as described before, i.e., 1.63 ± 0.63%. After correction to account for variability, the calculated dermal absorption value for bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)carbodiimide from test preparation 2 would then be 1.63 + (0.84×0.63) = 2.2%.

In conclusion, following topical application of [14C]bis(2,6-diisopropyl-phenyl)carbodiimide in test preparation 1 (actual concentration 96.8%) and test preparation 2 (actual concentration 0.97%) to human skin in vitro, the absorbed dose was 0.017% (0.76 μg equiv./cm2) and 0.021% (0.009 μg equiv./cm2) of the applied dose, respectively. The 8 h dislodgeable dose was 99.0% and 96.4% of the applied dose for test preparations 1 and 2, respectively, demonstrating consistently high decontamination of the skin. The total dislodgeable dose was 99.1% and 96.5% of the applied dose for test preparations 1 and 2, respectively. The dermal delivery of [14C]bis(2,6-diisopropyl-phenyl)carbodiimide was 0.07% (2.87 μg equiv./cm2) of the applied dose for test preparation 1 and 0.16% (0.07 μg equiv./cm2) of the applied dose for test preparation 2. Finally, the mass balance was 101.5% (4551 μg equiv./cm2) of the applied dose for test preparation 1 and 98.6% (44.9 μg equiv./cm2) of the applied dose for test preparation 2.

Description of key information

Short description of key information on bioaccumulation potential result:
1) Toxicokinetic assessment (Chemservice S.A., 2012)
2) CDI - Prediction using TOXTREE (Chemservice S.A., 2011)
3) DIPA - Prediction using TOXTREE (Chemservice S.A., 2012)
Short description of key information on absorption rate:
1) CDI - Dermal absorption study - in vitro (Maas, 2020)

2) Toxicokinetic assessment (Chemservice S.A., 2012)

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Bioaccumulation potential:
high bioaccumulation potential
Absorption rate - oral (%):
100
Absorption rate - dermal (%):
2.2
Absorption rate - inhalation (%):
100

Additional information

Prediction using TOXTREE


The chemical structure of bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)carbodiimide was assessed by TOXTREE (v.2.5.0) modelling tool for possible metabolism (Chemservice, 2011). SMART Cyp is a prediction model, included in the tool, which identifies sites in a molecule that are labile for the metabolism by Cytochromes P450.


Bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)carbodiimide, containing the structural alerts: CO2-derivative (general), carbodiimide and aromatic compound, is expected to be well metabolized by the Cytochrome P450 group of metabolizing enzymes. The molecule possesses equal or more than four sites of metabolism. The primary sites of metabolism are the diisopropyl-groups, which are predicted to be subject to aliphatic hydroxylation. The secondary and tertiary sites of metabolism are the carbon-atoms of the aromatic rings, which are predicted to be subject to aromatic hydroxylations. The SMARTCyp sites of metabolism with Rank >=4 are predicted to be the carbon-atoms of the diisopropyl-groups, which will be subject to aliphatic hydroxylation.


 


The chemical structure of 2,6 -bis(propan-2 -yl)aniline was assessed by TOXTREE (v.2.5.0) modelling tool for possible metabolism (Chemservice, 2012). SMART Cyp is a prediction model, included in the tool, which identifies sites in a molecule that are labile for the metabolism by Cytochromes P450.


2,6-bis(propan-2-yl)aniline, containing the structural alerts: primary aromatic amine and aromatic compound, is expected to be well metabolized by the Cytochrome P450 group of drugs metabolizing enzymes. The primary site of metabolism is the amine, which is predicted to be subject to amine hydroxylation. The secondary site of metabolism is the carbon atom inp-position of the aromatic ring, which is predicted to be subject to aromatic hydroxylation. The tertiary sites of metabolism are the carbon-atoms of the isopropyl-groups, which are predicted to be subject to aliphatic hydroxylation. The sites of metabolism with Rank >=4 were also identified to be the carbon-atoms in m-position of the aromatic ring, which are predicted to be also subject to aliphatic hydroxylation.


 


Expert statement for bis(2,6 -diisopropylphenyl)carbodiimide


 


Background


There is data available on the physico-chemical properties of bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)carbodiimide. With the aid of the EPIWIN software some physical-chemical properties were calculated.


The substance is at room temperature a white to light yellowish solid with a slight odour (Rheinchemie, 2011). The substance is insoluble in water (< 0.05 mg/L at 20°C, Erstling, 2008) and has a logPow of > 6.2 (Mullee and White, 2001). It has a very low vapour pressure (≤ 5.8*10E-3 Pa at 20°C, Kintrup, 2012). The melting point has been determined to be 50.97°C (Blaul, 2012) and the decomposition temperature 294°C (Blaul, 2012), respectively. Determination of hydrolysis as a function of pH revealed the substance to be hydrolytically unstable, especially at a low pH and high temperatures, and 2,6-bis(propan-2-yl)aniline was identified as the main hydrolysis product (Čížek, 2012). The substance is, when administered orally to rats toxic (LD50 > 300 mg/kg bw, Gillisson, 2009) and when administered dermally to rats not toxic (LD50 > 2000 mg/kg bw, Driscoll, 2001a). However, when administered orally in a subacute study, toxic effects were evident at low doses (NOAEL = 4 mg/kg, Popp, 2012). Total implantation loss (no implantation cites and no corpora lutea) was the main effect in the Reproduction/Developmental Screening Test (OECD 421, Popp, 2013, Study No. T6084004). NOAEL of 3 mg/kg bw and 1 mg/kg bw were established for systemic and reproduction/developmental toxicity, respectively. It is not an eye (Gmelin, 2010, and Kaufmann, 1993b) or skin irritant (Kaufmann, 1993a), and no skin sensitising properties have been found when tested in the guinea pig maximisation test (Driscoll, 2001b). Additionally, the substance was shown to be not mutagenic in studies according to OECD 471 (Herbold, 2009 and Thompson, 2001), 473 (Ciethier, 2011) and 476 (Wollny, 2011).


 


Absorption


In general, absorption of a chemical is possible, if the substance crosses biological membranes. This process requires a substance to be soluble, both in lipid and in water, and is also dependent on its molecular weight (substances with molecular weights below 500 are favourable for absorption). Generally, the absorption of chemicals which are surfactants or irritants may be enhanced, because of damage to cell membranes.


Bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)carbodiimide is favourable for absorption, when taking its molecular weight (362.55 g/mol) into account. However, its absorption is hindered considering its insolubility in water (< 0.05 mg/L). That the substance is more soluble in octanol than in water, is also demonstrated by the high logPow value of > 6.2.


Both characteristics, the insolubility in water and the the high lipophilicity, indicate the limited potential of the substance to be absorbed. However, as hydrolysis occurs and the subacute oral 28-day repeated dose study and the Screening Test showed toxic effects, it is evident that absorption into the body takes place to some extent.


Bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)carbodiimide is not irritating to the skin or to the eyes. Therefore, the above mentioned enhancement of absorption for irritants, does not apply.


In summary, it can be assumed that bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)carbodiimide will be absorbed into the body.


 


Absorption from the gastrointestinal tract


Regarding oral absorption, in the stomach, a substance will most likely be hydrolysed, because this is a favoured reaction in the acidic environment of the stomach. This was shown in a hydrolysis study on bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)carbodiimide (Čížek, 2012). It was shown that the substance is hydrolysed especially under acidic conditions and high temperatures, i.e. 93% hydrolysis at pH = 4.0 (60°C) after 3.2 days and 82-90% (23°C) after 30 days, respectively. Under these pH conditions, only N,N'-bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)urea was identified as a hydrolysis product in the hydrolysis study. Due to the even lower pH values found in the human stomach it can not be ruled out that this substance is possibly formed in the stomach maybe in relevant amounts. Therefore, this hydrolysis product has to be considered, too. QSAR modelling (Chemservice, 2012) revealed that this degradation product exhibit similar physico-chemical properties as its precursor (logPow = 8.79, water solubility 1.25*10-4mg/L). Therefore, the same considerations regarding ADME apply to this compound, based on physico-chemical data.


Nevertheless, it is rather unstable and decomposes into 2,6-bis(propan-2-yl)aniline (DIPA) and 2,6-diisopropylphenyl isocyanate (DIPI), whereas the latter undergoes easily decarboxylation and will be transformed to DIPA. DIPA is, compared to bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)carbodiimide, rather favoured for absorption in the gastrointestinal tract due to its low molecular weight (177,3 g/mol) and logPow of 3.18 (Chemservice, 2012). Even though, bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)carbodiimide is known to be hydrolysed in the stomach, its retention time in the stomach is rather short compared to its estimated half-life due to hydrolysis. Therefore, bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)carbodiimide is the more relevant molecule in the matter of gastrointestinal absorption, and the hydrolysis product DIPA is only relevant to a minor extent.


In the small intestine absorption occurs mainly via passive diffusion or lipophilic compounds may form micelles and be taken into the lymphatic system. Additionally, metabolism can occur by gut microflora or by enzymes in the gastrointestinal mucosa. However, the absorption of highly lipophilic substances (logPow of 4 or above) may be limited by the inability of such substances to dissolve into gastrointestinal fluids and hence make contact with the mucosal surface. The absorption of such substances will be enhanced if they undergo micellular solubilisation by bile salts. Substances absorbed as micelles enter the circulation via the lymphatic system, bypassing the liver.


Although the available physico-chemical and acute toxicity data suggest that orally administered bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)carbodiimide will be poorly absorbed, it can be assumed that absorption (and accumulation) occurs, considering the toxic effects in the 28-day subacute study (oral gavage, Popp, 2012) and in the Screeing Test (oral, gavage, Popp, 2013). Taking into account the affected organs after a subacute gavage of 16 mg/kg bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)carbodiimide, i.e. heart, white blood cells and lymphoid organs, gastro-intestinal tract, liver, kidney and female genital tract, an absorption via passive diffusion and consequent distribution is very likely.


Furthermore, since lymphoid organs are affected, absorption as micelles also seems to be likely. Here, a substance enters the lymphatic system while bypassing the liver and can therefore reach the target organs without being metabolized (see "Metabolism").


 


Absorption from the respiratory tract


Concerning absorption in the respiratory tract, any gas or vapour has to be sufficiently lipophilic to cross the alveolar and capillary membranes (moderate logPow values between 0-4 favourable for absorption). The rate of systemic uptake of very hydrophilic gases or vapours may be limited by the rate at which they partition out of the aqueous fluids (mucus) lining the respiratory tract and into the blood. Such substances may be transported out of the lungs with the mucus and swallowed or pass across the respiratory epithelium via aqueous membrane pores. Lipophilic substances (logPow >0) have the potential to be absorbed directly across the respiratory tract epithelium. Very hydrophilic substances can be absorbed through aqueous pores (for substances with molecular weights below and around 200) or be retained in the mucus.


Bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)carbodiimide has a very low vapour pressure (< 5.8 E-03 Pa at 20°C), which indicates a low availability for inhalation. Additionally the high logPow indicates no absorption through aqueous pores.


Based on this data, it is assumed that bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)carbodiimide is not available in the air for inhalation, due to its really low vapour pressure. However, if any amount of substance is available for inhalation, it is expected to be absorbed directly across the respiratory tract epithelium, due to its lipophilicity.


 


Absorption following dermal exposure


In order to cross the skin, a compound must first penetrate into the stratum corneum and may subsequently reach deeper layers of the epidermis, the dermis and the vascular network. The stratum corneum provides its greatest barrier function against hydrophilic compounds, whereas the epidermis is most resistant to penetration by highly lipophilic compounds. Substances with a molecular weight below 100 are favourable for penetration through the skin and substances above 500 are normally not able to penetrate. The substance must be sufficiently soluble in water to partition from the stratum corneum into the epidermis. Therefore if the water solubility is below 1 mg/l, dermal uptake is likely to be low. Additionally logPow values between 1 and 4 favour dermal absorption (values between 2 and 3 are optimal; TGD, Part I, Appendix VI). Above 4, the rate of penetration may be limited by the rate of transfer between the stratum corneum and the epidermis, but uptake into the stratum corneum will be high. Above 6, the rate of transfer between the stratum corneum and the epidermis will be slow and will limit absorption across the skin. Uptake into the stratum corneum itself may be slow. Moreover vapours of substances with vapour pressures below 100 Pa are likely to be well absorbed and the amount absorbed dermally is most likely more than 10% and less than 100 % of the amount that would be absorbed by inhalation. If the substance is a skin irritant or corrosive, damage to the skin surface may enhance penetration. During the whole absorption process into the skin, the compound can be subject to biotransformation.


In case of bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)carbodiimide, the molecular weight is above 100 and below 500, which indicates a low potential to penetrate the skin. Additionally, the low vapour pressure can be judged advantageous for dermal uptake. Based on this knowledge, bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)carbodiimide is expected to be absorbed following dermal exposure into the stratum corneum and to a limited extent into deepler layers of the epidermis, due to its molecular weight and its logPow. However, the systemic toxicity of bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)carbodiimide via the skin is assumed to be low and this has been shown with the results of the acute dermal toxicity study, which showed no mortality after dermal application of 2000 mg/kg bw in rats. Nevertheless, toxic effects (possibly due to accumulation) after chronic dermal exposure cannot be completely excluded. The contribution of metabolites to the substance’ toxicity cannot be absolutely quantified and therefore, contribution of the parent substance to the toxicity remains unknown.


 


To confirm the dermal uptake is low, a dermal absorption study was conducted following OECD Guideline 428 in compliance with GLP.


Due to the use pattern of the test item, a PE polymer matrix was selected to generate a relevant and technically feasible test mixture representing a worst-case sample of the test item (1 % mixture in PE) in addition to the neat compound (100 %).


The test preparations were applied to human split-thickness skin membranes from four different donors and the cells were left open to the atmosphere. Test item stability during dosing was confirmed by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).


Absorption was assessed by collecting receptor fluid in hourly fractions from 0 to 2 h after dosing, then in 2 hourly fractions until 24 h after dosing. At 8 h after dosing, the exposure period was terminated by washing the skin surface with a concentrated commercial hand wash soap followed by rinsing with a dilute soap solution (2%, v/v) and drying the surface with a cotton swab. At 24 h after dosing, the diffusion cell was dismantled. The skin was then removed from the flow-through diffusion cells, the stratum corneum tape stripped and the skin divided into exposed and unexposed skin. All samples were analyzed by liquid scintillation counting.


Based on the same EFSA Guidance, the absorption values should be corrected to account for variability. Based on the number of replicates, a multiple of the standard deviation is added to the mean value (e.g. 0.92 for 7 replicates and 0.84 for 8 replicates). The calculated dermal absorption value for bis(2,6- diisopropylphenyl)carbodiimide from Test Preparation 1 (100 %) would then be 0.14 + (0.92×0.05) = 0.19% (rounded to two significant numbers as per EFSA Guidance). After correction to account for variability, the calculated dermal absorption value for bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)carbodiimide from Test Preparation 2 (1 % mixture in PE) would then be 1.63 + (0.84×0.63) = 2.2%


 


 


Distribution


In general, the following principle applies: the smaller the molecule, the wider the distribution. A lipophilic molecule (logPow >0) is likely to distribute into cells and the intracellular concentration may be higher than extracellular concentration particularly in fatty tissues. It’s not possible to foresee protein binding, which can limit the amount of a substance available for distribution. Furthermore, if a substance undergoes extensive first-pass metabolism, predictions made on the basis of the physico-chemical characteristics of the parent substance may not be applicable.


In case of bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)carbodiimide, no quantitative data is available for distribution patterns. In general, the distribution of bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)carbodiimide is expected to be more extensive in fat tissues than in other tissues, due to its better solubility in octanol than in water (predicted logPow > 6.2). Accordingly, the possibility to reach the central-nerve-system is given.Taking into account the affected organs in a subacute study, i.e. heart, white blood cells and lymphoid organs, gastro-intestinal tract, liver, kidney and female genital tract, and the assumed absorption via passive diffusion, the following systemic distribution is likely: The first target will be the gastrointestinal tract, where the substance and possibly bacterial metabolites will be absorbed in small quantities and transferred via the blood stream to the liver. After first pass metabolism (see "Metabolism"), the substance will be further distributed via the bloodstream. Here, especially the kidneys due to their filter function and the heart due to its enormous need for nutrients and consequently large blood flow through coronary arteries will be affected. Additionally, accumulation (see "Accumulation") in all directly and indirectly (general supply via bloodstream) involved organs has to be considered. Furthermore, the affection of the lymphatic system via micellar uptake must also be taken into consideration.


 


Accumulation


It is also important to consider the potential for a substance to accumulate or to be retained within the body. Lipophilic substances have the potential to accumulate within the body (mainly in the adipose tissue), if the dosing interval is shorter than 4 times the whole body half-life. Although there is no direct correlation between the lipophilicity of a substance and its biological half-life, substances with high logPow values tend to have longer half-lives. On this basis, there is the potential for highly lipophilic substances (logPow >4) to accumulate in biota which are frequently exposed. Highly lipophilic substances (logPow between 4 and 6) that come into contact with the skin can readily penetrate the lipid rich stratum corneum but are not well absorbed systemically. Although they may persist in the stratum corneum, they will eventually be cleared as the stratum corneum is sloughed off. A turnover time of 12 days has been quoted for skin epithelial cells.


Accordingly, the predicted logPow of > 6.2 and the experimentally determined water solubility (< 0.05 mg/L) of bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)carbodiimide indicate a potential for accumulation in the body. Additionally, the effects observed in the subacute study in rats (Popp, 2012) and in the Screening Test (Popp, 2013) indicate a slow metabolism (> 24 h), because already low doses (16 mg/kg bw in the 28-day study and 8 mg/kg bw (later reduced to 5 mg/kg bw) in the OECD 421 study) showed significant signs of toxicity after repeated exposures. NOAEL of 4 and 3 mg/kg bw were established in the 28-day and in the OECD 421 study, respectively. The half-life was determined in the hydrolysis study (11.75 and 1.76 days at pH 4 and 23°C and 50°C, respectively), therefore, the accumulation of bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)carbodiimide and/or its metabolites, is rather likely. Although absorption of only small quantities is likely, its accumulative potential seems to increase its risk for harmful health effects significantly.


 


Metabolism


Route specific toxicity results from several phenomena, such as hydrolysis within the gastrointestinal or respiratory tracts, also metabolism by gastrointestinal flora or within the gastrointestinal tract epithelia (mainly in the small intestine), respiratory tract epithelia (sites include the nasal cavity, tracheo-bronchial mucosa [Clara cells] and alveoli [type 2 cells]) and skin.


First of all, partial hydrolysis is the first occurring modification of bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)carbodiimide in the stomach, because of the acidic environment and elevated temperature (approx. 37°C) in the stomach. The substance was determined to be hydrolytically unstable at low pH and elevated temperatures (Čížek, 2012). However, hydrolysis rate was slow at acidic conditions: a rate constant of 0.0685/day and DT50 of 10.13 days at pH 4 was determined at 25°C. The percentage of metabolised parent substance was 6-9% during 6 days at 50°C. It can be expected that a faster hydrolysis rate will occur at lower pH (pH in the stomach is between 1.5 and 3.5). The major degradation rate products (at least >= 10 % occurrence) were identified in the hydrolysis study: 2,6-diisopropylaniline (CAS 24544-04-5) with molecular weight of 177, and Urea, N,N´-bis[2,6-bis(1-methylethyl)phenyl] (CAS 76460-94-1) with molecular weight of 380.


 


Additionally, the target substance’ and its hydrolysis products are very likely to be metabolized via the Cytochrome P450 group of metabolising enzymes, as it has been predicted with the TOXTREE modelling tool and the OECD QSAR Toolbox (v3.1, 2013) (Chemservice, 2011 & 2012). There, the chemical and its main hydrolysis product 2,6-diisopropylaniline have been identified to bear primary, secondary, tertiary and quaternary sites and 4 or more sites for metabolism by the Cytochrome P450 group of metabolising enzymes. For bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)carbodiimide, the primary sites of metabolism are the isopropyl-groups, which are predicted to be subject to aliphatic hydroxylation. The secondary and tertiary sites of metabolism are the carbon-atoms of the heterocyclic cycles, which are predicted to be subject to aliphatic hydroxylation. The quaternary sites of metabolism were also identified to be the isopropyl-groups, which are predicted to be subject to aliphatic hydroxylation. So the 4 isopropyl-groups and the carbon-atoms of the ring are likely to be oxidised by cytochrome P450 enzymes, as already identified via TOXTREE modelling, yielding hydroxyl-groups.


For 2,6-diisopropylaniline, the primary site of metabolism is the amine, which is predicted to be subject to amine hydroxylation. The secondary site of metabolism is the carbon atom inp-position of the aromatic ring, which is predicted to be subject to aromatic hydroxylation. The tertiary sites of metabolism are the carbon-atoms of the isopropyl-groups, which are predicted to be subject to aliphatic hydroxylation. The sites of metabolism with Rank>=4 were also identified to be the carbon-atoms in m-position of the aromatic ring, which are predicted to be also subject to aliphatic hydroxylation.


As determined in the hydrolysis study (Čížek, 2012), the carbodiimide group of bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl) carbodiimide is likely cleaved at the nitrogen-carbon-bond, leading to the formation of 2,6-diisopropylaniline (DIPA, substance 1) and 2,6-diisopropylphenyl isocyanate (substance 2). The last molecule, however, is unstable and will hydrolyse (releasing carbon dioxide) to 2,6-diisopropylphenyl carbamic acid (substance 3). Carbamic acid derivatives are unstable compounds and are known to decompose to a corresponding amine releasing carbon dioxide (Morrison and Boyd, 1987). Therefore, it is likely that 2,6-diisopropylphenyl carbamic acid (substance 3) will decarboxylate to DIPA (substance 1). This was confirmed by the profiling results of the OECD QSAR Toolbox (v3.1). Four hydrolysis products are predicted for the target substance: 2,6-di(propan-2-yl)aniline (substance 1), 2-isocyanato-1,3-di(propan-2-yl)benzene (substance 2), [2,6-di(propan-2-yl)phenyl]carbamic acid (substance 3) and carbon dioxide.


Amines reacting with isocyanates form urea linkage (Screening assessment for TDIs, 2008). In this case, it is very likely that DIPA (substance 1) reacts with 2,6-diisopropylphenyl isocyanate (substance 2) yielding Urea, N,N´-bis[2,6-bis(1-methylethyl)phenyl] (CAS 76460-94-1), identified in the hydrolysis study.


The cleavage of the benzene ring is rather unlikely in mammalians, leading to the formation of either methyl groups or methyl groups and 2R-CHOH group.


The above mentioned functional groups will react in phase 2 of the biotransformation with different molecules, leading to the formation of conjugations. For the hydroxyl-groups of the ring it is most likely that they will be conjugated to glucuronic acid, activated sulphate or activated methionine.


Additionally, since a certain potential for absorption (see "Absorption") ofbis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)carbodiimide is indicative, the substance will not only accumulate in the affected organs directly after absorption, but also, and possibly to a larger extent, in fatty tissues (see "Accumulation"). Here, the distribution of metabolizing enzymes is rather low, CYP2 and 3 expression is nearly undetectable (Ellero, 2010). In the cytoplasm of the adipocytes degradation due to hydrolysis might also take place. Taking into account the experimental results under physiologically relevant pH-conditions, the compounds half-life at 37°C can be estimated to be 10-12 days. Since the final hydrolysis product, 2,6-diisopropylaniline, has a logPow of 3.18 and therefore does not tend to accumulate as extensively as bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)carbodiimide, secondary effects of poisoning due to DIPA can occur. This was confirmed by the results of the subacute study, as the affected organs are those which are affected after exposure via the blood stream. Toxic effects resulting from the hydrolysis product 2,6-diisopropylphenyl isocyanate (substance 2)., e.g. via addition on biomolecules, could also be possible. In this context, the formed 2,6-diisopropylphenyl isocyanate can bind to proteins by the mechanism of acyl transfer (via nucleophilic addition reaction, Toolbox, v3.1, 2013). Certainly, the depletion of the target substance to the amine under CO2release is the most likely reaction, and an addition to amines would result in urea derivatives, which were already shown to be unstable (Morrison and Boyd, 1987). Addition to an alcohol, on the other hand, would result in a carbamate, which is rather stable.


In conclusion, it is most likely that the substance of interest will be subject to metabolism by cytochrome P450 enzymes and subsequent glucuronidation. In addition, the diisocyanate-group will be cleaved and the resulting 2,6-diisopropylphenyl isocyanate hydrolysed through 2,6-diisopropylphenyl carbamic acid to 2,6-diisopropylaniline.


 


Excretion


The major routes of excretion for substances from the systemic circulation are the urine and/or the faeces (via bile and directly from the gastrointestinal mucosa). For non-polar volatile substances and metabolites exhaled air is an important route of excretion. Substances that are excreted favourable in the urine tend to be water-soluble and of low molecular weight (below 300 in the rat) and be ionized at the pH of urine. Most will have been filtered out of the blood by the kidneys though a small amount may enter the urine directly by passive diffusion and there is the potential for reabsorption into the systemic circulation across the tubular epithelium. Substances that are excreted in the bile tend to be amphipathic (containing both polar and nonpolar regions), hydrophobic/strongly polar and have higher molecular weights and pass through the intestines before they are excreted in the faeces and as a result may undergo enterohepatic recycling which will prolong their biological half-life. This is particularly a problem for conjugated molecules that are hydrolysed by gastrointestinal bacteria to form smaller more lipid soluble molecules that can then be reabsorbed from the gastrointestinal tract. Those substances less likely to recirculate are substances having strong polarity and high molecular weight of their own accord. Other substances excreted in the faeces are those that have diffused out of the systemic circulation into the gastrointestinal tract directly, substances which have been removed from the gastrointestinal mucosa by efflux mechanisms and non-absorbed substances that have been ingested or inhaled and subsequently swallowed. Non-ionized and lipid soluble molecules may be excreted in the saliva (where they may be swallowed again) or in the sweat. Highly lipophilic substances that have penetrated the stratum corneum but not penetrated the viable epidermis may be sloughed off with or without metabolism with skin cells.


For bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)carbodiimide no data is available concerning its elimination. Concerning the above mentioned behaviour predicted for its metabolic fate, it is unlikely that the parent substance will be excreted unchanged. However, if unchanged excretion is assumed, based on the chemical structure of bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)carbodiimide, its molecular weight and its non-existent water solubility, it is unlikely to be excreted via the urine. The excretion, if any, of the parent compound will occur via the gastrointestinal tract (unabsorbed material) and the bile (small amounts of unchanged compound), and it could be subject to enterohepatic recycling. Due to the high lipophilicity excretion is possible via saliva and/or milk, which could endanger the new-born, when repeated exposure occurs.


Concerning the fate of the metabolites formed of bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)carbodiimide, the hydroxylated isopropyl-groups, in cases linked to glucuronic acid, activated sulphate or activated methionine, will be eliminated via the urine. However, it is likely that 2,6-diisopropylaniline will be linked to glucuronic acid and subsequently excreted via the urine (polar amino-group, lower molecular weight).


 


Conclusion


In order to assess the toxicological behaviour of bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)carbodiimide, the available and predicted physico-chemical and toxicological data have been evaluated. The substance is expected to be poorly absorbed after oral exposure, based on its low molecular weight, it's low water solubility and it's logPow of >6.2. In the stomach however, as the substance is known to hydrolyse under acidic conditions, hydrolysis occurs and therefore the smaller hydrolysis product DIPA can be absorbed in the small intestine (where pH is higher and DIPA is no longer protonated). Concerning the absorption after exposure via inhalation, as the chemical has really low vapour pressure and a high boiling point (294°C), it is clear, that the substance has a low availability for inhalation. Given its lipophilicity (logPow of >6.2), if any of the substance is available for inhalation, it is expected to be absorbed directly across the respiratory tract epithelium. Bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)carbodiimide is expected to be absorbed following dermal exposure into the stratum corneum to a certain extent and into the epidermis, due to its molecular weight and its logPow.


A low dermal absorption was confirmed in a dermal absorption study. The obtained dermal absorption values are 0.19 % for the neat compound and 2.2 % for the 1 % mixture in PE polymer. Thus, as key values for the assessment, 0.19 % dermal absorption is set for the neat compound (100%) and as a worst case 2.2 % for formulations below 100 %.


However, the systemic toxicity via the skin is assumed to be low, which can be concluded from the results of the acute dermal toxicity study, which showed no mortality after dermal application of 2000 mg/kg bw in rats. The substance might bear accumulative potential after repeated exposures (i.e. via entero-hepatic recycling) and possibly subsequent poisoning from this depot by DIPA formation, which might be the reason for the toxic effects seen in the subacute study. Bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)carbodiimide is expected to be extensively metabolised via the Cytochrome P450 group of metabolizing enzymes. A likely metabolite is 2,6-diisopropylaniline, which is formed after cleavage of the diisocyanate group leading to the formation of the unstable 2,6-diisopropylphenyl isocyanate, which hydrolyses through 2,6 -diisoprpylphenyl carbamic acid to 2,6-diisopropylaniline. 2,6 -Diisopropylaniline will be eliminated mainly via the urine, either without or after conjugation to glucuronic acid, activated sulphate or activated methionine.


 


Summary:


Bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)carbodiimide was evaluated regarding its toxicokinetic behaviour. Due to its physico-chemical properties and findings in toxicological studies it is reasonable to assume, that the substance is well absorbed after oral exposure. In addition, it is assumed to be poorly absorbed after exposure via inhalation and to be only absorbed to a certain extent dermally into the stratum corneum and into deeper layer of the epidermis. A low dermal absorption was confirmed in a dermal absorption study. The obtained dermal absorption values are 0.19 % for the neat compound and 2.2 % for the 1 % mixture in PE polymer. Thus, as key values for the assessment, 0.19 % dermal absorption is set for the neat compound (100%) and as a worst case 2.2 % for formulations below 100 %.


The substance is expected to be distributed throughout the body, reaching also the inner cell compartments, due to its lipophilicity. The substance bears accumulative potential after repeated exposures. Bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)carbodiimide is expected to be extensively metabolised via the Cytochrome P450 group of metabolizing enzymes. A likely metabolite is 2,6-diisopropylaniline, which will be eliminated mainly via the urine, either without or after conjugation to glucuronic acid, activated sulphate or activated methionine.