Hoppa till innehåll
Hoppa till innehåll

Hur gör jag det?

Ersättning av ämnen är inte alltid ett enkelt byte av en kemikalie mot en annan. Du måste göra hemläxan, och "en storlek passar alla" gäller inte här. Det är inte säkert att metoder som fungerar på ett företag fungerar för din produkt eller process. Det kan också hända att du måste pröva flera alternativa lösningar innan du hittar den bästa. När du gör din bedömning ska du ta hänsyn inte bara till faran utan även till exponeringen för kemikalien, olika tekniska processer och produktdesigner, teknisk prestanda och ekonomiska aspekter. Det är viktigt att bedöma effekterna även ur ett bredare perspektiv och ta hänsyn till exempelvis energi- och resursanvändning, avfall, återvinning och sociala konsekvenser.


Once you have a shortlist of alternatives compiled, continue by comparing the options and decide which one would be the most promising for your use. You will need to carry out the following assessments:

  • Hazard and risk assessment.
  • Performance assessment.
  • Economic viability assessment.
  • Assessment of other impacts.

When comparing, you should also consider wider effects such as energy and resource use, waste, recycling or social impact.

Keep in mind that a substitution project is best approached in a stepwise and iterative process. You need to prioritise which elements you will assess first and in which level of detail – deciding this upfront when setting the scope for the substitution project.

After a first high-level analysis, come back to the criteria that appear to be key for the decision-making and carry out a more thorough analysis.

For chemical alternatives, make sure you evaluate their risks (hazard and exposure). Check whether ECHA or the EU Member States have them on a list for closer examination – they may be subject to future regulatory measures and you would not want to substitute to a substance that may soon become flagged as of concern. Use different toxicology databases and exposure models to make sure you get the full picture.

In addition to assessing the hazards and risks associated with the use of the alternative substances, it is also important that you assess performance and economic viability. You may want to make use of experimental design methods, which allow you to study several variables simultaneously. Finally, taking a lifecycle perspective, you might need to consider potential trade-offs between the different alternatives options (e.g. hazard vs greenhouse gas emissions).


Related methods, tools and materials for comparative hazard assessment
  • GreenScreen® for Safer Chemicals: A comparative hazard assessment tool developed by Clean Production Action. It helps evaluate alternatives to chemicals of concern based on 18 hazard endpoints.
  • The Quick Chemical Assessment Tool (QCAT): A simplified version of the GreenScreen® for Safer Chemicals hazard assessment methodology, to allow SMEs to perform a quick alternatives assessment for chemicals of concern. QCAT also provides detailed information on where to find data and how to interpret the data needed to complete a hazard assessment using the tool.
  • GHS Column Model: On the basis of just a small amount of information on the products in question, substitute substances can be assessed with the aid of this table.
  • Pollution Prevention Options Analysis System (P2OASys): The tool was designed by the Toxic Use Reduction Institute of Massachusetts (TURI). It aims to help companies conduct a comparative analysis of the hazard profile of alternatives. It can be used to analyse technological processes, individual chemicals or chemical mixtures. The tool requires certain expertise which may render it unsuitable for SMEs.


Related tools and resources for assessing economic viability


Related tools and resources for assessing other impacts

Categories Display

Taggad som:

(Klicka på taggen för att söka efter relevant innehåll)

Route: .live2