Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 939-657-1 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Klimisch reliability of study is 1 (GLP guideline study); according to ECHA Practical Guide 6 rel. 2 is selected from the IUCLID pick-list as this should be the maximum score for read-across.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
- Version / remarks:
- (2002)
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Strain: New Zealand White A1077 INRA (SPF)
- Source: Centre Lago S.A., 01540 Vonnas, France
- Age at study initiation: About 5 months
- Weight at study initiation: 3.08 - 3.39 kg
- Housing: Single housing in stainless steel wire mesh cages with grating, floor area: 3000 cm²
- Diet: Kliba-Labordiät, Provimi Kliba SA, Kaiseraugst, Switzerland (about 130 g/animal per day)
- Water: Tap water ad libitum
- Acclimation period: At least 5 days before the beginning of the study.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20 - 24
- Humidity (%): 30 - 70
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 / 12 - Type of coverage:
- semiocclusive
- Preparation of test site:
- clipped
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- other: Untreated skin sites of the same animal.
- Amount / concentration applied:
- 0.5 ml
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 4 hours
- Observation period:
- 14 days
- Number of animals:
- 3
- Details on study design:
- - Clipping of the fur: At least 24 hours before the beginning of the study clipping of the dorsolateral part of the trunk of the animal(s).
- Body weight determination: Just before application of the test substance and after the last reading.
- Route of application: The test substance was applied in a single dose to the intact untreated skin The test patch was secured in position with a semiocclusive dressing. The test substance was removed at the end of the exposure period with Lutrol and Lutrol/water (1 : 1).
- Readings: lmmediately after removal of the patch, approx. 1, 24, 48 and 72 h after removal of the patch and then in weekly intervals up to day 14.
- Illumination used for reading: Daylight tubes "Lumilux" (L 58W/860 PLUS ECO 25X1, Osram, Germany)
- Check for dead animals or moribund: Twice each workday (beginning and end) and once on Saturdays, Sundays and on public holidays.
- Evaluation of results: For evaluation, the calculation of the mean values of erythema and edema for readings 24, 48 and 72 hours were quoted. Additionally, the reversibility of the observed findings was taken into account. - Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- >= 2 - <= 3
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 7 days
- Remarks on result:
- other: mean score after 72h: 2.3
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- >= 1 - <= 3
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 7 days
- Remarks on result:
- other: mean score after 72 h: 2
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 3
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 14 days
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal: #1, #2, #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- >= 0 - <= 1
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48 hours
- Remarks on result:
- other: mean score after 72 h: 0.3
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- - Moderate erythema (grade 2), observed in all animals immediately and 1 hour after removal of the patch, increased to marked (grade 3) in all animals after 24 hours and decreased to slight or moderate (grade 1 or 2) in one or two animals after 48 and 72 hours. In one animal marked erythema persisted up to 72 hours, decreased to slight after day 7 and persisted up to study termination on day 14.
- Slight edema (grade 1) was noted in all animals immediately after removal of the patch up to 24 hours.
- Additionally erythema was extended beyond the area of exposure in all animals after 24 hours up to 72 hours. Moreover scaling and dryness of the skin was noted. The cutaneous reactions were reversible in two animals within 7 days, while in one animal slight erythema and scaling was still present up to study termination on day 14. Mean scores over 24, 48 and 72 hours for each animal were 2.3, 2.0 and 3.0 for erythema and 0.3 for edema. - Executive summary:
An Acute Skin Irritation/Corrosion test according to OECD 404 was conducted with the test substance. Slight to marked erythema, partly extending beyond the area of exposure and slight edema were observed in the animals during the course of the study. Additionally dryness of the skin and scaling were noted during the observation period. The cutaneous reactions were reversible in two animals within 7 days, while in one animal slight erythema and scaling was still present up to study termination on day 14. The average scores (24, 48, and 72 hours) were for erythema 2, 2.3, 3 and for edema 0.3, 0.3, 0.3.
Reference
For assessing skin irritation in vivo a read across from a substance with a very similar chemical composition (comparable allophanate-type HDI oligomerisation product, EC 900 -066 -9, CAS 197393 -84 -3) is applied. The read across is based on physicochemical and toxicological similarity of the two substances. Especially a recently conducted comparative pulmonary irritant potency study based on the recommendations of TRGS 430 (Technical Rule for Hazardous Substances 430, published by the German Federal Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs, last update 2009), confirmed for both allophanat-type HDI oligomerisation products the same toxicological mode of action and a nearly identical potency (both NOAEL at 3.4 mg/m³). For further justification of the grouping and read-across according to regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, Annex XI, 1.5 see document attached to chapter "Assessment Reports".
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Klimisch reliability of study is 1 (GLP guideline study); according to ECHA Practical Guide 6 rel. 2 is selected from the IUCLID pick-list as this should be the maximum score for read-across.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Version / remarks:
- (2002)
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Strain: New Zealand White A1077 INRA (SPF)
- Source: Centre Lago S.A., 01540 Vonnas, France
- Age at study initiation: About 6 - 7 months
- Weight at study initiation: 3.52 - 3.82 kg
- Housing: Single housing in stainless steel wire mesh cages with grating, floor area: 3000 cm²
- Diet: Kliba-Labordiät, Provimi Kuba SA, Kaiseraugst, Switzerland (about 130 g/animal per day)
- Water: Tap water ad libitum
- Acclimation period: At least 5 days before the beginning of the study.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20 - 24
- Humidity (%): 30 - 70
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 / 12 - Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- other: Untreated left eye
- Amount / concentration applied:
- 0.1 mL
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 24 hours. The test substance was applied in a single dose to the conjunctival sac of the right eyelid. About 24 hours after application of the liquid test substance the treated eye of the animal(s) was rinsed with 3 to 6 ml of hand warm tap water tor 1 to 2 minutes using a syringe with a blunt probe.
- Observation period (in vivo):
- Animals were monitored approx. 1, 24, 48 and 72 h after application and then in weekly intervals maximally up to day 28.
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 1 female, 2 males
- Details on study design:
- - Body weight determination: Just before application of the test substance and after the last reading.
- Route of application: The test substance 0.1 mL (undiluted) was applied in a single dose to the conjunctival sac of the right eyelid.
- Rinsing of the eye: About 24 hours after application of the liquid test substance the treated eye of the animal(s) was rinsed with 3 to 6 mL of hand warm tap water tor 1 to 2 minutes using a syringe with a blunt probe.
- Readings: Approx. 1, 24, 48 and 72 h after application.
- Illumination used tor reading: Daylight tubes ‹Lumilux" (L 58W/860 PLUS ECO 25X1, Osram, Germany)
- Check for dead or moribund Twice each workday (beginning and end) and once animais: on Saturdays, Sundays and on public holidays. - Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal: #1, #2, #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal: #1, #2, #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 2
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Remarks:
- (redness)
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- >= 0 - <= 1
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 72 hours
- Remarks on result:
- other: mean score after 72h: 0.3
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Remarks:
- (redness)
- Basis:
- animal: #2, #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- >= 0 - <= 2
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 72 hours
- Remarks on result:
- other: mean score after 72h: 1.3
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal: #1, #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- >= 0 - <= 1
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48 hours
- Remarks on result:
- other: mean score after 72h: 0.3
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- - Slight conjunctival redness (grade 1) was observed in one animal 1 hour after application up to 24 hours. Two animals showed moderate conjunctival redness (grade 2) from 1 hour until 48 hours after application. Slight conjunctival chemosis (grade 1) was noted in one animal 24 hours after application only. Slight discharge (grade 1) was observed in two animals 1 hour after application. Severe discharge (grade 3), noted in one animal after 1 hour, decreased to slight at the 24 hour-reading.
- No other ocular reactions were observed during the study.
- The ocular reactions were reversible in one animal within 48 hours and in two animals within 72 hours after application.
- Mean scores calculated for each animal over 24, 48 and 72 hours were 0.0 for corneal opacity and for iris lesions, 0.3, 1.3 and 1.3 for redness of the conjunctiva and 0.0, 0.3 and 0.0 for chemosis. - Executive summary:
An Eye Irritation/ Corrosion test according to OECD TG 405 was conducted with the test substance. Slight or moderate conjunctival redness and slight or severe discharge were observed in the animals during the course of the study. Slight conjunctival chemosis was noted in one animal 24 hours after application only.
The ocular reactions were reversible in all animals within 72 hours after application at the latest. The average scores (24, 48 and 72 hours) were for conjunctivae (redness) 0.3, 1.3, 1.3 and for chemosis 0.0, 0.3 and 0.0. No effects were observed on corneal opacity or iris.
Reference
For assessing eye irritation in vivo a read across from a substance with a very similar chemical composition (comparable allophanate-type HDI oligomerisation product, EC 900 -066 -9, CAS 197393 -84 -3) is applied.The read across is based on physicochemical and toxicological similarity of the two substances. Especially a recently conducted comparative pulmonary irritant potency study based on the recommendations of TRGS 430 (Technical Rule for Hazardous Substances 430, published by the German Federal Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs, last update 2009), confirmed for both allophante-type HDI oligomerisation products the same toxicological mode of action and a nearly identical potency (both NOAEL at 3.4 mg/m³). For further justification of the grouping and read-across according to regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, Annex XI, 1.5 see document attached to chapter "Assessment Reports".
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (irritating)
Additional information
Validated in vitro assays (OECD 431 and 439) reveal for the substance no corrosive and no irritant property to the skin. For investigating the ocular irritant property an in vitro human corneal epithelium (HCE) test, as prevalidated in 2004 (van Goethem et. al., Tox in Vitro 20, 2006, 1-17) was conducted. On the basis of this test the substance was considered to be non-irritant to the eye.
For a further evaluation of skin and eye irritation a read across of in vivo skin/eye irritation/corrosion studies from a substance with a very similar chemical composition (comparable allophanate-type HDI oligomerisation product, EC 900 -066 -9, CAS 197393 -84 -3) is applied. The read across is based on physicochemical and toxicological similarity of the two substances. Especially a recently conducted comparative pulmonary irritant potency study based on the recommendations of TRGS 430 (Technical Rule for Hazardous Substances 430, published by the German Federal ministra of Labour and Social Affairs, last update 2009), confirmed for both allophanate-type HDI oligomerisation products the same toxicological mode of action and a nearly identical potency (both NOAEL at 3.4 mg/m³). For further justification of the grouping and read-across according to regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, Annex XI, 1.5 see document attached to chapter "Assessment Reports".
The Skin Irritation/Corrosion test with the read-across substance was conducted according to OECD 404. Slight to marked erythema, partly extending beyond the area of exposure and slight edema were observed in the animals during the course of the study. Additionally dryness of the skin and scaling were noted during the observation period. The cutaneous reactions were reversible in two animals within 7 days, while in one animal slight erythema and scaling was still present up to study termination on day 14. The average scores (24, 48, and 72 hours) were for erythema 2, 2.3, 3 and for edema 0.3, 0.3, 0.3.
The Eye Irritation/ Corrosion test with the read-across substance was conducted according to OECD TG 405. Slight or moderate conjunctival redness and slight or severe discharge were observed in the animals during the course of the study. Slight conjunctival chemosis was noted in one animal only at 24 hours after application. The ocular reactions were reversible in all animals within 72 hours after application at the latest. The average scores (24, 48 and 72 hours) were for conjunctivae (redness) 0.3, 1.3, 1.3 and for chemosis 0.0, 0.3 and 0.0. No effects were observed on corneal opacity or iris.
Studies on acute inhalation toxicity show for the substance evidence for lower respiratory tract sensory irritation. This is further supported by repeated inhalation studies available from read across (cp. endpoint summary of chapters Acute Toxicity and Repeated dose toxicity).
Justification for selection of skin irritation / corrosion endpoint:
Only one in vivo study available.
Justification for selection of eye irritation endpoint:
Only one in vivo study available.
Effects on skin irritation/corrosion: irritating
Effects on respiratory irritation: irritating
Justification for classification or non-classification
According to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, Annex I, the substance has to be classified as Skin Irrit. 2 (H315: Causes skin irritation).
No classification is required for eye irritation according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, Annex I.
According to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, Annex I, the substance has to be classified as STOT SE 3 (H335: May cause respiratory irritation).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.