Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 630-330-6 | CAS number: 21715-46-8
Oxidising properties
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- oxidising solids
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 018
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- UN Manual of Tests and Criteria: Test O.3 (Gravimetric test for oxidizing solids)
- GLP compliance:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 6-chloro-N-ethyl-4-methyl-4-phenyl-4H-3,1-benzoxazin-2-amine
- EC Number:
- 630-330-6
- Cas Number:
- 21715-46-8
- Molecular formula:
- C17H18Cl2N2O
- IUPAC Name:
- 6-chloro-N-ethyl-4-methyl-4-phenyl-4H-3,1-benzoxazin-2-amine
- Test material form:
- solid: particulate/powder
Constituent 1
Study design
- Contact with:
- powdered cellulose
- Duration of test (contact time):
- 3 min
Results and discussion
Test results (Oxidising solids)open allclose all
- Key result
- Sample tested:
- 1:1 sample-to-cellulose ratio
- Parameter:
- burning rate
- Result:
- 521 s
- Remarks on result:
- other: ignition and smoke
- Key result
- Sample tested:
- 4:1 sample-to-cellulose ratio
- Parameter:
- burning rate
- Result:
- 301 s
- Remarks on result:
- other: ignition and smoke
Any other information on results incl. tables
No main reaction with the test item / cellulose mixture in proportion 4:1 was observed, the reaction time was then considered to be higher than the mean time of reaction with the reference item / cellulose mixture in proportions 3:7.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- No main reaction with the test item / cellulose mixture in proportion 4:1 was observed, the reaction time was then considered to be higher than the mean time of reaction with the reference item / cellulose mixture in proportions 3:7.
The mean times of reaction with the test item / cellulose mixture in proportion 1:1 was higher than the mean time of reaction with the reference item / cellulose mixture in proportion 3:7.
Therefore, the test item was not considered as an oxidizing solid of Division 5.1 and thus was not assigned to any packing group and was not classified following CLP regulation. - Executive summary:
No main reaction with the test item / cellulose mixture in proportion 4:1 was observed, the reaction time was then considered to be higher than the mean time of reaction with the reference item / cellulose mixture in proportions 3:7.
The mean times of reaction with the test item / cellulose mixture in proportion 1:1 was higher than the mean time of reaction with the reference item / cellulose mixture in proportion 3:7.
Therefore, the test item was not considered as an oxidizing solid of Division 5.1 and thus was not assigned to any packing group and was not classified following CLP regulation.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
