Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 226-033-2 | CAS number: 5235-82-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vivo
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2023
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 023
- Report date:
- 2023
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 474 (Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- mammalian erythrocyte micronucleus test
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 4-[3-(1-naphthylamino)propyl]morpholine
- EC Number:
- 226-033-2
- EC Name:
- 4-[3-(1-naphthylamino)propyl]morpholine
- Cas Number:
- 5235-82-5
- Molecular formula:
- C17H22N2O
- IUPAC Name:
- N-[3-(morpholin-4-yl)propyl]naphthalen-1-amine
- Test material form:
- solid: granular
- Details on test material:
- Colour: Dark Brown to Black
GLP Characterized: January 21, 2016
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Identification: 4-[3-(1-naphthylamino)propyl]morpholine
Alternate Identification: N-1-napthalenyl-4-morpholinepropanamine
Molecular Weight: 270.4
CAS No.: 5235-82-5
Lot No.: ZA01212016
Recertification Date: 14 Mar 2018; 24 Jun 2023
Physical Description: Brown powder
Purity: 94.4%; 96.58%
Correction Factor: 1.0582
Storage Conditions: 18°C to 24°C
Provided by: Sponsor
A preliminary characterization of purity of the test substance was assessed by the Sponsor in 2021 and was assigned with a purity of 94.5%. The same lot of the test substance was also previously characterized in 2016 and was observed with a purity of 94.4% (Ferrer, 2016, Study No. ML AL-2016-002085). The same lot of the bulk test substance was evaluated for purity after completion of this study in Jun 2022, and the purity was determined to be 96.58%. The formulations prepared during the study were corrected for purity using a correction factor of
1.0582 based on initial characterization (94.5%) provided by the Sponsor. The slight increase in purity did not impact the nominal dose levels used on the study, as the difference in the purity determined before the study and after the study was minimal.
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- other: Crl:CD(SD)
- Details on species / strain selection:
- At this time, studies in laboratory animals provide the best available basis for extrapolation to
humans and are required to support regulatory submissions. Acceptable models which do not use live animals currently do not exist.
The Sprague Dawley rat was chosen as the animal model for this study as it is an accepted rodent
species for nonclinical toxicity testing by regulatory agencies.
The total number of animals used in this study was considered to be the minimum required to
properly characterize the effects of the test substance. This study was designed such that it did
not require an unnecessary number of animals to accomplish its objectives. - Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- Receipt:
On 19 Jan 2022, 25 Jan 2022, and 01 Feb 2022, Crl:CD(SD) rats were received from Charles
River Laboratories, Inc., Raleigh, NC. The animals were approximately 7–11 weeks old and
weighed between 157 and 424 g (males) (see Appendix 1), and between 164 and 250 g (females)
at the initiation of dosing.
Environmental Acclimation:
Each animal was inspected by qualified personnel upon receipt. Animals judged to be in good
health were placed in acclimation for at least 5 days.
Selection, Assignment, and Disposition of Animals:
Animals were assigned to groups by a stratified randomization scheme designed to achieve
similar group mean body weights. Males and females were randomized separately. Animals at
extremes of body weight range were not assigned to groups. Individual body weights at
randomization were within ± 20% of the mean for each sex.
The disposition of all animals was documented in the study records.
Housing:
Housing: Single
Caging: Solid-bottom cages containing appropriate bedding material (Bed-O-Cobs®or other suitable material).
Cage Identification: Color-coded cage card indicating study, group, animal number(s), and
sex.
Housing set-up was as specified in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals
(National Research Council, 2011). Animals were separated during designated
procedures/activities. Cages were arranged on the racks in group order. Where possible, control
group animals were housed on a separate rack from the test substance-treated animals.
Environmental Conditions:
The targeted conditions for the animal room environment were as follows:
Temperature: 68°F to 78°F (20°C to 26°C)
Humidity: 30% to 70%
Light Cycle: 12 hours light and 12 hours dark (except during designated procedures).
Food:
Diet: PMI Nutrition International, LLC Certified Rodent LabDiet 5002.
Type: Meal
Frequency: Ad libitum.
Analysis: Results of analysis for nutritional components and environmental contaminants were provided by the supplier and are on file at the Testing Facility. It was considered that there were no known contaminants in the feed that would interfere with the objectives of the study.
Water:
Type: Municipal tap water, treated by reverse osmosis and ultraviolet irradiation.
Frequency/Ration: Freely available to each animal via an automatic watering system. Water
bottles were provided, if required.
Analysis: Periodic analysis of the water was performed, and results of these analyses are on file at the Testing Facility. It was considered that there were no known contaminants in the water that could interfere with the outcome of the study.
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- Identification: Propylene glycol, USP/FCC
CAS No.: 57-55-6
Lot No.: 206214
Retest Date: Nov 2023
Storage Conditions: 18°C to 24°C
Provided by: Testing Facility - Details on exposure:
- Administration of Test Materials:
Test substance formulations and vehicle control were administered once daily, for 2 consecutive days via oral gavage. The dose formulations were stirred continuously at room temperature
during dosing and as possible during transport. Each dose was administered via a syringe
equipped with attached gavage cannula.
Doses were based on the most recent body weight measurement. The first day of dosing was
based on Day 1 body weights. - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Test substance formulations and vehicle control were administered once daily, for 2 consecutive days via oral gavage.
- Frequency of treatment:
- Test substance formulations and vehicle control were administered once daily, for 2 consecutive days via oral gavage.
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Dose / conc.:
- 20 mg/kg bw/day
- Remarks:
- Positive control: Positive control substance reference slides, obtained from a separate experiment performed at the Test Site with cyclophosphamide monohydrate administered once approximately 24 hours prior to harvest, were included in the slide set to verify scorer proficiency (Roy, 2021, 30810).
- Dose / conc.:
- 1 200 mg/kg bw/day
- Remarks:
- Micronucleus Assay: 6 Females
Toxicokinetic Phase: 3 Females
- Dose / conc.:
- 600 mg/kg bw/day
- Remarks:
- Micronucleus Assay: 6 Females
- Dose / conc.:
- 300 mg/kg bw/day
- Remarks:
- Micronucleus Assay: 6 Females
- Dose / conc.:
- 800 mg/kg bw/day
- Remarks:
- Micronucleus Assay: 6 Males
Toxicokinetic Phase 3 Males
- Dose / conc.:
- 400 mg/kg bw/day
- Remarks:
- Micronucleus Assay: 6 Males
- Dose / conc.:
- 200 mg/kg bw/day
- Remarks:
- Micronucleus Assay: 6 Males
- Dose / conc.:
- 0 mg/kg bw/day
- Remarks:
- Vehicle: Micronucleus Assay - 6 Males and 6 Females
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- See "Study Design" document attached for details on dosing regimen.
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control(s):
- Positive Control Article: Cyclophosphamide monohydrate in Ultrapure water
Positive control substance reference slides, obtained from a separate experiment performed at the Test Site with cyclophosphamide monohydrate administered once approximately 24 hours prior to harvest, were included in the slide set to verify scorer proficiency (Roy, 2021, 30810).
Examinations
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- Micronucleus Evaluation:
Bone Marrow Sample Collection:
Bone marrow was collected from up to 5 surviving animals in each group at the time of euthanasia for the terminal necropsy from the right femur of animals euthanized by inhalation of carbon dioxide. Five animals/group in the vehicle control and test substance-treated groups were euthanized 18 to 24 hours following the last dose administration. The sixth animal was euthanized via carbon dioxide inhalation and the carcasses were discarded. Bone marrow was aspirated or flushed 2 to 3 times from the right femur into a centrifuge tube using a syringe containing heat inactivated fetal bovine serum (HI FBS). - Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- Micronucleus Evaluation:
Bone Marrow Sample Processing:
The bone marrow was centrifuged and all but approximately 0.25 mL (or a volume approximately twice that of the cell pellet) of HI FBS was decanted, and the pellet was resuspended in the remaining HI FBS. Bone marrow smears were prepared by placing approximately 1 drop of cell suspension onto a minimum of 4 appropriately labeled, clean microscope slides. Each slide was coded so that the treatment group would not be revealed during subsequent analysis. The slides were air dried, fixed in 100% methanol for approximately 20 minutes and allowed to air dry a second time. The slides were stored and shipped at ambient temperature to Charles River Skokie and then to the Test Site due to a change in the protocol.
Bone Marrow Sample Analysis:
Prior to analysis, the coded slides were stained with acridine orange staining solution (Hayashi et al., 1983). Two separate evaluations were made for each slide: 1) 500 total erythrocytes (TE:PCEs + normochromatic erythrocytes [NCs]) were counted per animal and the PCE:TE ratio was determined; and 2) the number of micronucleated PCEs (MN-PCEs) in total of 4000 PCEs scored per animal was determined. - Statistics:
- STATISTICAL ANALYSIS:
Statistical analyses were not performed due to the absence of a concurrent control group for the
range-finding phase. However, means and standard deviations were calculated.
Results and discussion
Test resultsopen allclose all
- Key result
- Sex:
- female
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Remarks:
- All dose levels tested.
- Toxicity:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Test substance-related lower body weights were observed at 1200 mg/kg/day in females. Decreases in body temperatures were observed at ≥ 800 mg/kg/day in females.
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: Based on effects on survival in both phases, the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) level was considered to be 800 mg/kg/day for females.
- Key result
- Sex:
- male
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Remarks:
- All dose levels tested.
- Toxicity:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Test substance-related lower body weights were observed at ≥ 400 mg/kg/day in males. Decreases in body temperatures were observed at ≥ 800 mg/kg/day in males.
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: Based on effects on survival in both phases, the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) level was considered to be 800 mg/kg/day for males.
- Additional information on results:
- Range-Finding Phase:
Mortality:
Test substance-related effects on survival were observed at ≥ 1200 mg/kg/day in males and at
2000 mg/kg/day in females, during the range-finding phase. Two males and 1 female at
2000 mg/kg/day and 1 male at 1200 mg/kg/day were found dead prior the scheduled euthanasia.
In the 2000 mg/kg/day group, Male Nos. 10002 and 10003 were found dead on Day 1 after dose
administration and were both noted with low carriage, slight incoordination, hunched posture,
and decreased activity at 1–3 hours post-dose. Female No. 10502 was found dead prior to the
scheduled euthanasia on Day 3, and was noted with clinical observations of decreased activity,
low carriage and slight incoordination, partly closed eyes, abnormal soft feces, erected fur,
urogenital brown fur staining attributed to the color of the test substance, hunched posture
between Days 1 and 2 on the days of dose administration.
In the 1200 mg/kg/day group, Male No. 9001 was found dead on Day 1 after dose administration
and was noted with observations of slight incoordination, low carriage, and decreased activity
after dose administration. Additionally, the animal was observed to be weak and lying on side
before being found dead.
All other animals survived to the scheduled euthanasia.
Clinical Observations:
Test substance-related clinical observations were noted at ≥ 200 mg/kg/day in females and at
≥ 400 mg/kg/day in males.
At 2000 mg/kg/day, test substance-related observations included decreased activity, hunched
posture, low carriage, abnormal slightly soft feces, and brown urogenital fur staining attributed to
the color of the test substance in both males and females. In addition, slight incoordination, and
erected fur in the females was observed.
At 1200 mg/kg/day, test substance-related observations of decreased activity, low carriage, and
hunched posture were noted in both males and females. In addition, males were observed with
slight incoordination, and females were observed with skin pallor, brown urogenital fur staining
attributed to the color of the test substance and abnormal slightly soft feces.
At 800 mg/kg/day, test substance-related ploughing behavior was observed in both males and
females at the time of dose administration. In addition, females were observed with brown
staining and wet fur in the urogenital region consistent with the color of the test substance, and
abnormal soft feces during the study.
At 400 mg/kg/day, test substance-related ploughing behavior observed in both males and females at the time of dosing. Additionally, abnormal slightly soft feces in a single male was also noted.
At 200 mg/kg/day, test substance-related ploughing behavior was noted on Day 2 at the time of
dosing in a single female.
Body Weights and Body Weight Gains:
Test substance-related body weight losses, compared to pretreatment body weights on Days 1–3,
were observed at dose levels ≥ 400 mg/kg/day in males and ≥ 200 mg/kg/day in females.
In the 400, 800, 1200, and 2000 mg/kg/day group males, mean body weight losses of -11.3 g,
-9.3 g, -42.5 g, and -25.0 g respectively were observed between Days 1–3. On Day 3, the mean
body weights in the 400, 800, 1200, and 2000 mg/kg/day group males were 6.5%, 5.0%, 11.9%,
and 6.5% decreased, respectively, compared to mean body weights on Day 1 and were associated
with the observed body weight losses. There were no test substance-related effects on body
weight in the 200 mg/kg/day group males.
In the 200, 400, 800, 1200, and 2000 mg/kg/day group females, mean body weight losses of
-10.7 g, -4.0 g, -14.0 g, -23.7 g, and -27.5 g, respectively were observed between Days 1–3. On
Day 3, the mean body weights in the 200, 400, 800, 1200, and 2000 mg/kg/day group females
were 6.1%, 2.3%, 8.2%, 10.1%, and 6.8% decreased, respectively, compared to mean body weights on Day 1 and corresponded to the body weight losses.
Body Temperature:
Test substance-related effects on body temperature were noted at ≥ 200 mg/kg/day in both males and females.
Mean body temperatures prior to dose administration on Days 1 and 2 in males and females
ranged between 34°C and 39°C. On Day 1, a ≥ 1°C decrease in mean body temperature was
observed at 2 and 5 hours post-dose in all test substance-administered males and female groups. A dose response was evident with a higher magnitude of approximately 2–4°C decreases in mean
body temperature observed at ≥ 800 mg/kg/day in males and females. On Day 2, mean body
temperatures at 2 and 5 hours post-dose were similar or noted to have a ≤ 1°C decrease after test
substance administration in the surviving males. However, in females, a higher magnitude of test
substance-related effects with an approximately 1–2°C decrease in mean body temperatures at 2
and/or 5 hours post-dose on Day 2 were observed in the 800, 1200, and 2000 mg/kg/day group
females.
Overall, a qualitative comparison of body temperatures after test substance administration to
pre-dose body temperatures showed a dose-dependent trend with higher magnitude of decreased
body temperatures observed at 1200 and 2000 mg/kg/day in males and at 800, 1200, and
2000 mg/kg/day in females.
Definitive Phase:
Mortality:
Test substance-related effects on survival were observed at 1200 mg/kg/day.
Female Nos. 13504 and 13502 in the 1200 mg/kg/day group were found dead on Day 2 and 3,
respectively. Both females were noted with decreased activity and low carriage at 1–3 hours
postdose on Day 1. In addition, Female No. 13502, was observed soft feces (moderate) with
brown anal fur staining on Day 2, and Female No. 13504 was observed with moderate
incoordination and abnormal gait on Day 1. There were no macroscopic observations at necropsy
in both animals.
All other animals survived to the scheduled euthanasia.
Clinical Observations:
Test substance-related clinical observations were noted in all test substance-administered males
and females.
Test substance-related observations included hunched posture in all test substance-administered
female groups, low carriage, moderate incoordination and decreased activity in 600 and
1200 mg/kg/day group females between Days 1–2. In addition, slight or moderately soft feces
with brown anal fur staining attributed to the color of test substance, were observed in all test substance-administered female groups. Incidences of abnormal breathing sounds on Day 3 in
600 mg/kg/day group female (No. 12504) and 1200 mg/kg/day group Female No. 13506, erected
fur between Days 1–2 in 600 mg/kg/day group Female No. 12501, hunched posture after dose
administration on Day 1 in 300 mg/kg/day group Female No. 11503 were also noted.
Test substance-related decreased activity in 800 mg/kg/day group males between Days 1–2,
abnormal slight or moderately soft feces and brown anal fur staining consistent with the color of
the test substance in all test substance-administered group males between Days 2–3 were observed. In addition, incidences of low carriage in 800 mg/kg/day group Male No. 7005,
abnormal breathing sounds in 800 mg/kg/day group Male No. 7003 and 200 mg/kg/day group
Male No. 5001, soft feces with mucoid material in 400 mg/kg/day group Male No. 6003, and
yellow urogenital fur staining in a 200 mg/kg/day group male, were observed.
Body Weights and Body Weight Gains:
Test substance-related lower body weights were noted in the 400 and 800 mg/kg/day group
males and in the 1200 mg/kg/day group females.
In the 400 and 800 mg/kg/day group males, mean body weight losses of -11.2 g and -29.7 g,
respectively, compared to a mean body weight gain of 2.7 g in the control group between
Days 1–3, were observed. The mean body weight loss was statistically significant at 800 mg/kg/day. On Day 3, the mean body weights in the 400 and 800 mg/kg/day group males
were -5.0% and -13.4% lower, respectively, compared to the control group and corresponded
with the body weight losses. There were no test substance-related effects on body weight in the
200 mg/kg/day group males.
In the 1200 mg/kg/day group females, a statistically significant mean body weight loss of -17.3 g
compared to a mean body weight gain of 0.3 g in the control group between Days 1–3 was noted.
On Day 3, the mean body weight in the 1200 mg/kg/day group females was 10.3% lower than the control group and corresponded with body weight loss. There were no test substance-related
effects on body weights in the 300 and 600 mg/kg/day group females.
Body Temperature:
Test substance-related effects on body temperature were noted in the 800 mg/kg/day group males and in the 1200 mg/kg/day group females.
Test substance-related lower mean body temperatures at 2 and 5 hours post-dose, compared to the control group were observed in the 1200 mg/kg/day group females on Days 1 and 2. The
decreased mean body temperatures were statistically significant at 2 hours post-dose on Day 1
and at 2 and 5 hours postdosing on Day 2. Statistically significant lower mean body temperatures
prior to dose administration on Days 1 and 2, compared to the control group, were considered
incidental.
Test substance-related slightly lower mean body temperatures at 2 and 5 hours postdosing were
observed in the 800 mg/kg/day group males compared to the control group on Day 1. The
differences were not statistically significant but were considered to test substance-related based
on the magnitudes of the decreases compared to the body temperatures before dose
administration.
Any other changes in body temperatures regardless of statistical significance in other test
substance-administered males and females were comparable to changes observed in the control
group and were considered to unrelated to test substance administration.
Bioanalytical Evaluation:
Whole blood samples at 1 hour after dose administration on Day 1 in the 800 mg/kg/day group
males and 1200 mg/kg/day group females were collected for possible future analyses.
The blood samples collected for exposure analyses during the study were not analyzed by the
Sponsor due to clinical observations of brown fur staining in the urogenital and/or anal regions
consistent with the color of the test substance, soft feces, and dose-dependent increases in body
temperature that demonstrated likely evidence of systemic exposure to the test substance.
Furthermore, similar observations of urogenital staining were also noted in a previous study
conducted by the Sponsor (Hannas et al., 2016, Study No. 160038).
Micronucleus Evaluation:
At least 3 dose levels and at least 4000 PCEs per each animal were analyzed to evaluate the
induction of micronuclei after test substance administration. There were at least 5 animals/sex/group for the micronucleus assay evaluation, with the exception of the number of
animals in the 1200 mg/kg/day group females. Due to test substance-related effects on survival
in 2 females and collection of bone marrow from only 3 females, there were less than 5 animals available for scoring the micronuclei; however, the assay was considered scientifically valid because all animals analyzed showed clear negative results without any bone marrow toxicity and the remaining animals allowed for a statistical comparison.
Test substance administration did not result in any statistically significant or dose-related
increases in mean micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes (%MN-PCE) in both males and
females, compared to concurrent vehicle control group. Means of %MN-PCE in all groups were
below the 95% historical negative control upper limit, with the exception of 800 mg/kg/day
group males (Group 7) that had mean % MN-PCE of 0.29% that was above the upper limit of
95% historical negative control limit at 0.22%. Based on slightly higher %MN-PCE observed in
800 mg/kg/day group males, compared to the control males, 4000 additional PCEs were
evaluated for further investigation. The number of MN-PCEs in the additional cells counted
(Represented as 2nd count), were consistent with the number of MN-PCEs noted, when the initial
4000 cells were counted and did not provide additional clarification. The MN-PCEs observed in
individual animals of 800 mg/kg/day group males were compared to the individual values noted
in the concurrent control group males, and higher mean %MN-PCE of 800 mg/kg/day males was
considered to be due to slightly higher %MN-PCE values of 0.438% and 0.375% noted in Male
No. 7003 and Male No. 7001, respectively. Additionally, Male No. 4003 in the control group
was also observed with a similar higher %MN-PCE value of 0.325%. Based on the lack of a
clear dose response and higher individual values in the control group male, the higher mean %
MN-PCEs in the 800 mg/kg/day males was considered minimal and not biologically relevant.
Therefore, the results for induction of micronuclei were considered as negative.
Test substance administration (4-[3-(1-naphthylamino)propyl]morpholine) did not result in any
notable decreases in the %PCE/TE, which indicated that there was no cytotoxicity in bone
marrow.
Therefore, it was concluded that administration of the test substance for 2 consecutive days did
not result in clastogenic effects or disruption of the mitotic apparatus to induce micronuclei
formation in bone marrow polychromatic erythrocytes of both male and female rats, at dose
levels of 200, 400 and 800 mg/kg/day in males and at 300, 600 and 1200 mg/kg/day for females.
Thus, the test substance was considered not to be genotoxic in this in vivo micronucleus
evaluation.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Summary of Body Weights: Range-Finding Phase | |||||||||
Bodyweight (g) | Day(s) Relative to start date | Day(s) Relative to start date | |||||||
Sex: Male | 1 | 2 | 3 | Sex: Female | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||
200 mg/kg/day: Group 1 | MEAN | 186.0 | 183.3 | 189.3 | 200 mg/kg/day: Group 1 | MEAN | 174.7 | 166.0 | 164.0 |
SD | 23.1 | 23.3 | 21.7 | SD | 4.6 | 2.6 | 3.6 | ||
N | 3 | 3 | 3 | N | 3 | 3 | 3 | ||
400 mg/kg/day: Group 2 | MEAN | 173.0 | 159.0 | 161.7 | 400 mg/kg/day: Group 2 | MEAN | 172.3 | 166.7 | 168.3 |
SD | 15.5 | 9.6 | 14.2 | SD | 6.7 | 8.7 | 8.1 | ||
N | 3 | 3 | 3 | N | 3 | 3 | 3 | ||
800 mg/kg/day: Group 3 | MEAN | 188.7 | 176.7 | 179.3 | 800 mg/kg/day: Group 3 | MEAN | 170.7 | 157.0 | 156.7 |
SD | 20.5 | 25.0 | 21.7 | SD | 7.6 | 6.6 | 10.1 | ||
N | 3 | 3 | 3 | N | 3 | 3 | 3 | ||
1200 mg/kg/day: Group 9 | MEAN | 333.3 | 301.5 | 293.5 | 1200 mg/kg/day: Group 9 | MEAN | 234.7 | 218.3 | 211.0 |
SD | 6.1 | 3.5 | 2.1 | SD | 7.8 | 8.3 | 13.5 | ||
N | 3 | 2 | 2 | N | 3 | 3 | 3 | ||
2000 mg/kg/day: Group 10 | MEAN | 327.3 | 309.0 | 306.0 | 2000 mg/kg/day: Group 10 | MEAN | 222.7 | 201.0 | 207.5 |
SD | 6.4 | SD | 26.1 | 18.7 | 7.8 | ||||
N | 3 | 1 | 1 | N | 3 | 3 | 2 |
Summary of bodyweight gains (g): Range finding phase | |||||||||
Bodyweight gain (Interval) | Day(s) Relative to start date | Day(s) Relative to start date | |||||||
Sex: Male | 1 to 2 | 2 to 3 | 1 to 3 | Sex: Female | 1 to 2 | 2 to 3 | 1 to 3 | ||
200 mg/kg/day: Group 1 | MEAN | -2.7 | 6.0 | 3.3 | 200 mg/kg/day: Group 1 | MEAN | -8.2 | -2.0 | -10.7 |
SD | 2.1 | 2.0 | 1.5 | SD | 2.1 | 2.0 | 3.2 | ||
N | 3 | 3 | 3 | N | 3 | 3 | 3 | ||
400 mg/kg/day: Group 2 | MEAN | -14.0 | 2.7 | -11.3 | 400 mg/kg/day: Group 2 | MEAN | -5.7 | 1.7 | -4.0 |
SD | 9.5 | 13.1 | 7.1 | SD | 5.5 | 2.5 | 7.0 | ||
N | 3 | 3 | 3 | N | 3 | 3 | 3 | ||
800 mg/kg/day: Group 3 | MEAN | -12.0 | 2.7 | -9.3 | 800 mg/kg/day: Group 3 | MEAN | -13.7 | -0.3 | -14.0 |
SD | 6.6 | 8.6 | 3.1 | SD | 7.5 | 3.5 | 9.6 | ||
N | 3 | 3 | 3 | N | 3 | 3 | 3 | ||
1200 mg/kg/day: Group 9 | MEAN | -34.5 | -8.0 | -42.5 | 1200 mg/kg/day: Group 9 | MEAN | -16.3 | -7.3 | -23.7 |
SD | 2.1 | 1.4 | 3.5 | SD | 4.0 | 5.7 | 9.2 | ||
N | 2 | 2 | 2 | N | 3 | 3 | 3 | ||
2000 mg/kg/day: Group 10 | MEAN | -22.0 | -3.0 | -25.0 | 2000 mg/kg/day: Group 10 | MEAN | -21.7 | -1.0 | -27.5 |
SD | - | - | - | SD | 8.5 | 11.3 | 13.4 | ||
N | 1 | 1 | 1 | N | 3 | 2 | 2 |
Summary of Body Weights: Main Study | |||||||||
Bodyweight (g) | Day(s) Relative to start date | Day(s) Relative to start date | |||||||
Sex: Male | 1 | 2 | 3 | Sex: Female | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||
0 mg/kg/day: Group 4 | MEAN | 297.7 | 295.7 | 300.3 | 0 mg/kg/day: Group 4 | MEAN | 195.5 | 192.5 | 195.8 |
SD | 22.9 | 24.5 | 29.2 | SD | 14.1 | 11.5 | 14.6 | ||
N | 6 | 6 | 6 | N | 6 | 6 | 6 | ||
200 mg/kg/day: Group 5 | MEAN | 291.5 | 286.2 | 290.7 | 300 mg/kg/day: Group 11 | MEAN | 192.5 | 189.5 | 187.7 |
SD | 27.7 | 33.8 | 29.2 | SD | 17.2 | 12.6 | 16.6 | ||
N | 6 | 6 | 6 | N | 6 | 6 | 6 | ||
%Diff | -2.1 | -3.2 | -3.2 | %Diff | -1.5 | -1.6 | -4.2 | ||
400 mg/kg/day: Group 6 | MEAN | 296.3 | 284.3 | 285.2 | 600 mg/kg/day: Group 12 | MEAN | 195.0 | 188.8 | 192.3 |
SD | 22.7 | 30.4 | 33.7 | SD | 14.9 | 14.5 | 14.8 | ||
N | 6 | 6 | 6 | N | 6 | 6 | 6 | ||
%Diff | -0.4 | -3.8 | -5.0 | %Diff | -0.3 | -1.9 | -1.8 | ||
800 mg/kg/day: Group 7 | MEAN | 289.8 | 269.0 | 260.2 | 1200 mg/kg/day: Group 13 | MEAN | 192.2 | 186.0 | 175.8 |
SD | 16.3 | 14.0 | 15.0 | SD | 192.2 | 186.0 | 175.8 | ||
N | 6 | 6 | 6 | N | 6 | 5 | 4 | ||
%Diff | -2.6 | -9.0 | -13.4 | %Diff | -1.7 | -3.4 | -10.3 | ||
Summary of bodyweight gains (g): Main study | |||||||||
Bodyweight gain (Interval) | Day(s) Relative to start date | Day(s) Relative to start date | |||||||
Sex: Male | 1 to 2 | 2 to 3 | 1 to 3 | Sex: Female | 1 to 2 | 2 to 3 | 1 to 3 | ||
0 mg/kg/day: Group 4 | MEAN | -2.0 | 4.7 | 2.7 | 0 mg/kg/day: Group 4 | MEAN | -3.0 | 3.3 | 0.3 |
SD | 7.6 | 7.4 | 10.5 | SD | 7.2 | 5.4 | 5.3 | ||
N | 6 | 6 | 6 | N | 6 | 6 | 6 | ||
200 mg/kg/day: Group 5 | MEAN | -5.3 | 4.5 | -0.8 | 300 mg/kg/day: Group 11 | MEAN | -3.0 | -1.8 | -4.8 |
SD | 7.5 | 6.4 | 3.6 | SD | 7.3 | 7.8 | 11.7 | ||
N | 6 | 6 | 6 | N | 6 | 6 | 6 | ||
400 mg/kg/day: Group 6 | MEAN | -12.0 | 0.8 | -11.2 | 600 mg/kg/day: Group 12 | MEAN | -6.2 | 3.5 | -2.7 |
SD | 9.7 | 6.7 | 13.5 | SD | 7.8 | 4.3 | 5.9 | ||
N | 6 | 6 | 6 | N | 6 | 6 | 6 | ||
800 mg/kg/day: Group 7 | MEAN | -20.8 | -8.8* | -29.7** | 1200 mg/kg/day: Group 13 | MEAN | -9.6 | -9.5** | -17.3* |
SD | 9.9** | 8.2 | 13.5 | SD | 5.8 | 5.3 | 8.5 | ||
N | 6 | 6 | 6 | N | 5 | 4 | 4 |
Summary of Micronucleus Results | |||||||||
Sampling Time - Day 3 (18-24 Hours post last dose) | |||||||||
Male | |||||||||
Group 4 - Vehicle | |||||||||
Group 6 - Test Substance 400 mg/kg/day | |||||||||
Group 5 - Test Substance 200 mg/kg/day | |||||||||
Group 7 - Test Substance 800 mg/kg/day | |||||||||
Group 8 - Positive Control 20/mg/kg/day | |||||||||
% MN-PCEa | |||||||||
Group | Number of Animals | Mean %PCE/TE | %RPCE/TE | Mean Incidence MN-PCE | Mean | ± | SD | ||
4 | 5 | 42.1 | 100.0 | 15.4 | 0.19 | ± | 0.08 | ||
5 | 5 | 57.2 | 135.9 | 14.8 | 0.19 | ± | 0.10 | ||
6 | 5 | 50.8 | 120.8 | 12.6 | 0.16 | ± | 0.04 | ||
7 | 5 | 48.2 | 114.6 | 22.8 | 0.29 | ± | 0.11 | ||
8 | 3 | 53.6 | 127.5 | 109.7 | 2.74 A | ± | 1.30 | ||
A = Significant increase from control group (Group 4) value: A - P ≤ 0.05 B - P ≤ 0.01 (Wilcoxon) | |||||||||
Sampling Time - Day 3 (18-24 Hours post last dose) | |||||||||
Female | |||||||||
Group 4 - Vehicle | |||||||||
Group 11 - Test Substance 300 mg/kg/day | |||||||||
Group 12 - Test Substance 600 mg/kg/day | |||||||||
Group 13 - Test Substance 1200 mg/kg/day | |||||||||
% MN-PCEa | |||||||||
Group | Number of Animals | Mean %PCE/TE | %RPCE/TE | Mean Incidence MN-PCE | Mean | ± | SD | ||
4 | 5 | 56.4 | 100.0 | 7.4 | 0.19 | ± | 0.04 | ||
11 | 5 | 54.0 | 95.6 | 7.0 | 0.18 | ± | 0.08 | ||
12 | 5 | 52.1 | 92.3 | 4.2 | 0.11 | ± | 0.06 | ||
13 | 3 | 49.0 | 86.9 | 6.0 | 0.15 | ± | 0.03 | ||
a - statistical analysis performed on %MN-PCE |
Micronucleus test in bone marrow of male rats group results | |||
Studies Performed Between Mar 2015 - Aug 2021 | |||
Historical negative control data | |||
Frequency of MN-PCEa | % MN-PCE | % PCE/TE | |
Mean ± SD | 5.3 ± 1.8 | 0.13 ± 0.04 | 54.6 ± 9.8 |
Range (min-max) | 1.8 - 11.4 | 0.05 - 0.29 | 27.2 - 78.0 |
Number of experiments | 108 | 108 | 108 |
95% Control Limits | 1.8-8.8 | 0.05 - 0.22 | |
Historical positive control datab | |||
Frequency of MN-PCEa | % MN-PCE | % PCE/TE | |
Mean ± SD | 80.0 ± 28.5 | 2.01 ± 0.71 | 37.9 ± 8.7 |
Range (min-max) | 31.0 - 214.7 | 0.78 - 5.37 | 8.2 - 59.1 |
Number of experiments | 115 | 115 | 115 |
a - Number of MN-PCE observed per 4000 PCE examined | |||
b - Rats were treated using CP (20 mg/kg/day) or CP and EMS (200 or 241 mg/kg/day | |||
Micronucleus test in bone marrow of female rats group results | |||
Studies Performed Between Mar 2015 - Aug 2021 | |||
Historical negative control data | |||
Frequency of MN-PCEa | % MN-PCE | % PCE/TE | |
Mean ± SD | 4.8 ± 1.8 | 0.12 ± 0.05 | 47.7 ± 6.8 |
Range (min-max) | 1.5 - 9.6 | 0.04 - 0.24 | 28.7 - 62.9 |
Number of experiments | 51 | 51 | 51 |
95% Control Limits | 1.2 - 8.4 | 0.03 - 0.21 | |
a - Number of MN-PCE observed per 4000 PCE examined |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Administration of 4-[3-(1-naphthylamino)propyl]morpholine by once daily oral gavage for 2 consecutive days to Crl:CD(SD) rats resulted in mortality at dose levels ≥ 1200 mg/kg/day in males and at 2000 mg/kg/day in females in the range-finding phase. In the definitive phase, effects on survival were also observed at 1200 mg/kg/day in females. Based on effects on survival in both phases, the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) level was considered to be 800 mg/kg/day for both males and females. Test substance-related lower body weights at ≥ 400 mg/kg/day in males and 1200 mg/kg/day females, decreases in body temperatures were observed at ≥ 800 mg/kg/day in males and females. There was no clear evidence of micronuclei induction in PCEs in bone morrow or bone marrow cytotoxicity in males or females. Based on these results, administration of 4-[3- (1 naphthylamino)propyl]morpholine at dose levels up to 800 mg/kg/day in males and 1200 mg/kg/day in females for 2 days by daily oral gavage, did not show a clear evidence of micronuclei induction genotoxicity in rats, but a dose level above 800 mg/kg/day was considered to exceed the maximum tolerated dose.
- Executive summary:
The objective of this study was to assess the potential toxicity of the test substance to induce micronuclei in polychromatic erythrocytes in rat bone marrow following 2 consecutive days of
treatment when administered by oral gavage.The following parameters and end points were evaluated in this study: mortality, clinical signs, body weights, body weight gains, body temperatures, and micronucleus evaluation (definitive
phase only), and macroscopic examinations (gross necropsy for animals found dead).
Range-Finding Phase:
Test substance-related effects on survival were observed at ≥ 1200 mg/kg/day in males and at 2000 mg/kg/day in females. Two males and 1 female at 2000 mg/kg/day and 1 male at 1200 mg/kg/day were found dead prior the scheduled euthanasia. Clinical observations noted for these animals prior to being found dead included low carriage, slight incoordination, hunched posture, decreased activity, slightly soft feces, brown urogenital staining consistent with the color of the test substance, eyes partly closed, erected fur, weak, and/or lying on side.
All other animals survived to the scheduled euthanasia.
Test substance-related clinical observations were observed at ≥ 200 mg/kg/day in females and at ≥ 400 mg/kg/day in males. At 2000 mg/kg/day, clinical observations included decreased activity,
hunched posture, slightly soft feces, brown staining of the fur in the urogenital area, and low carriage in both males and females, slight incoordination, and erected fur in females. At 1200 mg/kg/day, observations included decreased activity, low carriage and hunched posture in both males and females, slight incoordination in males, and skin pallor, slightly soft feces and
brown urogenital fur staining as consistent with the color of the test substance in females. At 800 mg/kg/day observations included ploughing behavior in males and females, brown staining and wet fur in the urogenital region as consistent with the color of the test substance, and slightly soft feces in females. At 400 mg/kg/day ploughing behavior in males and females, and slightly soft feces in males were noted. At 200 mg/kg/day, observations were limited to ploughing behavior in females.
Test substance-related body weight losses were observed between Days 1–3, in males at ≥ 400 mg/kg/day and ≥ 200 mg/kg/day in females. On Day 3, the mean body weights in the 400, 800, 1200, and 2000 mg/kg/day group males were decreased by 6.5%, 5.0%, 11.9%, and 6.5%, respectively, compared to Day 1 mean body weights. On Day 3, the mean body weights in the 200, 400, 800, 1200, and 2000 mg/kg/day group females were decreased by 6.1%, 2.3%, 8.2%, 10.1%, and 6.8%, respectively, compared to Day 1 mean body weights.
Test substance-related effects on body temperature were noted in the ≥ 200 mg/kg/day group males and females, when compared to their mean body temperatures before dose administration on Days 1 and 2. A qualitative comparison of the decreased body temperatures compared to predose body temperatures showed a dose-dependent trend with higher magnitudes of decreased body temperatures observed at 1200 and 2000 mg/kg/day in males and at 800, 1200, and 2000 mg/kg/day in females.Definitive Phase:
Test substance-related effects on survival were observed in 1200 mg/kg/day group females. Two females were found dead: 1 on Day 2 and 1 on Day 3. Clinical observations in these animals before being found dead during the study included decreased activity, low carriage, moderate incoordination, abnormal gait, moderate amount of soft feces, and/or brown fur staining on the anal region.All other animals survived to the scheduled euthanasia.
Test substance-related clinical observations were noted in all test substance-administered males and females. Test substance-related observations included hunched posture in all test substance-administered female groups, low carriage, moderate incoordination, and decreased activity in the 600 and 1200 mg/kg/day group females between Days 1–2. Slight or moderately soft feces with brown anal fur staining attributed to the color of test substance were observed in all test substance-administered female groups. In addition, single incidences of abnormal breathing
sounds in a 600 mg/kg/day female and a 1200 mg/kg/day female on Day 3, erected fur in a 600 mg/kg/day female between Days 1–2, hunched posture after dose administration in a 300 mg/kg/day female on Day 1 were observed. In males, test substance-related decreased activity was observed in 800 mg/kg/day group males between Days 1–2. Abnormal slight or moderately soft feces and brown anal fur staining attributed to the color of test substance was observed in all test substance administered group males between Days 2–3. Single incidences of low carriage in an 800 mg/kg/day group male, abnormal breathing sounds in an 800 mg/kg/day group male and a 200 mg/kg/day group male, soft feces with mucoid material in a 400 mg/kg/day group male, and yellow urogenital fur staining consistent with the color of the
test substance in a 200 mg/kg/day group male, were also observed.Test substance-related lower body weights were observed in the 400 and 800 mg/kg/day group males and the 1200 mg/kg/day group females. Mean body weights on Day 3 were 5.0% and 13.4% lower in the 400 and 800 mg/kg/day group males, respectively, compared to the control group. In the 1200 mg/kg/day group females, mean body weights were 10.3% lower on Day 3 when compared to the control group. Lower mean body weights in both males and females were associated with body weight losses observed between Days 1–3.
Test substance-related effects on body temperature were noted in 800 mg/kg/day group males and 1200 mg/kg/day group females. In the 1200 mg/kg/day group females, test substance-related
lower mean body temperatures at 2 and 5 hours postdose were noted compared to the control group on Days 1 and 2. In the 800 mg/kg/day group males, test substance-related slightly lower
mean body temperatures at 2 and 5 hours postdosing were noted compared to the control group on Day 1.
Test substance administration in males and females did not result in any statistically significant increases in the means of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes (%MN-PCE), compared to the vehicle control group. Group means of %MN-PCE in test substance-administered groups were within the 95% limits of the historical negative control distribution in all test substance-administered groups, with the exception of 800 mg/kg/day group males that had mean %MN-PCE above 95% historical negative control data but within the historical range. Thus, an
additional 4000 cells for each animal were analyzed for induction of micronuclei and the overall results were considered as negative as the increases were minimal compared to the individual
values noted in concurrent control and thus were considered biologically not relevant. There were no substantial decreases in the proportion of %PCE/TE, indicating that there was no bone
marrow cytotoxicity, after the administration of test substance.
Administration of 4-[3-(1-naphthylamino)propyl]morpholine by once daily oral gavage for 2 consecutive days to Crl:CD(SD) rats resulted in mortality at dose levels ≥ 1200 mg/kg/day in
males and at 2000 mg/kg/day in females in the range-finding phase. In the definitive phase, effects on survival were also observed at 1200 mg/kg/day in females. Based on effects on survival in both phases, the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) level was considered to be 800 mg/kg/day for both males and females. Test substance-related decreases in body temperatures were observed at ≥ 800 mg/kg/day in males and females. Also, significant changes in body weight were noted at 800 mg/kg/day in males and 1200 mg/kg/day in females. There was no clear evidence of micronuclei induction in PCEs in bone morrow or bone marrow cytotoxicity in males or females. Based on these results, administration of 4-[3-(1 naphthylamino)propyl]morpholine at dose levels up to 800 mg/kg/day in males and 1200 mg/kg/day in females for 2 days by daily oral gavage, did not show a clear evidence of micronuclei induction genotoxicity in rats, but a dose level above 800 mg/kg/day were considered to exceed the maximum tolerated dose.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.