Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 617-769-9 | CAS number: 858956-08-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Adsorption / desorption
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- adsorption / desorption: screening
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 20 Sep 2007 - 22 May 2008
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 106 (Adsorption - Desorption Using a Batch Equilibrium Method)
- Version / remarks:
- 2000
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority, Den Haag, The Netherlands
- Type of method:
- batch equilibrium method
- Media:
- soil
- Radiolabelling:
- yes
- Test temperature:
- 20 ± 2°C
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- - Concentrations: Five different soils at five concentrations: 0.45, 0.225, 0.045, 0.0225 and 0.0045 µg/mL
- Triplicate aliquots (500 µL from 0.0045, 0.0225, 0.045 levels and 200 µL from 0.225 and 0.45 µg/mL levels) of supernatants were added directly to scintillant and counted by LSC.
- To determine test item stability the supernatants of the highest concentration (0.45-µg/mL concentration) of the adsorption experiments were analyzed by HPLC with fraction collection.
- Sampling interval: At equilibrium (after 24 hours) - Matrix no.:
- #1
- Matrix type:
- clay loam
- % Clay:
- 31
- % Silt:
- 48
- % Sand:
- 21
- % Org. carbon:
- 3.8
- pH:
- 6.4
- CEC:
- 34.5 meq/100 g soil d.w.
- Bulk density (g/cm³):
- 1.1
- Matrix no.:
- #2
- Matrix type:
- loam
- % Clay:
- 15
- % Silt:
- 44
- % Sand:
- 41
- % Org. carbon:
- 0.5
- pH:
- 8.73
- CEC:
- 8.8 meq/100 g soil d.w.
- Bulk density (g/cm³):
- 1.2
- Matrix no.:
- #3
- Matrix type:
- sandy loam
- % Clay:
- 7
- % Silt:
- 34
- % Sand:
- 59
- % Org. carbon:
- 1.3
- pH:
- 8.09
- CEC:
- 6.4 meq/100 g soil d.w.
- Bulk density (g/cm³):
- 1.2
- Matrix no.:
- #4
- Matrix type:
- silty clay
- % Clay:
- 45
- % Silt:
- 48
- % Sand:
- 7
- % Org. carbon:
- 1.6
- pH:
- 7.83
- CEC:
- 16.6 meq/100 g soil d.w.
- Bulk density (g/cm³):
- 1.1
- Matrix no.:
- #5
- Matrix type:
- sandy loam
- % Clay:
- 13
- % Silt:
- 20
- % Sand:
- 67
- % Org. carbon:
- 1.2
- pH:
- 5.67
- CEC:
- 8.3 meq/100 g soil d.w.
- Bulk density (g/cm³):
- 1.3
- Details on matrix:
- COLLECTION AND STORAGE
- Geographic location: #1: Drummer (clay loam), #2: California (loam), #3: Nambsheim (sandy loam), #4: Lleida (silty clay), #5: Sassafras (sandy loam)
- Soil preparation: air-dried and sieved through a 2-mm sieve - Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Desorption experiments were conducted only on those samples treated at the highest test solution concentration
- Type, size and further details on reaction vessel: Tarson’s polypropylene centrifuge tubes
- Number of reaction vessels/concentration: 2
- Method of preparation of test solution: the two highest treatment solutions were prepared by transferring radiolabeled stock solution to a 10-mL volumetric flask and drying the contents under nitrogen. The residue was then reconstituted in 0.01 M CaCl2 by sonicating for less than a minute and bringing to volume with 0.01 M CaCl2. Treatment solutions of 0.45, 0.225 and 0.045 µg/L were prepared by further diluting 1000µL of the prepared treatment solutions to 10-mL volumetric flask using appropriate volumes of 0.01 M CaCl2. The radioactive concentrations of the test item were determined by LSC analysis of triplicate aliquots.
- 5 g (oven dry weight equivalent) soil was weighed into centrifuge tube, the total moisture content: 4.5 mL and mixed overnight via mechanical agitation, test samples were then treated with 0.5 mL of the treatment solution and placed on the mechanical agitator for 24 h; desorption (after supernatant removal): fresh 0.01 M CaCl2 solution (equivalent to that removed following adsorption) was added to each of the soil samples from the highest test item solution concentration (nominal 0.45 µg/mL). A second desorption equilibration and analysis was immediately repeated as described above. After the second desorption, the soil samples were air-dried, and triplicate aliquots of the dried soil sample were combusted prior to LSC analysis. - Duration:
- 24 h
- Temp.:
- 20 °C
- Duration:
- 24 h
- Temp.:
- 20 °C
- Sample No.:
- #1
- Type:
- Koc
- Value:
- 25.5 L/kg
- Temp.:
- 20 °C
- Matrix:
- clay loam
- Sample No.:
- #2
- Type:
- Koc
- Value:
- 4.9 L/kg
- Temp.:
- 20 °C
- Matrix:
- loam
- Sample No.:
- #3
- Type:
- Koc
- Value:
- 2.4 L/kg
- Temp.:
- 20 °C
- Matrix:
- sandy loam
- Sample No.:
- #4
- Type:
- Koc
- Value:
- 3.8 L/kg
- Temp.:
- 20 °C
- Matrix:
- silty clay
- Sample No.:
- #5
- Type:
- Koc
- Value:
- 24.3 L/kg
- Temp.:
- 20 °C
- Matrix:
- sandy loam
- Adsorption and desorption constants:
- Adsorption constants KF: #1 (clay loam): 0.941, #2 (loam): 0.004, #3 (sandy loam): 0.016, #4 (silty clay): 0.066, #5 (sandy laom): 0.217
- Recovery of test material:
- 98.2 - 99.8% of injected radioactivity among all test soils
- Details on results (Batch equilibrium method):
- A relationship of adsorption with soil pH was observed. The two soils with pH (CaCl2) <6 exhibited the strongest sorption (Koc approximately 25 mL/g) and three soils with pH >7 exhibited weaker sorption (Koc ≤5mL/g.).
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- not applicable
- Endpoint:
- adsorption / desorption: screening
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 28 Apr - 26 May 2008
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 106 (Adsorption - Desorption Using a Batch Equilibrium Method)
- Version / remarks:
- 2000
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority, Den Haag, The Netherlands; Bundesinstitut für Risikobewertung, Berlin, Germany; National GLP Compliance Monitoring Authority, Department of Science & Technology, New Dlhi, India
- Type of method:
- batch equilibrium method
- Media:
- soil
- Radiolabelling:
- yes
- Test temperature:
- 20 ± 2°C
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- - Concentrations: 20 different soils at a concentration of 4.5 µg/mL
- Triplicate aliquots (200 µL) of supernatants were added directly to scintillant and counted by LSC. A 500-μL aliquot of the supernatant from each soil was analysed by HPLC and 1 minute fractions were collected.
- Sampling interval: At equilibrium (after 24 hours) - Matrix no.:
- #1
- Matrix type:
- silty clay loam
- % Clay:
- 33
- % Silt:
- 67
- % Sand:
- 0
- % Org. carbon:
- 2.6
- pH:
- 6.72
- CEC:
- 21.9 meq/100 g soil d.w.
- Bulk density (g/cm³):
- 1
- Matrix no.:
- #2
- Matrix type:
- sandy loam
- % Clay:
- 9
- % Silt:
- 20
- % Sand:
- 71
- % Org. carbon:
- 0.5
- pH:
- 6.43
- CEC:
- 3.4 meq/100 g soil d.w.
- Bulk density (g/cm³):
- 1.4
- Matrix no.:
- #3
- Matrix type:
- silt loam
- % Clay:
- 25
- % Silt:
- 58
- % Sand:
- 17
- % Org. carbon:
- 3
- pH:
- 6.6
- CEC:
- 16.6 meq/100 g soil d.w.
- Bulk density (g/cm³):
- 1.02
- Matrix no.:
- #4
- % Org. carbon:
- 1.3
- pH:
- 5.5
- Bulk density (g/cm³):
- 1.16
- Matrix no.:
- #5
- % Org. carbon:
- 2.8
- pH:
- 5.4
- Bulk density (g/cm³):
- 1.12
- Matrix no.:
- #6
- % Org. carbon:
- 2
- pH:
- 5.4
- Matrix no.:
- #7
- % Org. carbon:
- 2.6
- pH:
- 4.2
- Matrix no.:
- #8
- % Org. carbon:
- 0.6
- pH:
- 7.2
- CEC:
- 4.6 meq/100 g soil d.w.
- Bulk density (g/cm³):
- 1.44
- Matrix no.:
- #9
- Matrix type:
- sandy loam
- % Clay:
- 18
- % Silt:
- 22
- % Sand:
- 60
- % Org. carbon:
- 5.5
- pH:
- 4.6
- CEC:
- 14.9 meq/100 g soil d.w.
- Bulk density (g/cm³):
- 0.87
- Matrix no.:
- #10
- Matrix type:
- sandy loam
- % Clay:
- 13
- % Silt:
- 19
- % Sand:
- 68
- % Org. carbon:
- 1
- pH:
- 5.87
- CEC:
- 6.5 meq/100 g soil d.w.
- Bulk density (g/cm³):
- 1.2
- Matrix no.:
- #11
- % Org. carbon:
- 3.8
- pH:
- 7.6
- Bulk density (g/cm³):
- 1.1
- Matrix no.:
- #12
- Matrix type:
- sandy loam
- % Clay:
- 15
- % Silt:
- 16
- % Sand:
- 69
- % Org. carbon:
- 10.9
- pH:
- 4.4
- CEC:
- 17.2 meq/100 g soil d.w.
- Bulk density (g/cm³):
- 0.71
- Matrix no.:
- #13
- Matrix type:
- sandy clay loam
- % Clay:
- 28
- % Silt:
- 18
- % Sand:
- 54
- % Org. carbon:
- 0.3
- pH:
- 8.23
- CEC:
- 14.6 meq/100 g soil d.w.
- Bulk density (g/cm³):
- 1.2
- Matrix no.:
- #14
- % Org. carbon:
- 1.8
- pH:
- 4.9
- Bulk density (g/cm³):
- 0.75
- Matrix no.:
- #15
- Matrix type:
- loam
- % Clay:
- 20
- % Silt:
- 48
- % Sand:
- 32
- % Org. carbon:
- 1.2
- pH:
- 7.6
- CEC:
- 10.2 meq/100 g soil d.w.
- Bulk density (g/cm³):
- 1.2
- Matrix no.:
- #16
- Matrix type:
- silty clay loam
- % Clay:
- 35
- % Silt:
- 64
- % Sand:
- 1
- % Org. carbon:
- 2.5
- pH:
- 6.71
- CEC:
- 22.5 meq/100 g soil d.w.
- Bulk density (g/cm³):
- 1.1
- Matrix no.:
- #17
- % Org. carbon:
- 0.6
- pH:
- 6
- Matrix no.:
- #18
- % Org. carbon:
- 2
- pH:
- 5.2
- Matrix no.:
- #19
- Matrix type:
- clay loam
- % Clay:
- 30.8
- % Silt:
- 45.6
- % Sand:
- 23.6
- % Org. carbon:
- 2.6
- pH:
- 6.2
- CEC:
- 34.6 meq/100 g soil d.w.
- Bulk density (g/cm³):
- 1.11
- Matrix no.:
- #20
- % Org. carbon:
- 3.8
- pH:
- 7
- Bulk density (g/cm³):
- 1.07
- Details on matrix:
- COLLECTION AND STORAGE
- Geographic location: #1: Lleida, Spain (silty clay loam), #2: Bojac, USA (Virginia, sandy loam), #3: Tama, USA (silt loam), #4: Champenoux (texture not determined), France, #5: Paynesville, USA (Minnesota, texture not determined), #6: Speyer 2.2, Germany (texture not determined), #7: Bukit Rotan, Malasia (texture not determined), #8: Baura, Brazil (texture not determined), #9: Glei Humico, Brazil (sandy loam), #10: Woodstown, USA (Delaware, sandy loam) , #11: Fargo, USA (North Dakota, texture not determined) , #12: Cape Fear, USA (South Carolina, sandy loam) , #13: Hidalago, USA (sandy clay loam), #14: Latassolo, Roxo Brazil (texture not determined), #15: Gross-Umstadt, Germany (loam), #16: Tama, USA (silty clay loam), #17: Saitama, Japan (texture not determined), #18: Fujishiro, Japan (texture not determined), #19: Drummer, USA (Illinois, clay loam), #20: Drummer # 2, USA (Illinois, texture not determined)
- Soil preparation: air-dried and sieved through a 2-mm sieve - Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Type, size and further details on reaction vessel: Tarson’s polypropylene centrifuge tubes
- Number of reaction vessels/concentration: 2
- Method of preparation of test solution: A treatment solution at a nominal concentration of 4.5 μg/mL was prepared by transferring 650 μL of radiolabeled stock solution (169.2 μg/mL) to a 25-mL volumetric flask and drying the contents under nitrogen. Reconstitution in0.01 M CaCl2 by sonicating for about a minute and brought to volume with 0.01 M CaCl2 to get a nominal concentration of 4.3992 μg/mL. The radioactive concentrations of the test item were determined by LSC analysis of triplicate aliquots.
- 5 g (oven dry weight equivalent) soil was weighed into centrifuge tube, the total moisture content: 4.5 mL and mixed overnight via mechanical agitation, test samples were then treated with 0.5 mL of the treatment solution and placed on the mechanical agitator for 24 h; desorption (after supernatant removal): fresh 0.01 M CaCl2 solution (equivalent to that removed following adsorption) was added to each of the soil samples. A second desorption equilibration and analysis was immediately repeated as described above. After the second desorption, the soil samples were air-dried, and triplicate aliquots of the dried soil sample were combusted prior to LSC analysis. - Duration:
- 24 h
- Duration:
- 24 h
- Sample No.:
- #1
- Type:
- Koc
- Value:
- 2.5 L/kg
- Temp.:
- 20 °C
- Matrix:
- silty clay loam
- Sample No.:
- #2
- Type:
- Koc
- Value:
- 26 L/kg
- Temp.:
- 20 °C
- Matrix:
- sandy loam
- Sample No.:
- #3
- Type:
- Koc
- Value:
- 12.5 L/kg
- Temp.:
- 20 °C
- Matrix:
- silt loam
- Sample No.:
- #4
- Type:
- Koc
- Value:
- 13.47 L/kg
- Temp.:
- 20 °C
- Matrix:
- texture not determined
- Sample No.:
- #5
- Type:
- Koc
- Value:
- 32.5 L/kg
- Temp.:
- 20 °C
- Matrix:
- texture not determined
- Sample No.:
- #6
- Type:
- Koc
- Value:
- 15.5 L/kg
- Temp.:
- 20 °C
- Matrix:
- texture not determined
- Sample No.:
- #7
- Type:
- Koc
- Value:
- 143.27 L/kg
- Temp.:
- 20 °C
- Matrix:
- texture not determined
- Sample No.:
- #8
- Type:
- Koc
- Value:
- 9.17 L/kg
- Temp.:
- 20 °C
- Matrix:
- texture not determined
- Sample No.:
- #9
- Type:
- Koc
- Value:
- 60.28 L/kg
- Temp.:
- 20 °C
- Matrix:
- sandy loam
- Sample No.:
- #10
- Type:
- Koc
- Value:
- 16.5 L/kg
- Temp.:
- 20 °C
- Matrix:
- sandy loam
- Sample No.:
- #11
- Type:
- Koc
- Value:
- 4.74 L/kg
- Temp.:
- 20 °C
- Matrix:
- texture not determined
- Sample No.:
- #12
- Type:
- Koc
- Value:
- 4.91 L/kg
- Temp.:
- 20 °C
- Matrix:
- sandy loam
- Sample No.:
- #13
- Type:
- Koc
- Value:
- 0 L/kg
- Temp.:
- 20 °C
- Matrix:
- sandy clay loam
- Sample No.:
- #14
- Type:
- Koc
- Value:
- 54.17 L/kg
- Temp.:
- 20 °C
- Matrix:
- texture not determined
- Sample No.:
- #15
- Type:
- Koc
- Value:
- 2.92 L/kg
- Temp.:
- 20 °C
- Matrix:
- loam
- Sample No.:
- #16
- Type:
- Koc
- Value:
- 19.4 L/kg
- Temp.:
- 20 °C
- Matrix:
- silty clay loam
- Sample No.:
- #17
- Type:
- Koc
- Value:
- 71.67 L/kg
- Temp.:
- 20 °C
- Matrix:
- texture not determined
- Sample No.:
- #18
- Type:
- Koc
- Value:
- 76.75 L/kg
- Temp.:
- 20 °C
- Matrix:
- texture not determined
- Sample No.:
- #19
- Type:
- Koc
- Value:
- 62.12 L/kg
- Temp.:
- 20 °C
- Matrix:
- clay loam
- Sample No.:
- #20
- Type:
- Koc
- Value:
- 7.11 L/kg
- Temp.:
- 20 °C
- Matrix:
- texture not determined
- Recovery of test material:
- 98.7 - 100% of injected radioactivity among all test soils
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- not applicable
Referenceopen allclose all
Table 1: Summary of the average sorption coefficients for each soil
SOIL |
KD(mL/g) |
KOM(mL/g) |
KOC(mL/g) |
#1 (clay loam) |
0.97 |
14.9 |
25.5 |
#2 (loam) |
0.02 |
3.1 |
4.9 |
#3 (sandy loam) |
0.03 |
1.4 |
2.4 |
#4 (silty clay) |
0.06 |
2.2 |
3.8 |
#5 (sandy loam) |
0.29 |
14.6 |
24.3 |
Average |
0.28 |
7.2 |
12.2 |
Table 2: Freundlich adsorption isotherm parameter derived from the linear function of the Freundlich equation
SOIL |
KF |
KFOM |
KFOC |
1/n |
R2 |
#1 (clay loam) |
0.941 |
14.5 |
24.8 |
1.0007 |
0.9780 |
#2 (loam) |
0.004 |
0.5 |
0.8 |
0.5167 |
0.6113 |
#3 (sandy loam) |
0.016 |
0.7 |
1.2 |
0.8071 |
0.9475 |
#4 (silty clay) |
0.066 |
2.4 |
4.1 |
1.0460 |
0.9615 |
#5 (sandy loam) |
0.217 |
10.9 |
18.1 |
0.9163 |
0.9841 |
Average |
0.249 |
5.8 |
9.8 |
0.8574 |
0.8965 |
Table 3: Average percent desorption for each soil
SOIL |
D1(%) |
D2(%) |
DT(%) |
#1 (clay loam) |
15.7 |
17.4 |
33.1 |
#2 (loam) |
8.6 |
15.9 |
24.5 |
#3 (sandy loam) |
42.3 |
27.6 |
69.9 |
#5 (sandy loam) |
26.3 |
20.4 |
46.7 |
Sassafras #16 |
38.2 |
20.6 |
58.8 |
Table 1: Summary of the average sorption coefficients for each soil
SOIL |
Kd(mL/g) |
Kom(mL/g) |
Koc(mL/g) |
#1: Lleida, Spain (silty clay loam) |
0.07 |
1.50 |
2.50 |
#2: Bojac, USA (Virginia, sandy loam) |
0.13 |
16.25 |
26.00 |
#3: Tama, USA (silt loam) |
0.38 |
7.35 |
12.50 |
#4: Champenoux (texture not determined) |
0.18 |
7.96 |
13.47 |
#5: Paynesville, USA (Minnesota, texture not determined) |
0.91 |
18.96 |
32.50 |
#6: Speyer 2.2, Germany (texture not determined) |
0.31 |
9.12 |
15.50 |
#7: Bukit Rotan, Malasia (texture not determined) |
3.73 |
82.78 |
143.27 |
#8: Baura, Brazil (texture not determined) |
0.06 |
5.50 |
9.17 |
#9: Glei Humico, Brazil (sandy loam) |
3.32 |
35.27 |
60.28 |
#10: Woodstown, USA (Delaware, sandy loam) |
0.17 |
9.71 |
16.50 |
#11: Fargo, USA (North Dakota, texture not determined) |
0.18 |
2.73 |
4.74 |
#12: Cape Fear, USA (South Carolina, sandy loam) |
0.54 |
2.85 |
4.91 |
#13: Hidalago, USA (sandy clay loam), |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
#14: Latassolo, Roxo Brazil (texture not determined) |
0.98 |
31.46 |
54.17 |
#15: Gross-Umstadt, Germany (loam) |
0.04 |
1.75 |
2.92 |
#16: Tama, USA (silty clay loam) |
0.49 |
11.28 |
19.40 |
#17: Saitama, Japan (texture not determined) |
0.43 |
43.00 |
71.67 |
#18: Fujishiro, Japan (texture not determined) |
1.54 |
43.86 |
76.75 |
#19: Drummer, USA (Illinois, clay loam) |
1.62 |
36.71 |
62.12 |
#20: Drummer # 2, USA (Illinois, texture not determined) |
0.27 |
4.09 |
7.11 |
Average |
0.80 |
19.58 |
33.44 |
Table 2: Summary of the average percent desorption for each soil
SOIL |
D1(%) |
D2(%) |
DT(%) |
#1: Lleida, Spain (silty clay loam) |
67.6 |
28.1 |
95.7 |
#2: Bojac, USA (Virginia, sandy loam) |
75.2 |
20.1 |
95.3 |
#3: Tama, USA (silt loam) |
26.8 |
24.3 |
51.1 |
#4: Champenoux, France (texture not determined) |
11.7 |
31.0 |
45.7 |
#5: Paynesville, USA (Minnesota, texture not determined) |
19.5 |
18.7 |
38.2 |
#6: Speyer 2.2, Germany (texture not determined) |
17.7 |
28.8 |
46.5 |
#7: Bukit Rotan, Malasia (texture not determined) |
3.3 |
6.5 |
9.7 |
#8: Baura, Brazil (texture not determined) |
30.4 |
13.4 |
43.8 |
#9: Glei Humico, Brazil (sandy loam) |
9.4 |
6.8 |
16.2 |
#10: Woodstown, USA (Delaware, sandy loam) |
31.5 |
21.4 |
52.9 |
#11: Fargo, USA (North Dakota, texture not determined) |
3.1 |
3.6 |
6.7 |
#12: Cape Fear, USA (South Carolina, sandy loam) |
26.0 |
16.6 |
42.5 |
#13: Hidalago, USA (sandy clay loam), |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
#14: Latassolo, Roxo Brazil (texture not determined) |
18.7 |
10.4 |
29.1 |
#15: Gross-Umstadt, Germany (loam) |
10.2 |
2.5 |
12.7 |
#16: Tama, USA (silty clay loam) |
25.3 |
17.0 |
42.3 |
#17: Saitama, Japan (texture not determined) |
9.3 |
24.5 |
33.8 |
#18: Fujishiro, Japan (texture not determined) |
7.1 |
9.8 |
16.9 |
#19: Drummer, USA (Illinois, clay loam) |
15.0 |
12.9 |
27.9 |
#20: Drummer # 2, USA (Illinois, texture not determined) |
30.6 |
18.2 |
48.8 |
Description of key information
logKoc = 0-2.16 (OECD 106)
The test item has a low adsorption potential to soil and sediment.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
The adsorption / desorption of the test substance was examined in two studies performing batch equilibrium experiments according to OECD guideline 106 under GLP conditions.
The first study was performed with five nominal test concentrations of radio labelled test item (0.45, 0.225, 0.045, 0.0225 and 0.0045µg/mL) in 0.01 M CaCl2 at 20°C. The test item concentrations were determined by liquid scintillation counting (LSC). The five representative soils cover a wide range of physico-chemical properties. Two desorption cycles were performed on samples treated at the highest test concentration. The adsorption parameters were calculated using the Freundlich adsorption isotherm. The material balance ranged from 94.1 to 105.1% and is within the acceptable guideline range of 90-110% of the applied radioactivity. The resulting Koc values for the adsorption of the test item and the five soils ranged between 2.4 and 25.5 L/kg (average 12.2 L/kg, LogKoc = 0.38 - 1.41). Furthermore, a relationship of adsorption with soil pH was observed. The two soils with pH (CaCl2) < 6 exhibited the strongest sorption (KOC approximately 25 mL/g) and three soils with pH > 7 exhibited weaker sorption (KOC ≤ 5 mL/g).
In a second study, adsorption and desorption properties of 0.45
µg/mL radiolabelled test item (in 0.01 M CaCl2) to a total of 20 soils
was investigated. The percent organic matter of the soils ranged from
0.5-18.8%, and the pH in 0.01 M CaCl2 ranged from 4.0-7.83. Sorption
coefficients and percent of the test item desorbed from the soil during
two desorption intervals was calculated and totalled (DT) for all soils.
The average material balance was in an acceptable range (91.4 - 108.8%).
The derived KOC values were in a range between 0.00 and 143.27 L/kg
(average: 33.44 L/kg, Log Koc = 0 - 2.16)
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.