Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 602-997-3 | CAS number: 124495-18-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Mice. Not sensitizing. OECD 429, Reliability = 1
Guinea pig. Not sensitizing. OECD 406; Reliability = 1
Guinea pig, Sensitizing, OECD 406, Reliability = 1
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin sensitisation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPP 81-6 (Skin Sensitisation)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of study:
- Buehler test
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Substance ID: TSN 100097
- Name of substance: XDE-795
- Lot number: DECO-97-152-1
- Purity: 97.4% - Species:
- guinea pig
- Strain:
- Hartley
- Sex:
- male
- Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Breeding Laboratories Inc., Kingston, New York
- Age at study initiation: Approximately 5 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 374.0 ± 13.1 g
- Housing: Five animals per cage
- Diet: ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: At least one week
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 ± 3
- Humidity (%): 40-70
- Air changes (per hr): 15 times
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12 - Route:
- epicutaneous, occlusive
- Vehicle:
- water
- Concentration / amount:
- A single 0.4 g of neat test substance moistened with 0.1 mL of distilled water
- Day(s)/duration:
- 6 h
- Adequacy of induction:
- other: non-irritating dose during the screen phase
- Route:
- epicutaneous, occlusive
- Vehicle:
- water
- Concentration / amount:
- A 0.4 g aliquot of neat test substance moistened with 0.1 mL of distilled water (approximately two weeks after last induction application)
- Day(s)/duration:
- 6 h
- Adequacy of challenge:
- highest non-irritant concentration
- Route:
- epicutaneous, occlusive
- Vehicle:
- water
- Concentration / amount:
- Five naive animals received a 0.4 g aliquot of neat test substance moistened with 0.1 mL of distilled water
- Day(s)/duration:
- 6 h
- Adequacy of challenge:
- highest non-irritant concentration
- No. of animals per dose:
- 10 for induction and challenge and 5 naive animals for challenge
- Details on study design:
- SCREEN PHASE: A preliminary skin irritation screen was conducted in order to determine a slightly irritating dose as well as to establish the highest non-irritating concentration of the test material. Guinea pigs were clipped free of hair, on the left and right side, the day prior to study initiation. Single application of 0.4 g of neat test substance moistened with 0.1 ml of distilled water was topically applied to the skin of guinea pigs for six hours, in up to two application sites per animal. The following day the application sites were depilated with Neet hair cream remover. Skin irritation readings were recorded approximately 24 and 48 after test substance removal.
MAIN STUDY
A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 3
- Exposure period: 6 hours
- Test groups: 1
- Control group: 1
- Site: Left side
- Frequency of applications: Once weekly
- Duration: Three consecutive weeks
- Concentrations: Neat test substance moistened with 0.1 mL of distilled water
B. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 1 after last induction application and 1 application to naive animals
- Days of challenge: Approximately two weeks after the last induction application
- Exposure period: 6 hours
- Test groups: 2
- Control group: 2
- Site: Right side
- Concentrations: Neat test substance moistened with 0.1 mL of distilled water
- Evaluation (hr after challenge): 24 and 48 - Positive control substance(s):
- yes
- Remarks:
- 10% solution of DER 331 epoxy resin in dipropylene glycol monomethyl ether
- Positive control results:
- Challenge application with the positive control caused slight to moderate erythema, considered to reflect a hypersensitivity response at the test site, on seven of ten animals. No effect was noted in the corresponding naive control animals, at the 48 hour read.
- Key result
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 100%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
- Key result
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 100%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
- Key result
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- other: Naive test substance animals
- Dose level:
- 100%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 5
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
- Key result
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- other: Naive test substance animals
- Dose level:
- 100%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 5
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- positive control
- Dose level:
- 10%
- No. with + reactions:
- 7
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of skin sensitisation
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- positive control
- Dose level:
- 10%
- No. with + reactions:
- 7
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of skin sensitisation
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- other: Naive positive control animals
- Dose level:
- 10%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 5
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- other: Naive positive control animals
- Dose level:
- 10%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 5
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- Test substance did not cause delayed contact hypersensitivity in guinea pigs
- Executive summary:
The test substance was evaluated for dermal sensitization potential using the Buehler method following OECD guideline 406 and US EPA guideline 81-6. Ten male Hartley albino guinea pigs received three dermal applications of 0.4 g of test substance during the three-week induction period. Guinea pigs were given a challenge application of 0.4 g of test substance two weeks after the last induction application. At the challenge phase, five naive animals also received a 0.4 g dermal application of test substance. The condition of the test sites was assessed approximately 24 and 48 hours after the challenge application. Challenge application with 0.4 g of test substance caused no erythema at the test site in the ten animals and none of the naive animals showed any evidence of irritation. An additional ten male Hartley albino guinea pigs received three dermal applications of 0.4 ml of a 10% solution of DER 331 epoxy resin, in dipropylene glycol monomethyl ether, which were run concurrently as a positive control. Challenge application with 0.4 ml of 10% DER 331 caused slight to moderate erythema at the test site in seven out of ten animals, while none of the DER 331 naive animals showed any evidence of irritation, at the 48-hour read. The animals were in apparent good health and gained weight over the study period. Therefore, under the conditions of this study, test substance did not cause delayed contact hypersensitivity in guinea pigs.
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.6 (Skin Sensitisation)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of study:
- guinea pig maximisation test
- Justification for non-LLNA method:
- LLNA test was also conducted (see Report 243491). Results of the LLNA test were negative. The results of this guinea pig maximazation test were positive and were therefore chosen as a key study along with the LLNA test. This study was conducted in 1995 whereas the LLNA test was conducted in 2007.
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Name of substance: XDE-795 Technical
- Lot No.: RMM 2008
- Purity: 97.5% - Species:
- guinea pig
- Strain:
- Dunkin-Hartley
- Sex:
- male/female
- Route:
- intradermal
- Vehicle:
- other: purified water
- Concentration / amount:
- 0.1 mL of Freunds complete adjuvant (FCA)
- Day(s)/duration:
- single injection at least five days before topical application
- Route:
- epicutaneous, occlusive
- Vehicle:
- propylene glycol
- Concentration / amount:
- First induction: 1% w/v
Sencond induction: 50% w/v - Day(s)/duration:
- 48 hours
- Adequacy of induction:
- highest technically applicable concentration used
- No.:
- #1
- Route:
- intradermal
- Vehicle:
- other: purified water
- Concentration / amount:
- 0.1 mL FCA
- Day(s)/duration:
- single injection at least 20 days before topical challenge
- No.:
- #2
- Route:
- epicutaneous, occlusive
- Vehicle:
- propylene glycol
- Concentration / amount:
- 10, 50% w/v
- Day(s)/duration:
- 24 hours
- Adequacy of challenge:
- highest non-irritant concentration
- No. of animals per dose:
- Test group: 10 per sex per dose
Congrol group: 5 per sex per dose - Challenge controls:
- Propylene glycol, 10 and 50% w/v test substance in propylene glycol
- Positive control substance(s):
- no
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 0
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 0
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
- Key result
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 50% w/v
- No. with + reactions:
- 18
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of skin sensitisation
- Key result
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 50% w/v
- No. with + reactions:
- 16
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of skin sensitisation
- Key result
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 10% w/v
- No. with + reactions:
- 6
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of skin sensitisation
- Key result
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 10% w/v
- No. with + reactions:
- 8
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of skin sensitisation
- Group:
- positive control
- Remarks on result:
- not measured/tested
- Interpretation of results:
- Category 1B (indication of skin sensitising potential) based on GHS criteria
- Conclusions:
- Repeated administration of the test substance caused delayed contact hypersensitivity in guinea pigs
- Executive summary:
The potential of the test substance to cause delayed contact hypersensitivity in the guinea-pig was assessed by the Magnusson-Kligman Maximisation Test following OECD guideline 406.
The closely-clipped dorsa of ten male and ten female Dunkin-Hartley guinea-pigs were subject to intradermal injections of Freund’s Complete Adjuvant, 1% w/v test substance in propylene glycol and 1% w/v test substance in the adjuvant on Day 1. On Day 7, the same area was treated with sodium lauryl sulphate to enhance the dermal penetration of the following dose. On Day 8, 50% w/v test substance in propylene glycol was applied topically and the test site was covered by an occlusive dressing for 48 hours. The same induction procedures were carried out on a contemporaneous control group of five male and five female animals, except that the test material was replaced by vehicle in all doses.
On Day 22, all animals were challenged by occluded topical application of propylene glycol to the left flank and 50% w/v test substance and 10% w/v test substance in propylene glycol to two sites on the right flank. The occlusive dressings were removed on the following day and the condition of the test sites was assessed approximately 24 and 48 hours later.
Intradermal injection of 1% w/v test substance in propylene glycol caused moderate erythema, eschar and occasional pallor, while intradermal injection of 1% w/v test substance in propylene glycol in FCA caused slight or moderate erythema and pallor. Intradermal injection of FCA alone caused moderate erythema in all animals. Topical induction application of 50% w/v test substance in propylene glycol caused barely perceptible or slight erythema, exfoliation and occasional eschar.
Challenge application of 50% w/v test substance in propylene glycol gave rise to a significant response (slight erythema or a more marked reaction) in eighteen test animals and no controls. Challenge application of 10% w/v test substance in propylene glycol gave rise to a significant response in nine test animals and no controls. Challenge application of propylene glycol alone caused no significant response.
It is concluded that, under the conditions of this study, repeated administration of test substance in propylene glycol caused delayed contact hypersensitivity in guinea-pigs, and is classified as a dermal sensitizer.
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.2600 (Skin Sensitisation)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.42 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of study:
- mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Substance ID: TSN 105644
- Name of substance: XDE-175 (85:15)
- Lot No.: F50-E1662-86
- Purity: 86.3% as the sum of XDE-175-J and XDE-175-L with 73.0% XDE-175-J and 13.3% XDE-175-L - Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- CBA:J
- Sex:
- female
- Vehicle:
- acetone/olive oil (4:1 v/v)
- Concentration:
- 5, 25, and 75%
- No. of animals per dose:
- 6
- Positive control substance(s):
- hexyl cinnamic aldehyde (CAS No 101-86-0)
- Key result
- Parameter:
- SI
- Value:
- 0.8
- Variability:
- 0.3
- Test group / Remarks:
- 5%
- Key result
- Parameter:
- SI
- Value:
- 1.2
- Variability:
- 0.6
- Test group / Remarks:
- 25%
- Key result
- Parameter:
- SI
- Value:
- 2.2
- Variability:
- 1.1
- Test group / Remarks:
- 75%
- Parameter:
- SI
- Value:
- 7.2
- Variability:
- 3.7
- Test group / Remarks:
- 30% HCA (positive control)
- Parameter:
- SI
- Value:
- 1
- Variability:
- 0.5
- Test group / Remarks:
- 4:1 acetone:olive oil (Vehicle control)
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- Not a sensitizer in the mouse LLNA
- Executive summary:
The Local Lymph Node Assay (LLNA) was conducted to assess the potential of test substance to cause contact sensitization by measuring the lymphocyte proliferative responses from auricular lymph nodes following topical application of the test substance to the mouse ear, following OECD guideline 429 and U.S. EPA OPPTS 870.2600.
In the screening study, three daily topical applications of 1%, 5%, 25%, 50%, 75%, or 90% test substance were given to one animal at each dose level. Erythema was absent in the mice treated with 1%, 5%, 25%, 50%, and 75%, while the mouse treated with 90% demonstrated slight erythema on day 3, which resolved by day 6. Body weights were unaffected in all mice, except the mouse treated with 90% test substance, which lost 1.8 grams of body weight. Results from this study were used to determine the dosing concentrations for test substance in the LLNA.
In the LLNA study, six female mice/group received 5%, 25%, or 75% of test substance, or vehicle (4:1 acetone:olive oil), on days 1-3. On day 6, uptake of 3H-thymidine into the auricular lymph nodes draining the site of chemical application was measured five hours post administration. Proper conduct of the LLNA was confirmed via a positive response using 30% α-hexylcinnamaldehyde (HCA), a moderate contact sensitizer, which elicited proliferation that was 7.2 in comparison to vehicle-treated mice.
Erythema was absent in the mice treated with 5% and 25% test substance, while the mice dosed with 75% demonstrated slight erythema on day 3, which persisted through day 6. Body weights were unaffected in all dose groups.
The test substance elicited proliferative responses with stimulation indices (SI) that were respectively 0.8, 1.2 and 2.2 in comparison to the vehicle-treated mice. The test substance did not demonstrate dermal sensitization potential in the mouse LLNA as the lymph nodes draining the area of topical application did not demonstrate a 3-fold proliferation when compared to vehicle-treated mice.
Referenceopen allclose all
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (sensitising)
- Additional information:
When tested in the local lymph node assay (LLNA) in mice, the test substance elicited proliferative responses with stimulation indices (SI) that were 0.8, 1.2, and 2.2 in comparison to the vehicle-treated mice. The test substance did not demonstrate dermal sensitization potential in the mouse LLNA as the lymph nodes draining the area of topical application did not demonstrate a 3-fold proliferation when compared to the vehicle-treated mice. The positive control substance, α-hexylcinnamaldehyde (HCA), elicited proliferation that was 7.2 in comparison to the vehicle-treated mice.
The dermal sensitization potential of the test substance was also evaluated in guinea pigs by the Buehler method in male Hartley albino guinea pigs. The positive control substance, DER 331 epoxy resin, caused slight to moderate erythema in seven out of 10 animals during the challenge application. Challenge application of the test substance did not produce any erythema at the test substance. Under the conditions of this study, the test substance did not possess skin sensitising potential. When tested in another guinea pig study conducted according to the Magnusson-Kligman Maximisation test, repeated administration of the test substance in propylene glycol caused delayed hypersensitivity.
Respiratory sensitisation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Justification for classification or non-classification
The test substance was negative for skin sensitization when tested in guinea pigs by the Buehler method and in mice when tested in the LLNA test. However, the test substance caused delayed hypersenisitivity in the guinea pig Magnusson-Kligman Maximisation test and a positive patch test in humans has been reported. Based on the results of the Magnusson-Kligman Maximisation test, the substance is classified as Category 1B for skin sensitisation according to EU Classification, Labelling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures (CLP) Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.