Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vivo

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
Remarks:
Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
Adequacy of study:
other information

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
other: Body responsible for the test
Title:
Unnamed

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: EEC Commission Directive 92/69/EEC Method B12 OECD Guidelines for testing of chemicals no. 474.
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of assay:
micronucleus assay

Test animals

Species:
other: Albino Crl:CD-1 (ICR) BR mice

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
intraperitoneal
Vehicle:
Arachis Oil
No. of animals per sex per dose:
Male: 0 mg/kg; No. of animals: 7; Sacrifice time: 48 hours
Male: 0 mg/kg; No. of animals: 7; Sacrifice time: 24 hours
Male: 50 mg/kg; No. of animals: 7; Sacrifice time: 24 hours
Male: 100 mg/kg; No. of animals: 7; Sacrifice time: 24 hours
Male: 200 mg/kg; No. of animals: 7; Sacrifice time: 24 hours
Male: 200 mg/kg; No. of animals: 7; Sacrifice time: 48 hours

Results and discussion

Test results
Toxicity:
yes
Remarks:
Doses producing toxicity: The highest dose of 200mg/kg/day caused no deaths. However hunched posture and lethargy were seen in animals dosed at and above 100mg/kg/day at both the 24 and 48 hour sampling times where applicable.
Additional information on results:
Observations:
The test material did not cause a significant increase in
the frequency of micronuclei in the polychromatic
erythrocytes of the mice treated in this study.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Interpretation of results (migrated information): negative