Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Eye irritation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
18 June 2007 to 28 June 2007
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: see 'Remark'
Remarks:
Study conducted in compliance with agreed protocols, with no or minor deviations from standard test guidelines and/or minor methodological deficiencies, which do not affect the quality of the relevant results. The study report was conclusive, done to valid guidelines and the study was conducted under GLP conditions.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2007
Report date:
2007

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.5 (Acute Toxicity: Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
-
EC Number:
480-390-0
EC Name:
-
Cas Number:
182442-95-1
Molecular formula:
LiCoNiMnO2 with the stoechiometry of Co+Ni+Mn equal to 1 and the ranges of the elements approximately as: Li: >0.90 - <1.20 Co: >0.0 - <0.50 Ni: >0.20 - <0.98 Mn: >0.0 - <0.50 O: 2
IUPAC Name:
Cobalt Lithium Manganese Nickel Oxide
Test material form:
solid: particulate/powder
Remarks:
migrated information: powder
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): Cellcore MX
- Physical state: solid
- Appearance: black powder
- Storage condition of test material: room temperature in the dark

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Age at study initiation: 12 - 20 weeks old
- Weight at study initiation: 2.0 - 3.5 kg
- Housing: individually in suspended cages
- Diet: ad libitum Certified Rabbit Diet
- Water: ad libitum access to mains drinking water
- Acclimation period: at least 5 days
Immediately before the start of the test, both eyes of the rabbits were examined for evidence of ocular irritation or defect with the aid of a light source from a standard ophthalmoscope. Only animals free of ocular damage were used.

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 17 – 23 °C
- Humidity (%): 30 – 70 % (relative)
- Air changes (per hr): at least 15 air changes per hour
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hours dark / 12 hours light (06:00 to 18:00)

Test system

Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
other: The left eye of each animal remained untreated and served as the control.
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.05 mL of test material (weighing 100 mg)

Owing to the high pH of the test material (pH 11.0), and in order to minimise the pain on application of the test material, one drop of local anaesthetic (Tetracaine hydrochloride 0.5 %) was instilled into both eyes of the treated animals 1 to 2 minutes before treatment.
Duration of treatment / exposure:
Test material was placed into the conjunctival sac of the right eye, formed by gently pulling the lower lid away from the eyeball. The upper and lower lids were held together for about one second immediately after treatment, and then released.
Observation period (in vivo):
Assessment of ocular damage/irritation was made approximately 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours following treatment.
Initially a single animal was treated. After consideration of the ocular response produced in the first treated animal, two additional animals were treated.
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
3 males
Details on study design:
SCORING SYSTEM:
- Immediately after administration of the test material, an assessment of the initial pain reaction was made according to the six point scale (see below).
- Assessment of ocular reaction at 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours was made according to the Draize scale (see below).
- Any other ocular effects were also noted

TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE:
Examination of the eye was facilitated by the use of a light source from a standard ophthalmoscope.

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
of all three animals
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: not applicable
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
of all three animals
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
other: not applicable
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Remarks:
(redness)
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
of all three animals
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.33
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 48 hours
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
of all three animals
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: not applicable
Irritant / corrosive response data:
- No corneal effects were noted.
- Iridial inflammation was noted in one treated eye one hour after treatment.
- Minimal to moderate conjunctival irritation was noted in all treated eyes one hour after treatment with minimal conjunctival irritation noted in all treated eyes at the 24-hour observation.
- All treated eyes appeared normal at the 48-hour observation.
Other effects:
Black staining on the fur was noted around all treated eyes throughout the study.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 1: Individual Scores for Ocular Irritation

Rabbit

1M (IPR = 2)

2M (IPR = 1)

3M (IPR = 0)

Time after treatment (hrs)

1

24

48

72

1

24

48

72

1

24

48

72

CORNEA

 

Opacity

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Area

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

IRIS

 

Score

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

CONJUNCTIVAE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Redness

1

1

0

0

2

1

0

0

2

1

0

0

Chemosis

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

Discharge

1Sf

0Sf

0Sf

0Sf

1Sf

0Sf

0Sf

0Sf

1Sf

0Sf

0Sf

0Sf

IPR = initial pain reaction

Sf = black staining of the fur around the treated eye

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not classified
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
Under the conditions of the study, the test material induced only minimal reversible irritation to the eye in the New Zealand White rabbit. The test material was therefore considered to be not irritating in accordance with EU criteria.
Executive summary:

The eye irritancy potential of the test material was investigated in a study which was conducted under GLP conditions and in accordance with the standardised guidelines OECD 405 and EU Method B.5.

0.05 mL of test material (weighing 100 mg) was installed into the right eye of the New Zealand White rabbits. Assessment of ocular damage/irritation was made approximately 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours following treatment. Initially a single animal was treated. After consideration of the ocular response produced in the first treated animal, two additional animals were treated.

The application of the test material to the non-irrigated eye of three rabbits produced iridial inflammation in one eye, and minimal to moderate conjunctival irritation in all treated eyes, one hour after treatment. All treated eyes appeared normal at the 48-hour observation.

Under the conditions of the study, the test material induced only minimal reversible irritation to the eye in the New Zealand White rabbit. The test material was therefore considered to be not irritating in accordance with EU criteria.