Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin irritation / corrosion

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2005-07-20 - 2005-07-23
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2005
Report date:
2005

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
Version / remarks:
April 24th 2002
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.4 (Acute Toxicity: Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
Version / remarks:
May 31st 2008
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EPA OPPTS 870.2500 (Acute Dermal Irritation)
Version / remarks:
August 1998
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
-
EC Number:
479-940-2
EC Name:
-
Cas Number:
613246-75-6
Molecular formula:
NA: Multi-const. substance
IUPAC Name:
16-(dodecanoyloxy)-2,2,5,8,12,15,15-heptamethyl-7,10-dioxa-4,13-diazahexadeca-3,13-dien-1-yl dodecanoate
Test material form:
liquid

Test animals

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Ferenc Sándor breeder, 2173 Kartal, Vörös Hadsereg Street 131, HUNGARY
- Age at study initiation: 11 weeks old
- Weight at study initiation: 3044 - 3293 g
- Housing: individually in metal cages
- Diet: PURISTAR standard diet, ad libitum
- Water: tap water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 8 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20±3
- Humidity (%): 30 - 70
- Air changes (per hr): 8-12
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

Test system

Type of coverage:
occlusive
Preparation of test site:
clipped
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
yes, concurrent no treatment
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.5 mL
Duration of treatment / exposure:
4 h
Observation period:
1h, 24h, 48h, 72h
Number of animals:
3 males
Details on study design:
TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: 6 cm2
- Type of wrap if used: plastic wrap

REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing: with water ( heated to body temperature)
- Time after start of exposure: 4h

SCORING SYSTEM:
- according to the scoring system by Draize (1959)

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #1
Remarks:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.33
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 48h
Remarks on result:
other: after 1 h well defined erythema, after 24h slight erythema
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #2
Remarks:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 24h
Remarks on result:
other: after 1 h well defined erythema
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #3
Remarks:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 24h
Remarks on result:
other: after 1h slight erythema
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #1
Remarks:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #2
Remarks:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #3
Remarks:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
The test substance was not irritating to the skin of New Zealand white rabbits.
Executive summary:

The acute skin irritation study of Sika Hardener LJ was performed in albino New Zealand white rabbits. The irritation effect of the test item was evaluated according to the Draize method (OECD No.: 404, 2002). The test item was administered in a pure state, as a single dose of 0.5 mL, to the shaved skin of all experimental rabbits. The untreated skin of each animal served as control. After 4 hours any remaining test item was removed with water (heated to body temperature). The animals were examined at 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours after the patch removal. One hour after the patch removal two animals developed well defined erythema (score 2) and in one animal very slight erythema (score 1) occurred on the treated skin surface. No oedema or other adverse effects were observed during the observation period, either at the treatment or the control application areas. At 24 hours after patch removal, one animal showed slight erythema on the treated skin surface (score 1). At 48 hours after patch removal no irritation symptoms (erythema and oedema) were recorded for any of the animals. The study was terminated after 72 hours. During the study behaviour and general state of animals were normal. The animals' individual mean scores (readings at 24, 48 and 72 hours after patch removal) for erythema and oedema were 0.33, 0.00 and 0.00 and 0.00, 0.00 and 0.00, respectively. Therefore the test item Sika Hardener LJ does not classify as a skin irritant. (LAB International Hungary Ltd., 2005)