Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 500-057-6 | CAS number: 27104-30-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Repeated dose toxicity: dermal
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- chronic toxicity: dermal
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1978
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- The read-across approach is based on the assumption, that Tetrakis(hydroxymethyl)phosphonium chloride (THPC, CAS 124-64-1), as part of the technical product 'Tetrakis(hydroxymethyl)phosphonium chloride, oligomeric reaction products with urea' (THPC-urea, CAS 27104-30-9), is the relevant, most hazardous compound. The (local) mode of action based on direct chemical reactivity is the same in both compounds. Additionally the read-across approach is based on the worst-case assumption that the reaction mixture THPC-urea is as reactive as THPC. In the confirmatory information it becomes obvious, that THPC is at least 6 times more hazardous than THPC, oligomeric reaction products with urea. For the detailed justification of the read-across hypothesis see “overall remarks, attachments”. When considering both the read-across hypotheses, the direct read-across from data obtained with technical THPC (80%) onto technical THPC-urea (65-68%) do not lead to an underestimation of the hazard. No further uncertainty factor, e.g. AF=2 for read-across, is considered to be necessary for deriving a DNEL(THPC-urea) from NOAEL(THPC). Published test report from Cancer Research and US-EPA assessment report thereof. Evaluated data from a reliable secondary source (US-CPSC).
Data source
Referenceopen allclose all
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 978
- Report date:
- 1978
- Reference Type:
- secondary source
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 999
- Report date:
- 1999
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- no guideline followed
- Guideline:
- other: one treatment group of 60 female mice (limit test at MTD, dermal) four no-treatment control groups that were used for these tests as well as for other concurrent experiments (249 mice).
- Deviations:
- no
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Limit test at MTD: one treatment group of 60 female mice; skin application 3 times weekly for 496 days (mouse chronic)
four no-treatment control groups that were used for these tests as well as for other concurrent experiments (249 mice). - GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Limit test:
- yes
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Tetrakis(hydroxymethyl)phosphonium chloride
- EC Number:
- 204-707-7
- EC Name:
- Tetrakis(hydroxymethyl)phosphonium chloride
- Cas Number:
- 124-64-1
- Molecular formula:
- C4H12O4P.Cl
- IUPAC Name:
- tetrakis(hydroxymethyl)phosphonium chloride
- Details on test material:
- Name: Tetrakis(hydroxymethyl)phosphonium chloride (THPC)
Molecular formula: C4H12O4P.Cl
Structure: [Cl-].OC[P+](CO)(CO)CO
Molecular weight: 190.56
Substance type: ionic substance
Physical state: solid
Further details (analytical purity etc): 80% aqueous THPC
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- ICR
- Sex:
- female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- random-bred female ICR/Ha Swiss mice (ARS/Sprague-Dawley Division, The Mogul Corp., Madison, Wis.) were acclimated to laboratory conditions
for 2 weeks, and treatments were begun when they were 6 to 8 weeks old. The mice were housed 6/cage on sterile hardwood chips (Betta Chip; Fisher & Son, Bound Brook, N. J.) in stainless steel cages, fed Purina laboratory chow and water ad libitum, and weighed monthly. The animal rooms were maintained at 22 to 24°C.
Administration / exposure
- Type of coverage:
- not specified
- Vehicle:
- other: aceton-water (9:1)
- Details on exposure:
- external dose: 2 mg THPC per 0.2 ml aceton-water (9:1)
The dosages used in all experiments were based on short-term toxicity evaluations (4 to 6 weeks); the highest possible doses that gave
minimal cytotoxic effects, as determined by histopathological examination, were used for the chronic exposures. - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- no
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- skin application 3 times weekly for 496 days
- Frequency of treatment:
- skin application 3 times weekly for 496 days
Doses / concentrations
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
2 mg/application
Basis:
nominal per unit area
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- one treatment group of 60 female mice (limit test at MTD, dermal)
four no-treatment control groups that were used for these tests as well as for other concurrent experiments (249 mice). - Control animals:
- yes, concurrent no treatment
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control:
- No addition of tumor inductor or promotor.
Study hypothesis is, the possible liberation of formaldehyde and hydrochloric acid from free THPC in the fabric. Formaldehyde and hydrochloric acid are known to be in equilibrium with the animal and human carcinogen bis(chloromethyl)ether (Van Duuren 1978).
Examinations
- Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
- All compounds were used in well-ventilated hoods, and the mice were housed there for at least 2 hr after treatment. All skin treatments were
continued for the duration of the experiment. Animals were examined regularly and scored, and the findings were charted once monthly. - Sacrifice and pathology:
- Animals in poor health or with large tumor masses were killed. Except for the cranial region, animals were completely autopsied at the end of the
experiment or at death. Samples of all abnormal-appearing tissues and organs were excised for histopathological diagnosis. In addition, routine
histopathology was performed on skin, liver, and kidney in all animals dying during the test period and in 20% of all animals killed at the end of the
test. All tissue sections were fixed in 10% formalin, proc essed, blocked in paraffin, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin for histopathological
examination. Included in the protocols were groups given vehicle only; no treatment groups were included in the protocols. - Other examinations:
- Skin lesions were diagnosed clinically as papillomas when they reached 1 cu mm in size and persisted for 30 days or more or when they were confirmed histopathologically.
- Statistics:
- The p values given in the table were assigned by means of computation of x2 analyses in which the tumor
incidences in the test groups were compared with a composite of 4 no-treatment control groups that were used for
these tests as well as for other concurrent experiments (249 mice).
Results and discussion
Results of examinations
- Clinical signs:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Dermal irritation:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Mortality:
- mortality observed, treatment-related
- Body weight and weight changes:
- not specified
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- not examined
- Food efficiency:
- not examined
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not examined
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not examined
- Haematological findings:
- not examined
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- not examined
- Urinalysis findings:
- not examined
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- not specified
- Gross pathological findings:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Details on results:
- THPC was inactive in induction of skin tumors in skin painting studies.
THPC is a quaternary compound. Such compounds do not cross membranes very readily, therefore, they are not absorbed via the skin and poorly
absorbed from mucuous membranes. The chloride salts of quaternary bases are not likely to generate active chloride ions that could then help to
form bischloromethyl ether from the THPC.
Effect levels
open allclose all
- Dose descriptor:
- other: maximal tolerated dose (dermal)
- Effect level:
- 2 other: mg/0.2 mL external dose
- Based on:
- act. ingr.
- Sex:
- female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: minimal cytotoxic (local irritation) effect to mouse skin
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 100 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- act. ingr.
- Sex:
- female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: minimal effect on mouse skin, no systemic toxicity
Target system / organ toxicity
- Critical effects observed:
- not specified
Any other information on results incl. tables
No significant increases in tumors were observed when THPC (2 mg/animal) in acetone:water was tested for carcinogenic activity
by dermal application 3 times/week for 496 days (VanDuuren et al. 1978). Of the 59 treated animals necropsied, 17 lung (papillary)
tumors and 1 forestomach (papilloma) were observed, compared to 90 lung (papillary) tumors and 7 forestomach tumors out of the
249 untreated mice necropsied (p>0.05). Of the 29 mice treated with acetone:water (90:10) and examined, there were 7 lung
(papillary) tumors.
THPC was inactive in induction of skin tumors in skin painting studies.
The maximal tolerated dose (MTD dermal) of technical THPC is 2 mg/mouse per day. (Mouse bw 18g, body surface 75cm2)
external dose= 2mg/0.2ml (acteon:water 9:1)=10g/L (1%)
MTD=NOAEL (dermal, local) = 2mg/10% body surface mouse= 2mg/ 7.5 cm2 = 0.27 mg/cm2.
NOAEL (dermal, systemic)= 2mg/18g mouse= 100mg/kg bw/day
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- The dermal toxicity study did not provide indications for systemic toxicity. Only slightly local effects were observed at the dose level applied.
In this chronic dermal test, based on minimal local irritation, a MTD of 2 mg THPC/animal=2mgTHPC/7.5cm2 = 0.25 mg/cm2, corresponding to 100 mg/kg bw/day (vehicle: aceton:water=9:1) what was identified to be the NOAEL in mice.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.