Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Repeated dose toxicity: inhalation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
short-term repeated dose toxicity: inhalation
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP compliant, guideline study, no restrictions, fully adequate for assessment.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2010

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 412 (Subacute Inhalation Toxicity: 28-Day Study)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.8 (Subacute Inhalation Toxicity: 28-Day Study)
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Limit test:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
2-aminoethanol
EC Number:
205-483-3
EC Name:
2-aminoethanol
Cas Number:
141-43-5
Molecular formula:
C2H7NO
IUPAC Name:
2-aminoethanol
Details on test material:
Name of test substance: Monoethanol amine
Test substance No.: 08/0924-1
Batch-Identification: MEOA K 540
CAS No.: 141-43-5
Purity: 99.93 area % (was performed by the manufacturer)
Homogeneity: The test substance is homogenous on account of the high purity.
Storage stability: The stability under storage conditions over the exposure period was guaranteed by the manufacturer, and the manufacturer holds this responsibility.
Physical state/ Appearance: Liquid / colorless, clear
Storage conditions: Ambient

Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
other: Wistar rats, Crl:WI(Han)
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Laboratories, Research Models and Services, Germany GmbH; Sandhofer Weg 7, 97633 Sulzfeld
- Age at study initiation: about 7 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: male ± 228 g; female ± 165 g
- Housing: The rats were housed together (up to 5 animals per cage) in Polysulfon cages (H-Temp [PSU]) (floor area about 2065 cm2). Bedding in the Polycarbonate cages were Type Lignocel fibres, dust free bedding. For enrichment wooden gnawing blocks (Typ NGM E-022), were added.
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): mouse/rat laboratory diet “GLP”, 10 mm pellets (Provimi Kliba SA, Kaiseraugst, Basel Switzerland), ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): tap water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: yes

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20-24
- Humidity (%): 30-70
- Air changes (per hr): 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
other: inhalation exposure to aerosol with vapour fraction
Type of inhalation exposure:
nose only
Vehicle:
air
Remarks on MMAD:
MMAD / GSD: The measurements of particle size in test group 3 resulted in MMADs of 1.1 and 1.2 µm with a GSD of 5.3and 6.4.
The calculated mass fractions of particles below 3 µm aerodynamic size were 70.0 and 70.3 %.
Thus the aerosols were highly respirable for rats and a very high proportion of the aerosol particles reached the lungs.
Details on inhalation exposure:
Generation of the inhalation atmospheres
Generator systems:
• Continuous infusion pumps PERFUSOR (B. Braun)
• Two-component atomizers (stainless steel, Schlick mod. 970)
Generation procedure:
The test substance was used unchanged.
For each concentration the test substance was supplied to a two-component atomizer at a constant rate by means of a metering pump. The aerosol was generated with compressed air mixed with conditioned dilution air into the inhalation system.
The control group was exposed to conditioned air.
Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
yes
Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
The concentrations of the inhalation atmospheres were analysed by a gas chromatography analysis (GC) in all test groups including control. The vapor and liquid aerosol concentration were determined separately.
Daily means were calculated based on two measured samples per concentration and exposure. From the daily mean values of each concentration, mean concentrations and standard deviations for the entire study were derived.
In these groups, the constancy of concentrations in the inhalation systems in the chambers were continuously monitored using scattered light photometers.
In the control group (test group 0) one sample was analysed over the study period.

The particle size analysis was carried out with a cascade impactor. In test group 3, particle size distribution was determined two times during the exposure period. In this test group significant amount liquid aerosol was found and the concentration was high enough for this measurement. In test group 2, due to the low aerosol concentration, long sampling time was necessary. During ongoing sampling, deposited aerosol would get evaporated again and the measured particle size distribution would not reflect the real size distribution. Therefore, no cascade impactor measurement was performed in this test group. In test group 1, no significant aerosol fraction was determined.
Duration of treatment / exposure:
28 days
Frequency of treatment:
6 hours/day, 5 days/week
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
Remarks:
Doses / Concentrations:
10, 50 and 150 mg/m3
Basis:
other: target concentration
Remarks:
Doses / Concentrations:
10.2±2.7, 49.1±8.3 and 155.9±23.4 mg/m3
Basis:
analytical conc.
No. of animals per sex per dose:
5
Control animals:
yes
Details on study design:
The concentrations to be tested in this study were selected based on the results of the 5-day range finding study.
Summarizing the results, inhalation exposure to MEA for 6 hours per day on 5 consecutive days caused histological changes all over the respiratory tract. Most pronounced effects were observed in the upper respiratory tract.
At 500 mg/m3, minimal to mild inflammatory cell infiltrates in the submucosa of the ventral meatus in level I of the nasal cavity. In addition, four of the five animals revealed (multi)focal perivascular hemorrhage in this region. One animal showed necrosis of the squamous epithelium. In the area of the transition from squamous to the respiratory epithelium, four of the five animals revealed minimal to mild squamous metaplasia of the respiratory epithelium. In level II of the nasal cavity three of the five animals of the same concentration group showed minimal to moderate inflammatory cell infiltrates. In the larynx, minimal to severe epithelial necrosis, mild to severe inflammatory cell infiltrates, and minimal to moderate squamous metaplasia was observed. In level I of the larynx, inflammation was accompanied by necrosis of the submucosal glands. Moreover, cellular atypia within the metaplastic epithelium was observed in level I and II of the larynx. These findings were less severe in level III. Inflammatory cell infiltrates, focal epithelial necrosis and minimal diffuse epithelial hyperplasia could still be observed.
In the carina (trachea) respiratory epithelium hyperplasia and degeneration intermingled with inflammatory cell infiltrates in almost all animals of the high concentration group. In the lung minimal to mild hyperplasia of the bronchiolar epithelium in the areas of bifurcation of large bronchi was observed.
At 200 mg/m³ similar findings were noted in the above mentioned organs and tissues with less incidence and severity. At 20 mg/m3, no adverse effects were observed.
The observed effects seem to be associated with aerosol exposure. Considering the histological findings in the respiratory tract, 150 mg/m3 was selected as the high concentration for the main study to cause toxic effect. The mid concentration for the main study should be 50 mg/m3 because this concentration was around the saturated vapor concentration in the inhalation system. The low concentration should be 10 mg/m³, as the expected No Observed Adverse Effect Concentration (NOAEC).
150 mg/m³(61 ppm) as high concentration causing toxic effects
50 mg/m³ (20 ppm): as mid concentration
10 mg/m³ (4 ppm): as low concentration and expected NOAEC

Examinations

Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
Mortality: The animals were examined for evident signs of toxicity or mortality twice a day (in the morning and in the late afternoon) on working days and once a day (in the morning) on Saturdays, Sundays and public holidays.

Clinical observations: The clinical condition of the test animals was recorded once during the pre-exposure period and on the post-exposure observation day and at least 3 times (before, during and after exposure) on exposure days. During exposure only a group wise examination was possible.

Body weight data: The body weight of the animals was determined at the start of the pre-exposure, at the start of the exposure period and then, as a rule, once a week as well as prior to gross necropsy. As a rule, the animals were weighed at the same time of the day. Body weight change was calculated as the difference between body weight on the respective exposure day and body weight on the day of the first exposure. Group means were derived
from the individual differences.

Food consumption: Food consumption was determined weekly and calculated as mean food consumption in grams per animal and day. The animals were maintained in social-housing cages, with 5 animals per cage, during the whole study period. Therefore, the food consumption was determined cage-wise. The food consumption per animal and day was calculated by dividing food consumption of the day of a respective cage by the 5 animals per cage. As the animals of each test group were housed in only one cage per sex, no statistical evaluation of food consumption is possible.

Ophthalmology: Before the start of the exposure period (day -3) the eyes of all animals, and at the end of the study (day 26) the eyes of all animals were examined for any changes in the refracting media with an ophthalmoscope (HEINE Optotechnik, Herrsching, FRG) after administration of a mydriatic (Mydrum, Chauvin ankerpharm GmbH, Rudolstadt, Germany).

CLINICAL PATHOLOGY
In the morning, blood was taken from the retro-orbital venous plexus from fasted animals. The animals were anaesthetized using isoflurane (Isoba®, Essex GmbH Munich, Germany). The blood sampling procedure and the subsequent analysis of the blood and serum samples were carried out in a randomized sequence. The assays of blood and serum parameters were performed under internal laboratory quality control conditions with commercial reference controls to assure reliable test results. The results of the clinical pathology examinations are expressed in units of the International System (SI). The following examinations were carried out in 5 animals per test group and sex.

Hematology: Leukocyte count (WBC), Erythrocyte count (RBC), Hemoglobin (HGB), Hematocrit (HCT), Mean corpuscular volume (MCV), Mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH), Mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC), Platelet count (PLT), Differential blood count, Reticulocytes, Prothrombin time.

Clinical chemistry: Alanine aminotransferase (ALT), Aspartate aminotransferase (AST), Alkaline phosphatase (ALP), γ-Glutamyltransferase (GGT), Sodium (NA), Potassium (K), Chloride (CL), Inorganic phosphate (INP), Calcium (CA), Urea (UREA), Creatinine (CREA), Glucose (GLUC), Total bilirubin (TBIL), Total protein (TPROT), Albumin (ALB), Globulins (GLOB), Triglycerides (TRIG), Cholesterol (CHOL), Magnesium (MG).
Sacrifice and pathology:
Necropsy: All animals were sacrificed under Narcoren anesthesia by exsanguination from the abdominal aorta and vena cava. The exsanguinated animals were necropsied and assessed by gross pathology.

Organ weights: The following weights were determined in all animals sacrificed on schedule:
1. Anesthetized animals
2. Adrenal glands
3. Brain
4. Epididymides
5. Heart
6. Kidneys
7. Liver
8. Lungs
9. Spleen
10. Testes
11. Thymus
12. Thyroid glands
3.10.3. Organ / Tissue fixation
The following organs or tissues were fixed in 4% buffered formaldehyde:
1. All gross lesions
2. Adrenal glands
3. Brain with olfactory bulb
4. Bone marrow (femur)
5. Eyes with optic nerve
6. Heart
7. Kidneys
8. Larynx/Pharynx
9. Liver
10. Lungs
11. Lymph nodes (tracheobronchial and mediastinal lymph nodes)
12. Nose (nasal cavity)
13. Esophagus
14. Ovaries
15. Seminal vesicle
16. Spinal cord (cervical, thoracic and lumbar cords)
17. Stomach (forestomach and glandular stomach)
18. Spleen
19. Testes
20. Thyroid glands
21. Thymus
22. Trachea
23. Urinary bladder
24. Uterus
From the liver, each one slices of the Lobus dexter medialis and the Lobus sinster lateralis were fixed in Carnoy’s solution and embedded in paraplast.

Histotechnical processing / Examination by light microscopy and assessment of findings: Fixation was followed by histotechnical processing and examination by light microscopy and assessment of findings according to the list below: Organs and tissues of main group animals designated for histological processing and light microscopic examination
1. All gross lesions
2. Nasal cavity (4 levels)
3. Larynx (3 levels)
4. Trachea
5. Lungs (5 lobes)
6. Lymph nodes (tracheobronchial and mediastinal lymph nodes)
7. Adrenal glands
8. Bone marrow (femur)
9. Brain
10. Heart
11. Kidneys
12. Liver
13. Esophagus
14. Ovaries
15. Seminal vesicles
16. Spinal cord (cervical, thoracic and lumbar cords)
17. Spleen
18. Stomach (forestomach and glandular stomach)
19. Testes
20. Thyroid glands
21. Thymus
22. Uterus
A correlation between gross lesions and histopathological findings was performed.
Statistics:
Body weight, body weight change: A comparison of each group with the control group was performed using DUNNETT's test (twosided) for the hypothesis of equal means.

Clinical pathology parameters, urine volume, urine specific gravity: Non-parametric one-way analysis using KRUSKALWALLIS test (two-sided).If the
resulting p-value was equal or less than 0.05, a pairwise comparison of each dose group with the control group was performed using Wilcoxon-test (two-sided) for the equal medians.

Weight parameters: Non-parametric one-way analysis using KRUSKALWALLIS test (two-sided). If the resulting p-value was equal or less than 0.05, a pair wise comparison of each concentration group with the control group was performed using the WILCOXON test for the hypothesis of equal medians.

Results and discussion

Results of examinations

Clinical signs:
no effects observed
Mortality:
no mortality observed
Body weight and weight changes:
no effects observed
Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
no effects observed
Food efficiency:
not specified
Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
not specified
Ophthalmological findings:
no effects observed
Haematological findings:
no effects observed
Clinical biochemistry findings:
no effects observed
Urinalysis findings:
not specified
Behaviour (functional findings):
not specified
Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
no effects observed
Gross pathological findings:
no effects observed
Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
effects observed, treatment-related
Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
no effects observed
Details on results:
Mortality: No deaths were recorded throughout the study.

Clinical observations: During the pre-exposure period and the post-exposure observation day the animals showed no clinical signs and findings different from normal. During the exposure period the animals of the control group showed no clinical signs and findings different from normal. During the exposure period a few animals crossbench all test groups showed salivation after exposure.

Body weight: The mean body weights of the test substance exposed groups were not statistically significantly different from the control group 0.

Body weight change: The mean body weight changes of the test substance exposed groups were not statistically significantly different from the control group 0.

Food consumption: No substance-related changes of food consumption were observed during the whole study period.

Ophthalmology: The ophthalmologic examinations did not show any impairment of the refracting media. Spontaneous findings such as remainders of the pupillary membrane or corneal stippling, striation of lens and opacity were observed in several animals of all test groups and the control group without any concentration-response relationship.

Hematology: No treatment-related, adverse changes among hematological parameters were measured. In male rats of dose group 2 and 3 (50 mg/m3 and 150 mg/m3) the mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC) was higher compared to controls. The increase of this calculated parameter was not accompanied by an alteration of any other red blood cell parameter value. Therefore, the MCHC increase is regarded as possibly treatment-related, but not adverse.

Clinical chemistry: No treatment-related changes among clinical chemistry parameters were measured. At the end of the study, in male rats of all dose groups the creatinine values were higher compared to controls, whereas in females of dose group 1 (10 mg/m3) the urea levels were lower compared to controls. The values were not changed dose-dependently. Therefore, they are regarded as incidental and not treatment-related. In male rats of dose group 3 (150 mg/m3) the triglyceride values were decreased. This was the only altered clinical chemistry parameter and it was especially not accompanied by any change of protein, glucose or cholesterol levels. Therefore, this decreased triglyceride concentrations were regarded as not adverse (ECETOC Technical Report No. 85, 2002).

Absolute weights: All mean absolute weight parameters did not show significant differences when compared with the control group 0.

Relative organ weights: When compared with control group 0 (=100%), the mean relative weights of liver in male treatment groups were significantly decreased. All other mean relative weight parameters did not show significant differences when compared with the control group 0. The decrease of mean liver weights in treated males was not concentration dependent and there were no histopathological correlates. Therefore, the reduced liver weights in males of all treatment groups were regarded to be incidental and not related to treatment.

Gross lesions:
There were no gross lesions in treated male and female animals.

Histopathology Larynx: At the base of epiglottis (level I), a submucosal inflammation that was characterized by infiltrates of granulocytes and lymphoid cells occurred in all males and females of test groups 2 (50 mg/m3) and 3 (150 mg/m3). In animals of test group 3 (150 mg/m3), the inflammation was accompanied by degeneration of the submucosal glands. In addition, 4 males and 3 females of test group 3 (150 mg/m3) showed a focal epithelial necrosis at the base of epiglottis. In the same region, a focal squamous cell metaplasia was observed in 3 males and 2 females of test group 2 (50 mg/m3) as well as in all males and females of test group 3 (150 mg/m3). All these findings were related to treatment. The occurrence of a minimal inflammation at the base of epiglottis in one female of test group 1 (10 mg/m3) was considered incidental. A minimal or slight epithelial alteration was observed in 2 males and 3 females of the control group, in 4 males and one female of test group 1 (10 mg/m3), as well as in 2 males and 3 females of test group 2 (50 mg/m3). The epithelial alteration was located at the base of epiglottis and was characterized by a slight focal flattening of epithelial cells. The epithelial alteration was regarded as a spontaneous lesion. At the entrance to the ventral pouch (larynx, level II), a minimal (grade 1) focal squamous metaplasia was seen in one female of test group 2 (50 mg/m3) as well as in one male and two females of test group 3 (150 mg/m3). A minimal focal epithelial hyperplasia occurred in all males and in 4 females. A mostly minimal inflammation was observed in 2 males and 3 females of test group 2 (50 mg/m3) as well as in all males and 4 females of test group 3 (150 mg/m3). All findings were considered treatment-related.

Histopathology Trachea: In males, a minimal or slight focal squamous metaplasia that was located in the area of the carina occurred in 3 animals of test group 3 (150 mg/m3). A minimal or slight inflammation was observed in one male of test group 1 (10 mg/m3) and in 4 males of test group 3 (150 mg/m3). The occurrence of squamous metaplasia and of inflammation in males of test group 3 (150 mg/m3) was related to treatment. In females, a minimal focal inflammation was only seen in one control animal.

Histopathology Lungs: A minimal or slight focal or multifocal mucous cell hyperplasia was seen in single or few large bronchi in all males and 2 females of test group 3 (150 mg/m3). In affected bronchi, the number of goblet cells was minimally or slightly increased. The occurrence of mucous cell hyperplasia was regarded as treatment-related.

Histopathology rest: All other findings occurred either individually or were biologically equally distributed over the control group and the treatment groups. They were considered to be incidental or spontaneous in origin and without any relation to treatment.

Effect levels

open allclose all
Dose descriptor:
NOAEC
Remarks:
local effects
Effect level:
10 mg/m³ air
Sex:
male/female
Basis for effect level:
other: concentration-related lesions in larynx, trachea and lung
Dose descriptor:
NOEC
Remarks:
systemic effects
Effect level:
150 mg/m³ air
Sex:
male/female
Basis for effect level:
other: no adverse systemic effects were reported

Target system / organ toxicity

Critical effects observed:
not specified

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Exposure over 28d to up to 150 mg/m3 of monoethanolamine via inhalation exposure to aerosol with vapour fraction was not shown to cause statistically significant systemic adverse effects. Local effects such as on mucous cell are considered to be treatment related at 150 mg/m3.
These data are considered directly applicable to the registered substance, as a very worst-case estimate of the effects of the registered substance, given the low vapour pressure of the registered substance.