Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin irritation / corrosion

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
5th - 8th April 1994.
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: see 'Remark'
Remarks:
Study conducted in compliance with agreed protocols, with no or minor deviations from standard test guidelines and/or minor methodological deficiencies, which do not affect the quality of the relevant results. The study report was conclusive, done to a valid guideline and the study was conducted under GLP conditions.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1994
Report date:
1994

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.4 (Acute Toxicity: Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
: shorter observation period.
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
not applicable
Principles of method if other than guideline:
The observation period was only for 4 days.
GLP compliance:
yes

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
3,5-dimethylpyrazole
EC Number:
200-657-5
EC Name:
3,5-dimethylpyrazole
Cas Number:
67-51-6
Molecular formula:
C5H8N2
IUPAC Name:
3,5-dimethyl-1H-pyrazole
Test material form:
solid: particulate/powder
Remarks:
migrated information: powder
Details on test material:
Appearance: White crystalline powder
Storage conditions: Room temperature in the dark.
Date received: 11th February 1994.

Test animals

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Froxfield Ltd. (U.K), Petersfield, Hampshire, England.
- Age at study initiation: 11 to 13 weeks.
- Weight at study initiation: 2.6 to 3.1 kg.
- Housing: Individually in plastic cages with perforated floors.
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Standard laboratory diet SDS Stanrab (P) Rabbit Diet, as libitum.
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Drinking water, ad libitum.
- Acclimation period: Period not reported, however animals were allowed to acclimatise to the test conditions prior to testing.

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): approx. 19ºC.
- Humidity (%): 30-70%.
- Air changes (per hr): 19 charges per hour.
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hour of artificial light (0700-1900) in each 24 hour period.

Test system

Type of coverage:
semiocclusive
Preparation of test site:
shaved
Vehicle:
water
Controls:
no
Amount / concentration applied:
Single dose of 0.5g
Duration of treatment / exposure:
Four hours.
Observation period:
Four days.
Number of animals:
Three
Details on study design:
TEST SITE
- Area: Dorso-lumbar region.
- Area of exposure: Approximately 25 mm x 25 mm.
- Site was prepared 24 hours prior to exposure.
- Type of wrap if used: gauze pad and an 'Elastoplast' dressing.

REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): Yes with warm water (30 - 40 ºC)
- Time after start of exposure: 4 hours, the end of the exposure period.

SCORING SYSTEM: Draize scale (1977) as seen in table 1 in the field "any other information on material and methods incl. tables".

OBSERVATIONS:
- Clinical signs: animals were observed daily for signs of ill health or toxicity.
- The dermal response was scored at the following time point; 60 mins after removal of dressing and 24, 48 and 72 hours after exposure.

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
other: No reaction observed at any time point.
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
other: No reaction observed at any time point.
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
other: No reaction observed at any time point.
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
other: No reaction observed at any time point.
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
other: No reaction observed at any time point.
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
other: No reaction observed at any time point.
Other effects:
Clinical signs: no signs of toxicity or ill health in any animal during the observation period.
Dermal response: no dermal reaction was observed in any of the test animals.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 2. Dermal Response

Observation Time
Rabbit Number Observation 60 min Day 2 Day 3 Day 4
366 Erythema 0 0 0 0
Oedema 0 0 0 0
367 Erythema 0 0 0 0
Oedema 0 0 0 0
368 Erythema 0 0 0 0
Oedema 0 0 0 0

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
There was no dermal response or signs of toxicity were observed in any of the test animals after a 4 hour exposure.
Executive summary:

In a GLP compliant study performed according to the standardised guideline EU Method B.4 the dermal response caused by exposure to the test material was determined. Three New Zealand White rabbits were exposed to the test material for 4 hours; the reaction was scored according to the Draize scale (1997), over a 4 day observation period. No dermal response or clinical signs of toxicity were observed in any of the test animals. It is this lack of any reaction which is thought to be the reason the observations were terminated after only 4 days.

The skin irritation study indicates that the test material does not require classification according to Regulation (EC) 1272/2008.