Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 941-224-7
CAS number: -
LC50 for freshwater fish (zebra fish) = 49 mg /L
test was performed with the read across substance CAS 577-11-7 (Docusate
Sodium) to the substance registered with this dossier. Due to the longer
C-chain-length of CAS 577-11-7 when compared to substance registered in
this dossier and a tendency of decreasing ecotoxicity with decreasing
C-chain length this is considered as a conservative substance for read
across. A more detailed read across argumentation is provided in a
the data endpoint “Short-term toxicity to fish” in total 7 studies on
freshwater fish are available: one Klimisch 2 key study, three
supporting studies and three disregarded studies with Klimisch 3 or
Klimisch 4 scores.
study from Elementis (Scholz 1995) was classified as Klimisch 2 key
study since this study was read across. From technical aspects, the
study would be a Klimisch 1 study. The study was conducted according to
the appropriate guidelines, without major deviations. In this study the
acute toxicity of a formulation containing 64.2% Docusate Sodium to
zebra fish, Brachydanio rerio (new Danio rerio) was determined in a
semi-static test with daily renewal of the test solutions. The test was
performed according to EG 92/69 C.1. Deviations to the guideline were
minor, e.g., the temperature ranged from 19 to 21 °C (guideline 20-24°C)
and the fish had a length of 2 cm (guideline 3.0 +/- 0.5 cm). The test
was performed with a control and nominal 5, 10, 20, 40 and 80 mg
Docusate Sodium/L. The stock solution was prepared with nominal 10 g
Docusate Sodium/L and was subsequently submitted to DOC analysis. The
experimentally determined concentration was 8.884 g Docusate Sodium/L.
Since the deviation to the nominal concentration was < 20 %, the nominal
concentration of the stock solution was used for calculations on dosing.
The stability of the Docusate Sodium in test medium was determined in an
appropriate separate side experiment under conditions similar to the
study itself. In that experiment the test solutions were stable for at
least 24 hours, i.e., the renewal interval of this test. During the
study, the temperature of the test solutions ranged from 19 to 21°C with
an average temperature of 20°C. After 96 hours of exposure, 0, 0, 0, 0,
3, and 10 out of 10 fish had died in the 0 (control), 5, 10, 20, 40 and
80 mg Docusate Sodium/L treatment groups. The 96 h LC50 was determined
to be 49 mg Docusate Sodium/L. The concentrations were based on nominal
this study represents the technically and scientifically best study, it
is considered reliable and relevant for the risk assessment of the
registered substance. Since read across was made from a longer C-chain
length substance to a shorter C-chain length substance and there was a
tendency of increasing toxicity with increasing C-chain length, this
read across is considered as conservative and no further assessment
factor is needed.
the key study, three supporting Klimisch 2 and three disregarded
Klimisch 3 or 4 studies are available for this endpoint. These studies
are considered to be just supportive or disregarded since no dose
verification was performed or major deviations to the guidelines were
observed, i.e., the size of the fish was higher than recommended in the
guideline and the test duration was only 48 hours instead of 96 hours as
outlined in the guideline.
Cytec study from Bowman (1987) was classified as Klimisch 2 key study.
In this study the acute toxicity of test substance - which contains at
least 97% Docusate Sodium - to bluegill sunfish, Lepomis macrochirus,
was determined in a static test. The test was performed according to
OECD 203. Deviations to the guideline were not reported. No
dose-verification analysis was performed. The test was performed with a
control and nominal 32, 42, 56, 75 and 100 mg CT-326 -87/L corresponding
to 31.0, 40.7, 54.3, 72.8, 97.0 mg Docusate Sodium/L. During the study,
the temperature of the test solutions was 22°C. After 96 hours of
exposure, 0, 0, 10, 10, 10 and 10 out of 10 fish had died in the
control, and 31.0, 40.7, 54.3, 72.8, 97.0 mg Docusate Sodium/L treatment
groups. The 96 h LC50 was determined to be 35.9 mg Docusate Sodium/L.
The concentrations were based on nominal concentrations.
Dow study from Raghuram (1992) was classified as Klimisch 2 key study.
In this study the acute toxicity of a formulated product- which contains
64% Docusate Sodium - to fathead minnow, Pimephales promelas, was
determined in a static 96 hour test. The test was performed according to
U.S. EPA-TSCA, 40 CFR Part 797.1400. The test concentrations were 0
(control), 0.625, 1.25, 2.5, 5, 10, 20 and 40 mg formulated product/L
corresponding to 0 (control),0.4, 0.8, 1.6, 3.2, 6.4, 12.8 and 25.6 mg
Docusate Sodium/L. Dose verification was not performed and therefore the
concentrations were based on nominal concentrations. The test was set up
with two replicates per test group. Each replicate received 10 fish,
i.e., the 20 fish were exposed per test group. The temperature ranged
from 21 to 23°C, the dissolved oxygen concentration from 4.1 to 8.2
mg/L, the pH from 6.2 to 7.6. After 96 hours of exposure, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
0, 1 and 20 out of 20 fish had died in the control,0.4, 0.8, 1.6, 3.2,
6.4, 12.8 and 25.6 mg Docusate Sodium/L treatment groups. The 96 h LC50
was determined to be 17.3 mg Docusate Sodium/L.
Cytec study from Drozdowski (1990) was classified as Klimisch 2 key
study. In this study the acute toxicity of the test substance - which
contains at least 97% Docusate Sodium - to rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus
mykiss, was determined in a static test. The test was performed
according to OECD 203 without deviations to the guideline. The test was
performed with a control and nominal 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50 and 100 mg test
substance/L corresponding to 6.06, 12.1, 24.3, 48.5 and 97 mg Docusate
Sodium/L. For each test group, 2 replicates with 5 fish were set up.
Dose verification analysis was not performed. During the study, the
temperature of the test solutions ranged within 15 +/- 2°C. After 96
hours of exposure, 0, 0, 0, 2, 10 and 10 out of 10 fish had died in the
control, 6.06, 12.1, 24.3, 48.5 and 97 mg Docusate Sodium/L treatment
groups. The 96 h LC50 was determined to be 27.2 mg Docusate Sodium/L.
The concentrations were based on nominal concentrations.
In addition to the Klimisch 2 studies, there
are two Klimisch 3 and one Klimisch 4 studies for short-term toxicity to
fish available. Due to the poor reliability of these studies, they are
not discussed here.
contrast to the above semi-static key study from Elementis (Scholz,
1995), no dose verification was performed in the static supporting
studies (Klimisch 2) resulting in lower certainty for correct dosage and
correct exposure when compared to the key study. The individual LC50
values of those studies were 35.9, 17.3 and 27,2 mg Docusate Sodium/L
and therefore lower than those of the key study. However,
due to the better test design of the key study (semi-static,
confirmation of test item stability under test conditions and
confirmation of correct dosage, correct oxygen concentration), this
value is considered as more relevant than the result of the supporting
the acute LC50 of 49 mg/L from the key study will be used for the
further risk assessment of the substance registered with this dossier.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
Welcome to the ECHA website. This site is not fully supported in Internet Explorer 7 (and earlier versions). Please upgrade your Internet Explorer to a newer version.
Do not show this message again