Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 239-556-6 | CAS number: 15520-10-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- Toxic effect type:
- dose-dependent
Effects on fertility
Description of key information
No reproduction toxicity study is available for the submission substance, MPMD.
However, there is a reliable two generation study (feeding study) with the structurally related Hexamethylenediamine (HMD, more details are available in the read-across justification document (see IUCLID section 13.2)).
In this two generation study (Schardein, 1985), 26 males and 26 females SD- rats/group received HMD orally in the diet at dosage levels of 0, 50, 150 or 500 mg/kg/day for 56 days prior to mating, then throughout the study in accordance with a respective EPA guideline (similar to OECD test guideline 416) and under GLP conditions.
No adverse effects on reproduction/fertility were obvious in any of the examined generations. The NOAEL was established at the highest dose tested, i.e. 500 mg/kg bw/day.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- two-generation reproductive toxicity
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Justification for type of information:
- For details on endpoint specific justification please see read-across report in section 13 or find a link in cross-reference “assessment report”.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- assessment report
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 500 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: Based on significant but slight decreased litter size without any other effects and any historical data.
- Remarks on result:
- other: read-across from 1,6-Hexanediamine - due to the identical molecular weight of source and target substance, the effect concentrations for the source substance are also valid for the target substance without further adjustment.
- Key result
- Critical effects observed:
- no
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 500 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other:
- Remarks on result:
- other: read-across from 1,6-Hexanediamine - due to the identical molecular weight of source and target substance, the effect concentrations for the source substance are also valid for the target substance without further adjustment.
- Key result
- Critical effects observed:
- no
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Generation:
- F1
- Effect level:
- 500 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: Based on slight decreased pups weight observed at high dose. It could be attributed to the un palatability of HMD inducing decrease in food consumption by the F0 and F1 parents.
- Remarks on result:
- other: read-across from 1,6-Hexanediamine - due to the identical molecular weight of source and target substance, the effect concentrations for the source substance are also valid for the target substance without further adjustment.
- Key result
- Critical effects observed:
- no
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Generation:
- F2
- Effect level:
- 500 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: Based on slight decreased pups weight observed at high dose. It could be attributed to the un palatability of the test material inducing decrease in food consumption by the F0 and F1 parents.
- Remarks on result:
- other: read-across from 1,6-Hexanediamine - due to the identical molecular weight of source and target substance, the effect concentrations for the source substance are also valid for the target substance without further adjustment.
- Key result
- Critical effects observed:
- no
- Key result
- Reproductive effects observed:
- no
- Conclusions:
- Under the test conditions, there were no adverse effects on reproduction and fertility induced by the test material.
Therefore,
The NOEL (parental) = 500 mg/kg bw/day (any adverse effects were not observed at all dose tested)
The NOEL (Developmental) = 150 mg/kg bw/day, based on slight decreased pups weight at high dose.
The NOEL (Fertility) = 150 mg/kg bw/day, based on slight decreased litter size at high dose.
In addition, these results indicate that the test material does not have significant systemic target organ toxicity. - Executive summary:
The study used as source investigated the effect of 1,6-Hexanediamine on fertility and reproduction in two generations in rats. The study results of the source compound were considered applicable to the target compound. Justification and applicability of the read-across approach (structural analogue) is outlined in the read-across report in section 13 or find a link in cross reference “assessment report”.
Reference
Effect on fertility: via oral route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 500 mg/kg bw/day
- Study duration:
- chronic
- Species:
- rat
- Quality of whole database:
- One two-generation study in rats conducted with the structural analogue HMD has a Klimisch Score = 1. The data base is of high quality.
Effect on fertility: via inhalation route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effect on fertility: via dermal route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
No reproduction toxicity study is available for the submission substance, MPMD.
However, there is a reliable two generation study (feeding study) with the structurally related Hexamethylenediamine (CAS 124-09-4, HMD, more details are available in the read-across justification document (see IUCLID section 13.2)).
In a this two-generation study (Schardein, 1985), 26 males and 26 females SD- rats/group received HMD orally in the diet at dosage levels of 0, 50, 150 or 500 mg/kg/day for 56 days prior to mating, then throughout the study
in accordance with Series 83 -4 of the Environmental protection Agency Pesticide Assessment Guidelines, Subdivision F., Hazard Evaluation: Human and Domestic Animals, issued November, 1982 (similar to OECD test guideline 416) and under GLP conditions.
The parental rats and pups were observed twice each day for signs of overt toxicity, changes in general appearance and behavior, and mortality. Individual body weights were recorded weekly for the adult rats; In addition, females were weighed on gestation days 0, 6, 15 and 20 and lacation days 0, 4, 7, 14 and 21. Parental food consumption was measured weekly for individual parental rats except during mating. Specific reproductive observations included tabulation of male and female fertility indices, and the length of cohabitation and gestation were recorded. Gross necropsies were performed on F0 and F1 parents as well as F2 pups. The following tissues were taken from F0 and F1 rats for histopathological evaluation: kidneys, liver, lung, ovaries, prostate, seminal vesicles, spleen, testes with epididymis, uterus, and vagina.
The results of this study were:
- Dietary analysis indicated that greater than 90% of the target concentration of hexamethylenediamine were fed to rats in all groups. The actual doses consumed, however, averaged between 123 and 132% of the target doses in these groups.
- No treatment-related mortality was observed in any of the groups. Some deaths occurred, however, they were singular events in specific groups and there was no pattern indicative of a dose-response relationship. Mortality ratios for the F0 males were 0/26, 1/26, 1/26, and 0/26 for the 0, 50, 150, and 500 mg/kg groups, respectively. Mortality ratios for the F0 females were 0/26, 0/26, 0/26, and 0/26 for the 0, 50, 150, and 500 mg/kg groups, respectively. Mortality ratios for the F1 males were 0/26, 0/26, 0/26, and 0/26 for the 0, 50, 150, and 500 mg/kg groups, respectively. Mortality ratios for the F1 females were 1/26, 1/26, 0/26, and 0/26 for the 0, 50, 150, and 500 mg/kg groups, respectively.
- Body weights of male F0 and F1 rats in the 500 mg/kg group were reduced by about 10%, relative to control values, at the end of study weeks 15 and 38. The body weights of females, in contrast, were comparable to control values at these intervals. During gestation, the female weight gain was reduced by about 10% in the high-dose group. Decreased body weight is correlated with a decreased food consumption. Therefore, this effect was likely due to the unpalatability of HMD.
- Fertility was not adversely affected by the dietary administration of hexamethylenediamine over 2 generations. The F0 and the F1 litter size in the 500 mg/kg group was significantly reduced without an increase in the number of dead pups. There were no biological meaningful or statistically significant differences in the number of viable and dead pups on lactation day 1, as compared to control for either generation in the mid and low-dose treatment groups. Pup survival was not significantly reduced in any of the treated groups. At birth, pup body weights were not adversely affected by treatment, but during lactation, reduced weights were apparent in pups of each sex from the high dose group
- No meaningful differences were noted between the control and treated rats of either generation with regard to antemortem observations, copulatory interval, gestation length, nesting and nursing behavior, and appearance of the pups. No treatment related effects were noted on testes weights and no effects were noted by macroscopic or microscopic examination of tissues evaluated.
In conclusion:
Under the test conditions, there were no adverse effects on reproduction and fertility, therefore:
The NOAEL (Parental) = 500 mg/kg bw/day (even if this effect was likely due to the decrease to food consumption as the worst case)
The NOAEL (Developmental) = 500 mg/kg bw/day, since slight decreased pups weight observed at high dose could be attributed to the unpalatability of HMD inducing decrease in food consumption by the F0 and F1 parents.
The NOAEL (Fertility) = 500 mg/kg bw/day, based on significant but slight decreased in litter size without any other effects and any historical data.
Effects on developmental toxicity
Description of key information
Two preliminary OECD TG 414 studies in two species (oral gavage, rats and rabbits) are available for the submission substance. The according main studies enabling to establish respective NOAELs will be submitted at a later point in time during a further update. Thus no final conclusion on developmental toxicity/ teratogenicity can be drawn yet. However, observations from the preliminary studies did not indicate the occurrence of any severe effects on fetal development to be expected in the main studies.
Effect on developmental toxicity: via oral route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effect on developmental toxicity: via inhalation route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effect on developmental toxicity: via dermal route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Mode of Action Analysis / Human Relevance Framework
No specific information available.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the above presented data no classification for reproduction toxicity/ developmental toxicity/ teratogenicity is necessary according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.
Additional information
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.