Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

In order to test the irritant/corrosive properties for skin and eyes of cC6O4 ammonium salt an in vitro skin irritation study and an in vitro eye irritation study (BCOP) were performed on cC6O4 ammonium salt, in compliance with test guidelines and GLP conditions.

In the human EPISKIN model, the relative absorbance value was slightly below the cut-off value, therefore the substance is considered a potential skin irritant.
Severe effects were observed in the BCOP assay.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin irritation / corrosion

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2009-03-19 until 2009-06-10
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: ECVAM international validation study on in vitro tests for acute skin irritation: Report on the validity of the EPlSKlN and EpiDerm assays and on the Skin Integrity Function Test (Altern Lab Anim. 2007 Dec; 35 (6): 559-601).
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: European Commission: Institute for Health an Consumer Protection and European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods (ECVAM): Statement on the validity of in-vitm tests for skin irritation (2007).
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: OECD Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals, Draft Proposal for a New Guideline, In Vitro Skin Irritation: Human Skin Model Test, December 2007.
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
Hessisches Ministerium für Umwelt, Energie, Landwirtschaft und Verbraucherschutz
Test system:
human skin model
Remarks:
EPISKIN kits
Source species:
human
Cell type:
non-transformed keratinocytes
Vehicle:
water
Remarks:
deionised water
Details on test system:
CELL CULTURE FOR IN VITRO TEST:
EPISKIN kits are purchased from Skinethic Laboratories (06000 Nice, France).
The EPISKIN tissue consists of normal, human-derived epidermal keratinocytes which have been cultured to form a multilayered, highly differentiated model of the human epidermis. It consists of organized basal, spinous and granular layers, and a multi-layered stratum corneum containing intercellular lamellar lipid layers arranged in patterns analogous to those found in vivo. The EPISKIN tissues (surface 0.38 cm²) are cultured on specially prepared cell culture inserts.
EPISKIN tissues were shipped at ambient temperature on medium-supplemented agarose gels in a 12-well plate and reached Harlan CCR on April 08, 2009. On day of receipt EPISKIN tissues were transferred to 12-well plates with maintenance medium.

TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 15 mg of the test item were applied to each tissue and wetted with 15 μL deionised water
- Concentration (if solution): 1000 g/l

VEHICLE
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 15 μL deionised water

TEMPERATURE USED FOR TEST SYSTEM
- Temperature used during treatment / exposure: 37 ± 1°C, 5 ± 0.5% CO2
- Temperature of post-treatment incubation (if applicable):


REMOVAL OF TEST MATERIAL AND CONTROLS
- Number of washing steps:
- Observable damage in the tissue due to washing:
- Modifications to validated SOP:

DYE BINDING METHOD
- Dye used in the dye-binding assay: MTT
- Wavelength:
- Filter:
- Filter bandwidth:

NUMBER OF INDEPENDENT TESTING RUNS / EXPERIMENTS TO DERIVE FINAL PREDICTION: triplicate tissues

PREDICTION MODEL / DECISION CRITERIA (choose relevant statement)
- The test substance is considered to be corrosive to skin if [complete, e.g. if the mean TER value is less than or equal to 5 kΩ and the skin disk is obviously damaged, or if the mean TER value is less than or equal to 5 kΩ, and the skin disc is showing no obvious damage, but the mean disc dye content is greater than or equal to the mean disc dye content of the 10M HCl positive control obtained concurrently.]
- The test substance is considered to be non-corrosive to skin if [complete, e.g. if the mean TER value obtained for the test substance is greater than 5 kΩ, or if the mean TER value is less than or equal to 5 kΩ, and the skin disc is showing no obvious damage, and the mean disc dye content is well below the mean disc dye content of the 10M HCl positive control obtained concurrently.]
- Justification for the selection of the cut-off point(s) if different than recommended in TG 430:
Control samples:
yes, concurrent vehicle
yes, concurrent positive control
Duration of treatment / exposure:
15 +/- 1 min direct exposure of the cell culture to the test item (after this 42 hours incubation)
Observation period:
not applicable, direct readings of the assay results
Number of animals:
No animals used. Three tissues were used, from each two replicate wells were tested per test substance concentration and controls.
Details on study design:
not applicable
Irritation / corrosion parameter:
other: Relative absorbance (% of negative control)
Value:
49.2
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks:
(3% of control)
Remarks on result:
other:
Remarks:
Basis: mean tissue 1, 2, and 3. Time point: 15 min exposure. Max. score: 62.83. Reversibility: not assessed.
Other effects / acceptance of results:
The relative absorbance in % of negative control is used for quantifying the potential skin irritating effect of the tested substances. After treatment with the test item cC6O4 the relative absorbance values were decreased to 49.2%. This value is slightly below the threshold for irritancy of ≤ 50%

Table 1: Results after treatment with cC604

 Dose group Treatment Interval  Absorbance 570 nm Tissue 1*  Absorbance 570 nm Tissue 2*  Absorbance 570 nm Tissue 3*  Mean Absorbance of 3 Tissues   Rel. Absorbance [% of Negative Control]**
Negative Control   15 min  0.8993 0.8653   0.7961  0.8536  100
Positive Control   15 min  0.0371 0.0247   0.0156  0.0258  3.0
cC6O4   15 min  0.3922  0.3656  0.5016  0.4198  49.2

* Mean of two replicate wells after blank correction

** relative absorbance [rounded values]: (absorbance ) 100 x (absorbance test item) / (absorbance negative control)

Optical evaluation of the MTT-reducing capacity of the test item after 1 hour incubation with MTT-reagent did not show blue colour.

Interpretation of results:
Category 2 (irritant) based on GHS criteria
Conclusions:
As a conclusion for this in-vitro study it can be stated that under the experimental conditions reported, the test item cC6O4 ammonium salt is irritant to skin. The in-vivo prediction would be an EU classification as Xi; R38, and a CLP classification as H315, Skin. irrit. 2.
Executive summary:

This in vitro study was performed to assess the irritation potential of cC6O4 ammonium salt by means of the Human Skin Model Test.

Three tissues of the human skin model EPISKIN were treated with either the test item, the negative or the positive control for 15 minutes. 15 mg of the test item were applied to each tissue and wetted with 15 μL deionised water. 15 μL of either the negative control (deionised water) or the positive control (5% Sodium lauryl sulfate) were applied to each tissue. After treatment with the negative control the absorbance values were well above the required acceptability criterion of mean OD ≥ 0.6 for the 15 minutes treatment interval thus showing the quality of the tissues.

Treatment with the positive control induced a decrease in the relative absorbance as compared to the negative control to 3.0% thus ensuring the validity of the test system. After treatment with the test item cC6O4 ammonium salt the relative absorbance values were decreased to 49.2%. This value is slightly below the threshold for irritancy of ≤ 50%. Therefore, the test item is considered to possess an irritant potential.

Note: For the current test, an irritation potential of a test item according to EU CLP classification, skin irrit. 2, H315 is predicted if the mean relative tissue viability of three individual tissues is reduced below 50% of the negative control.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
adverse effect observed (irritating)

Eye irritation

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2009-03-26 to 2009-06-10
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Remarks:
Guideline-conform study under GLP without deviations.
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: The Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Assay (BCOP) will be performed according to the INVITTOX (UK) protocol no. 98 "The Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Assay", dated February 1994.
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability (BCOP) Assay, SOP of Microbiological Associates Ltd., UK, Procedure Details, April 1997.
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: Draft OECD Guideline for Testing of Chemicals: The Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability (BCOP) Test Method for Identifying Ocular Corrosives and Severe Irritants (December, 2008).
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
Hessisches Ministerium für Umwelt, Energie, Landwirtschaft und Verbraucherschutz
Species:
other: in vitro test, using bovine cornea
Strain:
other: in vitro test, using bovine cornea
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
not applicable, in vitro test
Vehicle:
physiological saline
Controls:
not required
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): approx. 100 mg at a volume of 1.0 mL on the surface of the corneas
- Concentration (if solution): 100 g/l


VEHICLE
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 1.0 ml per applicatiom
- Concentration (if solution): 0.9% (w/v)
- Lot/batch no. (if required): no data
- Purity: no data
Duration of treatment / exposure:
240 minutes (± 5 minutes)
Observation period (in vivo):
not applicable to in vitro testing
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
Not applicable to in vitro testing; three bovine corneas used for each test item, negative and positive controls
Details on study design:
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): After incubation, test medium was rinsed off from the application side by changing cMEM buffer
- Time after start of exposure: 240 min


SCORING SYSTEM:

The following formula was used to determine the in vitro score of the negative control:
In vitro Score = opacity value + (15 x OD490 value)
The following formula was used to determine the in vitro score of the positive control and the test item:
In vitro Score = (opacity value – opacity valuenegative control + (15 x corrected OD490 value)
The in vitro score was calculated for each individual treatment and positive control cornea.
The mean in vitro score value of each treated group was calculated from the individual in vitro score values.

In vitro score Proposed in vitro irritation scale
0-3 non eye irritant
3.1-25 mild eye irritant
25.1-55 moderate eye irritant
55.1-80 severe eye irritant
>80.1 very severe eye irritant

TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: This test is designed to measure the opacity of the cornea by quantifying the ability of light of pass through it. The permeability, as a result of the irritation potential of the test item, is determined using Na-fluorescein solution.
Irritation parameter:
in vitro irritation score
Value:
183.46
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
other: very severe irritant
Other effects / acceptance of results:
The mean "in vitro irritation score" was 183.46, thus much above the score of 80.1, which represents the minimum score for the data interpretation "very severe irritating".

Table 1: Results after 240 Minutes Incubation Time

Test Group  Opacity value = Difference (t240-t0) of Opacity *  Permeability at 490 nm (OD490)*  In vitro Score  Mean in vitro Score  Proposed in vitro Irritation Scale 
 Negative control (mean of 3 tests) 0.143    2.15   No eye irritant
 Positive Control  104 -0.063  103.05     
 Positive Control  113  -0.034  112.49  105.73 Very severe eye irritant 
Positive Control   101  0.044 101.66     
 cC6O4  214  1.985  243.77    
 cC6O4  130 2.232  163.48   183.46 Very severe eye irritant 
cC6O4   109 2.276  143.14     

*corrected values

Interpretation of results:
Category 1 (irreversible effects on the eye) based on GHS criteria
Conclusions:
In conclusion, it can be stated that in this study and under the experimental conditions reported, the test item cC6O4 ammonium salt is considered to be a very severe eye irritant. As the observed effects caused by the test item exceeded by far the effects caused by the positive control substance, a worst case classification is suggested, i.e. CLP classification H318, eye damage 1.
Executive summary:

This in vitro study was performed to assess the corneal irritation and damage potential of cC6O4 ammonium salt by means of the BCOP assay using fresh bovine corneas.

After a first opacity measurement of the fresh bovine corneae (t0), about 100 mg of the test item cC6O4 ammonium salt, the positive, and the negative controls were applied to corneas and incubated for 240 minutes at 32 ± 2 °C in complete medium. After the incubation phase the test item, the positive, and the negative controls were each rinsed from the corneas and opacity was measured again (t240). After the opacity measurements permeability of the corneas was determined while application of 1 mL of a fluorescein solution for 90 minutes at 32 ± 2 °C in a horizontal position. The coming out liquid was measured spectrophotometrically.

With the negative control (0.9% NaCl solution) neither an increase of opacity nor permeability of the corneas could be observed. The in vitro score was calculated as 2.15. The positive control (10% (v/v) Benzalconium chloride) showed clear opacity and distinctive permeability of the corneas and therefore, is classified as very severe eye irritant. The in vitro score was calculated as 105.73. The test item cC6O4 ammonium salt caused opacity and permeability of the corneas compared with the results of the negative control. The calculated in vitro score was 183.46 and therefore, the test item was classified as very servere eye irritant.

As the observed effects caused by the test item exceeded by far the effects caused by the positive control substance, a worst case classification is suggested, i.e. CLP classification H318, eye damage 1.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
adverse effect observed (irreversible damage)

Respiratory irritation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Additional information

In order to test the irritant/corrosive properties for skin and eyes of cC6O4 ammonium salt an in vitro skin irritation study and an in vitro eye irritation study (BCOP) were performed on cC6O4 ammonium salt. The studies were guidelines conform and performed under GLP conditions.

 

In the skin irritation study three tissues of the human skin model EPISKIN were treated with either the test item cC6O4 ammonium salt, the negative or the positive control for 15 minutes. After treatment with cC6O4 ammonium salt the relative absorbance values were decreased to 49.2%. This value is slightly below the threshold for irritancy of ≤ 50% and therefore the test item was considered to possess an irritant potential.

In the eye irritation study, performed to assess the corneal irritation and damage potential of cC6O4 ammonium salt using fresh bovine corneas, the test item caused opacity and permeability of the corneas compared with the results of the negative control and therefore cC6O4 ammonium salt was considered to be a very severe eye irritant.


Effects on skin irritation/corrosion: irritating
Effects on eye irritation: highly irritating

Justification for classification or non-classification

Basing on the results above reported, REGULATION (EC) No 1272/2008 ( EU Regulation on Classification, Labelling and Packaging of substances and mixtures) would indicates the following for cC6O4 ammonium salt:

 

Classification

Skin corrosion/irritation: Skin Irritation Category 2

Hazard statement: H315: Causes skin irritation

 

Serious eye damage/ eye irritation: Eye damage 1

Hazard statement: H318: Causes serious eye damage.