Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 695-745-7 | CAS number: 1079221-49-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Genetic toxicity: in vivo
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- from 30 January 2009 to 17 June 2010
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: the study was performed according to internationally recognised guidelines and GLP.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 010
- Report date:
- 2010
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 474 (Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- micronucleus assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 2-({3-aminopyrazolo[1,5-a]pyridin-2-yl}oxy)ethan-1-ol hydrochloride
- EC Number:
- 695-745-7
- Cas Number:
- 1079221-49-0
- Molecular formula:
- C9 H11 N3 O2, ClH
- IUPAC Name:
- 2-({3-aminopyrazolo[1,5-a]pyridin-2-yl}oxy)ethan-1-ol hydrochloride
- Test material form:
- solid: particulate/powder
- Remarks:
- migrated information: powder
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Harlan Laboratories GmbH, Borchen, Germany
- Age at study initiation: 6 - 10 weeks
- Weight at study initiation:
> Main experiment: 166.7g ± 4.6g (males) and 169.1g ± 4.2g (females)
> Experiment repeat: 184.6g ± 5.8g (males) and 163.2g ± 7.8g (females)
- Assigned to test groups randomly: yes
- Fasting period before study: no data
- Housing: individually housed in Makrolon Type II cages, with wire mesh top and granulated soft wood bedding
- Diet: pelleted standard diet, ad libitum
- Water: tap water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 5 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 ± 3°C
- Humidity (%): 25-70%
- Air changes (per hr): no data
- Photoperiod: artificial light 6:00 am - 6:00 pm
IN-LIFE DATES: From 3 February 2009 to 6 March 2009
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: water
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: chosen for its relative non-toxicity
- Concentration of test material in vehicle:
- Amount of vehicle: 10 mL/kg
- Purity: deionised water (main experiment) and sterile water (experiment repeat) - Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
On the day of the experiment, the test item was formulated in water. Before preparation, the vehicle was degassed by sonication for 15 minutes and then saturated with inert gas, and kept under inert gas atmosphere for 15 minutes prior dosing. - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- unique exposure
- Frequency of treatment:
- once
- Post exposure period:
- 24 or 48 hours
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
0, 375, 750, 1500 mg/kg bw (main experiment)
Basis:
other: nominal
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
0, 1500 mg/kg (experiment repeat)
Basis:
other: nominal
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 6 animals/sex/group and per sampling time (except in control groups: 5 animals/sex/group)
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control(s):
- none; no data; cyclophosphamide
- Route of administration: orally
- Doses / concentrations: 20 mg/kg
Examinations
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- bone marrow
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- CRITERIA FOR DOSE SELECTION: based on a preliminary study on acute toxicity performed with 2 animals per sex under identical conditions as in the mutagenicity study
TREATMENT AND SAMPLING TIMES:
At the beginning of the treatment the animals were weighed and individual volume to be administered was adjusted to the animal body weight. The animals received the test item, the vehicle or the positive control once. The animals of all groups were examined for acute toxic symptoms at intervals of approx.. 1h, 2-4h, 6h, 24h and 48h after administration of the test item.
Sampling of the bone marrow was done 24 and 48 hours after treatment, respectively.
DETAILS OF SLIDE PREPARATION:
The animals were sacrificed using CO2 followed by bleeding. The femora were removed, the epiphyses were cut off and the marrow was flushed out with foetal calf serum using a syringe. The nucleated cells were separated from the erythrocytes using the method of Romagna. Four slides were made from each bone marrow sample, two of which were stained with May-Grunwald. The remaining two slides per animal were kept as reserve slides in case a confirmation of result using acridine orange staining becomes necessary.
METHOD OF ANALYSIS:
Evaluation of the slides was performed using NIKON microscopes with 100x oil immersion objectives. At least 2000 polychromatic erythrocytes (PCE) were analysed per animal for micronuclei. To describe a cytotoxic effect the ratio between polychromatic and normochromatic erythrocytes was determined in the same sample and expressed in polychromatic erythrocytes per 2000 erythrocytes. - Evaluation criteria:
- A test item is classified as mutagenic if it induces either a dose-related increase or a clear increase in the number of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes in a single dose group. Statistical methods (nonparametric Mann-Whitney test) will be used as an aid in evaluating the result. However, the primary point of consideration is the biological relevance of the results.
A test item that fails to produce a biological relevant increase in the number of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes is considered non-mutagenic in this system. - Statistics:
- nonparametric Mann-Whitney test
Results and discussion
Test results
- Sex:
- male/female
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- yes
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- RESULTS OF RANGE-FINDING STUDY
In the pre-experiment tests, groups of 4 animals (2 males and 2 females) received orally a single dose of test item formulated in deionised water at the following concentrations: 500, 1000, 2000, 1500, and 1750 mg/kg bw. They were then observed during 48 hours.
At 500, 1000 and 1500 mg/kg bw, the animals expressed reduction of spontaneous activity, ruffled fur and urine colored in orange/red. At 1750 and 2000 mg/kg, additional observation were abdominal position and death (1 male and A female at 1750 and 1 male and 2 females at 2000).
On the basis of these data 1500 mg/kg bw were estimated to be suitable.
RESULTS OF DEFINITIVE STUDY
In comparison to the corresponding vehicle controls there was no statistically significant or biologically relevant enhancement in the frequency of the detected micronuclei at any preparation interval and dose level after administration of the test item. The mean values of micronuclei observed after treatment with the test item were below or near to the value of the vehicle control group.
After treatment with the test item the number of PCEs was not substantially decreased as compared to the mean value of PCEs of the vehicle control thus indicating that the test item did not exert any cytotoxic effect in the bone marrow. The urine of all treated animals has taken the colour of the test item, indicating the systemic distribution of the test item and thus its bioavailability.
20 mg/kg bw cyclophosphamide administered orally was used as positive control which showed a statistically significant increase of induced micronucleus frequency.
- Ratio of PCE/NCE: see table
- Toxic symptoms: in the first main experiment 8 animals (4 males and 4 females) died after treatment with 1500 mg/kg bw. A further experiment was, thus performed treating further animals (12 animals per sex). In the study repeat 1 male and 2 females died.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1:Results of in vivo micronucleus test (Main experiment, sampling time 24h)
|
Vehicle |
375 mg/kg |
750 mg/kg |
1500 mg/kg |
CPA 20 mg/kg |
Number of cells evaluated |
2000 |
2000 |
2000 |
2000 |
2000 |
Sampling time (h) |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
Number of animals |
11 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
11 |
Micronucleated cells per 2000 PCEs per animals (mean) |
3.0 |
3.1 |
1.8 |
3.0 |
21.9 |
Percent cells with micronuclei (mean) |
0.150 |
0.154 |
0.092 |
0.150 |
1.095 |
PCE per 2000 erythrocytes (mean) |
1074 |
981 |
1117 |
1080 |
909 |
Table 2:Results of in vivo micronucleus test (Main experiment, sampling time 48h)
|
Vehicle |
1500 mg/kg |
Number of cells evaluated |
2000 |
2000 |
Sampling time (h) |
48 |
48 |
Number of animals |
11 |
4 |
Micronucleated cells per 2000 PCEs per animals (mean) |
3.0 |
2.3 |
Percent cells with micronuclei (mean) |
0.150 |
0.113 |
PCE per 2000 erythrocytes (mean) |
1127 |
1076 |
Table 3:Results of in vivo micronucleus test (Experiment repeat, sampling time 24h)
|
Vehicle |
1500 mg/kg |
CPA 20 mg/kg |
Number of cells evaluated |
2000 |
2000 |
2000 |
Sampling time (h) |
24 |
24 |
24 |
Number of animals |
12 |
10 |
12 |
Micronucleated cells per 2000 PCEs per animals (mean) |
3.7 |
1.4 |
31.8 |
Percent cells with micronuclei (mean) |
0.183 |
0.070 |
1.592 |
PCE per 2000 erythrocytes (mean) |
1075 |
1099 |
851 |
Table 4:Results of in vivo micronucleus test (Experiment repeat, sampling time 48h)
|
Vehicle |
1500 mg/kg |
Number of cells evaluated |
2000 |
2000 |
Sampling time (h) |
48 |
48 |
Number of animals |
12 |
11 |
Micronucleated cells per 2000 PCEs per animals (mean) |
4.5 |
4.2 |
Percent cells with micronuclei (mean) |
0.225 |
0.209 |
PCE per 2000 erythrocytes (mean) |
1102 |
1109 |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information): negative
Under the conditions of the test, the test item did not induce micronuclei as determined by the micronucleus test with bone marrow cells of the rat, after a unique oral administration up to 1500 mg/kg bw. - Executive summary:
In a Wistar rat bone marrow micronucleus assay performed according to OECD testing guideline 474 (GLP study, scored as validity 1 according to Klimisch criteria), 6 animals/sex/group and per sampling time were treated by a unique oral gavage withthe test itemat doses of 0, 375, 750 and 1500 mg/kg bw. Bone marrow cells were harvested at 24 and/or 48 hours post-treatment. The vehicle was deionised water (main experiment) or sterile water (repeat experiment).
In comparison to the corresponding vehicle controls there was no statistically significant or biologically relevant enhancement in the frequency of the detected micronuclei at any preparation interval and dose level after administration of the test item. The mean values of micronuclei observed after treatment with the test item were below or near to the value of the vehicle control group.
After treatment with the test item the number of PCEs was not substantially decreased as compared to the mean value of PCEs of the vehicle control thus indicating that the test item did not exert any cytotoxic effect in the bone marrow. The urine of all treated animals has taken the colour of the test item, indicating the systemic distribution of the test item and thus its bioavailability.
The positive control induced the appropriate response.
Under the conditions of the test, the test item did not induce micronuclei as determined by the micronucleus test with bone marrow cells of the rat, after a unique oral administration up to 1500 mg/kg bw.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
