Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 223-754-4 | CAS number: 4051-63-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro DNA damage and/or repair study
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: DNA damage and/or repair
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP- and OECD testing guideline compliant study (element with metabolic activation).
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 986
- Report date:
- 1986
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 482 (Genetic Toxicology: DNA Damage and Repair, Unscheduled DNA Synthesis in Mammalian Cells In Vitro)
- Deviations:
- no
- Remarks:
- optional inhibition of semi-conservative DNA replication was not included. But discrimination between cells in S-phase and repairing cells was included.
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- DNA damage and repair assay, unscheduled DNA synthesis in mammalian cells in vitro
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 4,4'-diamino[1,1'-bianthracene]-9,9',10,10'-tetraone
- EC Number:
- 223-754-4
- EC Name:
- 4,4'-diamino[1,1'-bianthracene]-9,9',10,10'-tetraone
- Cas Number:
- 4051-63-2
- Molecular formula:
- C28H16N2O4
- IUPAC Name:
- 4,4'-diamino-1,1'-bianthracene]-9,9',10,10'-tetraone
- Details on test material:
- - Analytical purity: commercial grade
- Lot/batch No.: E.Nr.204853.59
- Stability under test conditions: ensured
Constituent 1
Method
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- hepatocytes: rat
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- Primary hepatocytes are freshly isolated from a male rat (Tif.RAIf[SPF], weight: 250 g) induced with Aroclor 1254. The liver is then perfused in situ through the portal vein and carefully excised and placed into a dish containing calcium-free Hanks' solution. The cells are dispersed by gently shaking of the liver in the solution, then filtered and washed twice with calcium-free Hanks' solution. Finally, the cells are suspended in Williams' medium E and analysed for viability by trypan-blue exclusion. The viability of hepatocytes prepared in this way is generally greater than 90%. The cells are further cultivated in WILLIAMS' Medium E containing 10% foetal bovine serum and incubated in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2, at 37°C and treatment with test substance was performed on adhesive cells.
- Metabolic activation:
- not applicable
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- - First experiment; toxicity test: 0, 1.56, 3.13, 6.25, 12.5, 25.0, 50.0 and 100.0 µg/ml
- Second experiment; DNA-Repair assay: 0.4, 2.0, 10.0 and 50.0 µg/ml (4 cultures per group) - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) DMSO
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- culture medium
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- True negative controls:
- other: the UDS test is regularly conducted in the testing facility
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 2-acetylaminofluorene
- Remarks:
- Migrated to IUCLID6: 2-AAF (200 µg/ml)
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- 1) First experiment: toxicity test
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 5 hours
STAIN: after an incubation period the medium is removed and the cells are washed twice with BSS and stained with Trypan blue solution (0.2%) for five minutes
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 100
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: Cell count; after washing with BSS, the cells are fixed and the percentage of unstained cells evaluated.
2) Second experiment: DNA-Repair assay
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium; in agar (plate incorporation); preincubation; in suspension; as impregnation on paper disk
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 5 hours
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): immediately after addition of the test substance, 6-H-thymidine is added (specific activity 21 Curies/mmol). 8 µCi in 8 µl was added to the medium. At the end of the incubation period of 5 hours the cells are washed twice with BSS and fixed with ethanol/acetic acid, 3/1, v/v. The cover-slips are mounted on microscope slides and prepared for autoradiography. The exposure time is 6 days. The autoradiographs are stained with hematoxylin-eosine.
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: from each of the treatment groups and from the positive and the negative controls 150 nuclei in altogether three slides (50 cells/slide) are scored, the number of silver grains counted, the mean values and the standard deviations calculated.
OTHER: counting of silver grains over the nuclei and cytoplasm of the hepatocytes was carried out with the aid of an electronic counter attached to a microscope at a magnification of 2000x, using an objective l00x and a projective l0x. The net values are calculated by subtracting the average grain count over the cytoplasm from the total over the nuclei. If the net value for any nucleus is less than zero (i.e. if the cytoplasmic value is greater than the nuclear value), a net value of zero is taken for the calculations. Cells which were in the DNA-synthesis phase showed more than 120 silver grains/nucleus. The percentage of such cells was about 0.2. These cells were excluded from the determination of the silver grain/nucleus count. - Evaluation criteria:
- The test substance is generally considered to induce DNA damage if the mean number of silver grains per nucleus in relation to the negative controls is more than doubled at any concentration.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- hepatocytes: rat
- Metabolic activation:
- not applicable
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA:
Was performed
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY:
In a preliminary toxicity test, seven concentrations of the test substance increasing by a factor of 2 from 1.56 to 100 µg/ml were tested to determine the highest applicable concentration in the DNA-repair assay. At the three highest concentrations a clearly visible precipitation occurred. At the subsequent lower concentrations no precipitation was visible in the culture medium. From the results obtained (Table 1), the highest usable concentration was found to be 50 µg/ml. - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1: Toxicity test
Test substance concentration (µg/ml) |
Adhesion and condition of the cells (+, ±, +--, -) |
Percentage of viable cells (%) |
100 |
+-- |
13 |
50 |
± |
76 |
25 |
± |
73 |
12.5 |
± |
84 |
6.25 |
± |
81 |
3.13 |
+ |
87 |
1.56 |
± |
82 |
DMSO (1%) |
+ |
86 |
+: adequate number of adhered cells, which are in good condition; ±/+--: adequate number of adhered cells, however in bad condition; -: unadequate number or no adhered cells. If less than 25% of the cells are viable, the slide is not evaluated. |
The DNA-repair assay was carried out with concentrations of 0.4, 2, 10 and 50 µg/ml (Table 2). At the highest tested concentration a precipitation was visible in the culture medium. Comparison of the mean number of silver grains per nucleus in the vehicle control and after treatment with test substance revealed no marked differences.
By contrast, the positive control, 2-AAF (200 µg/ml) yielded a marked increase in the mean value of silver grains per nucleus. Here, the mean value was 13.3, whereas the negative controls gave values of 0.91 and 1.32.
In addition, the net values of grains per nucleus (i.e. mean number of silver grains per nucleus minus mean number of silver grains per nucleus-equivalent area of cytoplasm) were calculated and there was no marked deviation between the treatment groups and the vehicle control.
Table 2: Autoradiographic DNA repair test on rat hepatocytes
Treatment groups |
Concen-tration (µg/ml) |
Silver grains per nucleus (±SD) |
Cytoplasma silver grains per nucleus-equivalent area (±SD) |
Silver grains per nucleus (net value) |
Background determination outside the cells: silver grains per nucleus-equivalent area |
Negative control: medium |
- |
0.91±0.92 |
0.77±0.66 |
0.14 |
0.22 |
Negative control: vehicle |
- |
1.32±1.02 |
0.94±0.64 |
0.38 |
0.00 |
Positive control: 2-AAF |
200 |
13.3±5.68 |
4.09±2.80 |
9.23 |
0.28 |
Test substance |
50 |
2.01±1.48 |
1.90±1.22 |
0.11 |
0.11 |
10 |
1.75±1.23 |
1.60±0.97 |
0.15 |
0.00 |
|
2 |
1.35±1.16 |
1.61±0.93 |
0.26 |
0.11 |
|
0.4 |
1.51±1.21 |
1.40±0.85 |
0.10 |
0.06 |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.