Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 245-629-3 | CAS number: 23386-52-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 9 April 2020 to 11 June 2021
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 021
- Report date:
- 2021
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- Ninth Addendum to OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals, Section 4, No. 471, "Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test", 21 July 1997
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5100 - Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test (August 1998)
- Version / remarks:
- EPA Health Effects Test Guidelines, OPPTS 870.5100 "Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test", EPA 712-C-98-247, August 1998
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Version / remarks:
- Commission Regulation (EC) No. 440/2008, B.13/14. "Mutagenicity: Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria", 30 May 2008
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Sodium 1,4-dicyclohexyl sulphonatosuccinate
- EC Number:
- 245-629-3
- EC Name:
- Sodium 1,4-dicyclohexyl sulphonatosuccinate
- Cas Number:
- 23386-52-9
- Molecular formula:
- C16H26O7S.Na
- IUPAC Name:
- sodium 1,4-bis(cyclohexyloxy)-1,4-dioxobutane-2-sulfonate
- Test material form:
- liquid
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- histidine (Salmonella); tryptophan (E. coli)
Species / strainopen allclose all
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Species / strain / cell type:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- - source of S9
Test bacteria were also exposed to the test item in the presence of an appropriate metabolic activation system, which is a cofactor-supplemented post-mitochondrial S9 fraction.
The post-mitochondrial fraction (S9 fraction) was prepared by the Microbiological Laboratory of Charles River Laboratories Hungary Kft. according to Ames et al. [1] and Maron and Ames [2]. The documentation of the preparation of this post-mitochondrial fraction is stored in the reagent notebook in the Microbiological Laboratory which is archived yearly.
The composition of solution refers to 1000 mL.
1. BRUCE N. AMES, JOYCE MCCANN and EDITH YAMASAKI:
Methods for Detecting Carcinogens and Mutagens with the Salmonella /Mammalian-Microsome Mutagenicity Test. Mutation Research, 31: 347-364, 1975
2. DOROTHY M. MARON and BRUCE N. AMES:
Revised Method for the Salmonella Mutagenicity Test. Mutation Research,
113: 173-215, 1983
*Induction of Liver Enzymes
Male Wistar rats (444-628 g, animals were 17-20 weeks old and 433-642 g, animals were 13-17 weeks old) were treated with phenobarbital (PB) and β-naphthoflavone (BNF) at 80 mg/kg/day by oral gavage for three consecutive days. Rats were given drinking water and food ad libitum until 12 h before sacrifice when food was removed. Sacrifice was by ascending concentration of CO2, confirmed by cutting through major thoracic blood vessels. Initiation of the induction of liver enzymes used for preparation S9 used in this study were 02 September 2019 and 13 January 2020.
* Preparation of Rat Liver Homogenate S9 Fraction
On Day 4, the rats were euthanized and the livers were removed aseptically using sterile surgical tools. After excision, livers were weighed and washed several times in 0.15 M KCl. The washed livers were transferred to a beaker containing 3 mL of 0.15 M KCl per g of wet liver, and homogenized. Homogenates were centrifuged for 10 min at 9000 g and the supernatant was decanted and retained. The freshly prepared S9 fraction was aliquoted into 1-5 mL portions, frozen quickly and stored at -80 ± 10ºC. The dates of preparation of S9 fractions for this study were 05 September 2019 and 16 January 2020 (Charles River Laboratories Hungary code: E13142 and E13222, Expiry date: 05 September 2021 and 16 January 2022).
- method of preparation of S9 mix
The S9 Mix (containing 10 % (v/v) of S9)
Salt solution for S9 Mix:
NADP Na 7.66 g
D-glucose-6 phosphate Na 3.53 g
MgCl2 x 6 H2O 4.07 g
KCl 6.15 g
Distilled water q.s. ad 1000 mL
Sterilization was performed by filtration through a 0.22 μm membrane filter.
The complete S9 mix was freshly prepared containing components as follows:
Ice cold 0.2 M sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.4 500 mL
Rat liver homogenate (S9) 100 mL
Salt solution for S9 Mix (see above) 400 mL
Prior to addition to the culture medium the S9 mix was kept in an ice bath.
- concentration or volume of S9 mix and S9 in the final culture medium :
The content of the tubes:
top agar 2000 μL
vehicle or test item formulation (or reference controls) 50 μL
overnight culture of test strain 100 μL
phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) or S9 mix 500 μL
(S9 Mix (containing 10 % (v/v) of S9)
- quality controls of S9 (e.g., enzymatic activity, sterility, metabolic capability):
The sterility of the preparation was confirmed in each case. The protein concentration of the preparation was determined by a chemical analyzer at 540 nm in the Clinical Chemistry Laboratory of Charles River Laboratories Hungary Kft. The mean protein concentration of the S9 fraction used were determined to be 24.5 g/L and 28.0 g/L.
The biological activity in the Salmonella assay of S9 was characterized in each case using the two mutagens 2-Aminoanthracene and Benzo(a)pyrene, that requires metabolic activation by microsomal enzymes. The batches of S9 used in this study functioned appropriately. - Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Based on the results of the Compatibility Test, the test item was dissolved in Distilled water. Concentrations of 5000, 2500, 1000, 316, 100, 31.6 and 10 μg solid fraction of test item /plate were examined in the Range Finding Test in Salmonella typhimurium TA98 and TA100 tester strains in the absence and presence of metabolic activation. Based on the results of the preliminary experiment, the examined test concentrations in the Assay 1 were 5000, 1581, 500, 158.1, 50 and 15.81 μg solid fraction of test item/plate and in the Assay 2 were 5000, 1581, 500, 158.1, 50, 15.81 and 5 μg solid fraction of test item /plate.
- Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: Distilled Water (vehicle for the test item)
In the study two vehicle (solvent) control groups were used depending on the solubility of the test item and the solubility of strain specific positive control chemicals. The following chemicals were used for vehicle (solvent) control groups: Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and Distilled Water
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: The solubility of the test item was examined using Distilled water, DMSO (Dimethyl sulfoxide) and N,N-Dimethylformamide (DMF). The test item was soluble at 100 mg solid fraction of test item /mL concentration using Distilled water, DMSO and DMF. Due to the better biocompatibility Distilled water was selected as vehicle for the study. The obtained stock formulation (50 μL) with the solution of top agar and phosphate buffer was examined in a test tube without test bacterium suspension.
Controlsopen allclose all
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 9-aminoacridine
- sodium azide
- methylmethanesulfonate
- other: 4-nitro-1,2-phenylene-diamine
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-aminoanthracene in DMSO 2µg/plate all Salmonella strains and 50 µg/plate E.coli WP2uvra with S9
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS:
- Number of cultures per concentration: triplicate
- Number of independent experiments: Preliminary Range Finding Test, Assay 1 (plate incorporation), Assay 2 (preincubation)
METHOD OF TREATMENT/ EXPOSURE:
- Test substance added in agar (plate incorporation; Preliminary Range Finding Test and Assay 1); preincubation (Assay 2)
Assay 1: TREATMENT AND HARVEST SCHEDULE:
- Preincubation period, if applicable: No
- Exposure duration/duration of treatment: 48(±1) hours at 37°C
Assay 2: TREATMENT AND HARVEST SCHEDULE:
- Preincubation period, if applicable: Yes (20 minutes at 37°C in a shaking incubator)
- Exposure duration/duration of treatment: 20 minutes + 48(±1) hours at 37°C
FOR GENE MUTATION: - Evaluation criteria:
- (1)Criteria for Validity:
The study was considered valid if:
- the number of revertant colonies of the negative (vehicle/solvent) and positive controls are in the relevant historical control range, generated at the test facility, in all tester strains of the main tests (with or without S9-mix);
- at least five analysable concentrations are presented in all strains of the main tests.
(2) Criteria for a Positive Response:
A test item was considered mutagenic if:
- a concentration-related increase in the number of revertants occurs and/or;
- a reproducible biologically relevant positive response for at least one of the dose groups occurs in at least one strain with or without metabolic activation.
An increase is considered biologically relevant if:
- the number of reversions is more than two times higher than the reversion rate of the negative (solvent) control in Salmonella typhimurium TA98, TA100 and Escherichia coli WP2 uvrA bacterial strains;
- the number of reversions is more than three times higher than the reversion rate of the negative (solvent) control in Salmonella typhimurium TA1535 and TA1537 bacterial strains.
According to the guidelines, statistical method may be used as an aid in evaluating the test results. However, statistical significance should not be the only determining factor for a positive response.
(3) Criteria for a Negative Response:
A test article is considered non-mutagenic if it produces neither a concentration-related increase in the number of revertants nor a reproducible biologically relevant positive response at any of the concentration groups, with or without metabolic activation.
Results and discussion
Test resultsopen allclose all
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- In Assay 2 at 5000 µg solid fraction/plate without S9.
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- In Assay 2 at 1581 µg solid fraction/ plate without S9. Reduced colony number in Assy 2 at 5000 µg/solid fraction/plate without S9.
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- In Assay 2 at 1581 µg solid fraction/plate without S9.
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- In Assay 2 at 1581 µg solid fraction/plate without S9.
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Precipitation and time of the determination: No precipitate was detected on the plates in the main tests in the all examined Bacterial strains with and without metabolic activation.
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES (if applicable):
In the Preliminary Range Finding Test, the plate incorporation method was used. The preliminary test was performed using Salmonella typhimurium TA98 and Salmonella typhimurium TA100 tester strains in the presence and absence of metabolic activation system (±S9 Mix) with appropriate untreated, negative (solvent) and positive controls. Each sample (including the controls) was tested in triplicate.
Following concentrations were examined: 5000, 2500, 1000, 316, 100, 31.6 and 10 μg solid fraction of test item/plate.
No precipitate was detected on the plates in the preliminary experiment in both examined bacterial strains with and without metabolic activation.
No inhibitory or toxic effects of the test item was observed in the preliminary experiment in both examined bacterial strains with and without metabolic activation
STUDY RESULTS
- Concurrent vehicle negative and positive control data: See Table 2 and 3 under Any other information on results incl. tables
Ames test:
- Signs of toxicity: No inhibitory or toxic effects of the test item was observed in the preliminary experiment in both examined bacterial strains with and without metabolic activation. In Assay 1 no inhibitory, cytotoxic effect of the test item was observed in all Salmonella typhimurium bacterial strains and Escherichia coli WP2 uvrA strain with and without metabolic activation.
In Assay 2 inhibitory, cytotoxic effect of the test item (reduced/slightly reduced background lawn development) was observed in all Salmonella typhimurium strains without metabolic activation at 5000 μg solid fraction of test item/plate concentration and in Salmonella typhimurium TA98, TA100 and TA1537 strains without metabolic activation on the plates at the 1581 μg solid fraction of test item/plate concentration.
Reduced colony number was observed in the Assay 2 in Salmonella typhimurium TA1537 strain without metabolic activation on the plates at the 5000 μg solid fraction of test item/plate concentration.
-Revertants:
In Assay 1 (plate incorporation method), the highest revertant rate was observed in Salmonella typhimurium TA1537 strain at 15.81 μg solid fraction of test item/plate concentration without metabolic activation (the observed mutation factor value was: MF: 1.24). However, there was no dose-response relationship, the observed mutation factor values were above the biologically relevant threshold limit and the number of revertant colonies was within the historical control range.
In Assay 2 (pre-incubation method), the highest revertant rate was observed in Salmonella typhimurium TA1537 bacterial strain at 50 and 5 μg solid fraction of test item/plate concentration without metabolic activation (the observed mutation factor value was: MF: 1.33). However, there was no dose-response relationship, the number of revertant colonies did not show any biologically relevant increase compared to the solvent controls and the number of revertant colonies was within the historical control range.
Higher numbers of revertant colonies compared to the vehicle (solvent) control were detected in the main tests in some other sporadic cases. However, no dose-dependence was observed in those cases and they were below the biologically relevant threshold value. The numbers of revertant colonies were within the historical control range in each case, so they were considered as reflecting the biological variability of the test.
Sporadically, lower revertant counts compared to the vehicle (solvent) control were observed in the main tests at some non-cytotoxic concentrations. However, no background inhibition was recorded and the mean numbers of revertant colonies were in the historical control range in all cases, thus they were considered as biological variability of the test system.
HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA (with ranges, means and standard deviation, and 95% control limits for the distribution as well as the number of data)
- Positive historical control data: See under Any other information on results incl. tables
- Negative (solvent/vehicle) historical control data: See under Any other information on results incl. tables
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1. Historical Control Data (Period of 2015-2020)
Untreated control data |
||||||||||
|
without metabolic activation (-S9 Mix) |
with metabolic activation (+S9 Mix) |
||||||||
|
TA98 |
TA100 |
TA1535 |
TA1537 |
E.coli |
TA98 |
TA100 |
TA1535 |
TA1537 |
E.coli |
Mean |
20.9 |
98.3 |
13.2 |
8.8 |
40.6 |
25.6 |
104.6 |
12.3 |
9.9 |
44.1 |
St.dev. |
4.4 |
12.7 |
3.5 |
3.2 |
9.4 |
5.8 |
13.2 |
3.2 |
3.6 |
9.4 |
Range |
11-50 |
67-152 |
1-33 |
2-26 |
14-77 |
13-54 |
67-152 |
3-39 |
1-29 |
16-89 |
n |
1296 |
1297 |
1302 |
1314 |
1302 |
1311 |
1314 |
1314 |
1323 |
1299 |
DMSO control data |
||||||||||
|
without metabolic activation (-S9 Mix) |
with metabolic activation (+S9 Mix) |
||||||||
|
TA98 |
TA100 |
TA1535 |
TA1537 |
E. coli |
TA98 |
TA100 |
TA1535 |
TA1537 |
E. coli |
Mean |
20.5 |
95.4 |
13.0 |
8.4 |
39.6 |
24.9 |
101.0 |
11.8 |
9.4 |
43.0 |
St.dev. |
4.2 |
12.1 |
3.5 |
3.1 |
9.7 |
5.4 |
13.5 |
3.1 |
3.5 |
9.5 |
Range |
7-41 |
60-145 |
3-34 |
1-27 |
12-75 |
11-50 |
53-165 |
2-33 |
1-29 |
9-76 |
n |
1428 |
1419 |
1425 |
1449 |
1425 |
1443 |
1443 |
1449 |
1455 |
1431 |
Distilled water control data |
||||||||||
|
without metabolic activation (-S9 Mix) |
with metabolic activation (+S9 Mix) |
||||||||
|
TA98 |
TA100 |
TA1535 |
TA1537 |
E. coli |
TA98 |
TA100 |
TA1535 |
TA1537 |
E. coli |
Mean |
21.5 |
97.5 |
13.2 |
9.3 |
41.5 |
25.9 |
103.1 |
12.1 |
10.4 |
44.6 |
St.dev. |
4.4 |
12.5 |
3.3 |
3.4 |
9.1 |
5.6 |
13.6 |
3.1 |
3.7 |
9.0 |
Range |
13-37 |
58-150 |
2-32 |
3-20 |
17-72 |
15-45 |
59-164 |
3-34 |
3-24 |
13-76 |
n |
288 |
1332 |
1332 |
303 |
1341 |
291 |
1314 |
1326 |
300 |
1320 |
DMF control data |
||||||||||
|
without metabolic activation (-S9 Mix) |
with metabolic activation (+S9 Mix) |
||||||||
|
TA98 |
TA100 |
TA1535 |
TA1537 |
E. coli |
TA98 |
TA100 |
TA1535 |
TA1537 |
E. coli |
Mean |
19.6 |
93.5 |
12.9 |
9.2 |
42.0 |
23.8 |
96.2 |
11.9 |
10.5 |
43.3 |
St.dev. |
3.9 |
13.3 |
3.1 |
3.4 |
10.8 |
5.5 |
13.2 |
3.0 |
3.6 |
10.9 |
Range |
11-33 |
57-121 |
6-24 |
2-18 |
16-70 |
11-37 |
68-143 |
3-21 |
3-19 |
18-72 |
n |
114 |
114 |
114 |
117 |
111 |
114 |
114 |
114 |
114 |
111 |
Acetone control data |
||||||||||
|
without metabolic activation (-S9 Mix) |
with metabolic activation (+S9 Mix) |
||||||||
|
TA98 |
TA100 |
TA1535 |
TA1537 |
E. coli |
TA98 |
TA100 |
TA1535 |
TA1537 |
E. coli |
Mean |
20.9 |
97.1 |
12.9 |
8.2 |
40.1 |
25.5 |
102.2 |
11.5 |
9.1 |
44.1 |
St.dev. |
4.3 |
10.0 |
3.6 |
2.8 |
8.5 |
5.6 |
11.3 |
3.0 |
3.2 |
8.7 |
Range |
11-35 |
63-126 |
6-32 |
2-17 |
21-63 |
16-44 |
66-132 |
4-19 |
1-19 |
20-70 |
n |
219 |
222 |
222 |
225 |
219 |
219 |
222 |
225 |
225 |
219 |
Positive reference control data |
||||||||||
|
without metabolic activation (-S9 Mix) |
with metabolic activation (+S9 Mix) |
||||||||
|
TA98 |
TA100 |
TA1535 |
TA1537 |
E. coli |
TA98 |
TA100 |
TA1535 |
TA1537 |
E. coli |
Mean |
395.9 |
1130.9 |
1138.8 |
413.3 |
1020.6 |
2391.6 |
2408.0 |
219.0 |
214.0 |
239.5 |
St.dev. |
99.4 |
82.5 |
102.0 |
34.0 |
114.4 |
146.2 |
115.7 |
32.1 |
22.3 |
35.6 |
Range |
182-2336 |
536-1480 |
568-2004 |
208-629 |
488-2496 |
312-2736 |
1116-3104 |
101-418 |
147-424 |
127-384 |
n |
1296 |
1296 |
1302 |
1314 |
1305 |
1311 |
1317 |
1317 |
1323 |
1299 |
TA98: Salmonella typhimurium TA98, TA100: Salmonella typhimurium TA100, TA1535: Salmonella typhimurium TA1535, TA1537: Salmonella typhimurium TA1537, E. coli: Escherichia coli WP2 uvrA; n: number of cases
98: Salmonella typhimurium TA98, TA100: Salmonella typhimurium TA100, TA1535: Salmonella typhimurium TA1535, TA1537: Salmonella
Table 2: Summary Table of the Assay 1
Concentrations (μg solid fraction of test item /plate |
Mean values of revertants / Mutation factor (MF) |
Salmonella typhimurium tester strains |
Escherichia coli |
||||||||
TA98 |
TA100 |
TA1535 |
TA1537 |
WP2 uvrA |
|||||||
-S9 |
+S9 |
-S9 |
+S9 |
-S9 |
+S9 |
-S9 |
+S9 |
-S9 |
+S9 |
||
Untreated control |
Mean |
21.3 |
22.7 |
86.3 |
111.7 |
16.7 |
17.0 |
12.0 |
13.3 |
40.0 |
43.0 |
MF |
0.90 |
0.94 |
0.95 |
1.06 |
1.09 |
1.02 |
1.09 |
1.03 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
|
DMSO control |
Mean |
22.0 |
23.0 |
-- |
116.7 |
-- |
14.7 |
130. |
12.0 |
-- |
42.3 |
MF |
0.93 |
0.96 |
-- |
1.10 |
-- |
0.88 |
1.18 |
0.92 |
-- |
0.98 |
|
Distilled water control |
Mean |
23.7 |
24.0 |
90.7 |
105.7 |
15.3 |
16.7 |
11.0 |
13.0 |
40.0 |
43.0 |
MF |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
|
5000 |
Mean |
16.7 |
23.7 |
100.0 |
111.3 |
14.0 |
14.0 |
10.3 |
11.0 |
38.7 |
41.7 |
MF |
0.70 |
0.99 |
1.10 |
1.05 |
0.91 |
0.84 |
0.94 |
0.85 |
0.97 |
0.97 |
|
1581 |
Mean |
17.7 |
23.0 |
98.7 |
111.3 |
14.0 |
12.0 |
9.7 |
13.0 |
38.0 |
40.3 |
MF |
0.75 |
0.96 |
1.09 |
1.05 |
0.91 |
0.72 |
0.88 |
1.00 |
0.95 |
0.94 |
|
500 |
Mean |
19.0 |
21.7 |
108.3 |
110.3 |
14.7 |
14.7 |
11.0 |
11.7 |
39.7 |
42.7 |
MF |
0.80 |
0.90 |
1.19 |
1.04 |
0.96 |
0.88 |
1.00 |
0.90 |
0.99 |
0.99 |
|
158.1 |
Mean |
17.7 |
22.0 |
100.0 |
109.0 |
13.0 |
15.7 |
10.3 |
12.3 |
41.3 |
42.7 |
MF |
0.75 |
0.92 |
1.10 |
1.03 |
0.85 |
0.94 |
0.94 |
0.95 |
1.03 |
0.99 |
|
50 |
Mean |
17.0 |
24.0 |
99.0 |
120.7 |
17.7 |
12.0 |
10.7 |
11.7 |
37.0 |
42.3 |
MF |
0.72 |
1.00 |
1.09 |
1.14 |
1.15 |
0.72 |
0.97 |
0.90 |
0.93 |
0.98 |
|
15.81 |
Mean |
17.0 |
20.3 |
95.7 |
116.7 |
16.3 |
14.0 |
13.7 |
9.3 |
40.0 |
42.7 |
MF |
0.72 |
0.85 |
1.06 |
1.10 |
1.07 |
0.84 |
1.24 |
0.72 |
1.00 |
0.99 |
|
NDP (4µg) |
Mean |
409.3 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
MF |
18.61 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
|
2AA (2µg) |
Mean |
-- |
2469.3 |
-- |
2472.0 |
-- |
212.7 |
-- |
210.7 |
-- |
-- |
MF |
-- |
107.36 |
-- |
21.19 |
-- |
14.50 |
-- |
17.56 |
-- |
-- |
|
2AA (50µg) |
Mean |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
246.7 |
MF |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
5.83 |
|
SAZ (2µg) |
Mean |
-- |
-- |
1128.0 |
-- |
1081.3 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
MF |
-- |
-- |
12.44 |
-- |
70.52 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
|
9AA (50µg) |
Mean |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
405.3 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
MF |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
31.18 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
|
MMS (2µL) |
Mean |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
1098.7 |
-- |
MF |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
24.47 |
-- |
Table 3: Summary Table of the Assay 2
Concentrations (μg solid fraction of test item /plate |
Mean values of revertants / Mutation factor (MF) |
Salmonella typhimurium tester strains |
Escherichia coli |
||||||||
TA98 |
TA100 |
TA1535 |
TA1537 |
WP2 uvrA |
|||||||
-S9 |
+S9 |
-S9 |
+S9 |
-S9 |
+S9 |
-S9 |
+S9 |
-S9 |
+S9 |
||
Untreated control |
Mean |
17.3 |
21.0 |
82.3 |
98.3 |
17.0 |
17.7 |
9.3 |
11.0 |
42.3 |
44.0 |
MF |
0.93 |
0.84 |
0.98 |
0.95 |
1.02 |
1.00 |
1.17 |
0.89 |
1.03 |
1.01 |
|
DMSO control |
Mean |
18.3 |
23.3 |
-- |
94.0 |
-- |
17.0 |
11.0 |
11.7 |
-- |
42.7 |
MF |
0.98 |
0.93 |
-- |
0.91 |
-- |
0.96 |
1.38 |
0.95 |
-- |
0.98 |
|
Distilled water control |
Mean |
18.7 |
25.0 |
84.0 |
103.3 |
16.7 |
17.7 |
8.0 |
12.3 |
41.0 |
43.7 |
MF |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
|
5000 |
Mean |
11.3 |
21.3 |
51.7 |
93.3 |
8.3 |
17.0 |
0.0 |
6.3 |
23.0 |
43.7 |
MF |
0.61 |
0.85 |
0.62 |
0.90 |
0.50 |
0.96 |
0.00 |
0.51 |
0.56 |
1.00 |
|
1581 |
Mean |
16.7 |
22.0 |
56.0 |
102.7 |
12.0 |
17.7 |
8.0 |
12.0 |
37.3 |
47.0 |
MF |
0.89 |
0.88 |
0.67 |
0.99 |
0.72 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
0.97 |
0.91 |
1.08 |
|
500 |
Mean |
16.7 |
22.3 |
92.0 |
103.7 |
16.7 |
16.0 |
10.3 |
11.3 |
42.3 |
47.0 |
MF |
0.89 |
0.89 |
1.10 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
0.91 |
1.29 |
0.92 |
1.03 |
1.08 |
|
158.1 |
Mean |
17.3 |
23.0 |
92.7 |
104.7 |
17.7 |
15.3 |
9.0 |
11.7 |
43.0 |
46.0 |
MF |
0.93 |
0.92 |
1.10 |
1.01 |
1.06 |
0.87 |
1.13 |
0.95 |
1.05 |
1.05 |
|
50 |
Mean |
16.7 |
20.7 |
91.3 |
96.7 |
15.7 |
16.7 |
10.7 |
9.7 |
43.7 |
43.7 |
MF |
0.89 |
0.83 |
1.09 |
0.94 |
0.94 |
0.94 |
1.33 |
0.78 |
1.07 |
1.00 |
|
15.81 |
Mean |
17.0 |
26.7 |
94.7 |
108.0 |
14.7 |
17.3 |
10.0 |
11.7 |
41.7 |
46.7 |
MF |
0.91 |
1.07 |
1.13 |
1.05 |
0.88 |
0.98 |
1.25 |
0.95 |
1.02 |
1.07 |
|
5 |
Mean |
18.0 |
25.3 |
82.3 |
95.0 |
15.7 |
16.7 |
10.7 |
12.0 |
40.7 |
46.0 |
MF |
0.96 |
1.01 |
0.98 |
0.92 |
0.94 |
0.94 |
1.33 |
0.97 |
0.99 |
1.05 |
|
NDP (4µg) |
Mean |
421.3 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
MF |
22.98 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
|
2AA (2µg) |
Mean |
-- |
2468.0 |
-- |
2461.3 |
-- |
219.0 |
-- |
207.7 |
-- |
-- |
MF |
-- |
105.77 |
-- |
26.18 |
-- |
12.88 |
-- |
17.80 |
-- |
-- |
|
2AA (50µg) |
Mean |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
246.7 |
MF |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
5.78 |
|
SAZ (2µg) |
Mean |
-- |
-- |
1082.7 |
-- |
1217.3 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
MF |
-- |
-- |
12.89 |
-- |
73.04 |
-- |
-- |
--- |
-- |
-- |
|
9AA (50µg) |
Mean |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
414.7 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
MF |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
37.70 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
|
MMS (2µL) |
Mean |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
1056.0 |
-- |
MF |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
25.76 |
-- |
um TA1537, E. coli: Escherichia coli WP2 uvrA; n: number of cases
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- The reported data of this mutagenicity assay show that under the experimental conditions applied the test item did not induce gene mutations by base pair changes or frameshifts in the genome of the strains used. In conclusion, the registered substance had no mutagenic activity on the growth of the bacterial strains under the test conditions used in this study.
- Executive summary:
The test item was tested for potential mutagenic activity using the Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay.
The experiments were carried out using histidine-requiring auxotroph strains of Salmonella typhimurium (Salmonella typhimurium TA98, TA100, TA1535 and TA1537) and the tryptophan-requiring auxotroph strain of Escherichia coli (Escherichia coli WP2 uvrA) in the presence and absence of a post mitochondrial supernatant (S9 fraction) prepared from the livers of phenobarbital/β-naphthoflavone-induced rats.
The study included a Preliminary Compatibility Test, a Preliminary Range Finding Test, an Assay 1 (Plate Incorporation Method) and an Assay 2 (Pre-Incubation Method).
Based on the results of the Compatibility Test, the test item was dissolved in Distilled water. Concentrations of 5000, 2500, 1000, 316, 100, 31.6 and 10 μg solid fraction of test item /plate were examined in the Range Finding Test in Salmonella typhimurium TA98 and TA100 tester strains in the absence and presence of metabolic activation. Based on the results of the preliminary experiment, the examined test concentrations in the Assay 1 were 5000, 1581, 500, 158.1, 50 and 15.81 μg solid fraction of test item/plate and in the Assay 2 were 5000, 1581, 500, 158.1, 50, 15.81 and 5 μg solid fraction of test item /plate.
In the assays the number of revertant colonies did not show any biologically relevant increase compared to the solvent controls. There were no reproducible dose-related trends and there was no indication of any treatment-related effect.
No precipitate was detected on the plates in the main tests in all examined Bacterial strains with and without metabolic activation.
No inhibitory, cytotoxic effect of the test item was observed in the Preliminary Concentration Range Finding Test.
No inhibitory, cytotoxic effect of the test item was observed in Assay 1.
In Assay 2 inhibitory, cytotoxic effect of the test item (reduced/slightly reduced background lawn development) was observed in all Salmonella typhimurium strains without metabolic activation at 5000 μg solid fraction of test item/plate concentration and in Salmonella typhimurium TA98, TA100 and TA1537 strains without metabolic activation on the plates at the 1581 μg solid fraction of test item/plate concentration.
Reduced colony number was observed in the Assay 2 in Salmonella typhimurium TA1537 strain without metabolic activation on the plates at the 5000 μg solid fraction of test item /plate concentration.
The mean values of revertant colonies of the negative (vehicle/solvent) control plates were within the historical control range, the reference mutagens showed the expected increase in the number of revertant colonies, the viability of the bacterial cells was checked by a plating experiment in each test. At least five analyzable concentrations were presented in all strains of the main tests, the examined concentration range was considered to be adequate. The study was considered to be valid.
The reported data of this mutagenicity assay show that under the experimental conditions applied the test item did not induce gene mutations by base pair changes or frameshifts in the genome of the strains used.
In conclusion, the registered substance had no mutagenic activity on the growth of the bacterial strains under the test conditions used in this study.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.