Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 203-537-0 | CAS number: 107-96-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
3-MPA has shown skin corrosivity in vitro and in vivo. It caused irreversible cornea damage in one rabbit. Rats exposed to 3-MPA aerosol exhibited irritation of the respiratory tract only at high dosages.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin corrosion: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 18-19 July 2002
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.40 (In Vitro Skin Corrosion: Transcutaneous Electrical Resistance Test (TER))
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 431 (In Vitro Skin Corrosion: Human Skin Model Test)
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Test system:
- human skin model
- Source species:
- human
- Cell type:
- non-transformed keratinocytes
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Details on test system:
- REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): At the end of the exposure period each EpiDerm tissue was rinsed using Dulbecco’s phosphate buffered saline (DPBS).
- Time after start of exposure: 3 min, 60 min
SCORING SYSTEM: Data are presented in the form of % viability (MTT conversion relative to negative controls) for each of the two exposure times.
Classification of corrosivity potential was based on relative viabilities for both exposure times according to the Table 1 (Material & Methods). - Amount/concentration applied:
- 50 µL, undiluted
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 3 min, 60 min
- Duration of post-treatment incubation (if applicable):
- 3 h
- Number of replicates:
- duplicate tissues were used per exposure time
- Irritation / corrosion parameter:
- % tissue viability
- Run / experiment:
- 3 min exposure
- Value:
- 5.26
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Irritation / corrosion parameter:
- % tissue viability
- Run / experiment:
- 60 min exposure
- Value:
- 5.24
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Other effects / acceptance of results:
- see Table 2
- Interpretation of results:
- Category 1B (corrosive) based on GHS criteria
- Conclusions:
- The test material is considered to have the potential to be corrosive in vivo.
GHS classification: Danger, Skin Corrosive. Category 1B; H314: Causes severe skin burns and eye damage. - Executive summary:
The study was performed to assess the corrosivity potential of the test material using the EpiDerm Skin Model (MatTek, Ashland, MA, USA). The test is based on the assumption that corrosivity potential is related to toxicity to the EpiDerm tissue. The study was validated by the inclusion of a positive control material, 8.0 n Potassium Hydroxide and a negative control material, sterile distilled water.
The experimental design of the study consists of a test for Direct Reduction of MTT by the test material, followed by the main study.
For the main study, duplicate EpiDerm tissues were treated with 50 μl of test material and exposed for 3 minutes and 60 minutes. The tissues were incubated at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 in air for the appropriate exposure times.
Negative control-treated tissues (50 μl sterile, distilled water), and positive control-treated tissues (8.0 n Potassium Hydroxide), were also exposed for 3 minutes and 60 minutes. Duplicate EpiDerm tissues were used for the above.At the end of the exposure period each EpiDerm tissue was rinsed using Dulbecco’s phosphate buffered saline (DPBS) according to the modified rinsing procedure (Appendix 2) and placed into a ‘holding plate’, until all of the tissues had been treated and rinsed. They were then transferred to an MTT ‘loading plate’, and incubated at 37°C for 3 hours in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 in air. At the end of this time, each EpiDerm tissue was blotted dry and placed into an MTT ‘extraction plate’ in order to extract all of the reduced MTT from the tissues.
At the end of the extraction period, the extracted MTT solution was mixed for each EpiDerm tissue and 3 x 200 μl samples for each tissue were transferred to the appropriate wells of a 96 well plate. The absorbency at 540nm (OD540) of each well was measured with the Anthos 2001 microplate reader. Data are presented in the form of % viability (MTT conversion relative to negative controls) for each of the two exposure times.The ability of the test material to directly reduce MTT in the direct MTT reduction test proved inconclusive. There was a possibility that if the test material could not be totally rinsed off the EpiDerm tissues, that any residual test material present on the tissue may directly reduce MTT and could have given rise to a false negative result. Therefore a corrective procedure using a “freeze killed” control EpiDerm tissue, also treated with the test material, was necessary to quantify this possibility.
The relative mean viability was 5.26% after 3 minutes exposure, and 5.24% after 60 minutes exposure.
The relative mean viability of the test material-treated tissues was <10% after 3 minutes exposure. The test material is considered to have the potential to be corrosive in-vivo.
Reference
The relative mean viability was 5.26% after 3 minutes exposure, and 5.24% after 60 minutes exposure. The relative mean viability of the test material-treated tissues was <10% after 3 minutes exposure.
Table 2: Mean OD540Values and Mean % Viabilities for the Negative Control, Positive Control Material and Test Material
Material |
Exposure Time |
Mean OD5401 |
Mean % Viability1 |
Negative control |
3 minute |
1.977 |
100% |
60 minute |
1.986 |
100% |
|
Positive Control |
3 minute |
0.109 |
5.512 |
60 minute |
0.100 |
5.043 |
|
Test Material |
3 minute |
0.104 |
5.262 |
60 minute |
0.104 |
5.243 |
1= Mean of 2 EpiDerm tissues tested in duplicate
2= Mean viability expressed as a percentage of the mean viability of the 3 minute negative control tissues
3= Mean viability expressed as a percentage of the mean viability of the 60 minute negative control tissues
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (corrosive)
Eye irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (irreversible damage)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (irritating)
Additional information
Skin irritation
The study was performed to assess the corrosivity potential of the test material using the EpiDerm Skin Model (MatTek, Ashland, MA, USA). The test is based on the assumption that corrosivity potential is related to toxicity to the EpiDerm tissue. The study was validated by the inclusion of a positive control material, 8.0 n Potassium Hydroxide and a negative control material, sterile distilled water.
The experimental design of the study consists of a test for Direct Reduction of MTT by the test material, followed by the main study.
For the main study, duplicate EpiDerm tissues were treated with 50 μl of test material and exposed for 3 minutes and 60 minutes. The tissues were incubated at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 in air for the appropriate exposure times.
Negative control-treated tissues (50 μl sterile, distilled water), and positive control-treated tissues (8.0 n Potassium Hydroxide), were also exposed for 3 minutes and 60 minutes. Duplicate EpiDerm tissues were used for the above.
At the end of the exposure period each EpiDerm tissue was rinsed using Dulbecco’s phosphate buffered saline (DPBS) according to the modified rinsing procedure (Appendix 2) and placed into a ‘holding plate’, until all of the tissues had been treated and rinsed. They were then transferred to an MTT ‘loading plate’, and incubated at 37°C for 3 hours in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 in air. At the end of this time, each EpiDerm tissue was blotted dry and placed into an MTT ‘extraction plate’ in order to extract all of the reduced MTT from the tissues.
At the end of the extraction period, the extracted MTT solution was mixed for each EpiDerm tissue and 3 x 200 μl samples for each tissue were transferred to the appropriate wells of a 96 well plate. The absorbency at 540nm (OD540) of each well was measured with the Anthos 2001 microplate reader. Data are presented in the form of % viability (MTT conversion relative to negative controls) for each of the two exposure times.
The ability of the test material to directly reduce MTT in the direct MTT reduction test proved inconclusive. There was a possibility that if the test material could not be totally rinsed off the EpiDerm tissues, that any residual test material present on the tissue may directly reduce MTT and could have given rise to a false negative result. Therefore a corrective procedure using a “freeze killed” control EpiDerm tissue, also treated with the test material, was necessary to quantify this possibility.
The relative mean viability was 5.26% after 3 minutes exposure, and 5.24% after 60 minutes exposure.
The relative mean viability of the test material-treated tissues was <10% after 3 minutes exposure. The test material is considered to have the potential to be corrosive in-vivo.
Eye irritation
The study does not need to be conducted because the substance is classified as skin corrosion, leading to classification as serious eye damage (Category 1).
Justification for classification or non-classification
3-MPA has to be classified as strongly corrosive, based on in vivo and in vitro results.
GHS classification: Danger, Skin Corrosive. Category 1B; H314: Causes severe skin burns and eye damage.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.