Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 203-127-1 | CAS number: 103-60-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vivo
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- Not reported
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: A non GLP study performed to sound scientific principles, following a methodology similar to the OECD guideline 474; and reported with a sufficient level of detail to assess the quality of the submitted data; please see "Attached justification".
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Study of Artificial Flavouring Substances for Mutagenicity in the Salmonella/Microsome, Basc and Micronucleus Tests
- Author:
- Wild D, King MT, Gocke E & Eckhardt K
- Year:
- 1 983
- Bibliographic source:
- Food and Chemical Toxicology, Vol. 21, No. 6, pp 707-719
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 474 (Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Seventy six chemicals, which are used as artificial flavouring substances, were screened for mutagenic potential in a mouse micronucleus test. Male and female NMRI mice were treated with test material in a single exposure, at concentrations of 0, 625, 1250 and 1875 mg/kg, administered via intraperitoneal injection in olive oil. The mice were sacrificed and bone marrow smears prepared 30 hours after exposure. All slides were then stained and scored. The literature report provides limited details on the methodology; however the protocol is similar to that defined in OECD 474.
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- micronucleus assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 2-phenoxyethyl isobutyrate
- EC Number:
- 203-127-1
- EC Name:
- 2-phenoxyethyl isobutyrate
- Cas Number:
- 103-60-6
- Molecular formula:
- C12H16O3
- IUPAC Name:
- 2-phenoxyethyl 2-methylpropanoate
- Test material form:
- not specified
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): 2-phenoxyethyl isobutyrate
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- NMRI
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Age at study initiation: 10-14 weeks
- Diet: Standard food ad libitum.
- Water: ad libitum.
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- intraperitoneal
- Vehicle:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: olive oil.
- Frequency of treatment:
- A single exposure.
- Post exposure period:
- 30 hours after treatment.
Doses / concentrations
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
0, 625, 1250, 1875 mg/kg
Basis:
no data
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 2 animals per sex per dose.
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
Examinations
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- Mice were sacrificed 30 hours after treatment. Bone marrow smears were prepared and stained for examination and scoring.
- Statistics:
- Statistical significance was determined according to the methods of Kastenbaum & Bowman (1970).
Results and discussion
Test results
- Sex:
- male/female
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- not applicable
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1: Results
Dose Level (mg/kg) | Surviving/ Treated Mice | Mean No. of Micronucleated PE/1000 PE |
1875 | 4/4 | 2.2 |
1250 | 4/4 | 1.3 |
625 | 4/4 | 1.3 |
0 | 4/4 | 0.8 |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results: negative
Under the conditions of the test, the test material gave negative results. - Executive summary:
The potential for the test material to cause genetic mutation was determined as part of a screening study, in which seventy six artificial flavouring chemicals were screened using a mouse micronucleus test. The study was reported in brief, but was performed to a guideline similar to OECD 474. Two male and two female NMRI mice were treated with test material in a single exposure, at concentrations of 0, 625, 1250 and 1875 mg/kg, administered via intraperitoneal injection in olive oil. The mice were sacrificed and bone marrow smears prepared 30 hours after exposure. All slides were then stained and scored. Under the conditions of the test, the test material gave negative results and is considered to be non-mutagenic.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.