Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

To evaluate skin irritating properties of the test item follwing studys were evaluated:

- in vitro skin irritation (accordig to OECD 439)

- In vitro skin corrosion (according to OECD 431)

- in vivo skin irritation in rabbit (according to Code of Federal Regulations, Title 16, Section 1500.41)

To evaluate skin irritating properties of the test item follwing studys were evaluated:

- in vivo eye irritation (according to Code of Federal Regulations, Title 16, Section 1500.42)

Based on the results of these studies the test item has folloing properties:

Skin irritation (OECD 439- OECD 431): irritating
Eye irritation (Code of Federal Regulations, Title 16, Section 1500.42): corrosive

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin irritation / corrosion

Link to relevant study records

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Remarks:
other: in vitro
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2012-02-13 to 2012-02-17
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: EU Method b.46 (Skin Irritation)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: OECD Guideline 439 (In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Test Method)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
Bayerisches Landesamt für Gesundheit und Lebensmittelsicherheit, München, Germany
Test system:
human skin model
Source species:
human
Cell type:
other: EpiDerm( MatTek) rganotypic reconstructed three-dimensional model of the human epidermis
Cell source:
other: EpiDerm( MatTek)
Details on animal used as source of test system:
organotypic reconstructed three-dimensional model of the human epidermis
Justification for test system used:
Ths test method is able to detect chemicals that cause skin irritation, i.e. produce reversible daamage to the skin and allows for hazard identification in accordance with UN GHS category 2.
Vehicle:
other: Dulbecco's Phosphate Buffrered Saline (DPBS)
Details on test system:
This test used the EpiDerm TM reconstructed human epidermis model (MatTk) which consists of human keratinocytes (NHEK) and therefore represents in vitro the target organ of the species of ntrest and closely mimics the biochemical and physiological properties of the upper parts of the human, i.e. the epidermis.
Control samples:
yes, concurrent negative control
yes, concurrent vehicle
yes, concurrent positive control
Amount/concentration applied:
25 mg test substance in 25 µL DPBS
Duration of treatment / exposure:
60 ± 1 min
Duration of post-treatment incubation (if applicable):
Post-treatment incubation period: 42 ± 4 h
Number of replicates:
The test was performed in triplicates for each treatment and control group.
Details on study design:
3 replicate tissues are dosed with the test item, the negative control (DPBS) and the positive control (5% SDS), respectively. The tissues are incubated for 35 ± 1 minutes in a humidified incubator (37 ± 1 °C, 5 ± 1% CO2, 95% RH) and further 25 minutes at room temperature. Then the test item and the controls are rinsed off with DPBS and the tissues are post-incubated for 24 ± 2 h and, after medium renewal, for further 18 ± 2 h. Then the tissues are stained via MTT for 3 hours. Isopropanol extracts are measured photometrically at 550 nm.
Irritation / corrosion parameter:
% tissue viability
Run / experiment:
Negative control / 60 min exposure / mean
Value:
>= 100
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation / corrosion parameter:
% tissue viability
Run / experiment:
Positive control / 60 min exposure / mean
Value:
ca. 2.2
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks:
5 % SDS
Remarks on result:
positive indication of irritation
Irritation / corrosion parameter:
% tissue viability
Run / experiment:
test item/ 60 min exposure/ mean
Value:
ca. 6.2
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
positive indication of irritation
Other effects / acceptance of results:
The test item showed no direct MTT reducing capability and no colouring potential.

Name

Negative Control

Positive Control

Test Item

Tissue

1

2

3

1

2

3

1

2

3

corrected OD550

2.171

2.167

2.186

0.052

0.048

0.044

0.094

0.172

0.132

2.111

2.203

2.114

0.050

0.046

0.048

0.099

0.176

0.134

mean corrected OD550
of the duplicates

2.141

2.185

2.150

0.051

0.047

0.046

0.097

0.174

0.133

mean corrected OD550
of 3 replicate tissues

2.159*

0.048

0.134

mean SD OD550

0.038

0.003

0.035

tissue viability [%]

99.2

101.2

99.6

2.4

2.2

2.1

4.5

8.1

6.2

SD tissue viability [%]***

1.1

0.1

1.8

CV [% viability]

1.1

5.5

28.7

mean tissue viability [%]

100.0

2.2**

6.2

*       Corrected mean OD550 of the negative control corresponds to 100% absolute tissue viability.

**      mean relative tissue viability of the three positive control tissues is  20%

***    standard deviation (SD) obtained from the three concurrently tested tissues is < 18%

Interpretation of results:
irritating
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
CLP: Skin Irrit. 2, H315
DSD: Xi, R38
Executive summary:

In the present study the skin irritant potential of Sodium methyl-4-hydroxybenzoate was analysed. The EpiDerm TM-Standard Model (EPI-200 TM), a reconsituted three-dimensional human epidermis model, was used as a replacement of the Draize skin irritation test (OECD 404) to distinguish between UN GHS and EU CLP "Category 2" skin irritating test substances and not categorized test substances ("no category") which may be considered as non-irritant. Hereby, the test item was applied topically, cytotoxicity is expressed as the reduction of mitochondrila dehydrogenase activity measured by formazan production from MTTafter a 60 min exposure and 42 h post incubation period and compared to those of the concurrent negative controls. In this study under the given conditions the test item showed irritant effects. The relative mean tissue viability after 60 min of exposure and 42 h post incubation was < 50%. The test item is therefore classified as "irritant" in accordance with UN GHS and EU CLP "Category 2".

Endpoint:
skin corrosion: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2011-12-15 to 2011-12-16
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.40 (In Vitro Skin Corrosion: Transcutaneous Electrical Resistance Test (TER))
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: OECD Guideline 431 (In Vitro Skin Corrosion: Human Skin Model Test)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
(Bayerisches Landesamt für Gesundheit und Lebensmittelsicherheit, München, Germany)
Test system:
human skin model
Source species:
human
Cell type:
other: EpiDerm human epidermis model (MatTek) - organotypic reconstituted three-dimensional model of the human epidermis
Amount/concentration applied:
25 mg test substance in 25 µL H2O
Duration of treatment / exposure:
3 and 60 min
Number of replicates:
The test was performed in duplicates for each test or control group and treatment period (3 and 60 min).
Controls:
other: Concurrent control tissues treated with the vehicle served as negative controls, positive controls were exposed to 8 N KOH.
Details on study design:
2 replicate tissues per treatment period are dosed with the neat test item moistened with water, the negative control (distilled water) and the positive control (8 N KOH), respectively. After each treatment period the test item and controls are rinsed off and the tissues are stained with MTT for 3 h. Isopropanol extracts are measured photometrically at 550 nm.
Irritation / corrosion parameter:
% tissue viability
Run / experiment:
negative cotrol / 3 min
Value:
100
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Remarks:
Basis: other: mean value of negative controls (distilled water). Time point: 3 min. Reversibility: other: not applicable.
Irritation / corrosion parameter:
% tissue viability
Run / experiment:
positive control / 3 min
Value:
27
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
positive indication of irritation
Remarks:
Basis: other: mean value of positive controls (8 N KOH). Time point: 3 min.
Irritation / corrosion parameter:
% tissue viability
Run / experiment:
test item / 3 min
Value:
59
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Remarks:
Basis: other: mean value of the test substance. Time point: 3 min. Reversibility: other: not applicable. (migrated information)
Irritation / corrosion parameter:
% tissue viability
Run / experiment:
negative control / 60 min
Value:
100
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Remarks:
Basis: other: mean value of negative controls (distilled water). Time point: 60 min. Reversibility: other: not applicable. (migrated information)
Irritation / corrosion parameter:
% tissue viability
Run / experiment:
Positive control/ 60 min
Value:
23
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
positive indication of irritation
Remarks:
Basis: other: mean value of positive controls (8 N KOH). Time point: 60 min. Reversibility: other: not applicable. (migrated information)
Irritation / corrosion parameter:
% tissue viability
Run / experiment:
test item/ 60 min
Value:
26
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Remarks:
Basis: other: mean value of the test substance. Time point: 60 min. Reversibility: other: not applicable. (migrated information)
Other effects / acceptance of results:
The test item showed no direct MTT-reducing capability and no colouring potential.

3 min.

Name

Negative Control

Test Item

Positive Control

Tissue

1

2

1

2

1

2

absolute OD550 -values

1.311

1.115

0.670

0.731

0.287

0.352

1.340

1.098

0.704

0.785

0.305

0.360

1.366

1.108

0.696

0.764

0.319

0.360

OD550(mean of             3 aliquots)

1.339

1.107

0.690

0.760

0.303

0.358

SD

0.028

0.009

0.018

0.027

0.016

0.004

OD550(mean of             2 replicate tissues)

1.223*

0.725

0.330

mean relative tissue viability [%]

100

59

27**

mean inter tissue viability difference [%]***

19.0

9.7

16.3

*       mean OD550 0.8

**      mean relative tissue viability of the 3 min. positive control 30%

***     inter tissue viability difference 30%

60 min.

Name

Negative Control

Test Item

Positive Control

Tissue

1

2

1

2

1

2

absolute OD550 -values

1.418

1.232

0.361

0.327

0.319

0.282

1.416

1.224

0.355

0.330

0.340

0.279

1.441

1.230

0.361

0.339

0.339

0.281

OD550(mean of             3 aliquots)

1.425

1.229

0.359

0.332

0.333

0.281

SD

0.014

0.004

0.003

0.006

0.012

0.001

OD550(mean of             2 replicate tissues)

1.327*

0.345

0.307

mean relative tissue viability [%]

100

26

23

mean inter tissue viability difference [%]***

14.8

7.7

17.0

*       mean OD550 0.8

***         inter tissue viability difference 30%

Interpretation of results:
other: not corrosive
Remarks:
Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
There is regulatory acceptance in the EU that a substance can be considered corrosive (Skin Corrosive Cat.1A) based on a positive result in the human epidermis model test. Negative in vitro corrosivity responses are not conclusive with respect to non-classification or classification as irritant and shall therefore be subject to further evaluation.
Executive summary:

In the present study the skin corrosivity potential of Sodium methyl-4-hydroxybenzoate was analysed. Since corrosive chemicals are cytotoxic after a short time exposure to the stratum corneum of the epidermis the cytotoxic effects of the test item on EpiDerm TM, a reconstituted three dimensional human epidermis model, was determined. hereby, the test item was applied topically. Cytotoxicity is expressed as the reduction of mitochondrial dehydrogenase activity measured by formazanproduction from MTTafter 3 min. and 60 min. exposure period and compared to those of the concurrent negative controls. In this study under the given conditions the test item showed no corrosive effects. The relative mean tissue viability after 3 min. treatment was >= 50% and after 60 min. treatment >= 15 %. The test item is therefore classified as non corrosive.

Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Guideline study with acceptable restrictions. An occlusive dressing was used and 48 h scores are missing. Not performed according to GLP. No analytical purity was given in the study report.
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: Code of Federal Regulations, Title 16, Section 1500.41
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
no
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Lippische Versuchstierzucht, Extertal, Germany
- Weight at study initiation: average of 2.1 kg
- Housing: Animals were housed individually.
- Diet: mümmel z, ssniff, Soest, Germany, ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 7 - 14 d

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 16 - 18
- Humidity (%): 40
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
Type of coverage:
occlusive
Preparation of test site:
other: clipped or abraded
Vehicle:
water
Controls:
other: Not required, the untreated skin sites of the same animal served as control.
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 500 mg test substance, moistened with water
Duration of treatment / exposure:
24 h
Observation period:
8 d
reading time points: 24 and 72 h
Number of animals:
6 males
Details on study design:
TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: 6.25 cm²
- Type of wrap if used: The treated skin was covered with gauze and PVC foil, held in place with adhesive tape.

SCORING SYSTEM: Draize scoring system
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
over all 6 animals
Time point:
other: mean over 24, 48 and 72 h
Score:
1.44
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 3-8 d
Remarks on result:
other: no 48 h data are available; for calculation of mean scores, the 48 h values were assumed to be the same as those at 24 h (worst case assumption: persistence of effects seen at 24 h over 48 h)
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
over all 6 animals
Time point:
other: mean over 24, 48 and 72 h
Score:
0.72
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 3-8 d
Remarks on result:
other: no 48 h data are available; for calculation of mean scores, the 48 h values were assumed to be the same as those at 24 h (worst case assumption: persistence of effects seen at 24 h over 48 h)

Table 1. Results of skin irritation study.

Observation time

Rabbit no.

1

2

3

4

5

6

Erythema

Edema

Erythema

Edema

Erythema

Edema

Erythema

Edema

Erythema

Edema

Erythema

Edema

24 h

2

3

2

0

2

1

1

0

2

1

1

0

48 h

No experimental data available; for calculation of mean scores, the 48 h values were assumed to be the same as those at 24 h (worst case assumption).

72 h

2

1

1

0

1

0

1

1

1

1

0

0

8 d

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Mean value 24 + 48 + 72 h*

2.00

2.33

1.67

0

1.67

0.67

1.00

0.33

1.67

1.00

0.67

0

*No 48 h data are available: for calculation of mean scores, the 48 h values were assumed to be the same as those at 24 h (worst case assumption: persistence of effects seen at 24 h over 48 h).

Interpretation of results:
other:
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
CLP: not classified
DSD: not classified
Executive summary:

In this study the skin irritating properties of sodium methyl4 -hydoxybenzoate was tested in an in vivo study according to the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 16, Section 1500.41 (Schreiber, 1981a). An amount of 500 mg sodium methylparaben moistened with water was applied on the clipped and abraded skin of 6 New Zealand White rabbits and covered with an occlusive dressing for 24 h. The reading time points for erythema and edema formation were at 24 and 72 h after removal of the test substance. At the 24 h reading time point, erythema formation was observed in all animals (scores 1 or 2) and edema formation was observed in 3/6 animals (scores 1 or 3). After 72 h, erythema formation was observed in 5/6 animals (scores 1 or 2) and edema formation was observed in 3/6 animals (score 1). The effects were fully reversible in all animals within the 8 d observation period.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
adverse effect observed (irritating)

Eye irritation

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Guideline study with acceptable restrictions. Not performed according to GLP. No analytical purity.
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: Code of Federal Regulations, Title 16, Section 1500.42
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
no
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Lippische Versuchstierzucht, Extertal, Germany
- Weight at study initiation: average of 2.1 kg
- Housing: Animals were housed individually.
- Diet: mümmel z, ssniff, Soest, Germany, ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 7 - 14 d

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 16 - 18
- Humidity (%): 40
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
other: Not required, the untreated eye of each animal served as control.
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied: 100 µL (bulk volume)
Duration of treatment / exposure:
single application without washing
Observation period (in vivo):
8 d
reading time points: 24, 48 and 72 h
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
6 males
Details on study design:
SCORING SYSTEM: Draize scoring system
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
out of all 6 animals
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.89
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
not fully reversible within: 8 d in 2 animals
Remarks on result:
other: fully reversible in 2 animals each within 48 h and 72 h, respectively
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
out of all 6 animals
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.83
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
not fully reversible within: 8 d in 3 animals
Remarks on result:
other: fully reversible within 48 h in 2 animals and within 8 d in 1 animal
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
out of all 6 animals
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
2.17
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
not fully reversible within: 8 d in 3 animals
Remarks on result:
other: fully reversible within 8 d in 3 animals
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
out of all 6 animals
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
1.33
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
not fully reversible within: 8 d in 2 animals
Remarks on result:
other: fully reversible within 8 d in 4 animals

Table 1. Results of eye irritation study.

Rabbit #

Time

conjunctivae

iris

cornea

redness

swelling

1

24 h

2

1

1

2

48 h

2

1

1

2

72 h

2

1

1

1

8 d

1

0

1

1

average

2,0

1,0

1,0

1,7

2

24 h

2

1

0

1

48 h

2

1

1

0

72 h

2

1

1

0

8 d

0

0

0

0

average

2,0

1,0

0,7

0,3

3

24 h

2

1

1

1

48 h

2

1

1

1

72 h

2

1

1

0

8 d

2

1

1

0

average

2,0

1,0

1,0

0,7

4

24 h

2

1

1

1

48 h

2

1

1

1

72 h

2

1

0

0

8 d

0

0

0

0

average

2,0

1,0

0,7

0,7

5

24 h

2

1

1

1

48 h

2

1

1

0

72 h

2

1

0

0

8 d

0

0

0

0

average

2,0

1,0

0,7

0,3

6

24 h

3

3

1

1

48 h

3

3

1

2

72 h

3

3

1

2

8 d

1

1

1

1

average

3,0

3,0

1,0

1,7

 

 

Time

conjunctivae

iris

cornea

redness

swelling

 

24 h

2,17

1,33

0,83

1,17

48 h

2,17

1,33

1,00

1,00

72 h

2,17

1,33

0,67

0,50

24+48+72

2,17

1,33

0,83

0,89

After the 8 d-observation period, the effects on cornea and the swelling of conjunctivae were not fully reversible in 2 animals and the effects on iris and the redness of the conjunctivae were not fully reversible in 3 animals.

Interpretation of results:
corrosive
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
CLP: Eye dam. 1, H318
DSD: Xi, R41
Executive summary:

he eye irritating potential of sodium methyl-4-hydroxybenzoate was investigated in a study performed by Schreiber (1981b) according to the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 16, Section 1500.42. 0.1 mL of the unchanged test substance was instilled in one eye of each of 6 male New Zealand White rabbits without washing afterwards. The second eye of each animal was left untreated and served as control. The grades of ocular reaction (conjunctivae redness, conjunctivae chemosis, cornea, iris) were assessed 24, 48 and 72 h and 8 d after instillation of the test substance.

At 24 h post-application, swelling (score 1-3) and redness (score 2-3) of the conjunctivae were observed in all animals. The effects on conjunctivae persisted during the 48 and 72 h reading time point in all animals. After 8 d, the conjunctivae redness had fully reversed in 3/6 animals and the swelling of conjunctivae had fully reversed in 4/6 animals. Redness of the conjunctivae (score 1-2) was still noted in 3/6 rabbits and 2/6 rabbits still showed conjunctivae swelling (score 1). At 24 h post-application, effects on the iris (score 1) were observed in 5/6 rabbits. At the 48 h reading time point, the iris irritation (score 1) was noted in all animals. After 72 h, the effect persisted in 4/6 animals and reversed in 2/6 animals. After 8 d, the iris irritation had resolved in 3/6 animals. In all other rabbits the iris irritation still persisted. Corneal opacity (score 1-2) was noted in all rabbits after 24 h. The observation reversed in 2/6 animals within 48 h and in 2/6 other animals within 72 h. After 8 d, corneal opacity (score 1) was still noted in 2/6 animals.

Under the test conditions, the test substance was corrosive to the eyes (Category 1).

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
adverse effect observed (irritating)

Respiratory irritation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Additional information

Skin irritation

Three studies are available addressing skin irritating properties of teh test item.

In an in vitro study, sodium methyl-4-hydroxybenzoate was investigated in a reconstructed human epidermis model (EpiDerm™) for skin corrosion according to OECD 431 and GLP (Lehmeier, 2012a). The tissues were exposed with 25 mg of the test substance in distilled water for 3 and 60 min.

Afterwards, the tissues were stained with MTT solution for 3 h. The estimation of tissue viability based on the reduction of MTT to a blue formazan product. A test substance has to be classified as skin corrosive if the mean tissue viability after 3 min is < 50% and after 60 min is < 15% relative to the respective mean negative control value. Tissue treatment with the test substance for 3 or 60 min resulted in mean tissue viabilities of 59% and 26%, respectively. The positive control substance (8 N KOH) led to tissue viabilities of 27% and 23% after 3 and 60 min incubation time, respectively.

Under the test conditions, the test substance was not considered to be skin corrosive.

In a second in vitro study, sodium methylparaben was investigated in a reconstructed human epidermis model (EpiDerm™) for skin irritation according to OECD 439 and GLP (Lehmeier, 2012b). The tissues were exposed with 25 mg of the test substance in phosphate buffered saline for 60 min. After a post-treatment period of 42 h, the tissues were stained with MTT solution for 3 h. The estimation of tissue viability based on the reduction of MTT to a blue formazan product.

A test substance has to be classified as skin irritant if the mean tissue viability is ≤ 50% relative to the mean negative control value. Tissue treatment with sodium methylparaben led to a mean tissue viability of 6.2% relative to the mean negative control value. The positive control substance (5% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)) caused a mean tissue viability of 2.2% relative to the mean negative control value.

Under the test conditions, the test substance was irritating to the skin (Category 2).

  

In the third study, the skin irritating properties of sodium methylparaben were tested in an in vivo study according to the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 16, Section 1500.41 (Schreiber, 1981a). An amount of 500 mg sodium methylparaben moistened with water was applied on the clipped and abraded skin of 6 New Zealand White rabbits and covered with an occlusive dressing for 24 h. The reading time points for erythema and edema formation were at 24 and 72 h after removal of the test substance. At the 24 h reading time point, erythema formation was observed in all animals (scores 1 or 2) and edema formation was observed in 3/6 animals (scores 1 or 3). After 72 h, erythema formation was observed in 5/6 animals (scores 1 or 2) and edema formation was observed in 3/6 animals (score 1). The effects were fully reversible in all animals within the 8 d observation period.

In summary, the available in vitro data show that the test substance was not corrosive but irritating to the skin. The in vivo study resulted in slight erythema and edema formation which was reversible within 8 days. However, since the in vitro studies are more reliable than the in vivo study, the test substance meets the criteria for classification as skin irritant (Category 2).

 

 

Eye irritation

The eye irritating potential of sodium methyl-4-hydroxybenzoate was investigated in a study performed by Schreiber (1981b) according to the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 16, Section 1500.42. 0.1 mL of the unchanged test substance was instilled in one eye of each of 6 male New Zealand White rabbits without washing afterwards. The second eye of each animal was left untreated and served as control. The grades of ocular reaction (conjunctivae redness, conjunctivae chemosis, cornea, iris) were assessed 24, 48 and 72 h and 8 d after instillation of the test substance.

At 24 h post-application, swelling (score 1-3) and redness (score 2-3) of the conjunctivae were observed in all animals. The effects on conjunctivae persisted during the 48 and 72 h reading time point in all animals. After 8 d, the conjunctivae redness had fully reversed in 3/6 animals and the swelling of conjunctivae had fully reversed in 4/6 animals. Redness of the conjunctivae (score 1-2) was still noted in 3/6 rabbits and 2/6 rabbits still showed conjunctivae swelling (score 1). At 24 h post-application, effects on the iris (score 1) were observed in 5/6 rabbits. At the 48 h reading time point, the iris irritation (score 1) was noted in all animals. After 72 h, the effect persisted in 4/6 animals and reversed in 2/6 animals. After 8 d, the iris irritation had resolved in 3/6 animals. In all other rabbits the iris irritation still persisted. Corneal opacity (score 1-2) was noted in all rabbits after 24 h. The observation reversed in 2/6 animals within 48 h and in 2/6 other animals within 72 h. After 8 d, corneal opacity (score 1) was still noted in 2/6 animals.

Under the test conditions, the test substance was corrosive to the eyes (Category 1).


Justification for selection of skin irritation / corrosion endpoint:
The selected study is the most reliable study based on the overall quality assessment.

Justification for selection of eye irritation endpoint:
There is only one study on sodium methylparaben available. This study is reliable.

Effects on skin irritation/corrosion: irritating

Effects on eye irritation: corrosive

Justification for classification or non-classification

The available data on skin irritation and eye irritation of the test substance meet the criteria for classification as Skin Irritant (H315) and Irreversible effects on the eye (H318) according to Regulation (EC) 1272/2008 and as Xi, R38 and R41 according to Directive 67/548/EEC.

Skin irritation (OECD 439 and OECD 431): irritating
Eye irritation (Code of Federal Regulations, Title 16, Section 1500.42): corrosive